Contents Introduction Economies of scale to exploit fixed costs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Independent Demand Inventory Systems
Advertisements

Statistical Inventory control models I
Inventory Modeling Concepts
Dr. A. K. Dey1 Inventory Management, Supply Contracts and Risk Pooling Dr. A. K. Dey.
IES 303 Chapter 15: Inventory Management Supplement E
Managing Short-Term Assets
SHORT-TERM FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Chapter 4 – Inventory Management Prepared by Patty Robertson May not be used without permission.
Inventory models Nur Aini Masruroh. Outline  Introduction  Deterministic model  Probabilistic model.
Chapter 30 – Pricing Strategies
Supply Chain Management (3rd Edition)
1 Lecture 6 Inventory Management Chapter Types of Inventories  Raw materials & purchased parts  Partially completed goods called work in progress.
Lecture 5 Project Management Chapter 17.
Supply Chain Management Lecture 27. Detailed Outline Tuesday April 27Review –Simulation strategy –Formula sheet (available online) –Review final Thursday.
Chapter 5 Inventory Control Subject to Uncertain Demand
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Supply Chain Management Lecture 18. Outline Today –Chapter 10 3e: Sections 1, 2 (up to page 273), 6 4e: Sections 1, 2, 3 (up to page 260) Thursday –Finish.
Supply Chain Management Lecture 19. Outline Today –Finish Chapter 10 –Start with Chapter 11 Sections 1, 2, 3, 7, 8 –Skipping 11.2 “Evaluating Safety Inventory.
Independent Demand Inventory 1. Inventory Firms ultimately want to sell consumers output in the hopes of generating a profit. Along the way to having.
Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain: Cycle Inventory
Chapter 12: Inventory Control Models
Reasons for Inventory To create a buffer against uncertainties in supply & demand To take advantage of lower purchasing and transportation cost associated.
13 Inventory Management.
Graduate Program in Business Information Systems Inventory Decisions with Certain Factors Aslı Sencer.
The Marketing Mix Price
Introduction Achieving strategic fit to competitive strategy
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Chopra and Meindl Supply Chain Management, 5e Global Edition 1-1 Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education. 1-1 Copyright.
Supply Chain Management (3rd Edition)
Managing Business Process Flows: Ch 6 Supply Chain Management
Slides 2 Inventory Management
Contents Introduction Managing supply Managing demand
CHAPTER 2 Supply Chain Management. SCM (CSCMP Definition) The integration of key business processes from end user through original suppliers, that provides.
Contents Introduction
Managing Uncertainty in Supply Chain: Safety Inventory Spring, 2014 Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation Chapter 11 Byung-Hyun Ha.
Inventory Management: Cycle Inventory-II 【本著作除另有註明外,採取創用 CC 「姓名標示 -非商業性-相同方式分享」台灣 3.0 版授權釋出】創用 CC 「姓名標示 -非商業性-相同方式分享」台灣 3.0 版 第五單元: Inventory Management:
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Chopra and Meindl Supply Chain Management, 5e 1-1 Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Chapter 14 Equilibrium and Efficiency. What Makes a Market Competitive? Buyers and sellers have absolutely no effect on price Three characteristics: Absence.
Bullwhip Effect.  Fluctuation in orders increase as they move up the supply chain  Demand information is distorted as it travels within the supply chain,
Inventory Management FIN 340 Prof. David S. Allen Northern Arizona University.
Inventory Management and Risk Pooling (1)
Inventory Models in SC Environment By Debadyuti Das.
1 Copyright © 2009 by Nelson Education, Ltd. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Pricing Concepts 16 Canadian Adaptation prepared by Don Hill, Langara College.
Chapter 3. Managing economies of scale in a supply chain: cycle inventory Learning objectives: Balance the appropriate costs to choose the optimal amount.
Chapter 14 Equilibrium and Efficiency McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Channel Coordination and Quantity Discounts Z. Kevin Weng Presented by Jing Zhou.
© 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 9-1 Chapter 9 Planning Supply and Demand in a Supply Chain: Managing Predictable Variability Supply Chain Management (2nd Edition)
Inventory Management for Independent Demand Chapter 12.
Chapter 11 Managing Inventory throughout the Supply Chain
CHAPTER 13 INVENTORY MANAGEMENT. THE CONCEPTS Crucial for low profit margin, low cost strategy Determining appropriate inventory level by conflicting.
11-1 Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain: Cycle Inventory Role of Cycle.
Building Competitive Advantage Through Functional-Level Strategies
Inventory Management for Independent Demand Chapter 12, Part 1.
Week 14 September 7, 2005 Learning Objectives:
Chapter 4 Inventory Management. INVENTORY MANAGEMENT Stockpile of the product, a firm is offering for sale and the components that make up the product.
11-1 Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain: Cycle Inventory Role of Cycle.
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
© 2007 Pearson Education 10-1 Chapter 11 Managing Economies of Scale in the Supply Chain: Cycle Inventory Supply Chain Management.
Calculating Prices Bait-and-switch advertising: Promoting a low-priced item to attract customers to whom the business then tries to sell a higher.
OPSM 301 Spring 2012 Class 13: Inventory Management
How much to purchase? How much to produce?
Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain: Cycle Inventory
Chapter 4 Inventory Management.
Pure Competition in the Short-Run
Managing Short-Term Assets
Chapter 12 Determining the Optimal Level of Product Availability
Chapter 14 Sourcing Decisions in a Supply Chain
Building Competitive advantage through functional level strategies
Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain Cycle Inventory
Building Competitive advantage through functional level strategies
Chapter 14 Sourcing Decisions in a Supply Chain
Building Competitive Advantage Through Functional-Level Strategies
Presentation transcript:

