Measurements of Trace Gases and PM 2.5 Mass and Composition near the Ground and at 254 m agl During TexAQS 2000 and Comparison with Other Regions K. Baumann,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Source Apportionment of PM 2.5 in the Southeastern US Sangil Lee 1, Yongtao Hu 1, Michael Chang 2, Karsten Baumann 2, Armistead (Ted) Russell 1 1 School.
Advertisements

DIURNAL PATTERN OF SUBMICRON AEROSOL SIZE/MASS DISTRIBUTIONS IN URBAN ATMOSPHERE, PRAGUE WINTER 2004/2005 J. HOVORKA 1, M.BRANIŠ 1, J. SCHWARZ 2
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Atmospheric Aerosol From the Source to the Receptor Insights from the Pittsburgh Supersite Spyros Pandis, Allen Robinson, and Cliff Davidson Department.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 1 Modeling of 1,3-Butadiene for Urban and Industrial Areas B. Rappenglück and B. Czader.
Aerosol Pattern over Southeastern Europe Rudolf B. Husar and Janja D. Husar CAPITA, Washington University, St. Louis, MO Conference on Visibility, Aerosols,
Rice University Tropospheric Ozone Pollution Project (RU-TOPP) Gary A. Morris.
Sources of PM 2.5 Carbon in the SE U.S. RPO National Work Group Meeting December 3-4, 2002.
Variability in Ozone Profiles at TexAQS within the Context of an US Ozone Climatology Mohammed Ayoub 1, Mike Newchurch 1 2, Brian Vasel 3 Bryan Johnson.
P. D. Hien, V. T. Bac, N. T. H. Thinh Vietnam Atomic Energy Commission.
1 Recent PM 2.5 Trends in Georgia André J. Butler Mercer University EVE 290L 14 April, 2008.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
The semi-volatile nature of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area November 2, 2007 EAS Graduate Student Symposium Christopher.
Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosols in Atlanta
Air Quality Impacts from Prescribed Burning Karsten Baumann, PhD. Polly Gustafson.
Li ZHANG, Hong LIAO, and Jianping LI Institute of Atmospheric Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences Impacts of Asian Summer Monsoon on Seasonal and Interannual.
Hong Liao Institute of Atmospheric Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences Simulation of Air Pollutants (AP) over China using the GEOS-CHEM.
Southeast Nexus (SENEX) Studying the Interactions Between Natural and Anthropogenic Emissions at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change A NOAA Field.
Climate Change UNIT 3 Chapter 7: Earth’s Climate System
Pacific 2001 – Synthesis of Findings and Policy Implications Roxanne Vingarzan Pacific and Yukon Region.
Simulating diurnal changes of speciated particulate matter in Atlanta, Georgia using CMAQ Yongtao Hu, Jaemeen Baek, Bo Yan, Rodney Weber, Sangil Lee, Evan.
Introduction A new methodology is developed for integrating complementary ground-based data sources to provide consistent ozone vertical distribution time.
Temporal and Spatial Variations of PM2.5 Mass in Georgia Xiaolu Zhang EAS 6410 Spring 2007.
Source Signatures of Organic Compounds and Particle Growth in Bakersfield, CA Lars Ahlm 1, Shang Liu 1, Lynn M. Russell 1, Douglas A. Day 1,2, Robin Weber.
International Union of Air Pollution Prevention and Environmental Protection Association and Integrated Program on Urban, Regional and Global Air Pollution.
MODELS3 – IMPROVE – PM/FRM: Comparison of Time-Averaged Concentrations R. B. Husar S. R. Falke 1 and B. S. Schichtel 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
Observational Evidence: Ozone and Particulate Matter EMEP SB, 13 September summary Chapter 2 Kathy Law LATMOS-CNRS,
SEASONAL VARIABILITY OF ORGANIC MASS CONTRIBUTION TO PM2.5 WITHIN METRO ATLANTA AND FURTHER DOWNWIND K. Baumann 1, M.E. Chang 1, A.G. Russell 2, E.S. Edgerton.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Improved representation of boreal fire emissions for the ICARTT period S. Turquety, D. J. Jacob, J. A. Logan, R. M. Yevich, R. C. Hudman, F. Y. Leung,
Technical tool to evaluate the effectiveness of control measures I. ALLEGRINI and C. PERRINO Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche ISTITUTO sull’INQUINAMENTO.
August 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Characterizing PM1 Characterizing Ambient PM Concentrations and Processes What are the temporal, spatial, chemical,
