> Balancing urban redevelopment with urban expansion > Integrating transport, land use and infrastructure > Sustaining the vitality and viability of city.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
This is not a Plan Spatial planning is not a function of the European Union, as defined in its Treaties But it would be surreal if Territorial Cohesion.
Advertisements

Strong Regions Smart Business Vital Communities 2005 Annual Convening February Miami, Florida.
> Architect and Town Planner > Deputy Director of Physical Planning Strathclyde Regional Council > Strathclyde Structure Plan > First.
Territorial cohesion: what scales for policy intervention? Bruxelles Jean Peyrony DG REGIO, Unit C2 (Urban development, territorial cohesion)
Operational Programme I – Cohesion Policy Event part-financed by the European Union European Regional Development Fund Evaluation Plan for Maltas.
The political framework
FUTURE OUTLOOK Capitalising the gains from Athens 2004 Olympic Games for the competitiveness of Athens Metropolitan Area (AMA) in Post-Olympic era Based.
ESPON Open Seminar June 2012 in Aalborg New European Territorial Evidence for development of Regions and Cities.
March 2012 Ports and Cities Conference Newcastle Dorte Ekelund, Executive Director Major Cities Unit Department of Infrastructure and Transport
«Making Europe Open and Polycentric» Vision and Scenarios for the European Territory towards 2050 A political reading of ET2050 results Andreu Ulied
JOINING FORCES Metropolitan governance & competitiveness of European cities conclusions & recommendations presentation to the CoR commission on EU budget.
Thriving communities, affordable homes. Homes & Communities Agency and Planning Trevor Beattie Director Strategy Policy Performance Research National.
Regional & Urban Policy Christian Svanfeldt European Commission Regional and Urban Policy Rome, 4 December 2014 Reflections on a European Territorial Vision.
Niall Cussen Principal Adviser DECLG
The URBACT II Programme General Presentation Vilnius, 20 January 2011.
The role, specific situation and potentials of urban areas as nodes in a polycentric development ESPON Project Lead partner Nordregio Third interim.
Ministry of local Government and Regional Development Polycentric settlement structures (Odd Godal, Adviser, Vilnius, )
Part-financed by the European Union Priority 2 of the BSR Programme External and internal accessibility of the BSR Ryszard Toczek, City of Gdynia.
Department of Planning and Community Development Corporate Plan: Government priorities we contribute to Building friendly, confident and safe.
ALPINE SPACE II - SWOT analysis slide 1 Preparation of the Alpine Space II programme First results of the SWOT analysis Alpine Space Summit –
Envisioning healthy, sustainable and liveable neighbourhoods through collaborative city planning Andrew Wheeler Thriving Neighbourhoods Conference 2013.
EU Territorial Agenda and aspects related to the Baltic Area Content: Chapter I: Tomorrow´s Territorial Challenges to be tackled today.
The EU – China Mayor’s Forum 19 th September Brussels The importance of cities ‘Investing in Heritage’ as a catalyst for regeneration Brian Smith.
Key messages for territorial policy from ESPON 2013.
Implementing the Lisbon Strategy The Role of Regions Kirsty Macdonald Head of Office Scotland Europa.
Cape Town Spatial Development Framework PEPCO MEETING 14 th October ND May 2012.
Climate Change Council November 2011 draft ACT Planning Strategy.
Alpine Space Prospective Study T. Bausch (D) T. Dax (A) U. Janin Rivolin (I) F. Parvex (CH) S. Praper (SLO) M. Vanier (F) © INTERREG IIIB The.
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
Cooperation between European and Asian towns on urban sustainability Lambert van Nistelrooij Member of the European Parliament, EPP- Group/CDA Vice president.
ESPON 2.1.5: Territorial Impacts of European Fisheries Policy Third Interim Report Prepared for the Salzburg Seminar March 2006 Ove Langeland, Norwegian.
Seminar "Imovinski standard", 29. i 30. lipnja Spatial Planning in Ireland Farannán Tannam, MRICS, Dip.A&F.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Call for Proposals on Applied Research.
EU Structural Funds Presentation to Chief Executives 9 May 2006 Hillgrove Hotel Monaghan.
ESPOO meeting, November 2006 workshop 2: Innovation and competitiveness ESPON 2006 Programme ESPOO meeting, November 2006 workshop 2: Innovation.
ESPON INFO DAY 10 February 2011 in Bruxelles ESPON 2013 Programme: Progress and Prospects.
ET2050 European Territorial Scenarios modelled by SASI Klaus Spiekermann and Michael Wegener ESPON 2013 Programme Workshop Territorial Vision for Europe.
Planning and Economic Development National Spatial Strategy – Twin Objectives: Maintaining Economic Competitiveness and Balanced Regional Development.
Brainstorming meeting House of Catalonia, Bruxelles 26 March 2014 Territorial Vision and Pathways 2050.
Strategic Spatial Planning and the Promotion of Territorial Cohesion. Prof. Gordon Dabinett Department of Town & Regional Planning University of Sheffield,
ESPON 2.1.5: Territorial Impacts of European Fisheries Policy Final Revised Report Prepared for the Espoo Seminar November 2006 Ove Langeland, Norwegian.
ESPON Seminar Luxembourg, 8-9 December Cohesion-and-Urban-Policy-_26-27-November-2015_-Luxembourg-City_/index.php.
© BBR Bonn 2003 Hamburg, May 2007Wilfried Görmar, BBR The “Territorial Agenda” for the European Union – Effects on the Baltic Sea Region Baltic Sea.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN The Urban Dimension in Future Cohesion Policy Urban content of the regulations and the Community strategic guidelines.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
25 Years of INTERREG September 2015 in Luxembourg Building on 25 Years: Visions for your region and Europe.
ReFINE Research for Future Infrastructure Networks of Europe ECTP OG 10 -April 28, 2010 Brussels.
AlpCity AlpCity Final Conference Prà Catinat, 16 October 2006 Ivan Curzolo - JTS Alpine Space Programme.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
1 Second call for proposals – National Information Day EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Benoît Dalbert, Project Officer, Joint Technical Secretariat.
European Community European Regional Development Fund Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Programme Area 2000 – 2006.
Progress by the ESPON 2013 Programme in relation to the First Action Plan (Actions 4.1 and 4.2 plus) Meeting of General Directors on Territorial Cohesion.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
TRAP 5 th interregional meeting & Site Visits Limerick & Lough Derg, Ireland 9 th October 2013 CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional.
SESSION 4 DISCUSSION SESSION
Thematic platform 1 Competitiveness & Attractivness
Nijmegen, 11 October 2004 Potentials for polycentric development in Europe (ESPON project 1.1.1) Director Hallgeir Aalbu.
European needs for urban statistics Mireille Grubert
The EU on the agenda in Norwegian municipalities and counties

