An Introduction to Semantic Parts of Speech Rajat Kumar Mohanty rkm[AT]cse[DOT]iitb[DOT]ac[DOT]in Centre for Indian Language Technology Department of Computer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Problems of syntax-semantics interface ESSLLI 02 Trento.
Advertisements

The Structure of Sentences Asian 401
Sentence Construction and the Syntactical Tree forms Lecture 6 Feed back of mid-test.
Japanese Syntax. Outline  Review of typological characteristics of JL  Syntactic Structures Syntactic Constituency Phrase Structures Phrase Structure.
 Christel Kemke 2007/08 COMP 4060 Natural Language Processing Feature Structures and Unification.
Syntax-Semantics Mapping Rajat Kumar Mohanty CFILT.
Chapter 4 Syntax.
Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 2 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 4.
Detecting Complements and Adjuncts Rajat Kumar Mohanty Center for Indian Language Technology IIT Bombay.
Grammar Engineering: Set-valued Attributes Various Kinds of Constraints Case Restrictions on Arguments Miriam Butt (University of Konstanz) and Martin.
Statistical NLP: Lecture 3
SYNTAX Introduction to Linguistics. BASIC IDEAS What is a sentence? A string of random words? If it is a sentence, does it have to be meaningful?
Natural Language Processing - Feature Structures - Feature Structures and Unification.
1 Words and the Lexicon September 10th 2009 Lecture #3.
 Christel Kemke 2007/08 COMP 4060 Natural Language Processing Semantics.
 Christel Kemke 2007/08 COMP 4060 Natural Language Processing Feature Structures and Unification.
NLP and Speech 2004 Feature Structures Feature Structures and Unification.
Topics in Cognition and Language: Theory, Data and Models *Perceptual scene analysis: extraction of meaning events, causality, intentionality, Theory of.
Introduction to Computational Linguistics Lecture 2.
Sag et al., Chapter 4 Complex Feature Values 10/7/04 Michael Mulyar.
Artificial Intelligence 2005/06 From Syntax to Semantics.
NLP and Speech 2004 English Grammar
1 Introduction to Computational Linguistics Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Fall 2005-Lecture 2.
Complement Selection Rajat Kumar Mohanty Center for Indian Language Technology IIT Bombay.
1 CSC 594 Topics in AI – Applied Natural Language Processing Fall 2009/ Outline of English Syntax.
Sanjukta Ghosh Department of Linguistics Banaras Hindu University.
Models of Generative Grammar Smriti Singh. Generative Grammar  A Generative Grammar is a set of formal rules that can generate an infinite set of sentences.
VERBS: COMPOUND VERBS, PREPOSITIONAL VERBS. PHRASAL VERBS TEMA 6.
THE PARTS OF SYNTAX Don’t worry, it’s just a phrase ELL113 Week 4.
Outline What is a collocation? Automatic approaches 1: frequency-based methods Automatic approaches 2: ruling out the null hypothesis, t-test Automatic.
Mood and Modality Rajat Kumar Mohanty rkm[AT]cse[DOT]iitb[DOT]ac[DOT]in Centre for Indian Language Technology Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
1 LIN 1310B Introduction to Linguistics Prof: Nikolay Slavkov TA: Qinghua Tang CLASS 14, Feb 27, 2007.
Introduction to English Syntax Level 1 Course Ron Kuzar Department of English Language and Literature University of Haifa Chapter 2 Sentences: From Lexicon.
Chapter 4 Syntax Part II.
Syntax Lecture 8: Verb Types 1. Introduction We have seen: – The subject starts off close to the verb, but moves to specifier of IP – The verb starts.
1.Syntax: the rules of sentence formation; the component of the mental grammar that represent speakers’ knowledge of the structure of phrase and sentence.
IV. SYNTAX. 1.1 What is syntax? Syntax is the study of how sentences are structured, or in other words, it tries to state what words can be combined with.
SYNTAX Lecture -1 SMRITI SINGH.
Chapter 4 Syntax 4.1 What is syntax?What is syntax? 4.2 CategoriesCategories 4.3 Phrase structure rulePhrase structure rule 4.4 Phrase elementsPhrase.
Syntax 1 st class on Syntax Chapter 4. Hierarchical Structure  Sentences have internal structure that makes them more than just a sequence of words.
Time, Tense and Aspect Rajat Kumar Mohanty Centre For Indian Language Technology Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian.
Linguistic Essentials
Rules, Movement, Ambiguity
1 Principles & Parameters Approach in Linguistics - IV Bibhuti Bhusan Mahapatra.
November 16, 2004 Lexicon (An Interacting Subsystem in UG) Part-II Rajat Kumar Mohanty IIT Bombay.
1 Introduction to Computational Linguistics Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Spring 2006-Lecture 2.
SYNTAX.
◦ Process of describing the structure of phrases and sentences Chapter 8 - Phrases and sentences: grammar1.
November 9, Lexicon (An Interacting Subsystem in UG) Part-I Rajat Kumar Mohanty IIT Bombay.
TYPES OF PHRASES REPRESENTING THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF PHRASES 12/5/2016.
Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 2 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 3.
3.3 A More Detailed Look At Transformations Inversion (revised): Move Infl to C. Do Insertion: Insert interrogative do into an empty.
Principles and Parameters (II) Rajat Kumar Mohanty Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay.
Lec. 10.  In this section we explain which constituents of a sentence are minimally required, and why. We first provide an informal discussion and then.
Chapter 4 Syntax a branch of linguistics that studies how words are combined to form sentences and the rules that govern the formation of sentences.
King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 1 King Faisal University.
10/31/00 1 Introduction to Cognitive Science Linguistics Component Topic: Formal Grammars: Generating and Parsing Lecturer: Dr Bodomo.
Beginning Syntax Linda Thomas
Syntax Lecture 9: Verb Types 1.
Statistical NLP: Lecture 3
TREE ADJOINING GRAMMAR
: 2018.
BBI 3212 ENGLISH SYNTAX AND MORPHOLOGY
Language Variations: Japanese and English
Towards Semantics Generation
Linguistic Essentials
Principles and Parameters (I)
Syntax.
Structure of a Lexicon Debasri Chakrabarti 13-May-19.
Presentation transcript:

