Denver Public Schools Teacher Compensation Design Team April 23, 2014 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Designing a System of Performance-Based Pay Charlotte Danielson
Advertisements

1 (c) 2008 The McGraw Hill Companies Redesigning Teacher Salary Structures School Finance: A Policy Perspective, 4e Chapter 12.
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
Teacher Evaluation and Rewards OECD Mexico Joint Workshop December 1-2, 2009 Susan Sclafani National Center on Education and the Economy.
TEACHER EVALUATION What it is going to look like….
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Cincinnati Public Schools Teacher Evaluation System.
Continuum of Teacher Development and Shared Accountability Leading to Increased Student Performance Teaching Quality Policy Center Education Commission.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
1 Attracting and Retaining Great Teachers in Denver Public Schools The Professional Compensation System for Teachers Brad Jupp March 30 & 31, 2008.
RAPID CITY AREA SCHOOLS AUGUST 7, 2012 Denver ProComp Plan Summary.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Presented by Dr. Joe Robinson SENATE BILL Senate Bill 2033 Became Effective on May 28, 2010 Senate-Coffee, Jolley, Ford, Rice and Leftwich House-Benge.
Students Come First Senate Bill 1110 and Trailer Bill
Massachusetts Department of Education EDUCATOR DATABASE Informational Sessions Overview: September 2005 Web:
TRACS Toledo Review and Alternative Compensation System.
Educator Compensation Proposals for North Carolina Educator Effectiveness and Compensation Task Force March 31, 2014.
Transforming Education in Kentucky EPSB and TEK 1.
EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION UPDATE Michigan Association of School Personnel Administrators Conference December 3, 2010 Flora L. Jenkins, Director Office of.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
META Alternate Licensure Program for Special Education Teachers Terry Dozier, Director VCU Center for Teacher Leadership Wednesday, May 24, 2006 National.
Performance Pay in Arizona
PUSD Compensation Project Overview Governing Board Meeting March 14, 2013.
Minneapolis Public Schools QComp An Overview of Quality Compensation In Minneapolis Bill Gibbs Site administrator Kenny School Former district QComp Coordinator.
“Teachers do make a difference…” - Jere Brophy, 1979.
Students Come First Senate Bill 1110 and Trailer Bill
Teachers Lead, Students Learn A landmark teacher contract that takes the transformation of Baltimore City Public Schools to the next level September 29,
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
How to attract and retain the best people in the Civil Service Albania perspective Fatmir Demneri Director Training Institute of Public Administration.
FASPA Conference October, 2010 Implementing a Salary Differential Program.
Student Growth Objectives Overview and Impact on Educational Specialists.
1 Douglas County Schools Colorado A Strategic Approach to Teacher Compensation & Appraisal.
North Carolina Teacher Salaries State Board of Education March 2013 Alexis Schauss, Director of School Business.
Presentation Intro. The Future of Educator Compensation: Strategic and Sustainable Salary Structures Patrick Schuermann Center for Educator Compensation.
Thebroadfoundations PAY FOR PERFORMANCE PACE Conference Oakland and Los Angeles, CA March 2009.
Pay For Performance Plan Certified Staff Presentation.
WCER-CPRE,  2000, Allan Odden CPRE Research on New Forms of Teacher Compensation.
April –February 2014 – Advisory Council (SCAC) convenes –April 2014 – NYSED School Counselor Summit –June 2014 – Summit recommendations to BOR.
Rewarding Excellence in the Classroom Idaho’s Pay for Performance Plan
The No Child Left Behind Act Of 2001 Strategies for Improving Teacher Quality Dr. Kathleen Madigan American Board for Certification of Teacher Excellence.
Alicia Currin-Moore Executive Director, TLE Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Collective Bargaining Retreat for Management Discussion of the Impact of Measuring Teacher and Leader Effectiveness on Collective Bargaining August 17,
IDAHO STATE TEACHER ADVANCEMENT AND RECOGNITION SYSTEM.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Framework Agreement – Associate Tutors. Background on framework agreement Benefits of framework Job evaluation Associate Tutor grades Moving to the new.
Toolkit #3: Effectively Teaching and Leading Implementation of the Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including the Common Core.
STAR3 Project for WS/FCS. STAR3 All students deserve and thrive under a great teacher that cares for their well being. Our responsibility is to provide.
Issues and Actions: Joint Study Committee of Teacher Training and Certification & Alliance Math and Science Task Force Kelly Henson, Executive Director.
PI -34 What Every Educator Should Know R. Schemelin.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
PERFORMANCE BASED COMPENSATION UPDATE ON THE PROGRAM TO REVISE PROVIDENCE PRINCIPALS’ COMPENSATION IN
What Works? What Doesn’t? Overview of Teacher Compensation: What Works? What Doesn’t? James H. Stronge College of William and Mary Williamsburg, Virginia.
2012 – 2013 School Year. OTES West Branch Local Schools.
Briefing to Portfolio Committee on Public Enterprises On Performance Management of SOE Senior Management 10 November 2009.
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Cincinnati Public Schools Teacher Evaluation System.
BTSA Induction Support Provider Training Karen Evans Eileen Davis Rich Redmond
Teaching Leah Nature of the Work Teachers act as facilitators to help students learn and apply concepts to math, science, english, and history. Teachers.
TEACHER LEADERSHIP AND COMPENSATION SYSTEM OVERVIEW.
Overview of the ProComp Evaluation What to talk about when you can’t talk results. Robert Reichardt AEFP Seattle WA, 3/24/11 1.
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
Finance in Education Chapter 15.
1 ProComp The Denver Public Schools/Denver Classroom Teachers Association Professional Compensation System for Teachers Presented to the Board of Education.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Arizona’s Performance Based Compensation National Conference on Teacher Compensation and Evaluation Chicago, IL November 21-22, 2002 Penny Kotterman, President.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Teacher Compensation Design Team
Roles and Responsibilities
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
Presentation transcript:

Denver Public Schools Teacher Compensation Design Team April 23,

2 Overview of ProComp

About ProComp  ProComp is a bargained agreement between the Denver Classroom Teachers Association (DCTA) and Denver Public Schools (DPS) that is designed to link teacher compensation more directly with the mission and goals of DPS and DCTA.  Voters approved tax increase in Nov to fund ProComp.  The system aims to accomplish the following goals: → Rewards and recognizes teachers for meeting and exceeding expectations. → Links compensation more closely with instructional outcomes for students. → Enables the district to attract and retain the most qualified and effective teachers by offering uncapped annual earnings in a fair system. 3

Milestones: Collaboration Between DCTA and DPS August 1999: DPS and DCTA agree to the “Pay for Performance Pilot” December 2014: DCTA and DPS to agree upon revisions to ProComp with input from teachers Oct 2001 to Jan 2004: Joint Task Force on Teacher Compensation develops ProComp based in part on learnings from pilot March 2004: DCTA members ratify ProComp 59.8% to 40.2% November 2005: Denver voters approve property tax increase August 2008: DPS and DCTA reach agreement on significant revisions to ProComp with support of 78% of teachers

ProComp Ballot Language Denver Public Schools (School District No. 1) taxes shall be increased $25 million per year, adjusted for inflation, solely and exclusively to fund the professional compensation system for teachers (ProComp), which tax increase shall terminate if ProComp terminates, including compensation to teachers for: → Teaching in hard to staff schools. → Teaching in hard to fill positions such as math, science and special education. → Increasing teaching knowledge and teaching skills by successfully completing ProComp approved advanced degrees, professional teaching standards licenses and additional training to improve classroom skills. → Positive evaluations of teaching performance. → Meeting or exceeding objectives for student learning. → Achieving distinguished school status. 5

ProComp Overview: How are starting salaries set? 6 Schedule changes annually. Base salary will increase without moving on the schedule. Level of education at time of hiring Years of experience at time of hiring Starting salaries are set based on the district or state’s minimum salary schedule which is updated annually.

ProComp Overview: How do incentives work? 7 BASE SALARY INCREASESBONUSES One-time compensation Incentive is paid only in the years in which it is earned Ongoing compensation Once the incentive is earned, it is paid every year Base salary increases and bonuses are set as a percent of an index value 2013/2014 value is $38,117 Index value is calculated using the first year entry salary for someone with a BA and no experience Example: A 1% bonus is worth $381 this academic year HOW ARE BASE SALARY INCREASES AND BONUSES CALCULATED?