Current orientations on territorial cohesion in policy development
ESPON, the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network
Territorial Trends and Challenges in Regional Policies
Action Plan on Urban Mobility
Biodiversity, Natura 2000 & Green Infrastructure in the Regional Policy Mathieu Fichter European Commission, DG Regio Team leader "sustainable.
JOINING FORCES Metropolitan governance & competitiveness of European cities conclusions & recommendations presentation to the City of tomorrow working.
ESPON Workshop 15 May 2013, Bruxelles Stepping into the sea.
ESPON POLICY OBJECTIVES
Presentation transcript:

> Balancing urban redevelopment with urban expansion > Integrating transport, land use and infrastructure > Sustaining the vitality and viability of city and town centres > Enabling economic competitiveness > Promoting social inclusion > Assessing the environmental impact of development > Safeguarding natural and heritage resources > Achieving a carbon light future METROPOLITAN DIMENSION KEY METROPOLITAN ISSUES

> Such key issues can only be addressed effectively at the level of the Functional Urban Area (FUA) or Region or Metropolitan European Growth Area (MEGA) > These are the key building blocks for any European spatial perspective or strategy > They are recognised in the ESDP, by ESPON, by the CoR and in the Third Cohesion Report > They need to be made operational through effective metropolitan governance METROPOLITAN DIMENSION

> Subsidiarity in Europe will only become a reality if there is effective governance at the metropolitan level > Without effective metropolitan governance the populations of metropolitan areas are unable to influence some of the key issues affecting their future and its sustainability > Without effective metropolitan governance the EU will be without a key level of partnership to implement its wider strategies > An integrated approach to key metropolitan issues requires effective governance METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE

> The mechanisms for governance may range from the statutory and comprehensive, through the selective, to the voluntary, depending on the range of key strategic issues that need to be addressed and their severity > Effective metropolitan governance and economic competitiveness and sustainability are interrelated METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE

ELECTED METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY WITH CORE PLANNING, OPERATING AND MANAGING POWERS 22 Primary stakeholders in the Metropolitan strategic planning and development process [denotes privatised].

> Effective metropolitan governance requires the three key functions of competence, capability and process > Competence means having the authority to adopt, implement and safeguard an Integrated Metropolitan Strategy > Capability means having the knowledge and understanding to take informed decisions > Process means having the means to regularly monitor, review and update the strategy COMPETENCE, CAPABILITY AND PROCESS

An assessment process that can provide the basis for informed decision making on those aspects of the Metropolitan Spatial Plan that are market related, that is, industry and business, offices, retailing, housing and transportation. The diagram summarises an approach to balancing supply and demand for sectoral issues.

THE INTERRELATED ACTION INVOLVED IN THE PREPARATION OF AN INTEGRATED METROPOLITAN SPATIAL PLANNING STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ON A POLYCENTRIC BASIS

1Population mass and proximity/connectivity 2Identity 3Definition of Functional Urban Region/Area or Metropolitan European Growth Area (MEGA) 4Recognition 5Marketing 6Influence 7Support 8Governance 9Strategic issues and the longer term view 10Visions and strategies to engage stakeholders 11Competencies related to issues 12Capability for informed decision making on the issues 13Processes to implement strategies, policies, programmes and projects 14Processes to regularly roll forward a longer term view STEPS TO A METROPOLITAN EUROPE

> Recognised inner core (GIZ) and related outer core bridging areas linking to the periphery > Balance between the inner core and the Mediterranean and Danubian/Baltic transnational areas > Improved East/West, North/South and peripheral connectivity > Good connectivity from all areas to the core area > Good connectivity to European gateways > Recognition of Europe’s metropolitan regions and areas > In consequence, strong polycentric relationships within European inter regional areas and between them TERRITORIAL COHESION WHAT MIGHT BETTER URBAN BALANCE LOOK LIKE?

> InterMETREX seeks to enable them to become as individually strong as possible through effective spatial planning and development practice within metropolitan regions and areas > PolyMETREXplus seeks to enable them to become as collectively strong as possible though the development of effective polycentric relationships between metropolitan regions and areas > A polycentric Europe cannot be built without strong metropolitan regions and areas > InterMETREX enables PolyMETREXplus INTERMETREX AND POLYMETREXPLUS

> Facilitate metropolitan recognition and definition (data collection and comparative indicators) > Promote mechanisms for appropriate and effective metropolitan governance > Promote the production of key issue based Integrated Metropolitan Strategies (with stakeholder involvement) > Actively support the implementation of such Strategies through the Structural funds > Actively support the exchange of practitioner knowledge on metropolitan affairs METROPOLITAN