An Introduction to Semantic Parts of Speech Rajat Kumar Mohanty rkm[AT]cse[DOT]iitb[DOT]ac[DOT]in Centre for Indian Language Technology Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Mumbai, India

Monday, May 09, 2005 CFILT Outline Conceptual Constituents Markedness Convention Place- and Path-function Conceptual Constituents of Motion Verbs Mapping a Thing into a Path Multiple Subcategorization The Case of climb Multiple Expressions of Path

Monday, May 09, 2005 CFILT Conceptual Constituents The semantic structure of a sentence is built up from a hierarchical arrangement of conceptual constituents. Each of the conceptual constituents belongs to a major ontological category or semantic part of speech. Semantic POS: Thing, Place, Path, Event, State, Manner, and Property Conceptual constituents are realized syntactically by means of major phrasal constituents (such as, NP, S, PP, AP, AdvP)

Monday, May 09, 2005 CFILT Example Bill ran into the room Syntactic Structure: [ S [ NP Bill] [ VP ran [ PP into [ NP the room]]] ] Conceptual Structure: Event GO ([ Thing Bill ], [ Path TO [ Place IN [ Thing the room] ] ])

Monday, May 09, 2005 CFILT Markedness Convention The correspondence of semantic to syntactic categories is governed by markedness convention. The unmarked realization of Thing is NP Place and Path is PP Property is AP Manner is AdvP Event and State is S However, the marked realizations also occur. The NP a bummer expresses Property The NP earthquake expresses an Event

Monday, May 09, 2005 CFILT Place- and Path-function PLACE PATH Place Path PLACE-FUNCTION ( [THING] ) (e.g., in the room) (e.g., to the station) TO FROM TOWARD VIA ( [THING] )

Monday, May 09, 2005 CFILT Motion Verbs Motion verbs map two arguments, a Thing and a Path, into an Event consisting of the Thing traversing the Path. (e.g., John ran into the room) run +V, -N [ _ PP j ] [ Event GO ([ Thing i ], [ Path j ] ] ]) Lexical entry: Motion verbs are represented generically by GO and differentiated from one another by various markers of manner.

Monday, May 09, 2005 CFILT Mapping a Thing into a Path The preposition into is a function that maps a thing – the reference object – into a Path. To satisfy the well-formedness conditions on the use of into, its sister phrase must be an NP (the syntactic condition) and must express a concept of a category Thing (the semantic condition). into P [ _ NP j ] [ Path TO [ Place IN [ Thing j ] ] ] Lexical entry:

Monday, May 09, 2005 CFILT Example John entered the room enter +V, -N [ _ NP j ] [ Event GO ([ Thing i ], [ Path TO [ Place IN [ Thing j ]]]) Lexical entry: The position and category of the variable in enter result in a syntactic realization as transitive verbs plus NP instead of verb plus PP.

Monday, May 09, 2005 CFILT Multiple Subcategorization The verb climb occurs in three subcategorization frames: [ __ ](e.g., She climbed) [ __ NP](e.g., She climbed the stairs) [ __ PP](e.g., She climbed through the window) Motion is carried out in a clambering fashion (the precise nature of the manner depends on the character of the direct object) The motion is understood as Upward Upward to the top (roughly) to the object NP Not necessarily upward (the PP frame is more distantly related)

Monday, May 09, 2005 CFILT The case of Climb Lexical entry: climb +V, -N b. [ _ PP j ] a. [ _ NP j ] [ Thing j ] ] Event GO [ Thing i ], [ Path UPWARD TO TOP OF VIA [ Manner CLAMBERING ] [ Path j ] Event GO [ Thing i ], [ Manner CLAMBERING ]

Monday, May 09, 2005 CFILT The case of Climb The subentries differ in how the Path is specified. The subentry (a) combines the transitive and intransitive subcategorization frames. The subentry (b) contains the PP frame. Something is climbing is an Event. The Event is constituted of motion (the semantic function GO) of a Theme (the argument i ) along a Path (the argument j ). The semantic structure of climb has two argument positions a Thing-variable embedded in the Path TO TOP OF j and a Path-variable that itself fills the Path argument of GO

Monday, May 09, 2005 CFILT Multiple Expressions of Path Examples John climbed the mountain up a narrow path John ran through the field into the woods. (Two PPs expresse part of the same Path) The PPs (up a narrow path and into the woods) are non-subcategorized PPs in V`, which are interpreted as extra constituents of the Path in Semantic Structure.

Monday, May 09, 2005 CFILT Sources & further Readings Jackendoff, R Multiple Subcategorization and The θ-criterion: The case of climb. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3. Jackendoff, R Semantic Structures. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Jackendoff, R Semantics and Cognition. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Monday, May 09, 2005 CFILT Thank You