1 Calorimeters of the Very Forward Region Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University DESY Collaboration High precision design March 5 th 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
Advertisements

GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
LCWS 2005 SLAC, March 19 Low Angle Bhabha Events and Electron Veto. Comparison Between Different Crossing Angle Designs Vladimir DrugakovNC PHEP, Minsk/DESY.
TESLA R&D: LCAL/LAT Achim Stahl DESY Zeuthen Cracow Tel Aviv Minsk Prague Colorado Protvino UCL London Dubna.
P hysics background for luminosity calorimeter at ILC I. Božović-Jelisavčić 1, V. Borka 1, W. Lohmann 2, H. Nowak 2 1 INN VINČA, Belgrade 2 DESY, Hamburg.
SUSY small angle electron tagging requirements Philip Bambade LAL-Orsay MDI workshop - SLAC 6-8 January 2005 With M. Berggren, F. Richard, Z. Zhang + DESY.
Beamdiagnostics by Beamstrahlung Analysis C.Grah ILC ECFA 2006 Valencia, 9 th November 2006.
August 2005Snowmass Workshop IP Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Measurement of: Luminosity (precise and fast) Energy Polarisation.
August 2005Snowmass Workshop Instrumentation of the Very Forward Region of a Linear Collider Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle HH-Zeuthen-LC-Meeting Zeuthen September.
Effect of the Shape of the Beampipe on the Luminosity Measurement September 2008 Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University DESY.
1 LumiCal Optimization and Design Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, Boulder, September 18, 2008.
Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Krakow2006.
Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Cambridge ILC software tools meeting.
Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.
Jan MDI WS SLAC Electron Detection in the Very Forward Region V. Drugakov, W. Lohmann Motivation Talk given by Philip Detection of Electrons and.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle LCWS 2004 Paris April 19 th 2004.
BeamCal Simulations with Mokka Madalina Stanescu-Bellu West University Timisoara, Romania Desy, Zeuthen 30 Jun 2009 – FCAL Meeting.
Luminosity Monitoring and Beam Diagnostics FCAL Collaboration Workshop TAU, September 18-19, 2005 Christian Grah.
Analysis of Beamstrahlung Pairs ECFA Workshop Vienna, November 14-17, 2005 Christian Grah.
March 2004LCWS Stanford Instrumentation of the Very Forward Region of a Linear Collider Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY.
Beam Monitoring from Beam Strahlung work by summer students  Gunnar Klämke (U Jena, 01)  Marko Ternick (TU Cottbus, 02)  Magdalena Luz (HU Berlin, 03)
Instrumentation of the very forward region of the TESLA detector – summary of the Workshop on Forward Calorimetry and Luminosity Measurement, Zeuthen,
ILC Meeting Vancouver July What Does Beam-strahlung Tell Us? William Morse - BNL.
Simulation of physics background for luminosity calorimeter M.Pandurović I. Božović-Jelisavčić “Vinča“ Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, SCG.
2. December 2005Valencia Workshop Very Forward Region Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Basic functions: - Hermeticity to small polar angles - Fast.
Ivan Smiljanić Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia Energy resolution and scale requirements for luminosity measurement.
Septembre SLAC BeamCal W. Lohmann, DESY BeamCal: ensures hermeticity of the detector to smallest polar angles -important for searches Serves as.
Karsten Büßer Instrumentation of the Forward Region of the TESLA Detector International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics Aachen, July 19th.
ILC-ECFA Workshop Valencia November 2006 Four-fermion processes as a background in the ILC luminosity calorimeter for the FCAL Collaboration I. Božović-Jelisavčić,
Beam Monitoring from Beam Strahlung new work by summer students  Magdalena Luz (HU)  Regina Kwee (HU) Achim Stahl DESY Zeuthen 10.Oct.2003 LumiCal BeamCal.
