Thrust IIB: Dynamic Task Allocation in Remote Multi-robot HRI Jon How (lead) Nick Roy MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Manuela Veloso, Anthony Stentz, Alexander Rudnicky Brett Browning, M. Bernardine Dias Faculty Thomas Harris, Brenna Argall, Gil Jones Satanjeev Banerjee.
Advertisements

Fraunhofer FOKUS Context Management in Dynamic Environments IWCMC 2009, June 2009 Jens Tiemann Humberto Astudillo Evgenij Belikov Fraunhofer Institute.
GRASP University of Pennsylvania NRL logo? Autonomous Network of Aerial and Ground Vehicles Vijay Kumar GRASP Laboratory University of Pennsylvania Ron.
Thrust ID: Peer-to-Peer HRI Training and Learning with Humans Rod Grupen (lead) Cynthia Breazeal Nicholas Roy MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007.
0 General information Rate of acceptance 37% Papers from 15 Countries and 5 Geographical Areas –North America 5 –South America 2 –Europe 20 –Asia 2 –Australia.
Effective Coordination of Multiple Intelligent Agents for Command and Control The Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University PI: Katia Sycara
Cognitive Colonization The Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University Bernardine Dias, Bruce Digney, Martial Hebert, Bart Nabbe, Tony Stentz, Scott.
In practice, we run into three common issues faced by concurrent optimization algorithms. We alter our model-shaping to mitigate these by reasoning about.
Cognitive Science 1 Kartik Talamadupula Subbarao Kambhampati J. Benton Dept. of Computer Science Arizona State University Paul Schermerhorn Matthias Scheutz.
Rutgers Components Phase 2 Principal investigators –Paul Kantor, PI; Design, modelling and analysis –Kwong Bor Ng, Co-PI - Fusion; Experimental design.
Multirobot Coordination in USAR Katia Sycara The Robotics Institute
Distributed Robot Agent Brent Dingle Marco A. Morales.
Introductory Remarks Robust Intelligence Solicitation Edwina Rissland Daniel DeMenthon, George Lee, Tanya Korelsky, Ken Whang (The Robust Intelligence.
Aeronautics & Astronautics Autonomous Flight Systems Laboratory All slides and material copyright of University of Washington Autonomous Flight Systems.
Biointelligence Laboratory School of Computer Science and Engineering Seoul National University Cognitive Robots © 2014, SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab.,
INTEGRATED PROGRAMME IN AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING Coordinated Control, Integrated Control and Condition Monitoring in Uninhabited Air-Vehicles Ian Postlethwaite,
Process: A Generic View
Decentralised Coordination of Mobile Sensors School of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Ruben Stranders,
Summary Alan S. Willsky SensorWeb MURI Review Meeting September 22, 2003.
Improving Human-Robot Interaction Jill Drury, The MITRE Corporation Improving Human-Robot Interaction Jill Drury, The MITRE Corporation Collaborators:
September1 Managing robot Development using Agent based Technologies Dr. Reuven Granot Former Scientific Deputy Research & Technology Unit Directorate.
Intelligent Mobile Robotics Czech Technical University in Prague Libor Přeučil
Thesis Proposal PrActive Learning: Practical Active Learning, Generalizing Active Learning for Real-World Deployments.
An Integration Framework for Sensor Networks and Data Stream Management Systems.
Sliding Autonomy for Peer-To-Peer Human-Robot Teams M.B. Dias, B. Kannan, B. Browning, E. Jones, B. Argall, M.F. Dias, M.B. Zinck, M. Veloso, and A. Stentz.
ANTs PI Meeting, Nov. 29, 2000W. Zhang, Washington University1 Flexible Methods for Multi-agent distributed resource Allocation by Exploiting Phase Transitions.
University of Amsterdam Search, Navigate, and Actuate - Qualitative Navigation Arnoud Visser 1 Search, Navigate, and Actuate Qualitative Navigation.
Improved Human-Robot Team performance using Chaski Proceeding: HRI '11HRI '11 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction.
Modelling Synergies in Large Human-Machine Networked Systems Research Team: CMU: K. Sycara, C. Lebiere, P. Scerri Cornell: M. Campbell George Mason: R.
MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation 1 Dynamic Sensor Resource Management for ATE MURI.
Thrust III HRI Studies for Human Factors and Performance Evaluation J. A. Adams (Lead – Task A) P. Hinds (Lead – Task B) C. Breazeal J. How N. Roy MURI.
Value of Information 1 st year review. UCLA 2012 Kickoff VOI Kickoff ARO MURI on Value-centered Information Theory for Adaptive Learning, Inference, Tracking,
Transitions MJ Barnes SOURCE, IMOPAT AND Robotic Collaboration ATO 6.2 HRI portion.
