Strategies for Improving Response Rates Minnesota’s First Year Success Family Outcomes Surveys.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IFSP and Functional Outcome and Goal Development
Advertisements

Welcome! Review of the National Part C APR Indicator 4 Family Data FFY 2011 ( ) Siobhan Colgan, ECTA, DaSy Melissa Raspa, ECTA.
Rules and Regulations.  Requirements (Title I and Title III)  Notices  Timeline  Schools on Improvement  Use of Funds.
1 Parent Survey Project: Results from Year One Conducted by SRI International for the Office of the Independent Monitor March 13, 2006.
©2013 MFMER | slide-1 Advancing Health Literacy of Transplant Patients and Caregivers Julia G Behrenbeck, MS, MPH, RN, Rachel F Carroll MAE, BAS, William.
ECO Early Childhood Family Education Coordinated Outreach Early Childhood Family Education “Building Blocks for Family and School Success”
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTATION AND LANGUAGE ACCESS RIGHTS Tanya Douglas Attorney Director, Disability Advocacy and Veterans Justice Projects Manhattan Legal.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Determining if the Family Survey Response is Representative 1.
Learn How States Are Finding “Hard-to-reach” Students for Post-school Outcome Data Collection! How the Heck Do We Contact Some of Our Former Students?
Maureen Sullivan Vermont’s Family Infant and Toddler Program October 7, 2009 Understanding and Utilizing Family Survey Data.
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011.
Child and Family Outcomes Chapter 15: Discussion Facilitator Exit Information.
So Many Questions... Who is going to pay for the AT? The School District Districts may utilize alternative funding sources unless the results would be.
Child and Family Outcomes Chapter 4: Using Assessment Tools in the Child Outcomes Measurement Process Entry & Exit Sample Information.
1 Trends in Child Outcomes (C-3 / B-7) and Family Outcomes (C-4) Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports Christina.
Child and Family Outcomes Chapter 1: General Background Information Entry Sample Information.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
1 Strengthening Child Welfare Supervision as a Key Practice Change Strategy Unit I: Helping Child Welfare Leaders Re-conceptualize Supervision.
MINNESOTA’S EARLY HEAD START ORAL HEALTH CAMPAIGN PREVENTING TOOTH DECAY AT THE EARLIEST STAGE OF A CHILD’S DEVELOPMENT.
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS ESL/Immersion Department 6941 N Central Ave. Portland, Oregon
Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.
PERSPECTIVES ON VACCINE RESISTANCE MMR Vaccine Resistance among Minnesota Somalis Lynn Bahta, BSN, PHN Minnesota Department of Health.
Technology Leadership
Project Screening: Lessons Learned Alison Schonwald, MD Kelly Horan, MPH Noelle Huntington, PhD.
Language Assistance Program Provider Training Created by ICE Education and Training Workgroup 12/2008.
Early Intervention Technical Assistance Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Pennsylvania’s Plan for Sharing Family & Child Outcome Data.
1 What did Connecticut do?. 2 The Basics A group of people who hold stakes met to give the lead agency suggestions. We chose the NCSEAM survey and we.
Monica Ballay Data Triangulation: Measuring Implementation of SPDG Focus Areas.
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter:. Training Overview Introduction Participation requirements FET Tool Orientation Distribution of username & passwords.
Implementing Adult Risk Factor Surveillance in Manitoba Case Studies ARFS Symposium January 26, 2011.
1 Preschool English Learners Principles and Practices to Promote Language, Literacy, and Learning A Resource Guide, Second Edition Published by the California.
1 Inspiring a lifelong love of books Helping children achieve more Bookstart Booktime Booked Up Letterbox Club for Looked after children ( a purchasable.
Overview of the Plain Talk Data Collection System Sarabeth Shreffler, MPH, CHES Program Officer, Plain Talk Program Public/Private Ventures.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter: Updated 6/21/2013.
1. Original SPDG (2005 – no-cost extension) – School-wide PBIS – Literacy – Family engagement New SPDG (2010 – 2015) – PBIS School-wide (scaled.
Parent Input Directions. Parent Input Meeting The District Monitoring Plan team must include a parent (from such sources as CAC, PTI, FRC, FEC).
HPV Vaccine Survey Project Roshan Bastani and Vicky Taylor UCLA and U Washington All interested CPCRN Network Sites.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
No GSEG? Low Budget Data Initiative with High Dollar Impact Lisa Backer 619 Co-Coordinator/ECSE Specialist MN Department of Education
Using Data for Program Improvement State and Local Activities in Minnesota Lisa Backer: 619 Coordinator/Part C Data Manager Loraine Jensen: Part C Coordinator.
Your Site Name Here Accreditation Your logo here Picture of children from your site here.
Supporting parents as their children’s first and most important teachers LoveTalkPlay.org.
Monitoring MCHB’s Six Core Outcomes for CSHCN Paul Newacheck, DrPH MCH Policy Research Center.
Effective Referral System for the Utilization of Critical Maternal and Newborn Health at Rural Health Centers of Ethiopia APHA 143 rd Annual Conference.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
2010 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Effective Collaboration between Parent Centers and Early Childhood.
1 Collaboration Across Part C and 619 on Child Outcomes Measuring Child and Family Outcomes.
English Learners at MPS January Who are our students? O MPS currently has 398 EL students enrolled K-12 O Current EL students speak 10 different.
Including Parents In Alaska Child Outcomes. Alaska Child Outcomes Development Summer 2005 – General Supervision Enhancement Grant (GSEG) Infant & Toddler.
Capturing the Patient Experience at the Point Of Care UW Department of Family Medicine Wingra Clinic Terri Carufel-Wert RN, BSN, MHA, Kirsten Rindfleisch.
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010 Cornelia Taylor, ECO Christina Kasprzak, ECO/NECTAC Lisa Backer, MN DOE 1.
Early Childhood Outcomes Trying to Get The Word Out Maria Synodi, 619 Coordinator Connecticut State Department of Education NECTAC National TA Meeting.
Process Level Evaluation of Internal Productivity, Communication, and Collaboration SIGnetwork Grant Management PLC Anna Harms March 26, 2012.
Office of Title I Federal Programs 1021 Marion Street Saint Paul, MN
What’s Unique about the Child Outcome Summary Process in Minnesota:
IFSP Aligned with the Early Intervention Data System
Butte Falls Charter School Open House & Annual Title I Meeting
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Dr. Jacqueline C. Ellis, NBCT July 11, 2017
Dr. Jacqueline C. Ellis, NBCT July 11, 2017
Christina Kasprzak, ECTA/ECO/DaSy September 16, 2013
Using outcomes data for program improvement
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
2019 Title I Annual Parent Meeting
2019 Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Strategies for Improving Response Rates Minnesota’s First Year Success Family Outcomes Surveys