Fast Beam Diagnostics at the ILC Using the Beam Calorimeter Christian Grah, Desy FCAL Workshop February Cracow.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Electron Detection in the SiD BeamCal Jack Gill, Gleb Oleinik, Uriel Nauenberg, University of Colorado ALCPG Meeting ‘09 2 October 2009.
TESLA R&D: Forward Region Achim Stahl DESY Zeuthen Cracow Tel Aviv Minsk Prague Colorado Protvino UC London Dubna.
A Clustering Algorithm for LumiCal Halina Abramowicz, Ronen Ingbir, Sergey Kananov, Aharon Levy, Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University DESY Collaboration High.
A Luminosity Detector for the Future Linear Collider Ronen Ingbir Prague Workshop HEP Tel Aviv University.
HEP Tel Aviv University LumiCal (pads design) Simulation Ronen Ingbir FCAL Simulation meeting, Zeuthen Tel Aviv University HEP experimental Group Collaboration.
Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1.
W. Morse GamCal1 GamCal: a Beam-strahlung Gamma Detector for Beam Diagnostics William M. Morse Brookhaven National Lab.
HEP Tel Aviv UniversityLumical - A Future Linear Collider detector Lumical R&D progress report Ronen Ingbir.
16 February 2009CLIC Physics & Detectors Konrad Elsener 1... some issues regarding the forward region... (“picking up” from Lucie Linssen, 29 Sept 2008)
The Luminosity Calorimeter Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University Desy ( On behalf of the FCAL collaboration ) June 11 th 2008.
1 LumiCal Optimization Simulations Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University Collaboration High precision design May 6 th 2008.
The Very Forward Region of the ILC Detectors Ch. Grah FCAL Collaboration TILC 2008, Sendai 04/03/2008.
Systematic limitations to luminosity determination in the LumiCal acceptance from beam-beam effects C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay LCWS06, Bangalore, 9-13 March.
Fast and Precise Luminosity Measurement at the ILC Ch.Grah LCWS 2006 Bangalore.
Beamdiagnostics using BeamCal C.Grah FCAL Workshop, Paris,
Correction methods for counting losses induced by the beam-beam effects in luminosity measurement at ILC Ivan Smiljanić, Strahinja Lukić, Ivanka Božović.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
1/24 SiD FCAL Takashi Maruyama Tom Markiewicz SLAC TILC’09, Tskuba, Japan, April 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K.
September 2007SLAC IR WS Very Forward Instrumentation of the ILC Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Talks by M. Morse, W. Wierba, myself.
LumiCal background and systematics at CLIC energy I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences.
1 LoI FCAL Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K. Krempetz T. MarkiewiczBNLW.
HEP Tel Aviv University Lumical R&D progress report Ronen Ingbir ECFA - Durham2004 Lumical - A Future Linear Collider detector.
Octobre 2007LAL Orsay Very Forward Instrumentation of the ILC Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY.
FCAL Workshop Munich -17 October 2006FCAL Workshop Munchen -17 October 2006 Four-fermion processes as a background in the luminosity calorimeter M.Pandurović.
FCAL Krakow meeting, 6. May LumiCal concept including the tracker R. Ingbir, P.Růžička, V. Vrba.
Very Forward Instrumentation: BeamCal Ch. Grah FCAL Collaboration ILD Workshop, Zeuthen Tuesday 15/01/2008.
FCAL Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, 15 – 17 November, 2010, Eugene, Oregon.
Initial proposal for the design of the luminosity calorimeter at a 3TeV CLIC Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University March 6th 2009
FCAL R&D towards a prototype of very compact calorimeter
Luminosity Measurement using BHABHA events
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
Summary of the FCAL Workshop Cracow, February 12-13
The Optimized Sensor Segmentation for the Very Forward Calorimeter
Report about “Forward Instrumentation” Issues
Beamdiagnostics by Beamstrahlung Pair Analysis
Calorimeters of the Very Forward Region
The Very Forward Region of the ILC Detectors
Presentation transcript:

1 Calorimeters of the Very Forward Region Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University DESY Collaboration High precision design March 5 th 2008

2 IP ECal and Very Forward Tracker acceptance region. 5 mrad ~40 mrad ~85 mrad Challenges: High precision, high occupancy, high radiation dose, fast read-out! Layout of the Forward Region  Precise measurement o the Integrated Luminosity (ΔL/L ~ ).  Provide 2 photon veto.  BeamDiagnostics using beamstrahlung pairs.  Provide 2 photon veto.  BeamDiagnostics using beamstrahlung photons.

3 BeamCal: Overview  Compact EM calorimeter with sandwich structure: 1.30 layers of 1 X 0 : 3.5 mm W and 0.3 mm sensor. 2. Angular coverage from ~ [5,40] mrad 3. Moliére radius (R M ) ~ 1 cm 4. Segmentation between 0.5 and 0.8 x R M.  Functionality: 1.Provide electron veto. 2.Perform beam diagnostics for a feedback loop on luminosity optimization. 3.Shield the inner part of the detector from upstream backscattered particles..

4 BeamCal: Electron veto  Two photon events constitute the most serious background for many search channels which are characterized by missing energy and missing momentum.  Example: stau/smuon production: 1.Large SM background: γ*γ*  τ + τ - (E t > 4.5GeV)σ ~ 4.3 ∙ 10 5 fb  μ + μ - (E t > 2GeV)σ ~ 5.2 ∙ 10 6 fb  WW e + e -  μ + μ -, τ + τ - σ ~ 1.0 ∙ 10 3 fb  WW 2.Some cuts based on event topology & kinematics help, but are not enough due to the high background cross-section. 3.Missing energy (the neutralino (LSP?)). 4.The difference between SUSY and the SM background is the final state electron. ( Talk by Z. Zhang, FCAL Collaboration Meeting, October 2007, )

5 BeamCal: Electron veto Average tile energy subtracted e  e e + e -  μ + μ -, τ + τ -

6 BeamCal: Beam diagnostics  Beam parameters: beam sizes (σx, σy and σz) emittances (εx and εy) offsets (Δx and Δy) waist shifts (wx and wy) angles and rotation (αh, αv and φ) Particles per bunch (Nb)  Observables: total energy first radial moment thrust value angular spread E(ring ≥ 4) / Etot r-φ observables T1, T2 E / N l/r, u/d, f/b asymmetries Observables Δ BeamPar Taylor Matrix nom = + * “Diagnostics of Colliding Bunches from Pair Production and Beam Strahlung at the IP” – Achim Stahl (LC-DET )

7 1.Required precision is: 2.Measure luminosity by counting the number of Bhabha events (N): LumiCal: Performance requirements

8 LumiCal: Design parameters 3. Layers:  Number of layers - 30  Tungsten Thickness mm  Silicon Thickness mm  Elec. Space mm  Support Thickness mm 1. Placement:  2270 mm from the IP.  Inner Radius - 80 mm  Outer Radius mm 2. Segmentation:  48 sectors & 64 cylinders: Azimuthal Cell Size mrad Radial Cell Size mrad

9 LumiCal: Selection of Bhabha events Right side signal Left side signal Simulation distribution Distribution after acceptance and energy balance selection

10 LumiCal: Physics Background  Four-fermion processes are the main background, dominated by two-photon events (bottom right diagram). The cuts reduce the background to the level of Four-fermion processes

11 1.High beam-beam field (~kT) results in energy loss in the form of synchrotron radiation (beamstrahlung). 2.Bunches are deformed by electromagnetic attraction: each beam acting as a focusing lens on the other. Change in the final state polar angle due to deflection by the opposite bunch, as a function of the production polar angle. LumiCal: Beam-Beam effects at the ILC  Since the beamstrahlung emissions occur asymmetrically between e+ and e -, the acolinearity is increased resulting in a bias (reduction) in the counting rate. “Impact of beam-beam effects on precision luminosity measurements at the ILC” – C. Rimbault et al. (

12 LumiCal: Systematic Effects – Placement  Small tilts/shifts cause large φ- dependant errors in the Luminosity measurement.  Azimuthal symmetry is lost when LumiCal is placed along the detector axis → Choose the outgoing beam option. Headon, 14,20 mrad X-angle outgoing beam 14 mrad X-angle detector axis 20 mrad X-angle detector axis

13 LumiCal: Machine background (Magnetic Field) Radiation Hardness of Silicon  Negative effect of grazing LumiCal with the pair distribution: 1.Radiation damage to the silicon sensors ~Ο(MGy/year). 2.Detrimental to the Luminosity measurement. 3.Backscattering to the inner part of the detector.

14 Δθ σ(θ) LumiCal: Cell size [mrad] # Radial divisions σ(θ) [mrad]Δθ [mrad]2∙Δθ/ θ min ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ Detector Performance

15 LumiCal: Silicon Tracker  Tracker parameters (still being optimized…): 2 silicon layers, 5 cm gap between layers, 0.3 mm silicon thickness, 1000 azimuthal divisions, 1600 radial divisions.  Use Tracker information to correct the Calorimeter reconstruction of the polar angle, θ.

