Ag Leader Crop Sensors. May 2008 announced worldwide distribution of Holland Scientific (HS) crop sensor Holland Scientific Crop Sensor Commercializing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FIELD-SCALE N APPLICATION USING CROP REFLECTANCE SENSORS Ken Sudduth and Newell Kitchen USDA-ARS Translating Missouri USDA-ARS Research and Technology.
Advertisements

Marketing Ag Commodities, Grain and Cattle Considerations Rodney Jones Oklahoma Farm Credit Professor of Ag Finance.
High Plains Desert.  North Central Montana  High elevation located on Rocky Mountain Front  4,000 Acre Wheat/Barley/Pea/Fallow  200 Angus Beef Cows.
N Reflections on Years of Sensor Research Algorithm Development and Jim Schepers.
Ethanol: Impacts on Soil and Water Quality Bob Broz University of Missouri Extension Water Quality Program (573)
Economics of Specialty Corn Production in Missouri Joe Parcell PIE -231.
Free Entry and Exit. Definitions  Long Run -a situation where a producer is able to vary all the factors of production.  Free Entry and Exit - a condition.
Dealer Experience in Nitrogen Sensing Danny Peeper Wheeler Brothers Grain.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
Impressions of China and More Dr. Chuanguo Xu. Dr. Fang Chen Regional Director IPNI Mr. Maury Keonig Vice-President Ag Services.
Precision Agriculture in Europe Olga S. Walsh BIOEN/SOIL 4213 Spring 2007.
GreenSeekerTM Variable Rate Applicator Equipment and Applications
Site-Specific Management Factors influencing plant growth Water Light Temperature Soil Compaction Drainage.
Comparison of Commercial Crop Canopy Sensors Ken Sudduth Newell Kitchen Scott Drummond USDA-ARS, Columbia, Missouri.
Integrating Weather and Soil Information With Sensor Data Newell Kitchen USDA ARS Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia, Missouri.
Corn Seeding Densities and Transgenic Traits: Economics and Farmer Behavior Paul D. Mitchell Ag & Applied Economics, UW-Madison Wisconsin Crop Management.
Contrasting Precision Ag Technology Between Different Crop Species By Dodi Wear.
Making the Most of Spatial Technologies: from an Ag Retailer and Service Provider’s Perspective Clint Jayroe Director of Operations – OptiGro Jimmy Sanders,
Presented By: Scott Clark SOIL 4213
New Technology and Strategies for Nitrogen Management.
The Precision-Farming Guide for Agriculturalists Chapter One
Sensors for Mapping Soil pH Eric Lund, Veris Technologies, Salina, KS Sensors for Crop Management Conference Stillwater OK January 17, 2008.
1413 E. Poplar St. Algona, IA Ph:
Crop Spec, A Collaborative Partnership A real time integrated plant nutrient monitoring and application system for Agricultural equipment.
Crop Insurance and Processing Vegetables: Farmer Practices and Net Returns Paul D. Mitchell Ag and Applied Economics, UW-Madison
Estimating your Cost of Production for Growing Irrigated Corn Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural and Applied Economics UW-Madison and UW-Extension Hancock ARS.
GreenSeeker® Handheld Crop Sensor
Organic Agriculture …… Making the transition… Craig Chase, Field Specialist Farm & Ag Business Management.
Farming a Flat Function AAE 320. Overview of Talk “Farming a Flat Function” What is it? (Give Examples) What does it mean? (Implications) In my opinion,
OptRx Crop Sensors (Optimum Prescription). Comparison of OptRx and farmer flat rate.
The Use of Red and Green Reflectance in the Calculation of NDVI for Wheat, Bermudagrass, and Corn Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213 Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213.
Missouri algorithm: Design & objectives Peter Scharf University of Missouri Peter Scharf Newell Kitchen, Ken Sudduth, Glenn Davis, John Lory, Vicky Hubbard,
GreenSeeker ® Applicator Mounted Crop Vigor Sensors.
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
Development of a Small Remotely Piloted Vehicle for the Collection of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index Readings Dr. Randy R. Price, Goutam Nistala.
Michigan Precision Farming Survey Roger Brook, Ph.D. Agricultural Engineering Dept. Michigan State University Presentation for Agricultural Engineering.
Precision Agriculture: GPS and Differential Corrections.
Refinement of the Missouri Corn Nitrogen Algorithm Using Canopy Reflectance Newell Kitchen, Ken Sudduth, and Scott Drummond USDA-Agricultural Research.
State of Engineering in Precision Agriculture, Boundaries and Limits for Agronomy.
Precision Agriculture an Overview. Precision Agriculture? Human need Environment –Hypoxia –$750,000,000 (excess N flowing down the Mississippi river/yr)
No-till Oklahoma Optimizing Nitrogen Fertilizer Through Use of Optical Sensors Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University
AG LEADER SCHOLARSHIP PRESENTATION Andrew Jungers.
N Fertilization in Colorado Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19 th & 20 th Oklahoma State University Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19.
U2U Tools and Educational Resources U2U Training Webinar May 6, 2015 Chad Hart Iowa State University
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma.
The Importance of Precision Ag in Custom Operations Trindle Brueggen.
Dave Franzen – North Dakota State University Newell Kitchen – USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO Laura Stevens, Richard Ferguson – University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Precision Agriculture John Nowatzki Extension Ag Machine Systems Specialist.
Farms, sensors and satellites. Using fertilisers Farming practice are changing Growing quality crops in good yields depends on many factors, including.
Cost/Return Analysis of Precision Agriculture on Oklahoma Farms Aaron Witt April 25, 2001.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
Variable Rate Nitrogen Application in Corn Production
Variable Rate Nitrogen
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech
Evolution of OSU Optical Sensor Based Variable Rate Applicator
Precision Agriculture
Organic Agriculture ……
What is this?.
Farming a Flat Function
Dave Franzen – North Dakota State University
By Blake Balzan1, with Ramesh Sivanpillai PhD2
UNL Algorithm for N in Corn
Objective: To discuss the current regional project and identify improvements needed for conducting future collaborative sensor-based research.
Livestock & Crop Outlook
Ag Marketing for Beginning Farmers
2012 Crop Market Outlook Iowa Farm Bureau’s 2012 Economic Summit
2011 Crop Market Outlook Coleman Research Group Presentation
Reflectance and Sensor Basics
Newell R. Kitchen, Kenneth A. Sudduth USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO
Precision Irrigation in Oklahoma
Presentation transcript:

Ag Leader Crop Sensors

May 2008 announced worldwide distribution of Holland Scientific (HS) crop sensor Holland Scientific Crop Sensor Commercializing HS crop sensor for world wide production ag market HS handles sales and support of research market

Sensor measures reflectance of 3 light wavebands -Red Edge – correlates to chlorophyll content -Red – not used presently -Near Infrared (NIR) – correlates to plant size Use NDRE for vegetative index

Vary N rate on the go by sensing crop’s need for N. Use crop sensor maps to identify areas of poor crop health to help make follow up scouting and application decisions Uses of crop sensors Potentially vary rate of any agrochemical whose recommended rate changes with crop size or vigor

2008 field testing

Crop sensor passes made $120/ac more than 50 lb/ac flat rate passes

2008 field testing Crop sensor passes made $15/ac more than 50 lb/ac flat rate passes

2008 field testing

$.60 per lb N and $4 per bushel corn Crop sensor rate and farmer’s flat rate alternated across entire field Iowa – Field 1 - $41.00/ac more than flat rate – Field 2 - $24.00/ac more than flat rate – Field 3 - $100.00/ac more than flat rate Missouri – Field 1 - $75.00/ac more than flat rate – Field 2 - $120.00/ac more than flat rate – Field 3 - $15.00/ac more than flat rate Crop sensor vs flat N rate

Using Insight to run crop sensor Testing variable rate application of N in corn on 11 machines – IA, IL, IN, MI, KS, MO, LA – 6 tractor/toolbar machines – 5 self propelled machines 2009 Field testing 4 machines collecting crop sensor maps while they spray

System diagram

Early 2010 – Start selling crop sensors – User interface through Insight display – Prescribe N rate on-the-go while side dressing corn – Mount sensors on post application sprayer to map crop sensor readings to identify poor crop health areas Europe and North American wheat market – Field test variable rate N application 2010

List Pricing $3000 per sensor $1500 per master module (1 per system) Recommend 5 sensors for 80 foot or wider boom Recommend 3 sensors for less than 80 foot swaths

Other comments Do different hybrids affect crop sensor? – Answer: Some, but not enough to be concerned.

Final thoughts Uniform N rates on variable fields “leaves lots of money on the table.” Corn farmers generally don’t trust the sensor. – Must prove sensors are better than farmers current N program – 2 years of good results before they start to trust it Corn farmers perception of sensors after first use – It puts more on shorter corn and less on taller corn – Rate variation seems logical, but they don’t really know if sensor prescribed the right amount – Proof is in the yield and financial return per acre

Final thoughts How accurately does the crop sensor need to prescribe N to corn for it to be more profitable than farmers uniform rate? – Answer (Ag Leader’s opinion): within lbs/ac of economic optimum N rate