Managing Economies of Scale in the Supply Chain: Cycle Inventory Spring, 2014 Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation Chapter 10 Byung-Hyun Ha

Contents Introduction Economies of scale to exploit fixed costs Economies of scale to exploit quantity discount Short-term discounting: trade promotions Managing multiechelon cycle inventory

Introduction Cycle inventory Notation D: demand per unit time Q: quantity in a lot or batch size (order quantity) Cycle inventory management (basic) Determining order quantity Q that minimizes total inventory cost with demand D given inventory level time

Introduction Analysis of cycle Average inventory level (cycle inventory) = Q/2 Average flow time = Q/2D  Little’s law: (arrival rate) = (avg. number in system)/(avg. flow time) Example D = 2 units/day, Q = 8 units Average inventory level (7 + 5 + 3 + 1)/4 = 4 = Q/2 Average flow time (0.25 + 0.75 + 1.25 + 1.75 + 2.25 + 2.75 + 3.25 + 3.75)/8 = 2 = Q/2D

Introduction Costs that are influenced by order quantity C: (unit) material cost ($/unit) Average price paid per unit purchased  Quantity discount H: holding cost ($/unit/year) Cost of carrying one unit in inventory for a specific period of time Cost of capital, obsolescence, handling, occupancy, etc. H = hC  Related to average flow time S: ordering cost ($/order) Cost incurred per order Assuming fixed cost regardless of order quantity Cost of buyer time, transportation, receiving, etc.  10.2 Estimating cycle inventory-related costs in practice SKIP!

Introduction ? ? Assumptions Cycle optimality regarding total cost Constant (stable) demand, fixed lead time, infinite time horizon Cycle optimality regarding total cost Order arrival at zero inventory level is optimal. Identical order quantities are optimal. ? ?

Introduction ? Determining optimal order quantity Q* Economy of scale vs. diseconomy of scale, or Tradeoff between total fixed cost and total variable cost Q1 D ? Q2 D

Economies of Scale to Exploit Fixed Costs Lot sizing for a single product Economic order quantity (EOQ) Economic production quantity (EPQ) Production lot sizing Lot sizing for multiple products Aggregating multiple products in a single order Lot sizing with multiple products or customers

Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Assumption Same price regardless of order quantity Input D: demand per unit time, C: unit material cost S: ordering cost, H = hC: holding cost Decision Q: order quantity D/Q: average number of orders per unit time Q/D: order interval Q/2: average inventory level Total inventory cost per unit time (TC) TO: total order cost TH: total holding cost TM: total material cost

Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Total cost by order quantity Q Optimal order quantity Q* that minimizes total cost Opt. order frequency Avg. flow time TC Q Q*

Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Robustness around optimal order quantity (KEY POINT) Using order quantity Q' = Q* instead of Q*  0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 1/2( + 1/) 1.250 1.133 1.064 1.025 1.006 1.000 1.017 1.057 1.113 1.178 TC' = 1.25TC* TC*  0.5 1 2

Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Robustness regarding input parameters Mistake in indentifying ordering cost S' = S instead of real S Misleading to  0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 1/2( + 1/) 1.061 1.033 1.016 1.006 1.001 1.000 1.004 1.014 1.028 1.043 TC' = 1.061TC* TC*  What does mean by robust?  0.5 1 2

Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Sensitivity regarding demand (KEY POINT) Demand change from D to D1 = kD Opt. order frequency Avg. flow time

Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Reducing flow time by reducing ordering cost (KEY POINT) Efforts on reducing S to S1 = S Hoping Q1* = kQ* How much should S be reduced? (What is ?)   = k2 (ordering cost must be reduced by a factor of k2)

Economic Production Quantity (EPQ) Production of lot instead of ordering P: production per unit time Total cost by production lot size Q Optimal production quantity Q*  When P goes to infinite, Q* goes to EOQ. Q x D (P – D) Q/P Q/D – Q/P = Q(1/D – 1/P) 1/(D/Q) = Q/D

Aggregating Products in a Single Order Multiple products m products D: demand of each product S: ordering cost regardless of aggregation level All the other parameters across products are the same. All-separate ordering All-aggregate ordering  Impractical supposition for analysis purpose

Lot Sizing with Multiple Products Multiple products with different parameters m products Di, Ci, hi: demand, price, holding cost fraction of product i S: ordering cost each time an order is placed Independent of the variety of products si: additional ordering cost incurred if product i is included in order Ordering each products independently? Ordering all products jointly Decision n: number of orders placed per unit time Qi = Di /n: order quantity of item i Total cost and optimal number of orders

Lot Sizing with Multiple Products Example 10-3 and 10-4 Input Common transportation cost, S = $4,000 Holding cost fraction, h = 0.2 Ordering each products independently ITC* = $155,140 Ordering jointly n* = 9.75 JTC* = $155,140 i LE22B LE19B LE19A Di Ci si 12,000 $500 $1,000 1,200 120 i LE22B LE19B LE19A Qi* ni* TCi* 1,095 11.0 $109,544 346 3.5 $34,642 110 1.1 $10,954 i LE22B LE19B LE19A Qi* 1,230 123 12.3

Lot Sizing with Multiple Products How does joint ordering work? Reducing fixed cost by enjoying robustness around optimal order quantity Is joint ordering is always good? No! Then, possible other approaches? Partially joint NP-hard problem (i.e., difficult) A heuristic algorithm Subsection: “Lots are ordered and delivered jointly for a selected subset of the products” SKIP!

Exploiting Quantity Discount Total cost with quantity discount Types of quantity discount Lot size-based All unit quantity discount Marginal unit quantity discount Volume-based Decision making we consider Optimal response of a retailer Coordination of supply chain TO: total ordering cost TH: total holding cost TM: total material cost

All Unit Quantity Discount Pricing schedule Quantity break points: q0, q1, ..., qr , qr+1 where q0 = 0 and qr+1 =  Unit cost Ci when qi  Q  qi+1, for i=0,...,r where C0  C1    Cr  It is possible that qiCi  (qi + 1)Ci Solution procedure 1. Evaluate the optimal lot size for each Ci. 2. Determine lot size that minimizes the overall cost by the total cost of the following cases for each i. Case 1: qi  Qi*  qi+1 , Case 2: Qi*  qi , Case 3: qi+1  Qi* average cost per unit C0 C1 C2 ... Cr ... q0 q1 q2 q3 ... qr

All Unit Quantity Discount Example 10-7 r = 2, D = 120,000/year S = $100/lot, h = 0.2 Q* = 10,000 i 1 2 qi Ci $3.00 5,000 $2.96 10,000 $2.92

All Unit Quantity Discount Example 10-7 (cont’d) Sensitivity analysis Optimal order quantity Q* with regard to ordering cost (no discount) C = $3 (discount) (original) S = $100/lot 6,324 10,000 (reduced) S' = $4/lot 1,256

Marginal Unit Quantity Discount Pricing schedule Quantity break points: q0, q1, ..., qr , qr+1 where q0 = 0 and qr+1 =  Marginal unit cost Ci when qi  Q  qi+1, for i=0,...,r where C0  C1    Cr Price of qi units Vi = C0(q1 – q0) + C1(q2 – q1) + ... + Ci–1(qi – qi–1) Ordering Q units Suppose qi  Q  qi+1 . marginal cost per unit C0 C1 C2 ... Cr ... q0 q1 q2 q3 ... qr

Marginal Unit Quantity Discount Example 10-8 r = 2, D = 120,000/year S = $100/lot, h = 0.2 Q* = 16,961 i 1 2 qi Ci Vi $3.00 $0 5,000 $2.96 $15,000 10,000 $2.92 $29,800