Anthropogenic influence on stratospheric aerosol changes through the Asian monsoon: observations, modeling and impact Lamarque, Solomon, Portmann, Deshler,
UNH Soluble Acidic Gases and Aerosol (SAGA) during INTEX Phase A Jack E. Dibb, Eric Scheuer, and Robert W. Talbot With Thanks to the INTEX Science Team.
1/30 2-year observation of Organic Aerosol properties In Cape Corsica J. Sciare, and LSCE.
SUBMICRON AEROSOL PARTICLES IN A SMALL SETTLEMENT NEAR HIGHWAY J. HOVORKA, Z. STAŇKOVÁ Institute for Environmental.
Estimating local versus regional contributions to tropospheric ozone: An example case study for Las Vegas Mark Green and Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
X. Zhang, J. Liu, E. T. Parker and R. J. Weber
Fine Particle (PM 2.5 ) Composition and Trace Gas Measurements in the Yangtze Delta Region In memoriam Dr. Glen Cass K. Baumann, M.H. Bergin, W.L. Chameides,
Human fingerprints on our changing climate Neil Leary Changing Planet Study Group June 28 – July 1, 2011 Cooling the Liberal Arts Curriculum A NASA-GCCE.
The effect of pyro-convective fires on the global troposphere: comparison of TOMCAT modelled fields with observations from ICARTT Sarah Monks Outline:
Goal: “What are the sources and physical mechanisms that contribute to high ozone concentrations aloft that have been observed in Central and Southern.
Overview of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study:  Understand the long-range, trans-boundary transport of visibility-reducing.
Continued improvements of air quality forecasting through emission adjustments using surface and satellite data & Estimating fire emissions: satellite.
First GURME Air Quality Forecasting Workshop for Latin American project Santiago, Chile October 2003 Pedro Oyola, CONAMA.
SEARCH & VISTAS Special Studies RPO National Technical Meeting St. Louis, MO November 5, 2003.
1 Aika Yano, Yongtao Hu, M. Talat Odman, Armistead Russell Georgia Institute of Technology October 15, th annual CMAS conference.
CE (%) Conclusions and Outlook  Most monitoring sites in GA exceed the annual NAAQS for PM 2.5, coastal sites benefit from land-sea breeze circulation.
August 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Characterizing PM1 Characterizing Ambient PM Concentrations and Processes What are the temporal, spatial, chemical,
March 24, 2004EAS 4/88031 EAS 4/8803: Experimental Methods in AQ Week 11: Air Quality Management (AQM) Clean Air Act (History, Objectives, NAAQS) Emissions.
MILAGRO Science Workshop -- October 2006 Summary of preliminary discussions on near-, mid-, and far-field chemistry W. Brune reporting Preliminary Findings.
Breakout Session 1 Air Quality Jack Fishman, Randy Kawa August 18.
Aerosol Pattern over Southern North America Tropospheric Aerosols: Science and Decisions in an International Community A NARSTO Technical Symposium on.
Exceptional Events: Complexity for Ozone
Long-term measurements of surface ozone at remote and rural sites in China Xiaobin Xu 1, Weili Lin 1,2 1 Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences Key.
AOSC 200 Lesson 27. A Typical Day in a Pollution Episode A common severe pollution weather pattern occurs when high pressure is centered just west of.
Smog “Trends” -- Atlanta and Elsewhere Annual Peak Observed Concentration, EPD, US EPA.
Results and discussion Ground based characterization of biomass burning aerosols during the South American Biomass Burning Analysis (SAMBBA) field experiment.
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
Paul Kelley1,2, Winston Luke2, Xinrong Ren1,2
Karsten Baumann, Mei Zheng, Michael Chang, and Ted Russell
Fig. 2 shows the relationship between air temperature and relative humidity. 2 (a) (i) Describe the relationship shown in Fig. 2. [3] (ii) State.
The course finished last lesson but what are you missing?
Fig. 2 shows the relationship between air temperature and relative humidity. (a) (i) Describe the relationship shown in Fig. 2. [3] (ii) State.
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
Monitoring Data Sets and Analysis Tools for the VIEWS/TSS Web Sites
Georgia Institute of Technology
K. Baumann, M.E. Chang, V. Dookwah, S. Lee, A.G. Russell
Time-Integrated Particle Measurements : Status in Canada
Mixing layer transport flux of particulate matter in Beijing, China
Presentation transcript:

Measurements of Trace Gases and PM 2.5 Mass and Composition near the Ground and at 254 m agl During TexAQS 2000 and Comparison with Other Regions K. Baumann, F. Ift, J.Z. Zhao, M.H. Bergin, A.G. Russell, W.L. Chameides School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta  Tools and data quality  PM 2.5 and O 3 relationships  Episodes  Seasonal and regional trends in PM 2.5 mass and composition Acknowledgement: J. Lester, University of Houston, Clearlake R. Weber, D. Orsini, D. DiPasquale, W. Younger, all Georgia Tech Work sponsored by U.S. EPA through NCER Grant R826372

2 Particle Composition Monitor “PCM” More details described in paper accepted to JGR “Atlanta Supersite” special section, coming out soon…

3 Assessing Accuracy of PCM Measurements S-compounds and mass agree well, volatile species esp. NO 3 - more difficult to measure accurately

4 Motivation During SOS’99, 16 June - 22 July 1999, measurements near Nashville, TN, between 4 and 42 m agl showed positive vertical gradients for % of all daytime, and % of all nighttime samples of PM 2.5 mass, SO 4 =, NO 3 -, and NH 4 + !! Direct emissions and/or secondary formation of fine PM aloft

5 Differences in [O 3 ] and [PM 2.5 ] Based on 30 min Averages WT-O 3 levels are significantly higher early mornings and lower at midday Positive vertical [PM 2.5 ] ‘gradients’ favored more often at night than at day, similar to Hendersonville

6 High Ozone and Biomass Burning Episodes LP max [O 3 ] on 08/30 is more than twice WT-[O3], which more seems to follow a “rising tide”. In contrast: [PM 2.5 ] only slightly different and in fact higher average on 08/29. BB plume on 9/5: max [NOy] and alkaline aerosol at LP only (!) but joint increase in mass.

7 High Ozone and Biomass Burning Episodes, continued Increases in SO 4 = mass fraction preceded by high [SO 2 ] episodes, coinciding with max [O 3 ]. Largest increase in TOC m.f. on day w/max [O 3 ] & [SO 2 ] and signature of traffic emissions. Maximum [CO] & [LOA] g associated with BB plume on 9/5 but [NH 3 ] high at LP only!

8 Regional Comparison of Average PM 2.5 Composition in 2000 Entire period mid August to mid September Williams Tower La Porte Macon, GA Late June Augusta, GA Early July Columbus, GA Late July Sequential measurements at GA sites captured different episodes !

9 Seasonal Comparison of Average PM 2.5 Composition Summer ‘99 Dixon Hendersonville Fall ‘ Winter’99/’ Differences in composition are insignificant regionally but not seasonally Differences in mass related to different BL dynamics

10 Comparison of Seasonal and Regional Averages - incl. China Significantly higher [PM 2.5 ] at Yangtze sites in fall, even relative to U.S. summer [O 3 ] comparable in fall, but much higher in summer, esp. in U.S. metro areas [O 3 ] build-up observed in both summers and regions, TN&GA / GA&TX [PM 2.5 ] generally correlates with max [O 3 ] (“rising tide”), except for TexAQS2k

11 Seasonal/Regional Aerosol Acidity Based on [SO 4 = /NO 3 - /NH 4 + ] Slightly alkaline aerosol in fall and winter, as opposed to Yangtze sites. Different emission patterns, e.g. post-harvest burns at Yangtze: [K + ] mean = 2.2 ±1.4  g m -3. LP & WT closely neutralized, only occasionally alkaline, esp. ~9/5.

12 Summary Positive vertical gradients of PM 2.5 mass and sulfate point to atmospheric aerosol formation with the ground being a net sink, confirming Hendersonville observations Localized plume on 8/30 carrying max [O 3 ] at LaPorte, coincided with high [SO 2 ] and showed max TOC increase relative to PM 2.5 mass possibly indicating high aerosol forming potential Average PM composition at LaPorte and Williams Tower are very similar, showing sulfate and organics each contributing ~1/3 to total fine mass Insignificant regional differences in fine particle composition, but noticeable seasonal differences, esp. wrt C-species and sulfate, likely due to higher primary (SO 2 ) emissions and photochemical activity in summer Based on SO 4 = /NO 3 - /NH 3 + system, PM 2.5 in SE-US is slightly alkaline in winter but more acidic in summer Significantly (~3x) lower PM 2.5 mass in SE-US compared to Yangtze Delta region, which has a potential impact on American continent due to long-range transport across Pacific Use of OOE factor 1.4 possibly too low for Houston aerosol; different factors might have to be applied for OC from quartz and XAD coated quartz backup filters due to different volatilities, which has been shown to be valid for the Atlanta Supersite data

13 PCM

14 La Porte Wind Roses day = CST, night = CST Daytime sea breeze dominated with prevailing SE flows. Those SE air masses were low in primary gaseous pollutants. Highest average Ozone with flows from SW and N. Photochemical precursors moved in from N and NW; with nighttime levels >> daytime indicating BL dynamics. SO 2 points to possible point sources to W and NW