Development Workgroup 0282 Action 018 – impact on RbD 13 September 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MOD 326 – Allocation of Unidentified Gas Following the Appointment of the AUGE August 2010.
Advertisements

PN UNC Workgroup (Settlement topic) Allocations Overview 4 th December 2012.
© 2007 E.ON Nexus AQ Requirements To support the current business processes We need to maintain performance and enable market operation as is using current.
Mod 232 Anna Taylor Pricing Manager. 1 Mod 232 An alternative methodology for allocating unidentified energy Currently allocated by RbD entirely in SSP.
Proposal to Change the UNC AQ ‘Backstop Date’ to accommodate the 2010 Seasonal Normal Review DESC – 2nd October 2009 NOTE: Instances where TBC is stated.
USRV Incentives Review Chris Warner. USRV Resolution Responsibility and Occurrence  E8.1.1  “…the User shall investigate Reconciliation Values that.
1 Project Nexus Market Differentiation Topic Workgroup 14 th & 15 th July 2009.
Project Nexus Workgroup 9 th September Background During detailed design a number of areas have been identified that require clarification with.
CSEP Transportation Charges 11 th August Background Action NEX0604 from 18 th June PN UNC requested Xoserve to provide a presentation on how Supply.
AQ Overview.  Annual Quantity (AQ) is a value held for each meter point that reflects the expectation as to the volume of gas that a meter point will.
1 Mod Review Group 126 Feb 07 slides 126 Review Group – Restriction of Invoice Billing Period  The review proposal is primarily concerned with restricting.
UNC G7.3.7 Invoicing Read Estimation Proposal Requirement for Read Estimation & Proposed Methodology Dean Johnson Distribution Workstream – 25 th August.
Project Nexus Workgroup Read Validation following Transfer of Ownership 13 th October
MP0131: Meter Error Notifications Liz Spierling – July 4 th 2007.
UNC Review Group 0178 National Grid Distribution “Reclassification of SSP to Domestic only” Review Group Meeting – 22 February 2008 Chris Warner.
Performance Assurance 21 st May Value Chain. Value Chain Xoserve would like to propose an approach to further aid the development of the Performance Assurance.
Governance and Charging Methodology for User Pays Services 10 th January 2007.
Meter Read Validation 11 th August Background The meter read validation principles were developed under ‘The Settlement’ BRD and formed part of.
1 Performance Assurance Workgroup January 2014 A proposal by Xoserve for a Performance Assurance methodology.
Mod 270 Potential Options Rob Hill 15/02/2009. Six potential options following discussion at last months Development Workgroup OptionNameDescription 1Elective.
AQ Tolerance Proposal Mod 209 – August Page 2Theme Date Department AQ Tolerances  Provide a view of appropriate tolerances for AQ validation 
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement 2013/14 6 th February 2012.
1 To re-define the Aggregate Reconciliation Period to reflect the period to which the charge relates.
Project Nexus Workgroup – Invoicing 11 th August 2014.
1 Project Nexus Approach to modelling costs and benefits Cesar Coelho Ofgem Project Nexus UNC Workgroup 15 May 2012.
Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Fiona Cottam.
Customer Charge On behalf of all DNs 25 October 2010.
1 Mod Review Group 126 Mar 2007 slides 126 Review Group – Restriction of Invoice Billing Period  The review proposal is primarily concerned with restricting.
1 Mod Review Group 126 Apr 2007 slides 126 Review Group – Restriction of Invoice Billing Period  These slides describe the business rules for the treatment.
ScottishPower, Energy Retail MOD 282 – Introduction of a process to manage Long Term Vacant Sites May 2010 Elaine Carr ScottishPower.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement – Interim Report findings 17 th September 2012.
PN UNC 4 th September 2012 Reconciliation Issues (Action: NEX06/02)
ALLOCATION OF RbD ACROSS RELEVANT PERIOD DNOs’ comments on previous Workstream discussion ALLOCATION OF RbD ACROSS RELEVANT PERIOD DNOs’ comments on previous.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 10 th January Objectives of the Workgroups To determine business principles for future Invoicing processes –Consider/review.
Meter Error – NTS Revenue Flows Gas TCMF – 2 nd December 2010.
1 Modification 0152V Implementation Matters 25 October 2007.
Options for Mod 640 Replacement
Capacity/Commodity Split Impact on Suppressed reconciliations
Review Group 178 SSP as Domestic only.
Extraordinary DSC ChMC
Orifice plate meter error resolution – cash flows
Modification th July 2008.
Large Supply Point Reconciliation which spans Pre & Post Go Live
CSEPs Reconciliation Proposals
Elaine Carr ScottishPower
Modification 0117 – Additional Considerations
Project Nexus Workgroup
UNC Modification Proposal 0362
Nexus Requirements To support the current business processes
Project Nexus Workgroup
Modification Proposal 115 – ‘Correct Apportionment of NDM Error’
Actions for Mod209 Workgroup
Genuine Reconciliation
Project Nexus Workgroup
Modification Proposal 115 – ‘Correct Apportionment of NDM Error’
Nexus Workgroup Mod 0473 Presentation
MOD 640 INVOICING VALIDATION RULES
Modification 421 – Updates and Benefits Case
AQ BTU Form – Process & Timeline 29th September 2009
Project Nexus Workgroup
Reconciliation Volume Impacts 25 January 2008
Invoicing Proposals 20th May 2013
Project Nexus Workgroup
Modification Proposal 136
Actions Updates Action 0282/006 – Exclude from AQ process
COR3007: UNC MOD 450B – Monthly revision of erroneous SSP AQs outside the User AQ Review Period Implementation UK Link Committee – May 2014.
REVIEW GROUP 178 – AN ALTERNATE SOLUTION
Extraordinary DSC ChMC
Development Work Group 194
Further Considerations
Presentation transcript:

Development Workgroup 0282 Action 018 – impact on RbD 13 September 2010

Action 0282/018  “xoserve RbD expert to consider the proposal impacts and provide a view/attend the next meeting”  This action refers to treatment of SSP vacant sites in the RbD calculations

What is RbD?  Reconciliation by Difference is the substitute for meter point reconciliation in the SSP market  SSPs receive energy allocation and commodity charges via NDM Daily Allocation process  Individual meter readings are not used to reconcile SSPs  Within each LDZ, every LSP rec has an equal and opposite entry in RbD – both energy and commodity charges  RbD charges are apportioned on basis of live (not isolated) SSP AQ  Monthly RbD values are dependent on the number and value of LSP Recs in the month  RbD energy is usually a small fraction of commodity allocation

Comparison to other existing/future scenarios CapacityEnergyCommodityRbD AllocationAllocationSmear  Isolated & Withdrawn sites    Isolated sites√   DWG 0270 – Elective Meter Point Rec for SSPs  Proposed treatment √ √ √ √  DWG 0282 – Vacant sites  Suggested treatment √  √

Financial Impacts of RbD  For the 12 months to July 2010, RbD represented 2.2% of total SSP Allocation  % varies between months depending on levels of reconciliation and allocation and financial adjustments

Assessment of Suggested Treatment  No precedent for sites being subject to RbD but not allocation  No parallel with DWG 270 Elective Meter Point Rec proposal  Those sites remain in Allocation  Retaining those sites in RbD shares the unaccounted for gas across all active SSPs  Leaving those sites in RbD should be a simpler change  Leaving Vacant sites in RbD is not consistent with similar scenarios, e.g. Isolations  Risk of erroneous isolation is borne by remainder of SSP market  No reduction in complexity of change