Marginal Unit Quantity Discount Example 10-8 (cont’d) Sensitivity analysis Optimal order quantity Q* with regard to ordering cost  Higher inventory level (longer average flow time)? (no discount) C = $3 (discount) (original) S = $100/lot 6,324 16,961 (reduced) S' = $4/lot 1,256 15,775

Why Quantity Discount? 1. Improve coordination to increase total supply chain profit Each stage’s independent decision making for its own profit Hard to maximize supply chain profit (i.e., hard to coordinate) How can a manufacturer control a myopic retailer? Quantity discounts for commodity products Quantity discounts for products for which firm has market power 2. Extraction of surplus through price discrimination Revenue management (Ch. 15)  Other factors such as marketing that motivates sellers Munson and Rosenblatt (1998) Manufacturer (supplier) Retailer customers supply chain

Coordination for Total Supply Chain Profit Quantity discounts for commodity products Assumption Fixed price and stable demand  fixed total revenue  Max. profit  min. total cost Example case Two stages with a manufacture (supplier) and a retailer Manufacturer (supplier) Retailer customers SS = 250 hS = 0.2 CS = 2 SR = 100 hR = 0.2 CR = 3 D = 120,000

Coordination for Total Supply Chain Profit Quantity discounts for commodity products (cont’d) No discount Retailer’s (local) optimal order quantity ( supply chain’s decision) Q1 = (212,000100/0.23)1/2 = 6,325 Total cost (without material cost) TC1 = TC1S + TC1R = $6,008 + $3,795 = $9,803 Minimum total cost, TC*, regarding supply chain (coordination) Q* = 9,165 TC* = TC*S + TC*R = $5,106 + $4,059 = $9,165 Dilemma? Manufacturer saving by $902, but retailer cost increase by $264 How to coordinate (decision maker is the retailer)?

Coordination for Total Supply Chain Profit Quantity discounts for commodity products (cont’d) Lot size-based quantity discount offering by manufacturer q1 = 9,165, C0 = $3, C1 = $2.9978 Retailer’s (local) optimal order quantity (considering material cost) Q2 = 9,165 Total cost (without material cost) TC2 = TC2S + TC2R = $5,106 + $4,057 = $9,163 Savings (compared to no discount) Manufacturer: $902 Retailer: $264 (material cost) – $262 (inventory cost) = $2 KEY POINT For commodity products for which price is set by the market, manufacturers with large fixed cost per lot can use lot size-based quantity discounts to maximize total supply chain profit. Lot size-based discount, however, increase cycle inventory in the supply chain.

Coordination for Total Supply Chain Profit Quantity discounts for commodity products (cont’d) Other approach: setup cost reduction by manufacturer Retailer’s (local) optimal order quantity Q3 = Q1 = 6,325 Total cost (without material cost): no need to discount! TC3 = TC3S + TC3R = $3,162 + $3,795 = $6,957  Same with optimal supply chain cost when material cost is considered  Expanding scope of strategic fit Operations and marketing departments should be cooperate! Manufacturer (supplier) Retailer customers S'S = 100 hS = 0.2 CS = 2 SR = 100 hR = 0.2 CR = 3 D = 120,000

Coordination for Total Supply Chain Profit Quantity discounts for products with market power Assumption Manufacturer’s cost, CS = $2 Customer demand depending on price, p, set by retailer D = 360,000 – 60,000p  Profit depends on price. D = 360,000 – 60,000p Manufacturer (supplier) Retailer customers CS = 2 CR = ? p = ?

Coordination for Total Supply Chain Profit Quantity discounts for products with market power (cont’d) No coordination (deciding independently) Manufacturer’s decision on CR Expected retailer’s profit, ProfR ProfR = (p – CR)(360 – 60p) Retailer’s optimal price setting (behavior) when CR is given p1 = 3 + 0.5CR Demand by p1 (supplier’s order quantity) D = 360 – 60p1 = 180 – 30CR Expected manufacturer’s profit, ProfS ProfS = (CR – CS)(180 – 30CR)  CR1 that maximizes ProfR (manufacturer’s decision) CR1 = $4 Retailer’s decision on p1 with given CR1 p1 = $5 (D1 = 360,000 – 60,000p1 = 60,000) Supply chain profit, Prof01 Prof01 = ProfR1 + ProfS1 = $120,000 + $60,000 = $180,000

Coordination for Total Supply Chain Profit Quantity discounts for products with market power (cont’d) Coordinating supply chain Optimal supply chain profit, Prof0* Prof0 = (p – CS)(360 – 60p) p* = $4 D* = 120,000 Prof0* = $240,000  Double marginalization problem (local optimization) But how to coordinate? i.e., ProfS* = ?, ProfR* = ?

