Quality indicators impact on overall citizen satisfaction BEST Survey 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Travel Training Program. Planning Your Trip [Insert Image]
Advertisements

BEST 2014 BEST special topic 2013 Ticket media Kjetil Vrenne, BEST Project Manager 2014.
BEST 2014 BEST special topic 2013 Use of PT information channels Kjetil Vrenne, BEST Project Manager 2014.
BEST Survey 2010 City report: Copenhagen Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Handy Holiday Vocab 3 Getting Away with the Wandering Spanish Omelette.
City of West Covina Green Line Evaluation. Presented By Presented By Joanne Coletta Jim Jobst Leticia Llamas Kelly McDonald Ana Rosales Enrique Salgado.
Cheryl Thole, Jennifer Flynn CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associates Transit in GIS Conference September 14, 2011 St. Petersburg, Florida.
Bus Travel Travelling to St Edward’s C. E. Academy.
Objective quality and customer satisfaction BEST CIG Berlin
Result from Parents survey May Responses 131 families gave their opinions - 74% Scale Answers on a scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly.
Hampshire Learning Disability Partnership Board Representatives Transport Report Handout July 2013 Winchester and District Advocacy Project.
Road Show Magic Feedback This presentation takes you through the 8 messages delivered by the Road Show Additional supporting material can be found at
TRAVELLING.
Kenia Garcia Monica Molina UC MERCED CAT TRACKS. SURVEY QUESTION 1.
BEST 2014 BEST 2011 BEST 2014 BEST Survey results 2014.
BEST Survey 2009 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Am I safe? Passenger perceptions of personal security Anthony Smith 18 March 2009.
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
1 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Customer Satisfaction Measurement FY 2006 Q3 Comparison April 28, 2006.
BEST Survey 2010 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Planning & Standards Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
BEST Survey 2011 City report: Stockholm Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Prepared by: DECEMBER 2008 Metro Transit Light- Rail and Bus Rider Survey FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PERISCOPE.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2010 Survey.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2009 Survey.
FEST Finans Energi Samferdsel Telekom BEST Survey 2008 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Per Gellert /Barcelona Quality for Passengers.
Evaluating the Impacts of Real Time Passenger Information and Bus Signal Priority in Trondheim Morten Welde, Norwegian Public Roads Administration Trond.
Train timetables Time real life problems – Year 4/5.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Timetabling Components Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
90m distance from exit 3 at Myeong-dong station 명동역 Korean Alphabet Website : otel.co.kr/eng/ Adress : 2 20-gil Toigye-ro Jung-gu,
Customer Surveys Tiger1 Card Services Clemson University.
1 BEST results 2007 for Oslo Svein L. Alfheim Manager for Planning and Development SL (Greater Oslo Public Transport)
BEST Survey 2010 City report: Oslo Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
BEST on Strategic Planning September 2008 Benchmarking Public Transport Strategic Planning Participants Ruter AS, Oslo HKL, Helsinki Movia, Copenhagen.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Extra report 2007 Based on 400 interviews in areas surrounding Vienna city.
Kamo - Mobile guide for city traveller xx- xx- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
Walking between home and school. Leaving home in the morning on your walk to school.
BEST 2014 BEST 2011 BEST 2014 Special survey & key figure topic 2014 Tickets and ticket inspections Kjetil Vrenne, BEST Project manager.
1 Meeting of Project Group Planning the Road Network Copenhagen January 2008 Travelling information The meeting will take place at the Danish Roads.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Extra report 2007 Based on 600 interviews in Vienna city.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Report Copenhagen BEST 2007 BEST Survey Contents About the survey Participants Sample Method How to read the graphs Overall.
Lab: 3rd floor in Biocenter 3. bus 68 parking bus 70T, 75 Bus 550 To get bus 550, take metro to Itäkeskus, come to street level. Bus stop is directly alongside.
The Transportation Let’s learn the transportation we take. How did you get to the school?
PARTS The train that never stop at station. Project Features Avoid the accident 100% Available technology For the traveling time consumption is less.
The monitoring of Customer Satisfaction Customer satisfaction survey of HCT BEST-survey Customer complaints.
BEST 2010 BEST 2010 Results of the survey Kjetil Vrenne BEST Project Manager May 27 th, 2010 BEST Survey 2010 Results & Analyses Page 1.
Prepared by: May Metro Transit Train and Bus Rider Surveys COMPARATIVE RESULTS Bruce Howard Director of Marketing.
Presentation to DPTAC David Greeno Research team Passenger Focus 15th May 2013.
Driver analysis Aspects driving customer satisfaction
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2008 Survey.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport Results of the 2007 survey.
Road Show Magic Feedback This presentation takes you through the 8 messages delivered by the Road Show Additional supporting material can be found at
Young people Students/ under 25’s How to encourage train travel.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Go to page 71 cruise ship coach bus plane tram scooterhelicopter.
Introduction to BEST Survey results 2015 Oslo, 8 th of February 2016.
Turku is located 160km west from Helsinki. There are several flights, trains and busses per day between these two cities. Train schedules:
Dr Sharma’s Practice Patient Survey The Survey Online and paper questionnaire 10 questions 217 respondents Results statistically accurate.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport BEST BEST Seminar 2006 Main results of the seminar evaluation Helsinki, 16th and 17th of November.
Dental Patient Satisfaction Survey
Die Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) - Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts
Based on 400 interviews in areas surrounding Vienna city
Normal Hills Route Departure Times from Normal Hills
Performance Management Cycle
BEST Special topic 2015 What could make PT more interesting for car users? Stockholm, 15th of March 2016.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST)
? The slope tells us the speed Run into a jungle Stop for 5 sec Walk backwards The slope tells us the speed.
Montana University System Staff Association (MUSSA) Board of Regents meeting May 25, 2017 John.
Prepared by: Riyaaz Ebrahim
Presentation transcript:

