ALLOCATION OF RbD ACROSS RELEVANT PERIOD DNOs’ comments on previous Workstream discussion ALLOCATION OF RbD ACROSS RELEVANT PERIOD DNOs’ comments on previous.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MOD 326 – Allocation of Unidentified Gas Following the Appointment of the AUGE August 2010.
Advertisements

PN UNC Workgroup (Settlement topic) Allocations Overview 4 th December 2012.
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic) Meeting 3, 18 th July 2011.
Proposal to Change the UNC AQ ‘Backstop Date’ to accommodate the 2010 Seasonal Normal Review DESC – 2nd October 2009 NOTE: Instances where TBC is stated.
USRV Incentives Review Chris Warner. USRV Resolution Responsibility and Occurrence  E8.1.1  “…the User shall investigate Reconciliation Values that.
1 Project Nexus Market Differentiation Topic Workgroup 14 th & 15 th July 2009.
Project Nexus Workgroup 9 th September Background During detailed design a number of areas have been identified that require clarification with.
CSEP Transportation Charges 11 th August Background Action NEX0604 from 18 th June PN UNC requested Xoserve to provide a presentation on how Supply.
CSEPs Update Chris Warner. 2 Background  Review Group 0157  Incremental Improvements (eg: UNC Modifications 0167, 0180V, 0200)  Ofgem CSEP Group 
Credit Scenarios – Modification 0335 Joanna Ferguson.
1 Mod Review Group 126 Feb 07 slides 126 Review Group – Restriction of Invoice Billing Period  The review proposal is primarily concerned with restricting.
UNC G7.3.7 Invoicing Read Estimation Proposal Requirement for Read Estimation & Proposed Methodology Dean Johnson Distribution Workstream – 25 th August.
Nexus Workgroup CSEP Transition Topic June
IGT Single Service Provision Requirements Update – 27 th March 2013.
PN UNC Workgroup iGT Services 7 th February 2012.
Mod 270 Potential Options Rob Hill 15/02/2009. Six potential options following discussion at last months Development Workgroup OptionNameDescription 1Elective.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement 2013/14 6 th February 2012.
1 To re-define the Aggregate Reconciliation Period to reflect the period to which the charge relates.
1 Project Nexus Approach to modelling costs and benefits Cesar Coelho Ofgem Project Nexus UNC Workgroup 15 May 2012.
Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Fiona Cottam.
Modification Proposal 0395 & 0398 – Limitation on Retrospective Invoicing and Invoice Correction 1 st December 2011.
1 v1 iGT CSEP Billing Solution ScottishPower Proposals April 08.
1 Mod Review Group 126 Mar 2007 slides 126 Review Group – Restriction of Invoice Billing Period  The review proposal is primarily concerned with restricting.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement – Interim Report findings 17 th September 2012.
PN UNC 4 th September 2012 Reconciliation Issues (Action: NEX06/02)
Development Workgroup 0282 Action 018 – impact on RbD 13 September 2010.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement 2014/15 15 th May 2013.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 24 th October Objectives of the Workgroups To determine detailed business requirements Consider/review comments made.
Replacement of Any Read – Initial views. 2 Assumptions  Can’t re-open NDM Allocation or Energy Balancing after D+5  Can’t go back to a read before prevailing.
PN UNC Workgroup Settlement Issues 1 st November 2011.
1 UNC Review Group 175 – Encouraging Participation in the Elective Daily Metered Regime 26 th June 2008.
UNC Modification Proposal 0380 Periodic Annual Quantity Calculation Calculation of Daily Supply Point Capacity Alan Raper – DNCMF 26 th September 2011.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 10 th January Objectives of the Workgroups To determine business principles for future Invoicing processes –Consider/review.
Project Nexus UNC Workstream Consolidation of High-Level Principles Fiona Cottam 19 May 2010.
1 Modification 0152V Implementation Matters 25 October 2007.
CONFIDENTIAL - Modification Proposal 0395 © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc. All rights Reserved. 1.
Supply Point Register 7th December 2011
Supply Point Register 10th January 2012
UNC Modification Proposal 0202 National Grid Distribution
Options for Mod 640 Replacement
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 4th October 2011.
Weekly Progress Update 3rd Aug 2018
Rebecca Knight Mod 644 UIG Analysis.
Action 0002: Meter Error Notifications
Review Group 178 SSP as Domestic only.
Modification th July 2008.
Project Nexus Workgroup
Weekly Progress Update 13 July 2018
CSEPs Reconciliation Proposals
Rolling AQ Review Group 177.
Weekly Progress Update 15 June 2018
Modification 0117 – Additional Considerations
Project Nexus Workgroup
Weekly Progress Update 11 May 2018
Project Nexus Workgroup
Modification Proposal 115 – ‘Correct Apportionment of NDM Error’
Genuine Reconciliation
AUG Query Responses 21st November 2013.
Project Nexus Workgroup
Modification Proposal 115 – ‘Correct Apportionment of NDM Error’
Nexus Workgroup Mod 0473 Presentation
Project Nexus Workgroup
Modification 421 – Updates and Benefits Case
Reconciliation Volume Impacts 25 January 2008
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup Meeting 14 – Meter Reading
Project Nexus Workgroup
Modification Proposal 136
REVIEW GROUP 178 – AN ALTERNATE SOLUTION
Unidentified Gas (UIG)
Xoserve Draft UIG Incentives Modifications 20 May 2019
Presentation transcript:

