Data for Student Success May, 2010 Ann Arbor, MI “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development and web based.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Data Warehouse What is a Data Warehouse? MAISA Definition Michigan Association of Intermediate School Administrators (supported by MSBO-Michigan School.
Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
Overview for Teachers. Session Objectives I.Review Teacher Effectiveness System II.Define SLO process III.Exploring SLO Templates -Assessment Literacy-
Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.
What are some instructional strategies that support inquiry?
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Reporting and Accountability System.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
INTRODUCTION TO THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION’s ACHIEVEMENT CHART Bedford Park PS September 2013.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Summer 2006 Preschool CSDC.
Individual Professional Development Planning for Teachers
Using Data to Identify Student Needs for MME Stan Masters Coordinator of Curriculum, Assessment, and School Improvement Lenawee ISD August 26, 2008.
1 Session 1: Overview of Title III Plan, Data, and Review of Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE) Title III Access to Core Professional.
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
Review Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Data for Student Success Regional Data Initiative Presentation November 20, 2009.
Strand A In Depth Context and Introduction. Strand A: Instruction Demonstrates your competency in instruction based on your documentation of NM Teacher.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement MI- CSI.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Data for Student Success Using Classroom Data to Monitor Student Progress “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
Data for Student Success August, 2009 Mission Pointe “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development and web.
“It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development and web based dynamic inquiries for school improvement.”
ENGAGING STUDENTS FOSTERING ACHIEVEMENT CULTIVATING 21st CENTURY GLOBAL SKILLS Designing Engaging Units for 21 st Century Learners Consider the 21st Century.
Data for Student Success Using State Assessment Data to Identify School Improvement Goals Lani Seikaly Professional Development Coordinator Data for Student.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Michigan School Data (MI School Data). What is MI School Data? MI School Data is the web presence for district users, the public, researchers, etc. to.
Understanding Alaska Measures of Progress Results: Reports 1 ASA Fall Meeting 9/25/2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon,
MYP: Humanities The Criteria.
Evaluation Results MRI’s Evaluation Activities: Surveys Teacher Beliefs and Practices (pre/post) Annual Participant Questionnaire Data Collection.
SLG Goals: Reflecting on the First Attempt Oregon Collaboration Grant Statewide Grantee Meeting November 21, 2013.
Successfully “Translating” ELPA Results Session #25 Assessment and Accountability Conference 2008.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Data for Student Success Using State Data to Identify School Improvement Goals “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program Improving Math and Science Achievement in Low-Performing, High-Poverty Schools: Implications for Professional.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Goals, Objectives, Outcomes Goals—general purpose of curriculum Objectives—more specific purposes that describe a learning outcome Outcomes—what learner.
Data for Student Success November 2009 Lansing “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development and web based.
1 Georgia’s Changing Assessment Landscape Melissa Fincher Associate Superintendent for Assessment and Accountability Georgia Department for Education GACIS.
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
Data for Student Success September 16, 2011 “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development and web based.
Gathering Evidence to Achieve Results. A Culture of Collaboration - PLC Norms - Systems Support A Focus on Results -Pre-assessments -Common Formative.
Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
Data for Student Success Using State Data to Identify School Improvement Goals “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional.
Maxson Bilingual/ESL Program Type of Bilingual Program Developmental (Content area taught in Spanish) -Language Arts -Math -Science -Social Studies Type.
Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) Presenter: Rachel Iaconelli-Scheyer Director of Curriculum Director of Curriculum Ocean City School District Ocean.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
1 Session 1: Overview of Title III Plan, Data, and Review of Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE) Title III Access to Core Professional.
Student Growth Model Salt Lake City School District Christine Marriott Assessment and Evaluation Department Salt Lake City School District State.
Welcome. Outcomes  Learn to analyze growth as a catalyst for change  Understand the process to evaluate the effectiveness of instructional interventions.
SCIENCE Assessment Amanda Cantafio.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Michigan School Data (MI School Data). Agenda  Overview of MI School Data Portal  Navigation 101  Sample Reports  Training and TA  Q & A 2.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
NWEA Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
Special Education Inquiry MI School Data Portal
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
EPAS Educational Planning and Assessment System By: Cindy Beals
Presentation transcript:

Data for Student Success May, 2010 Ann Arbor, MI “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development and web based dynamic inquiries for school improvement.”

Introduction to the Grant Federal Title II Part D of the NCLB Act of 2001 Enhancing Education through Technology Grant awarded through CEPI

OUTCOMES: 1.IDENTIFY IMPORTANT TOPICS RELATED TO MME 2.LEARN MORE ABOUT MME STANDARDS, COMPONENTS, AND ASSESSMENT DESIGN 3.DEMONSTRATE AND EXPLORE THE NEW MME INQUIRIES

WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT MME?