Quality indicators impact on overall citizen satisfaction BEST Survey 2014

Page 2 Impact on satisfaction - Stockholm

Page 3 Impact on satisfaction - Stockholm Indicators ranked by importance Performance Impact on satisfaction 1. Public transport mostly runs on schedule 2. I am satisfied with the number of departures 3. I normally get a seat when I travel with public transport 4. Transfers are easy 5. I feel secure on board busses and trains 6. The staff behaves nicely and correctly 7. It is easy to get the information needed when planning a trip

Page 4 Impact on satisfaction - Oslo

Page 5 Impact on satisfaction - Oslo Indicators ranked by importance Performance Impact on satisfaction 1. Public transport mostly runs on schedule 2. Transfers are easy 3. I am satisfied with the number of departures 4. I feel secure on board busses and trains 5. Nearest stop is close to where I live 6. I normally get a seat when I travel with public transport 7. Waiting time is short at transfers

Page 6 Impact on satisfaction - Helsinki

Page 7 Impact on satisfaction - Helsinki Indicators ranked by importance Performance Impact on satisfaction 1. I am satisfied with the number of departures 2. Public transport mostly runs on schedule 3. Transfers are easy 4. Waiting time is short at transfers 5. I am not afraid of traffic accidents when using public transport 6. It is easy to get the information needed when planning a trip 7. I feel secure on board busses and trains 8. The busses and trains are modern 9. Nearest stop is close to where I live

Page 8 Impact on satisfaction - Copenhagen

Page 9 Impact on satisfaction - Copenhagen Indicators ranked by importance Performance Impact on satisfaction 1. Public transport mostly runs on schedule 2. Transfers are easy 3. I am satisfied with the number of departures 4. Waiting time is short at transfers 5. The staff behaves nicely and correctly 6. I feel secure on board busses and trains

Page 10 Impact on satisfaction - Geneva

Page 11 Impact on satisfaction - Geneva Indicators ranked by importance Performance Impact on satisfaction 1. I am satisfied with the number of departures 2. Transfers are easy 3. The information is good when traffic problems occur 4. I feel secure on board busses and trains 5. Public transport mostly runs on schedule 6. The busses and trains are clean 7. The busses and trains are modern 8. I feel secure at stations and bus stops

Page 12 Impact on satisfaction - Bergen

Page 13 Impact on satisfaction - Bergen Indicators ranked by importance Performance Impact on satisfaction 1. I am satisfied with the number of departures 2. Transfers are easy 3. Public transport mostly runs on schedule 4. I normally get a seat when I travel with public transport 5. Waiting time is short at transfers 6. The busses and trains are modern 7. I feel secure on board busses and trains 8. The staff answers my questions correctly 9. Nearest stop is close to where I live