CEQ’s Proposed NEPA Guidance Listening Session _________________________ Welcome Please Sign In Horst Greczmiel Council on Environmental Quality April.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ron Bass, J.D., AICP, Senior Regulatory Specialist Jones & Stokes Common NEPA Mistakes and How to Avoid Them January 17, 2008 Oregon Department of Transportation.
Advertisements

September 16, Where have we been???? Economic downturn… Stimulus Program… Todays Program Packed agenda Lunch program… Ask questions… Thank you!
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
DEQ Mission By the end of the decade, Virginians will enjoy cleaner water available for all uses, improved air quality that supports communities and ecosystems,
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
NEPA and Property Acquisition May 19, 2014 Elizabeth Patel Environmental Protection Specialist FTA Office of Planning and Environment.
Bureau of Land Management Regulations Washington State Association of Counties Cooperating Agency & Coordination Training November 22, 2013 – Vancouver,
p The Federal Leadership Forum A Case Study NEPA Oil & Gas EPA NPS Cumulative Effects FS Unsatisfactory EIS UT EA MT BIA EXPLORE CO Air Quality Energy.
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
FOREST SERVICE GHG ISSUES AND INFORMATION NEEDS Elizabeth Reinhardt, FS Climate Change Office.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
EMS / NEPA Integration at the Idaho National Laboratory Bruce Angle & John Irving Battelle Energy Alliance Idaho National Laboratory Environmental Management.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
The National Environmental Policy Act
EPA!!!!.  One of the first laws ever created to protect the environment  Came into effect due to public concern about the deteriorating human environment.
Discussion of Draft CEQ Guidelines for Addressing Climate Change in NEPA Projects Tim Stroope, NEPA Coordinator, GMUG National Forest
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Rob Adams Vice President, Landrum & Brown NEPA Essentials — Tools: E, B, Desk Reference,
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
1 NEPA Document Formats Chapter 2 Module 3 HO# 4.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
Hazards Risk Management Course Revision Project Update George Haddow June 2012.
Completing the NEPA Process for CatEx Projects: Part 3 to CE Closeout.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
PRESENTED BY: RAHIMA NJAIDI MJUMITA 3 RD APRIL 2012.
Energy, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Development Presented by Cat Shrier, Ph.D., P.G. Water Resources Planner (403)
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Strengthening Science Supporting Fishery Management  Standards for Best Available Science  Implementation of OMB’s Peer Review Bulletin  Separation.
WRITING A BETTER PURPOSE AND NEED A COMMON SENSE APPROACH Kevin E. Davis Environmental Supervisor ODOT-OES.
Climate Change Regulation and Water Supply Craig Gannett Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Seattle Office Water Law in Washington Conference Law Seminars International.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
The National Environmental Policy Act and Oil and Gas Development in Region 8 WESTAR Oil and Gas Conference October 22, 2008.
Examples of benefits assessment of low emissions development Iris Jiménez National Institute of Ecology and Climate Change Mexico October 14th.2015.
The California Environmental Quality Act and Greenhouse Gas Emissions SB97 and the Proposed Amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines on Analyzing Greenhouse.
Local Agency Programs An Overview Gonzalo Puente, PE Shaun Bates, PE Development Engineer Project Manager.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Traditional Project Development Process ConstructionPlanningNEPA Design ROW CE, EIS, EA Location and Design Concept approval.
Developing a Purpose & Need Statement. Objectives  Understand when the P&N is developed in the PDP  Understand the importance of a well- written/well-justified.
CEQA and Climate Change Evaluating & Addressing GHG Emissions from Projects Barbara Lee, CAPCOA.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
The Role of NEPA Leasing and Mineral Rights Sales Subject to Environmental Use and Planning Provisions –The National Environmetal Policy Act of 1969 requires.
LBNE Environmental Assessment NEPA Informational Meeting May 23, 2013 Rod Walton, LBNE NEPA Manager.
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
Highlights of the “Procedural Guidance” Results of transportation planning process “inform” the NEPA process. Format of planning products for inclusion.
National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Engineer US Army Garrison.
Director’s Order 12 contains information concerning review of other agency proposals.
Ministry of Sustainble Development and Planning Vice-ministry of Environment, Natural Resources and Forestry Development Climate Change National Program.
The Climate Action Task Force’s Transportation Workgroup October 16, 2008 FacOps Conference Room B.
PURPOSE & NEED Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
National Environmental Policy Act An established US national policy Draft Year: 1969 Amendment Years: Section amended May 27, 1986 “Environmental.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
Standards Development for Climate Change  Consensus reached between UNFCCC & ISO that internationally accepted standards will be promoted globally  Include.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
Welcome to Community Solutions: NEPA & EJ: Leveraging Federal Resources to Advance Community Environmental, Economic and Health Vitality “A Focus on.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Unit 6 NEPA.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) Ryo Ishikawa
GCF business model.
Purpose & Need Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Environmental Requirements and planning grants
© Fresh Thoughts Consulting
Presentation transcript:

CEQ’s Proposed NEPA Guidance Listening Session _________________________ Welcome Please Sign In Horst Greczmiel Council on Environmental Quality April 15, 2010

NEPA Fundamentals Categorical Exclusions (CE) Environmental Assessments (EA) Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)

Draft Climate Change & GHG Guidance Purpose of the Guidance Two aspects: GHG Emissions Effects of the Proposed Action and Alternative Actions Relationship of Climate Change to a Proposed Action or Alternatives and to Proposal Design, Impacts, Mitigation and Adaptation Measures

Draft Climate Change & GHG Guidance When to Evaluate GHG Emissions  25,000 Metric Tons of CO 2 Equivalent GHG  Reference Point for Evaluation and Disclosure How to evaluate GHG Emissions  Use Information in Existing Technical Documents  Comment Requested on Land and Resource Management protocol What to consider  Energy Requirements

Draft Climate Change & GHG Guidance Considering Current or Projected Effects of CC  Affected Environment  Integrity of Development or Structure  Vulnerable Communities - Subsistence Nexus of Project Effects and CC Effects Adaptation Incorporate Existing Research by Reference

We appreciate your perspectives

Draft Categorical Exclusion Guidance Purpose of the Guidance Substantiating a New Categorical Exclusion – Evaluate Agency’s Implemented Actions – Use Impact Demonstration Projects – Rely on Professional Staff and Expert Opinions, and Scientific Analyses – Benchmark Public and Private Entities’ Experiences

Draft Categorical Exclusion Guidance Applying an Established Categorical Exclusion – Determine what Documentation is Necessary – Public Involvement Periodic Review of Categorical Exclusions

We appreciate your perspectives

Draft Mitigation and Monitoring Guidance Purpose of the guidance MITIGATION: - Mitigated Findings of No Significant Impact -- Distinct from Elements Integral to Design - Mitigation Commitments in an EIS / ROD -- Mitigation Alternatives - Mitigation Needs, Plans, Implementation -- Document and Monitor -- Issue: Funding - Deference to Agency Professionals

Draft Mitigation and Monitoring Guidance MONITORING: - Factors to Consider for Prioritizing Monitoring - Form / Method of Monitoring -- Agency discretion -- EMS / Landscape or Facility Monitoring -- Open Government Agenda/reporting Implementation Effectiveness Role of the Public

We appreciate your perspectives

Thank You Horst Greczmiel Council on Environmental Quality