We are home to… The Mall of America The first professional wrestler to hold the office of Governor The headwaters of the Mississippi River The world’s largest ball of twine Yes, that says “twine”

Why am I up here today? 76%

Key Decisions What tool to use? How often to distribute it? To who? By whom? How to get it back? Follow up?

Which Tool? Considered –NCSEAM –ECO –Developing our own Minnesota’s adopted the ECO Survey –Length –Readability –Question Format

Distributed to…..? Considered –Sample –Universal Distribution Minnesota surveys all families

Survey Format Considered Web-based Scantron Pencil/Paper MN uses a paper version of the ECO survey. Child’s MARSS number is printed on survey

Frequency of Distribution Considered –Pre/post –Annually –One time per family Adopted a one-time approach –Families receive a survey at exit from Part C –Turn 3 or exit for another reason

Distribution Methodology Surveys are handed to families during a home visit around the time of exit from Part C. Given by the family’s service coordinator or Primary Service Provider Provided training on “talking points”

Talking Points Each family’s answers are private They will not be shared directly with program staff Responses will be combined with responses from other families to create a statewide and local picture of the early intervention system Information will be used to help make programs stronger

Language or Literacy Barriers Districts use interpreters when necessary** When literacy is a barrier, districts use a staff member who is NOT a service provider to gather responses through an interview (**Now available in multiple languages)

Available Languages Arabic, Cambodian, Croatian, Hmong, Laotian, Simplified Chinese, Oromo, Russian, Somali, Spanish, Vietnamese & English.

Method of Return Family given an envelop with proper postage Addressed to the MN Department of Education Minnesota utilizes an intentional lack of follow-up

First “Year’s” Data Implemented the survey process on April 1, /2007 SPP included 3 months’ worth of data 530 families eligible to receive the survey 403 surveys returned