ON THE STRUCTURE OF A WORLD (WHICH MAY BE) DESCRIBED BY QUANTUM MECHANICS. A.WHAT DO WE KNOW ON THE BASIS OF ALREADY PERFORMED EXPERIMENTS? A A’ ~ S B.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantum measurements and quantum erasers
Advertisements

Quantum Correlations in Nuclear Spin Ensembles T. S. Mahesh Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune.
What really happens upon quantum measurement?[n eeds revision] References are more fully listed in my Phys Rev A paperPhys Rev A paper Art Hobson Prof.
Quantum Information Stephen M. Barnett University of Strathclyde The Wolfson Foundation.
Blaylock - Clark University 2/17/10 Wringing John Bell vocabulary the EPR paradox Bell’s theorem Bell’s assumptions what does it mean? Guy Blaylock Clark.
Bell inequality & entanglement
Macroscopic Realism Emerging from Quantum Physics Johannes Kofler and Časlav Brukner 15th UK and European Meeting on the Foundations of Physics University.
Bell’s inequalities and their uses Mark Williamson The Quantum Theory of Information and Computation
Entanglement and Quantum Correlations in Capacitively-coupled Junction Qubits Andrew Berkley, Huizhong Xu, Fred W. Strauch, Phil Johnson, Mark Gubrud,
1 Recap Heisenberg uncertainty relations  The product of the uncertainty in momentum (energy) and in position (time) is at least as large as Planck’s.
Solid state realisation of Werner quantum states via Kondo spins Ross McKenzie Sam Young Cho Reference: S.Y. Cho and R.H.M, Phys. Rev. A 73, (2006)
Quantum Error Correction Michele Mosca. Quantum Error Correction: Bit Flip Errors l Suppose the environment will effect error (i.e. operation ) on our.
Dr Mark Hadley A Gravitational Explanation for Quantum Theory & non-time-orientable manifolds.
Quantum Oracles Jesse Dhillon, Ben Schmid, & Lin Xu CS/Phys C191 Final Project December 1, 2005.
PHYS Quantum Mechanics PHYS Quantum Mechanics Dr Jon Billowes Nuclear Physics Group (Schuster Building, room 4.10)
Quantum Entanglement David Badger Danah Albaum. Some thoughts on entanglement... “Spooky action at a distance.” -Albert Einstein “It is a problem that.
Introduction to Quantum Information Processing Lecture 4 Michele Mosca.
Dirac Notation and Spectral decomposition Michele Mosca.
SQUID Based Quantum Bits James McNulty. What’s a SQUID? Superconducting Quantum Interference Device.
Quantum violation of macroscopic realism and the transition to classical physics Faculty of Physics University of Vienna, Austria Institute for Quantum.
Necessary and sufficient conditions for macroscopic realism from quantum mechanics Johannes Kofler Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics (MPQ) Garching/Munich,
Truong Pham.  Ψ: state of a particle  Φ: state of a measuring device  Ψ(+) : state of a particle that has an upspin  Ψ(-): state of a particle.
Study and characterisation of polarisation entanglement JABIR M V Photonic sciences laboratory, PRL.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER School of Physics and Astronomy FACULTY OF MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES Introduction to entanglement Jacob Dunningham.
Superconducting Qubits Kyle Garton Physics C191 Fall 2009.
In 1887,when Photoelectric Effect was first introduced by Heinrich Hertz, the experiment was not able to be explained using classical principles.
Quantum, classical & coarse-grained measurements Johannes Kofler and Časlav Brukner Faculty of Physics University of Vienna, Austria Institute for Quantum.
University of Gdańsk, Poland
Witnessing Quantum Coherence IWQSE 2013, NTU Oct. 15 (2013) Yueh-Nan Chen ( 陳岳男 ) Dep. of Physics, NCKU National Center for Theoretical Sciences (South)
The Quantum Measurement Problem Art Hobson Professor Emeritus of Physics University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Handout: Phys Rev A paperPhys Rev A paper.
Steering witnesses and criteria for the (non-)existence of local hidden state (LHS) models Eric Cavalcanti, Steve Jones, Howard Wiseman Centre for Quantum.
A comparison between Bell's local realism and Leggett-Garg's macrorealism Group Workshop Friedrichshafen, Germany, Sept 13 th 2012 Johannes Kofler.
(=“P B ”) (=“P C ”) (=“P B or C ”). NEITHER B NOR C “SELECTED”…. BY EACH INDIVIDUAL ATOM !
Waves, Light & Quanta Tim Freegarde Web Gallery of Art; National Gallery, London.
A condition for macroscopic realism beyond the Leggett-Garg inequalities APS March Meeting Boston, USA, March 1 st 2012 Johannes Kofler 1 and Časlav Brukner.
Bell tests with Photons Henry Clausen. Outline:  Bell‘s theorem  Photon Bell Test by Aspect  Loopholes  Photon Bell Test by Weihs  Outlook Photon.
Violation of local realism with freedom of choice Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Austria Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information.
Entanglement for two qubits interacting with a thermal field Mikhail Mastyugin The XXII International Workshop High Energy Physics and Quantum Field Theory.
Quantum Mechanics1 Schrodinger’s Cat. Quantum Mechanics2 A particular quantum state, completely described by enough quantum numbers, is called a state.
“Experimental quantum computers” or, the secret life of experimental physicists 1 – Qubits in context Hideo Mabuchi, Caltech Physics and Control & Dynamical.
Uni-Heidelberg Physikalisches Insitut Jian-Wei Pan Multi-Particle Entanglement & It’s Application in Quantum Networks Jian-Wei Pan Lecture Note.
Indefinite causal order in quantum mechanics Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna & Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information, Vienna Mateus.
Mesoscopic Physics Introduction Prof. I.V.Krive lecture presentation Address: Svobody Sq. 4, 61022, Kharkiv, Ukraine, Rooms. 5-46, 7-36, Phone: +38(057)707.
A6S1 Is Quantum Mechanics the Whole Truth?* A.J. Leggett University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1.Why bother? 2.What are we looking for? 3.What have.
Nonlocality test of continuous variable state 17, Jan,2003 QIPI meeting Wonmin Son Queen’s University, Belfast.
M ACROSCOPIC Q UANTUM T UNNELLING AND C OHERENCE : T HE E ARLY D AYS A. J. Leggett Department of Physics University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Quantum.
Bell’s Inequality.
A1 “BASIC QUANTUM MECHANICS, AND SOME SURPRISING CONSEQUENCES” Anthony J. Leggett Department of Physics University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Chapter 3 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics. Questions QM answers 1) How is the state of a system described mathematically? (In CM – via generalized coordinates.
SCHLC- 1 S CHRÖDINGER ’ S C AT AND H ER L ABORATORY C OUSINS A.J. Leggett Dept. of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1 st Erwin Schrödinger.
DPG 1 What is Realism in Physics? What is the Price for Maintaining It? A. J. Leggett Dept. of Physics University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 75 th.
No Fine Theorem for Macrorealism Johannes Kofler Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics (MPQ) Garching/Munich, Germany Quantum and Beyond Linnaeus University,
Using Neutrino Oscillations to Test the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics David Kaiser.
No Fine theorem for macroscopic realism
Quantum Information Promises new insights Anthony J
The Structure of a World Described by Quantum Mechanics
The Structure of a World Described by Quantum Mechanics A. J
Study of nonlocal correlations in macroscopic measurement scenario
Is Quantum Mechanics the Whole Truth?*
Realism Versus Quantum Mechanics: Implications of Some Recent Experiments A. J. Leggett Department of Physics University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
On one set of runs (1“A,” 2 “C”) can measure correlation of A and C
Classical World because of Quantum Physics
Mario Palma.
Double Slit Experiment
“BASIC QUANTUM MECHANICS, AND SOME SURPRISING CONSEQUENCES”
MESO/MACROSCOPIC TESTS OF QM: MOTIVATION
Does the Everyday World Really Obey Quantum Mechanics?
Does the Everyday World Really Obey Quantum Mechanics?
T A. WHAT DO WE KNOW ON THE BASIS OF ALREADY PERFORMED EXPERIMENTS?
Experimental test of nonlocal causality
Presentation transcript:

ON THE STRUCTURE OF A WORLD (WHICH MAY BE) DESCRIBED BY QUANTUM MECHANICS. A.WHAT DO WE KNOW ON THE BASIS OF ALREADY PERFORMED EXPERIMENTS? A A’ ~ S B B’ ~ ~ 100 km polarizer set in direction a ~ A “A = + 1” “A = - 1” T1

WHAT DOES EXPERIMENTAL VIOLATION OF CHSH INEQUALITY IMPLY? Must reject (at least) one of 1.Einstein locality 2.Induction 3.MCFD  macroscopic counterfactual definiteness. A’ Had photon been switched into rather than. A would not have been definite. But in actuality, A is definite. (bell rings, computer prints out…). So: at which point did A become definite? ~ A switch A polarizer here? bell T2

MACROSCOPIC QUANTUM COHERENCE (MQC) “Q = +1” “Q = -1” macroscopically distinct states Example: “flux qubit”: Supercond. ring Josephson junction Existing experiments: if raw data interpreted in QM terms, state at t int is quantum superposition (not mixture!) of states and. + -  : how “macroscopically” distinct? time  titi t int tftf “Q=+1” “Q=-1” T3

Analog of CHSH theorem for MQC: Any macrorealistic theory satisfies constraint ≤ 2 which is violated (for appropriate choices of the t i ) by the QM predictions for an “ideal” 2-state system Definition of “macrorealistic” theory: conjunction of 1) induction 2) macrorealism (Q(t) = +1 or -1 for all t) 3) noninvasive measurability (NIM) In this case, unnatural to assert 3) while denying 2). NIM cannot be explicitly tested, but can make “plausible” by ancillary experiment to test whether, when Q(t) is known to be (e.g.) +1, a noninvasive measurement does or does not affect subsequent statistics. But measurements must be projective (“von Neumann”). + - M NIM: measuring device If Q = +1, throw away If Q = -1, keep T4

in-plane KE lattice potential inter-conduction electron Coulomb interaction in-plane FT of Coulomb interaction “bare” density response function T5

T6

*El-Azrak et al., Phys. Rev. B 49, 9846 (1994) T7

S UPERFLUIDITY AND “S UPERSOLIDITY ”: T HE T OPOLOGY OF M ANY -B ODY W AVE F UNCTIONS (some problems just don’t go away)  R A B C T8

T9

In “standard” (TTLS) tunneling 2-level systems T10