16 LumiCal: MIP (muon) Detection  Many physics studies demand the ability to detect muons (or the lack thereof) in the Forward Region.  Example: Discrimination between super-symmetry (SUSY) and the universal extra dimensions (UED) theories may be done by measuring the smuon-pair production process. The observable in the figure, θ μ, denotes the scattering angle of the two final state muons. “Contrasting Supersymmetry and Universal Extra Dimensions at Colliders” – M. Battaglia et al. (

17 LumiCal: MIP (muon) Detection  Multiple hits for the same radius (non-zero cell size).  After averaging and fitting, an extrapolation to the IP (z = 0) can be made.

18 LumiCal: EM Shower Properties

19 LumiCal: Bhabha reconstruction - Clustering 1.Perform initial 2D clustering in shower-peak layers. 2.Extrapolate “virtual cluster” CMs in non shower-peak layers, and build real clusters accordingly. 3.Build (global) 3D “super clusters” from all 2D layer clusters. 4.Check cluster properties (e.g. percentage of energy within a Molière Radius), and (attempt to) re-cluster if needed. 5.Correct cluster-energy distributions.  Events were generated with BHWIDE(1.04) and simulated by Mokka(v06-05-p02) using Geant4(v patch-01). The super-driver LumiCalX of the LDC(00-03Rp) model was used to build LumiCal in Mokka.  The clustering algorithm was written as a Marlin processor, using Marlin(v ).

20 LumiCal:Clustering - Molière Radius corrections  Two clusters (blue & red full circle) are merged by mistake (black hallow circle).  Inside a cluster’s Molière radius should be found ~90% of the cluster’s total energy.

21 LumiCal: Clustering – Energy Corrections  Hits from either cluster are projected into a coordinate system where the X-axis connects the two cluster centers.  The difference between the reconstructed and generated clusters is apparent in the area where the two clusters are inter-mixed. Relative error in Energy: 5% → 0.1%

22 LumiCal: Clustering – Algorithm performance  Photons which were not found.  Fake photons.

23 LumiCal: Clustering – Algorithm performance Cut Photons which are available for reconstruction [%] Relative errors Moliere radius [%] Minimal Energy [GeV] Miss Separating [%] Miss Clustering [%] Total error for 500 fb ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙  Selection of different cuts on minimal cluster energy and on separation distance between the cluster pair results in different counting errors.

24 EXTRA SLIDES

25 LumiCal: Systematic Effects

26 LumiCal: Geometry – Inner & outer radii R min → R max [mm] Fiducial volume σ Bhabha [nb] Relative Error θ min [mrad] θ max [mrad] ΔN/N2∙Δθ/ θ min 60 → ∙ ∙ → ∙ ∙ → ∙ ∙ → ∙ ∙  The fiducial volume sets bounds that prevent leakage through the sides and back of LumiCal, thus insuring shower containment.

27 LumiCal: Clustering – Energy Corrections  The procedure: Some of the energy from hits which are associated with the small-energy cluster is allocated to the high-energy cluster. Exactly how much is determined according to the energy distribution of the large-energy cluster on the left (negative) side, where the cluster inter-mixing is negligible.  The relative error of the cluster energy for small-energy clusters is improved by a factor of 3. Relative error in Energy: 5% → 0.1%

28 Instant Luminosity Measurement BeamCal:  Use as much information about the collision as possible.  BeamCal measures the energy of pairs originating from beamstrahlung.  GamCal will measure the energy of the beamstrahlung photons.  Define a robust signal proportional to the luminosity which can be fed to the feedback system.  Ratio of E_pairs/E_gam vs offset_y is proportional to the luminosity.  similar behaviour for angle_y, waist_y …

29 LumiCal: Clustering – Algorithm performance Cuts Acceptance [%] Purity [%] Efficiency [%] Moliere radius [%] Minimal Energy [GeV] Cut Photons which are available for reconstruction [%] Relative errors Moliere radius [%] Minimal Energy [GeV] Miss Separating [%] Miss Clustering [%] Total error for 500 fb ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ 10 -5