Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran www.NEiSoftware.com A Probabilistic Approach To Modeling Fatigue.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modeling of Data. Basic Bayes theorem Bayes theorem relates the conditional probabilities of two events A, and B: A might be a hypothesis and B might.
Advertisements

11-1 Empirical Models Many problems in engineering and science involve exploring the relationships between two or more variables. Regression analysis.
Copula Regression By Rahul A. Parsa Drake University &
Structural reliability analysis with probability- boxes Hao Zhang School of Civil Engineering, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia Michael Beer Institute.
An Experimental Study and Fatigue Damage Model for Fretting Fatigue
Materials for Lecture 11 Chapters 3 and 6 Chapter 16 Section 4.0 and 5.0 Lecture 11 Pseudo Random LHC.xls Lecture 11 Validation Tests.xls Next 4 slides.
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
Outline input analysis input analyzer of ARENA parameter estimation
Fatigue life assessment of structural component with a non-uniform stress distribution based on a probabilistic approach Aleksander KAROLCZUK. Thierry.
Incubation & Nucleation Validation Study SIPS TIM, October 22 nd 2007 Cornell and RPI.
6-1 Introduction To Empirical Models 6-1 Introduction To Empirical Models.
MEGN 537 – Probabilistic Biomechanics Ch.4 – Common Probability Distributions Anthony J Petrella, PhD.
Training Manual Aug Probabilistic Design: Bringing FEA closer to REALITY! 2.5 Probabilistic Design Exploring randomness and scatter.
University of Texas at San Antonio Probabilistic Sensitivity Measures Wes Osborn Harry Millwater Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Texas.
Probability distribution functions Normal distribution Lognormal distribution Mean, median and mode Tails Extreme value distributions.
The Multiple Regression Model Prepared by Vera Tabakova, East Carolina University.
Helicopter System Reliability Analysis Statistical Methods for Reliability Engineering Mark Andersen.
Department of Electrical Engineering National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan IEEE ICHQP 10, 2002, Rio de Janeiro NCCU Gary W. Chang Paulo F. Ribeiro Department.
CSE 221: Probabilistic Analysis of Computer Systems Topics covered: Continuous random variables Uniform and Normal distribution (Sec. 3.1, )
Chap 9-1 Statistics for Business and Economics, 6e © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 9 Estimation: Additional Topics Statistics for Business and Economics.
11-1 Empirical Models Many problems in engineering and science involve exploring the relationships between two or more variables. Regression analysis.
1 2. Reliability measures Objectives: Learn how to quantify reliability of a system Understand and learn how to compute the following measures –Reliability.
Lecture II-2: Probability Review
1 Assessment of Imprecise Reliability Using Efficient Probabilistic Reanalysis Farizal Efstratios Nikolaidis SAE 2007 World Congress.
Reliability Model for Compressor Failure SMRE Term Project Paul Zamjohn August 2008.
Component Reliability Analysis
Critical Plane Approach in Stage I and Stage II of Fatigue Under Multiaxial Loading A. KAROLCZUK E. MACHA Opole University of Technology, Department of.
Probability distribution functions
On Model Validation Techniques Alex Karagrigoriou University of Cyprus "Quality - Theory and Practice”, ORT Braude College of Engineering, Karmiel, May.
Probabilistic Mechanism Analysis. Outline Uncertainty in mechanisms Why consider uncertainty Basics of uncertainty Probabilistic mechanism analysis Examples.
R. Kass/W03P416/Lecture 7 1 Lecture 7 Some Advanced Topics using Propagation of Errors and Least Squares Fitting Error on the mean (review from Lecture.
Integrated circuit failure times in hours during stress test David Swanick DSES-6070 HV5 Statistical Methods for Reliability Engineering Summer 2008 Professor.
An Empirical Likelihood Ratio Based Goodness-of-Fit Test for Two-parameter Weibull Distributions Presented by: Ms. Ratchadaporn Meksena Student ID:
1 6. Reliability computations Objectives Learn how to compute reliability of a component given the probability distributions on the stress,S, and the strength,
7. Reliability based design Objectives Learn formulation of reliability design problem. Understand difference between reliability-based design and deterministic.
MEGN 537 – Probabilistic Biomechanics Ch.5 – Determining Distributions and Parameters from Observed Data Anthony J Petrella, PhD.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FATIGUE SIMULATION DATA J R Technical Services, LLC Julian Raphael 140 Fairway Drive Abingdon, Virginia.
FRACTURE MECHANICS AND FATIGUE DESIGN HANS MF PANJAITAN Marinteknisk Senter Otto Nielsens Veg Trondheim Norway Mobile:
1 11 Simple Linear Regression and Correlation 11-1 Empirical Models 11-2 Simple Linear Regression 11-3 Properties of the Least Squares Estimators 11-4.
Xianwu Ling Russell Keanini Harish Cherukuri Department of Mechanical Engineering University of North Carolina at Charlotte Presented at the 2003 IPES.
Calculating Risk of Cost Using Monte Carlo Simulation with Fuzzy Parameters in Civil Engineering Michał Bętkowski Andrzej Pownuk Silesian University of.
5-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. May 28, 2009 Inventory # Chapter 5 Six Sigma.
Silesian University of Technology in Gliwice Inverse approach for identification of the shrinkage gap thermal resistance in continuous casting of metals.
A Short Course on: Weibull Analysis & Parameter Estimation Presented at: Honeywell March 14 – 17, 2006 Stephen F. Duffy PhD, PE Connecticut Reserve Technologies,
Machine Design Under Uncertainty. Outline Uncertainty in mechanical components Why consider uncertainty Basics of uncertainty Uncertainty analysis for.
Learning Simio Chapter 10 Analyzing Input Data
Probabilistic Design Systems (PDS) Chapter Seven.
1 1 Slide Simulation Professor Ahmadi. 2 2 Slide Simulation Chapter Outline n Computer Simulation n Simulation Modeling n Random Variables and Pseudo-Random.
NESSUS Overview and General Capabilities
L Berkley Davis Copyright 2009 MER301: Engineering Reliability Lecture 12 1 MER301: Engineering Reliability LECTURE 12: Chapter 6: Linear Regression Analysis.
Chapter 20 Statistical Considerations Lecture Slides The McGraw-Hill Companies © 2012.
1 Effects of Error, Variability, Testing and Safety Factors on Aircraft Safety Erdem Acar, Amit Kale and Raphael T. Haftka
G. Cowan Lectures on Statistical Data Analysis Lecture 5 page 1 Statistical Data Analysis: Lecture 5 1Probability, Bayes’ theorem 2Random variables and.
MEGN 537 – Probabilistic Biomechanics Ch.4 – Common Probability Distributions Anthony J Petrella, PhD.
Rick Walker Evaluation of Out-of-Tolerance Risk 1 Evaluation of Out-of-Tolerance Risk in Measuring and Test Equipment Rick Walker Fluke - Hart Scientific.
MEGN 537 – Probabilistic Biomechanics Ch.5 – Determining Distributions and Parameters from Observed Data Anthony J Petrella, PhD.
Bootstrapping James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Probabilistic Slope Stability Analysis with the
R. Kass/Sp07P416/Lecture 71 More on Least Squares Fit (LSQF) In Lec 5, we discussed how we can fit our data points to a linear function (straight line)
On the formulation and application of design rules Barna Szabó Washington University in St. Louis Engineering Software Research and Development, Inc. St.
Fundamentals of Data Analysis Lecture 11 Methods of parametric estimation.
Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers
11-1 Empirical Models Many problems in engineering and science involve exploring the relationships between two or more variables. Regression analysis.
Materials for Lecture 18 Chapters 3 and 6
Chapter 3 Component Reliability Analysis of Structures.
Weibull Analysis & Parameter Estimation for Ceramic Reliability
MEGN 537 – Probabilistic Biomechanics Ch
RAM XI Training Summit October 2018
Weibull Analysis & Parameter Estimation
Chapter 9 Estimation: Additional Topics
Presentation transcript:

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran A Probabilistic Approach To Modeling Fatigue Life Variation Julian Raphael 1, Bart McPheeters 2, Ray DelDin 2 1. J R Technical Services, LLC, Abingdon, Virginia 24211, USA 2. NEiSoftware, Inc, Westminster, California 92683, USA

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Presentation Outline Objective Rationale Simulation Algorithm Probabilistics Finite Element Results Fatigue Model Stochastic Results Correlated Random Variables Crack Growth Models Summary

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Objective To develop and implement a numerical procedure that can reasonably estimate both fatigue life and fatigue life variation. Output is the Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) that predicts life expectancy and its variation.

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Rationale For The Approach “ Factors of 100 in life are not uncommon for very low stress level fatigue tests ” –Stephens, R. I., Fatemi, A., Stephens, R. R., Fuchs, H.O., Metal Fatigue in Engineering, 2nd edition, 2001 “ Variability in test conditions,  and  p, will be much smaller than the variability in material properties; all of the variability in the fatigue lives can be attributed to the material constants ” –Socie, D., Reemsnyder, H., Downing, S., Tipton, S., et al, Fatigue Life Prediction, SAE Fatigue Design Handbook, 3rd edition, 1997 “ The $119 billion cost of fracture and its prevention, expressed in 1982 dollars, amounts to about 4% of the gross national product.” –Duga, J. J., Fisher, W. H., Buxbaum, R.W., Rosenfield, A. R., Burh, A. R., Honton, E.J., McMillan, S. C., The Economic Effects of Fracture in the United States, NBS Special Publication, 647-2, United States Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, March 1983

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Fatigue Model Simulation Algorithm Stochastics Simulation of Material Properties Fatigue Model Damage Parameter Material Properties Data Analysis Failure CDF Stress Analysis Stress State Strain State

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Monte Carlo Simulation Generate Random Numbers Between Zero and Unity Using Mean and Std Dev Convert the RNs to Material Constants Solve Fatigue Life Equation for Cycles to Failure, N f Analyze Failure Data to Compute CDF for Life Get Another Set of Material Constants Damage Parameter Comes From Stress And Strain States

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Probabilistics

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Uniform Distribution Simulation N=100

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Uniform Distribution Simulation N=1000

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Uniform Distribution Simulation N=100000

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Finite Element Results

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran The Solid Model

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Bending Stress Distribution t = 500  sec (1000 Hz Sine Wave) Units = MPa

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Location Of Maximum Bending Stress Crack Nucleation Is Expected To Occur At This Point. Max Principal Stress Is 1729 MPa Units = MPa

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Stress & Strain States at Expected Crack Initiation Site

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Fatemi-Socie Fatigue Model

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Damage Parameter:

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Plane of Maximum Damage Plane on which maximum damage occurs is not known a priori It must be calculated from the stress state, the strain state, & normal stress sensitivity The value of the damage parameter must be evaluated on every possible plane Non-proportional loading complicates the calculation

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Fatemi-Socie Crack Nucleation Plane Units = MPa Damage Parameter =

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Simplified Fatemi-Socie Fatigue Model

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Cycles to Crack Nucleation vs Fatemi-Socie Damage Parameter  ’ f = 1758 MPa  ’ f = 2.12 b = c = G = MPa

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Stochastic Results

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Simulation Results of Cycles to Failure With D = , E E E E E E E E E E+04 Cycles to Failure D = E E E E E E E E E E+05 Cycles to Failure D=

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Weibull Data Analysis Linear Least Square Estimates D= N=25000  =6.744  =4499 r=0.966 F -1 (0.01)=2274 F -1 (0.10)=3222 F -1 (0.50)=4261 F -1 (0.90)=5091 D= N=25000  =3.575  =87896 r=0.959 F -1 (0.01)=24273 F -1 (0.10)=46837 F -1 (0.50)=79331 F -1 (0.90)=110991

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Maximum Likelihood Estimates Can Be Obtained For The Weibull Parameters Abernathy, R., The New Weibull Handbook, 4th edition, North Palm Beach, Florida, 2000

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Some Useful Statistical Distributions Weibull Lognormal Birnbaum-Saunders (Fatigue Life) General Extreme Value Gumbel Frechet

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Good Statistical Fits (Compact Specimen) Lognormal Birnbaum-Saunders (Fatigue Life)

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Not So Good Statistical Fits Both Distributions Excluded At Significance Levels Between 0.01 And 0.20 NormalWeibull

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Goodness-of-Fit Tests Goodness-of-fit tests won’t tell you what the distribution function is However, they will tell you that a candidate distribution is unsuitable at a particular significance level Some general goodness-of-fit tests –Kolmogorov-Smirnov –Anderson-Darling –Chi Square (   )

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Cumulative Distribution Function  =  = 4499

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Probability Density Function  =6.744  =4499

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Reliability Function (Survival Probability)  =6.744  =4499

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Hazard Function  =6.744  =4499

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Correlated Random Variables  f and b are correlated  f and c are correlated  Failure to account for these correlations will overestimate actual fatigue life variation

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Other Fatigue Models

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Crack Propagation And Other Fatigue Models The approach is applicable to any fatigue model or crack propagation model Variations in load can be considered Variations in initial and final crack lengths can be modeled The only requirement is that the necessary CDFs be known or estimated

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Compact Specimen

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Basic Equations Of Crack Growth For A Compact Specimen Anderson, T. L., Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, 1 st edition, CRC Press, 1991

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Summary Monte Carlo methods are well known and appropriate for problems of this type. Solution is based on assuming the CDFs for Material Properties are Normally Distributed and known a priori. These assumptions should be replaced with experimental verification. Correlation between paired fatigue variables must be accounted for - otherwise too much variation.

Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran Thank You!