ALLOCATION OF RbD ACROSS RELEVANT PERIOD DNOs’ comments on previous Workstream discussion ALLOCATION OF RbD ACROSS RELEVANT PERIOD DNOs’ comments on previous Workstream discussion Linda Whitcroft

1 Current RbD Allocation Process  Daily Shipper AQs aggregated to one monthly AQ (by Shipper, by LDZ) in order to allocate market shares  Three “pots” used for RbD allocation – 4 sectors: (UNC E.7)  1 month sector  6 month sector  12 month sector  LDZ measurement sector (L)  special case 1 month sector

2 Current process – continued RbD Sectors and Sources  1 Month Sector (M)  Sources:  DM Estimate to Actual  NDM Monthly read meters  Adjustments to Monthly read meters  Reconciliation of LSPs on CSEPs  Adjustments to LSPs on CSEPs  SSP Adjustments <1 month duration  6 Month Sector (6)  Sources:  NDM Non-Monthly read meters  Adjustments to Non-Monthly read meters  SSP Adjustments 1-4 month duration  12 Month Sector (A)  Sources:  DM Annual Resynchronisations  SSP Adjustments >4 month duration  LDZ Measurement Sector (L) (Special case 1 month sector)  Sources:  LDZ Measurement Errors

3 Current process - continued  All reconciliation is allocated to one of the sectors, totalled and then divided equally across the number of months in each sector  Each monthly slice is allocated to RbD Shippers using their market shares  Maximum RbD period is 12 months. Therefore Shippers who exit the market have assurance that RbD charges will cease after this time

4 Suggested process discussed at previous Workstream  Apportion all LSP reconciliations through RbD over the relevant period  Impacts  Every LSP reconciliation would have an opposite RbD allocation. On average 200,000 LSP meter reads/adjustments processed monthly, hence 200,000 sectors to calculate  Requires significant amount of data storage and processing  Need to hold daily AQs on system back to RbD start date (1.2.98)  Need to calculate and store daily market shares  Need to calculate and store total daily LDZ AQ  Off line reconciliation – impacts on off line systems/processes to store additional data  Potential issues on Shippers exiting the market (no foreseeable close-out), e.g.  terminations  voluntary discontinuance  mergers/acquisitions

5 Is the focus on the right solution? Underlying issues that cause RbD allocation for inappropriate period  Portfolio data issues  Infrequent/incorrect meter readings (filter failures)  LDZ measurement errors

6 Comments/Conclusions  DNOs’ assumption that draft Modification was raised to address LDZ metering issues  Scope of metering issues? – Those meting 643 notification process requirements (>£1million or >50gWh)?  If so, due to low volumes and clear trigger points an off line solution could be possible to allow RbD to be allocated across relevant period N.B. Consideration would need to be given on prospective errors and whether retrospective data would be available. Also, issues would still remain on rules for Shippers exiting the market. DNOs believe that this process is unsuitable for all LSP reconciliations due to scale, complexity and it does not address the root causes