The Impact of Classroom Technology Availability on Novice Teacher and Student Use Nancy D. Weber Hersh C. Waxman Department of Teaching, Learning, and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Team Teaching Section 7: Monitoring Teacher. The Monitoring Teacher model One teacher assumes the responsibility for instructing the entire class. The.
Angela Chow Centre for Information Technology in Education The University of Hong Kong IT in Education Symposium, 10th July, 04.
Team Teaching Section 2: Traditional Team Teaching.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Teacher Evaluation Model
COURSEWORK ON BASE NUMERATION SYSTEMS AND ITS INFLUENCE ON PRE- SERVICE ELEMENTARY TEACHER’S UNDERSTANDING OF PLACE VALUE CONCEPTS BY DOROTHY J. RADIN.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
ESTEEMS (ESTablishing Excellence in Education of Mathematics and Science) Project Overview and Evaluation Dr. Deborah H. Cook, Director, NJ SSI MSP Regional.
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
Consistency of Assessment
Weber State University Master of Education in Curriculum and Instruction Candidate Assessment Plan.
The Impact of Immersion in a Local Research Problem on Technology Skills and Use CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY PREPARING TOMORROW’S TEACHERS TO USE TECHNOLOGY.
BEST Survey Results: Feeding Information Back to Institutions of Higher Education Scott W. Brown, Ph.D. Teachers for a New Era Project University of Connecticut.
Collaborating for Student Success Teacher Collaboration: Strategies & Outcomes ARCHES Seminar UC Irvine ~ 3/15/10 Ivan Cheng
Technology Standards for Language Learners TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR LANGUAGE TEACHERS.
Presenter: Gary Bates.  “If a certificated employee receives a rating of ineffective or improvement necessary, the evaluator and the certificated employee.
Day 3. Agenda [always] Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement.
Local Evaluation Overview and Preliminary Findings Diane Schilder, EdD.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.
Overall Teacher Judgements
Technology Leadership
Classroom Management Self-efficacy in a Teacher Preparation Program Presentation at NERA, October 2013 University of Connecticut - Neag School of Education.
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline In planning.
Staff Development and the Change Process
The Impact of the Maine Learning Technology Initiative on Teachers, Students, and Learning Maine’s Middle School 1-to-1 Laptop Program Dr. David L. Silvernail.
WELCOME TO CHATSWORTH ELEMENTARY ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING! THURSDAY, OCTOBER 30, :30 AM OR 1:00 PM.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
Establishing a Culture of Mathematics Learning in Urban Schools Syracuse City School District / Syracuse University Partnership Beyond Access to Math Achievement.
Workshop 3 Early career teacher induction: Literacy middle years Workshop 3 Literacy teaching and NSW syllabus 1.
Learnings from Classroom Connections Findings and Conclusions from Two Studies on the Statewide Laptop Initiative Dr. Wade Pogany – South Dakota DOE –
DASA Policy and Practice Conference June 24, 2015.
Research Indicators for Sustaining and Institutionalizing Change CaMSP Network Meeting April 4 & 5, 2011 Sacramento, CA Mikala L. Rahn, PhD Public Works,
The Jordan Performance Appraisal System (JPAS) is designed to help educators in their continuing efforts to provide high quality instruction to all students.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
TWS Aids for Student Teachers & Interns Overview of TWS.
The Use of Distance Learning Technology by Business Educators for Credentialing and Instruction Christal C. Pritchett, Ed.D. NABTE Research Session Anaheim,
Intel ® Teach to the Future Pre Service Evaluation across Asia - Gaining the Country Perspective - Deakin University Faculty of Education Consultancy and.
Educators’ Attitudes about the Accessibility and Integration of Technology into the Secondary Curriculum Dr. Christal C. Pritchett Auburn University
Culturally Relevant Pedagogy Tahseen Muhammad ED 7202 NET.
Using Assessment Data Helen Thumann Department of Education.
STARTALK: Our mission, accomplishments and direction ILR November 12, 2010.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program Regional Conference Washington D.C December 11, 2006 Getting Results in the Classroom F. Joseph Merlino, PI/PD.
Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.
Preparing Future Teachers for 21 st Century Learning Partnerships that enhance the capacity of pre-service education 2008 Deakin University Faculty of.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Preservice versus Inservice Educators’ Attitudes Toward Information Technology Presentation to the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education.
Learning Sciences International Develops and provides the 21 st Century Teaching & Learning Series for the CFF initiative. Provides the e MBEDDED L EARNING.
(c) 2007 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Accountability and Teacher Evaluation Chapter 14.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Washington State’s Professional Certification The Big Picture (reminder : ) Everett Public Schools Pre-Assessment Seminar
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
America´s Lab Report. Chapter 2: The Education Context Key Points: “High school students’ science achievement nationwide is not impressive and has not.
Professional Development
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
Using the CLASS tool to Improve Instructional Practices in Early Childhood Tracie Dow and Felicia Owo.
GALLATIN COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL ADVANCED ED. REPORT Team Leader: Karen Maxell 3.1 Team Captain: Michelle Cravens 3.2 Team Captain: Brandon Brockman 3.3 Team.
Interview Responses: Job Satisfaction
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
APERS scores: the first semester of the program and one year post graduation for 9 graduates Results Improved overall scores and for all but one of the.
Classroom Walk-Through
The School Mentor 9/19/2018.
The School Mentor Updated 2018.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth
Association of Teacher Educators Jacsksonville, FL. February 18, 2003
Student Centered Coaching Benchmark 2.1.E
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Presentation transcript:

The Impact of Classroom Technology Availability on Novice Teacher and Student Use Nancy D. Weber Hersh C. Waxman Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture Texas A&M University SITE International Conference, 2015 March 6, 2015

The Call for Technology Integration For the past two decades, federal policy has reflected a commitment to technology integration in classrooms through the development and implementation of student technology use standards (U. S. DOE, 1996, 2001, 2003).

Facilitating Teachers’ Technology Integration School contexts that support and value instructional technology use increase the chances that new teachers who were equipped by their preparation programs to use technology, will do so (Clausen, 2007). Schools and districts that ensure increased access to technology support acquisition of 21 st Century skills by facilitating learning beyond the walls of the classroom, which, in effect, allows them to keep up with the growing social and professional demands for success (Collins & Halverson, 2009).

Challenges to First-Year Teachers’ Technology Integration Effective technology integration is especially challenging for first-year teachers because there are many personal, contextual, and professional issues that affect when and how first-year teachers integrate technology into their pedagogical routines (Clausen, 2007).

Research Question 1.How does the availability of technology in secondary classrooms affect: –Novice teacher use of technology? –Student use of technology? –The overall quality of technology use?

Methods - Participants All participants (n = 60) were first-year secondary teachers from a single cohort of a field-based internship program, which is part of their M.Ed. Coursework. –The certification portion of the program includes three teaching methods-based graduate courses that are taken during a single summer, followed by a year-long paid internship at a state-accredited and -subsidized secondary school of the teacher’s choice. –Technology integration is a major focus of one of the summer methods courses.

Methods - Instrument T3 Overall Classroom Observation Measure –What technology is available Desktop computer, projector, document reader, etc. –Extent to which available technology is used –Teacher technology use To display material/assignment; to assess; to create lessons –Student technology use To learn basic skills; for word processing; to gather information –Overall rating for classroom technology use

Methods – Instrument T3 Overall Classroom Observation Measure –At the closing of each observation, the observer indicated the degree to which each type of technology was integrated into the teaching and/or learning and to what extent each type of technology use and instructional behavior occurred. 1 = “not observed at all” 2 = “some extent (once or twice)” 3 = “great extent (3 or more times)”

Methods - Instrument T3 Overall Classroom Observation Measure –At the closing of each observation, the observer rated the classroom on its overall implementation of technology, using a 5-point scale: 0 = no use of technology 1 = low-level use of technology 2 = somewhat meaningful use of technology 3 = meaningful use of technology 4 = very meaningful use of technology

Methods – Data Collection Each teacher was observed for the duration of a single secondary class period. –Typically 50 minutes –Ranged from minutes Mean inter-rater reliability across all observers was high (κ = 0.87).

Results – Technology Availability & Use *** p < 0.001; ** p <.01; * p <.05 Low Technology Availability (<5 devices) Medium Technology Availability (5-10 devices) High Technology Availability (>10 devices) n = 30n = 14n = 16 dfFMSDM M F Technology Use67.574*** Teacher Use of Technology ab b a * Student Use of Technology b b a *** Overall Technology Use b b a ***

There are significant differences between the levels of technology availability (low, medium, and high) for each of the dependent variables. classrooms with high technology availability were scored significantly higher than those with low and medium availability in the areas of student and overall use. Teacher use of technology may not be dependent on the availability of technology, as it does not follow the same pattern. Results – Technology Availability & Use

DISCUSSION

Conclusions Though greater access to technology in the classroom does not have a clear impact on teaching practices, it does increase the quality of how it is used for student learning. –Teachers with greater access may be more familiar and comfortable with using technology because it is more readily available for practice and regular use.

Limitations Sample Homogeneity –Gender is more homogenous than Texas state post-baccs –Ethnicity is less homogenous than Texas state post- baccs Sample Size Observation Data –Although the data was reliable, it was based on only 1 observation