Coordination for Total Supply Chain Profit Quantity discounts for products with market power (cont’d) Two pricing schemes that can be used by manufacturer Two-part tariff Up-front fee $180,000 (fixed) + material cost $2/unit (variable) Retailer’s decision ProfR = (p – CR)(360 – 60p) p2 = 3 + 0.5CR = $4 Prof02 = ProfR2 + ProfS2 = $180,000 + $60,000 = $240,000  Retailer’s side: larger volume  more discount Volume-based quantity discount q1 = 120,000, C0 = $4, C1 = $3.5 p3 = $4 Prof03 = ProfR3 + ProfS3 = $180,000 + $60,000 = $240,000

Coordination for Total Supply Chain Profit Quantity discounts for products with market power (cont’d) KEY POINT For products for which the firm has market power, two-part tariffs or volume-based quantity discounts can be used to achieve coordination in the supply chain and maximizing supply chain profits. For those products, lot size-based discounts cannot coordinate the supply chain even in the presence of inventory cost. In such a setting, either a two-part tariff or a volume-based quantity discount, with the supplier passing on some of its fixed cost to the retailer, is needed for the supply chain to be coordinated and maximize profits. Lot size-based vs. volume-based discount Lot size-based: raising inventory level  suitable for supplier’s high setup cost  Hockey stick phenomenon & rolling horizon-based discount

Short-term Discounting: Trade Promotion Trade promotion by manufacturers Induce retailers to use price discount, displays, or advertising to spur sales. Shift inventory from manufactures to retailers and customers. Defend a brand against competition. Retailer’s reaction? Pass through some or all of the promotion to customers to spur sales. Pass through very little of the promotion to customers but purchase in greater quantity during the promotion period to exploit the temporary reduction in price. Forward buy  demand variability increase  inventory & flow time increase  supply chain profit decrease

Short-term Discounting: Trade Promotion Analysis Determining order quantity with discount Qd Unit cost discounted by d (C' = C – d) Assumptions Discount is offered only once. Customer demand remains unchanged. Retailer takes no action to influence customer demand. Qd Q* Qd/D 1 – Qd/D

Short-term Discounting: Trade Promotion Analysis (cont’d) Optimal order quantity without discount Q* = (2DS/hC)1/2 Optimal total cost without discount TC* = CD + (2DShC)1/2 Total cost with Qd Example 10-9 C = $3  Q* = 6,324 d = $0.15  Qd* = 38,236 (forward buy: 31,912  500%) KEY POINT Trade promotions lead to a significant increase in lot size and cycle inventory, which results in reduced supply chain profits unless the trade promotion reduces demand fluctuation.

Short-term Discounting: Trade Promotion Retailer’s action of passing discount to customers Example 10-10 Assumptions Customer demand: D = 300,000 – 60,000p Normal price: CR = $3 Ignoring all inventory-related cost Analysis Retailer’s profit, ProfR ProfR = (p – CR)(300 – 60p) Retailer’s optimal price setting with regard to CR p = 2.5 + 0.5CR No discount (CR1 = $3) p1 = $4, D1 = 60,000 Discount (CR2 = $2.85) p2 = $3.925, D2 = 64,500 (p1 – p2 = 0.075 < 0.15 = CR1 – CR2)

Short-term Discounting: Trade Promotion Retailer’ response to short-term discount Insignificant efforts on trade promotion, but High forward buying Not only by retailers but also by end customers Loss to total revenue because most inventory could be provided with discounted price KEY POINT Trade promotions often lead to increase of cycle inventory in supply chain without a significant increase in customer demand.

Short-term Discounting: Trade Promotion Some implications Motivation for every day low price (EDLP) Suitable to high elasticity goods with high holding cost e.g., paper goods strong brands than weaker brand (Blattberg & Neslin, 1990) Competitive reasons  Sometimes bad consequence for all competitors Discount by not sell-in but sell-though Scanner-based promotion

Managing Multiechelon Cycle Inventory Configuration Multiple stages and many players at each stage General policy -- synchronization Integer multiple order frequency or order interval Cross-docking (Skip!)