ProComp Overview: What is rewarded? Market Incentives: Teach where you’re needed most Knowledge and Skills: Develop in your profession Comprehensive Professional Evaluation: Aim for effectiveness Student Growth: Helping students and your school

Student Growth 9 Top Performing School School is Distinguished or Meets Expectations School Performance Framework (SPF) 6.4% of index $2,440 High Growth School School achieves blue or green growth stoplight School Performance Framework (SPF) 6.4% of index $2,440 Exceeds Expectations 50%+ of students are in 55 th percentile or higher for statewide student growth in math and language arts TCAP 6.4% of index $2,440 Student Growth Objectives Meets one or two approved SGOs SGOs 2 SGOs 1 SGO 1% of index $ INCENTIVESDESCRIPTIONASSESSMENTBASEBONUSVALUE

Market Incentives Hard to Staff Assignment Fulfills requirements and is staffed to a “Hard to Staff” role Policy & Vacancy rates 6.4% of index* $2,440 Hard to Serve Assignment Serves in a school designated “High Needs” Percent FRL & Alternative school designation 6.4% of index $2,440 INCENTIVESDESCRIPTIONASSESSMENTBASEBONUSVALUE *per assignment

Knowledge and Skills INCENTIVESDESCRIPTIONASSESSMENTBASEBONUSVALUE Professional Development Units Completion of an eligible Professional Development Unit PDUs complete 1-14 years 15+ years 2% of index $762 Tuition and Student Loan Reimbursement Reimbursement for satisfactory completion of approved coursework or an outstanding loan $1,000/yr (lifetime max is $4,000) Advanced Degrees, Licenses and Certificates Completion of an advanced degree or NBPTS relevant to current or proposed assignment Degrees completed 9% of index $3,431* *payable once every 3 years

Comprehensive Professional Evaluation INCENTIVESDESCRIPTIONASSESSMENTBASEBONUS % OF INDEX Comprehensive Professional Evaluation Satisfactory rating on comprehensive professional evaluation LEAP 1-14 years 3% of index $1,144* *payable once every 3 years, except for Non-Probationary Teachers

ProComp incentives are earned at different rates – from 7% to 80% of teachers each year 13

Examples of how teachers increase compensation over time ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE Works in a Hard to Staff Assignment, in a Hard to Serve & High Growth school Usually meets SGOs and usually receives satisfactory CPE ratings Completes a PDU every 2-3 years 14 Example 1: Teacher A Example 2: Teacher B Example 3: Teacher C Works in a High Growth school Usually meets SGOs and usually receives satisfactory CPE ratings Completes a PDU most years and completes a Master’s degree while teaching at DPS Works in a High Growth school Usually meets SGOs and usually receives satisfactory CPE ratings Completes a PDU every 2-3 years Annual bonus earnedBase builders earnedStarting base salaryLegend:

Design Team - The Work Ahead Based on your experience and observations of ProComp over time, what changes if any do you think we should consider as a group? What information will be useful to the Design Team in undertaking this work?

16 Appendix: Additional ProComp Data

ProComp Teacher Perspectives (2010) 70% OF AUTOMATICALLY-ENROLLED TEACHERS WOULD HAVE OPTED-IN TO PROCOMP EDUCATOR PERSPECTIVE ON PROCOMP Participating teachers and principals are generally comfortable with ProComp as a compensation system Teachers who participate in ProComp hold more favorable views of ProComp than non-participators Generally, principals reported more favorable beliefs about ProComp than did teachers A majority of participants believe that ProComp will ultimately improve student achievement Source: ProComp External Evaluation Report

ProComp Teacher Perspectives (2010) TEACHERS BELIEVE THAT PROCOMP CAN IMPROVE INSTRUCTION Source: ProComp External Evaluation Report PROCOMP IS GENERALLY ALIGNED TO TEACHERS’ PROFESSIONAL GOALS

Teachers may be unclear on the requirements for some ProComp incentives Source: 2011 ProComp External evaluation; 2011 ProComp report on Teacher Retention “[When I signed my employment contract], ProComp was just a confusing thing at the bottom of the job description.”-DPS Teacher