(SEE HANDOUT) MME Spring 2009 Assessment Design

(SEE HANDOUT) Spring 2009 MME Contributing Components

(SEE HANDOUT) Spring 2009 MME High School Content Standards by Subject

User name: demo_test1 Password: fall_01

School Year Reading/ELA Grade % 31% 42% % 31% 42% % 31% 42% % 43% 52% %48%46%45%43%41%52% %48%46%45%43%41%52% %59%57%56%54%53%61% %59%57%56%54%53%61% %69%68%67%66%65%71% %77%76%75%74%73%79% %85%84%83%82% 86% %92% 91% 93% % School Year Mathematics Grade % 31%33% % 31%33% % 31%33% % 43%44% %56%53%50%46%43%44% %56%53%50%46%43%44% %65%62%60%57%54%55% %65%62%60%57%54%55% %65%62%60%57%54%55% %74%71%70%67%66%67% %82%81%80%78%77%78% % 90% 89% % Michigan Annual AYP Objectives

School Data Dig Access your own school’s data You may use the templates provided to record your own MME data for –MME Proficiency 11 th grade –MME Proficiency Subgroups

MME Standard Analysis

Accessing Demo Data Dynamic Inquiry Access Dynamic Inquiry Tool User Name: demo_test1 Password: fall_01 MME Standard Analysis 27

Navigation Process for Demo Site Select Inquiry Settings - tab Select Demo ISD Select Disneyland School District Select Grzebien High School Select 11 th grade Select Reading Select View Results 28

MME Standard Analysis 29

MME Blueprint for

MME Standard Analysis Main Graph Identifies points possible for each standard within a content area Identifies average number of points received by the state and the school in each standard assessed Identifies the Blueprint which shows the breakdown of points and percentage by standard for each content area

MME Reading Standard Analysis Spring

33

What information does the detail graph provide? Identifies the state average number of points on the continuum of points available in the identified standard Identifies how our students performed on this standard in comparison to the state average. 34

Student Data 35

What information does the student data provide? Identifies the students who scored in the same point range on a particular standard For each student the following is identified Scaled score Proficiency level for content area Maximum points in the standard Points scored Percent Correct 36

Data Narrative Statements… Are objective statements of FACT about the school data Represent student achievement, demographics, school programs, school processes, and stakeholder perceptions Communicate a SINGLE idea Are clear and concise – written in sentences or phrases Describe the data; they do not evaluate the data! MUST stand alone; they do not require the data source to accompany them in order to be understandable 38

How might we use the Tabular results to write data narrative statements about our students?

40 13 students scored equal to or more than half the points possible in this standard 16 % of our students scored equal to or more than half the points possible in this standard 70 Students scored less than half the points possible in this standard 84% of our students scored less than half the points possible in this standard

Standard Analysis Tabular Results

School – Data Dig MME Standard Analysis Complete data dig Access Data 4SS inquiry tool Focus on Reading and Math Templates MME Main Graph Tabular Results Reading Standard Analysis MME Math Standard Analysis Data Narrative Statements 42

Navigation Process Login Select Inquiries – MME Standard Analysis Select Inquiry Settings - tab Select ISD –Select District –Select School –Select Grade Level –Select Subject –Select School Year(s) View Results 43

Where do we go next?

45 13 students scored equal to or more than half the points possible in this standard 16 % of our students scored equal to or more than half the points possible in this standard 70 Students scored less than half the points possible in this standard 84% of our students scored less than half the points possible in this standard

Use of High School Content Expectation Document Find the Standard indicated on the MME Standard Analysis Blueprint Determine the Content Expectations contained within this standard Which Content Expectations are identified as Pre-MME? 46

Tabular Results for Standard

48 Expectations identified as Pre-MME by Standard

Now that we have identified the Content Expectations within the Standard what is our next question? What concepts and skills do students need to know and be able to do to be successful on these content expectations? 49

Where are these Content Expectations taught? –What courses? –What grades? How are these Content Expectations taught? –Do we use common instructional practices? –Are our practices effective? How are we going to assess these Content Expectations? –Do we use common assessments linked to these Content Expectations? –Do we analyze and use the results of our common assessments? 50

How do we know that students have learned these Content Expectations? What evidence will we collect? What are we going to do for the students that did not learn? What are we going to do for the students who have learned these expectations? 51

“High-quality classroom data clearly reflective of the students’ attainment of the most critical academic content – and available to educators routinely throughout the quarter/semester/year – are the data teachers need to be able to analyze in order to determine if students are indeed “hitting the target.” Common Formative Assessments by Larry Ainsworth and Donald Viegut,

What do we know about our High School Students? The last state assessment is given in the beginning of the 8 th grade year for Math and Reading? How do we know what 9 th graders know as they come into high school? What data are we using to monitor student learning between 8 th grade and 11 th grade? 53

Assessing your Culture of Quality Data Assessment Inventory What does our school have in place? What data source are they using? Do they have: –long-term or summative data? –medium-term or formative/summative data? –short-term or formative data? In which content areas? Who uses all this data? 54

Assessing your Culture of Quality Data Assessment Inventory Activity Objectives Designed to inventory the sources of data used by individual schools. Enables schools to identify the dates data is collected, its audience, and how it is used. Provides schools an overall inventory of the sources of their data in a clear and concise chart. 55

Data Assessment Inventory State Assessment Level 56

Assessment Inventory Local Assessment Level 57

Assessing the Culture of Quality Data Using your school –What data do you collect? Use template to record what you currently know –What is in place? –Where do we need to go next? 58

QUESTIONS?