Indirect Supervision Protocols for Learning in Natural Language Processing II. Learning by Inventing Binary Labels This work is supported by DARPA funding.
DARPA ITO/MARS Project Update Vanderbilt University A Software Architecture and Tools for Autonomous Robots that Learn on Mission K. Kawamura, M. Wilkes,
Cooperative Air and Ground Surveillance Wenzhe Li.
Information & Decision Superiority Case studies in applying AI planning technologies to military & civil applications Dr Roberto Desimone Innovations.
Advanced Decision Architectures Collaborative Technology Alliance An Interactive Decision Support Architecture for Visualizing Robust Solutions in High-Risk.
Curiosity-Driven Exploration with Planning Trajectories Tyler Streeter PhD Student, Human Computer Interaction Iowa State University
Design, Optimization, and Control for Multiscale Systems
Agents that Reduce Work and Information Overload and Beyond Intelligent Interfaces Presented by Maulik Oza Department of Information and Computer Science.
Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance System for California Wildfire Detection Presented by- Shashank Tamaskar Purdue University
Group member: Kai Hu Weili Yin Xingyu Wu Yinhao Nie Xiaoxue Liu Date:2015/10/
Chapter 1. Cognitive Systems Introduction in Cognitive Systems, Christensen et al. Course: Robots Learning from Humans Park, Sae-Rom Lee, Woo-Jin Statistical.
December 20, 2015 Decentralized Mission Planning for Heterogeneous Human-Robot Teams Sameera Ponda Prof. Jonathan How Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
CBR and CNP Applied to Litoral Reconnaissance Goal: –Apply the research on the integration of CBR mission specification with CNP task allocation towards.
Behavior-based Multirobot Architectures. Why Behavior Based Control for Multi-Robot Teams? Multi-Robot control naturally grew out of single robot control.
Advanced Decision Architectures Collaborative Technology Alliance Five Lessons Learned in Human-Robot Interaction Patricia McDermott Alion Science and.
Mutual Empowerment in Human-Agent-Robot Teams 16 December 2010 HART Workshop Jurriaan van Diggelen.
Distributed Data Analysis & Dissemination System (D-DADS ) Special Interest Group on Data Integration June 2000.
1 Multiagent Teamwork: Analyzing the Optimality and Complexity of Key Theories and Models David V. Pynadath and Milind Tambe Information Sciences Institute.
COMP 417 – Jan 12 th, 2006 Guest Lecturer: David Meger Topic: Camera Networks for Robot Localization.
Robust Decentralized Planning for Large-Scale Heterogeneous Human-Robot Teams Prof. Jonathan P. How Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts.
Boeing-MIT Collaborative Time- Sensitive Targeting Project July 28, 2006 Stacey Scott, M. L. Cummings (PI) Humans and Automation Laboratory
1 Power to the Edge Agility Focus and Convergence Adapting C2 to the 21 st Century presented to the Focus, Agility and Convergence Team Inaugural Meeting.
ESA Harwell Robotics & Autonomy Facility Study Workshop Autonomous Software Verification Presented By: Rick Blake.
Slide 1 2/22/2016 Policy-Based Management With SNMP SNMPCONF Working Group - Interim Meeting May 2000 Jon Saperia.
Learning for Physically Diverse Robot Teams Robot Teams - Chapter 7 CS8803 Autonomous Multi-Robot Systems 10/3/02.
Dynamic Mission Planning for Multiple Mobile Robots Barry Brumitt and Anthony Stentz 26 Oct, 1999 AMRS-99 Class Presentation Brian Chemel.
Develop Schedule is the Process of analyzing activity sequences, durations, resource requirements, and schedule constraints to create the project schedule.
1 Catherine Ordun, MBA, MPH May 10, 2016 Challenges and Considerations of Big Data Analytics Workshop on Big Data and Analytics for Infectious Disease.
Presenter: Prof. Dimitris Mourtzis Advanced Manufacturing: Industry 4.0 and Smart Systems.
University of Pennsylvania 1 GRASP Control of Multiple Autonomous Robot Systems Vijay Kumar Camillo Taylor Aveek Das Guilherme Pereira John Spletzer GRASP.
Enabling Team Supervisory Control for Teams of Unmanned Vehicles
CS b659: Intelligent Robotics
Thrust IC: Action Selection in Joint-Human-Robot Teams
MURI Annual Review Meeting Randy Moses November 3, 2008
Thrust II: Task C Visualization and Interface for Situation Awareness
Market-based Dynamic Task Allocation in Mobile Surveillance Systems
Pallet Detection and Engagement
Presentation transcript:

Thrust IIB: Dynamic Task Allocation in Remote Multi-robot HRI Jon How (lead) Nick Roy MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007

MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 Task Objective  Objective: develop a robust interactive planner for assigning tasks and responsibilties to the multiple agents  Complex problem for heterogeneous teams with numerous time- varying capabilities and coupled tasks:  Must find dynamically feasible trajectories  Task assignment with tightly coupled tasks is combinatorial problem  Further complicated by uncertainty in the situational awareness and asset requirements for future missions  Numerous planning algorithms already exist -- research issues include:  Developing computationally tractable algorithms for distributed real-time team planning  Ensuring robustness to uncertainty / modeling errors / different environmental abstractions within the team  Human / planner / robot integration and interfaces  Mixed initiative control with humans “in” and “on” the loop

MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 Planning Algorithms  Algorithms developed for each planning component  Receding horizon with repeated optimizations on-line  Numerous programming frameworks - MDP, MIP, NLP  Robustness to uncertainty and filtering enables both reactive and proactive response without excessive changes or “churning”  Consensus algorithms to enable efficient sharing of information Trajectory Design Actuation Mission Planning Task Assignment Vehicle/Obstacle/Target States Environment Estimator Vehicle Controllers Waypoint plans Mission Objectives

MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 Dynamic Task Allocation for Distributed H-R Teams  Issues:  Heterogeneous team (UAVs, UGVs) with humans as mobile agents (not just operators)  Local constraints such as physical capabilities, computational or communication limitations, cognitive load, and attention span  Various levels of team connectivity  From nearby HR teammates to looser, lower-bandwidth collaboration between a robot team and remote commander  Must adapt to changes in the constraints as teams form/move and complete tasks  Need to integrate joint action policies encoding human preference models, capabilities and constraints with the task allocation process  Each “task primitive” is a complete joint-action policy computed using interaction planning algorithm (e.g., POMDP)  Need to extract high-level features of the cognitive model and the natural language communication for the task allocation, compared to within-team action selection  Determine key parameters that determine how to adapt these models in real-time, e.g. stress level, amount of information available to human  Metrics to determine these parameters

MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 Technical Innovations  Quantitative models for combined human-robot teams must be developed, not only to analyze team performance but also to design tasking protocols  H/R have very different capabilities and will perform different tasks in the planning loop.  Must allocate these roles using the current human state and the environment task  Task models must accurately capture the team dynamics in terms of:  Task capability (e.g., can this human-robot team perform this triage?),  Changing communication constraints,  Individual human preference models  Tasking algorithms must integrate seamlessly with the humans  How to effectively modify the different planners to enable suitable operator interaction  Task planning is data and computation intensive, typically using algorithms that are well beyond the scope of human capabilities, especially in stressful environments.  Consensus algorithms require computationally intensive iterative filtering process  Human has much to contribute, but how participate?  Must develop better methods to convey the uncertainty of the current situational awareness (SA) to the human; and enable the human to provide feedback on the SA and succinctly codify their doubts about any new data  Depends on current human state and the amount / accuracy of their information

MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 Technical Innovations  Tasking representations must integrate with human mental models, which are typically more abstract than in planner  Task allocation and team-based action selection must share common representation so that tasks can be converted into local plans  Resulting plans must be conveyed to the human in a way that can be readily understood and queried for more information  Provide teams with enough information (but not too much)  Example: if more urgent situation develops in another area, planner might wantto reassign the robots to new tasks, but the human should have enough information to know why the robots were reallocated  Dialogue interaction system must be able to identify which components of the global plan are relevant to the human teammate, and be able to express that information in a shared abstraction  Involves a trade-off between actions that maximize utility and actions that maximize information  Joint-action selection policy encoded using a POMDP will provide one way to do this  Motivates development of models of human preference, so that planner can provide dynamic re-allocations when humans are prepared  Determine “rules of interaction” for humans / planner interface  E.g. if human and planner disagree on relative importance of the tasks, how should the planner proceed?  Functions of many parameters (stress level, information available)

MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 Milestones  Year 1: Demonstrate HRI between robots (UAVs and UGVs) and remote human operators in medical triage scenario  Aerial robots flying around with camera. Mapping and finding targets. Some moving some stationary. Some human some not. Label ares of interest that need more exploration by ground robots.  Based on that map, mobile robots go out into hot zone and investigate regions highlighted by aerial robots. Tools for remote medics to get closer view, talk to victims through robot. Robot can give a medical triage tag to person. Administer some medical treatment using some medical sensing of MDS in hands, etc.

MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 Milestones  Year 2: Human-robot peer-to-peer in a hot zone.  Demonstrate integration of task allocation, cognitive models, state estimation and joint action selection  1 human and 2 MDS and 2 Arial robots in the hot zone  Task allocation after entering hot zone:  Search and Surveillance for a robot-robot team  Human-robot trained sample collection  Dynamic reallocation when new tasks found  Year 3: HRI with peer-to-peer and remote robots  Develop and evalute fully integrated architecture