Atlas Copco Group Q2 2012 results July 17, 2012. Q2 - highlights  Healthy demand –Organic order intake declined slightly –Stable order intake for small.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
April 27, 2009, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 27, 2009.
Advertisements

April 28, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 28, 2010.
Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 16, Contents  Q2 business highlights  Market development  Business areas  Financials  Outlook 2 July 16,
July 17, 2009, Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 17, 2009.
July 18, 2008, Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 18, 2008.
February 4, 2008, Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 4, 2008.
Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 2, Q4 - highlights  Order growth continued  Record operating profit –All business areas above 20% operating.
February 1, Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 1, 2007.
Committed to sustainable productivity
February 2, 2009, Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 2, 2009.
April 27, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 27, 2006.
I N T E R I M R E S U L T S 8 September Financial highlights 6 months to June 2004 £ million Half Half% inc. Group sales %
Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 20, Q1 - highlights  Very strong order intake –Record orders received in all business areas  Record operating.
February 2, Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 2, 2010.
The SKF Group Year-end result, 2005 Tom Johnstone, President and CEO.
The SKF Group Half-year result, 2005 Tom Johnstone, President and CEO.
The SKF Group Nine-month result, 2005 Tom Johnstone, President and CEO.
Third Quarter 2012 Earnings Conference Call October 25, 2012.
Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 22, Q3 - highlights  Strong order growth –Sequentially higher volumes in all regions and in most customer.
April 27, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 27, 2005.
October 24, Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 24, 2006.
July 17, Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 17, 2006.
October 22, 2009, Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 22, 2009.
April 24, 2008, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 24, 2008.
October 23, 2008, Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 23, 2008.
April 26, 2007, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 26, 2007.
October 21, 2005www.atlascopco.com1 Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 21, 2005.
FUCHS PETROLUB / Q Conference Call Dr. Alexander Selent, Vice Chairman and CFO Reiner Schmidt, Member of the Group Management Committee Mannheim,
Atlas Copco Group Q results January 30, 2014.
Atlas Copco Group Q results January 31, 2013.
Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 18, Q2 - highlights  Very strong organic order growth –Record orders received –Favorable demand in mining, manufacturing.
October 22, Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 22, 2004.
Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 29, Page 2 April 29, 2002www.atlascopco-group.com Contents  Q1 Highlights and Strategic Moves  Market Development.
Atlas Copco Group Q results October 25, 2013.
Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 23, Page 2 October 23, 2001www.atlascopco-group.com Contents  Market Development  Business Areas  Financials.
Group, First Quarter 8,156 MSEK -3% Change in value 1st Half-year, 1999 / 1998 Orders.
July 16, 2007, Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 16, 2007.
Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 21, Q3 - highlights  Overall demand remained at a high level –Solid development in manufacturing and mining.
Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 17, Contents  Q2 Business Highlights  Market Development  Business Areas  Financials  Outlook.
Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results Stockholm, April 26, 2001.
COMMITTED TO SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTIVITY Q results April 29, 2014.
Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 14, Page 2 February 14, 2002www.atlascopco-group.com Contents  Q4 Highlights and strategic moves  Market.
Group Handout Atlas Copco Group – September 30 th 2000 The face of interaction.
Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 18, Page 2 July 18, 2002www.atlascopco-group.com Contents  Q2 Highlights  Market Development  Business Areas.
Giulio Mazzalupi Atlas Copco Group - Q4 Results Stockholm, February 12, 2001.
Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 28, Contents  Q1 Business Highlights  Market Development  Business Areas  Financials  Outlook.
Index Group Handout Atlas Copco Group – June 30 th 2000 The face of interaction.
Atlas Copco Group Q results July 18, Q2 in brief  Service business continues to develop well  Industrial and construction demand improved.
Atlas Copco Group Q results April 29, 2013.
The SKF Group Half-year result 2003 Tom Johnstone President and CEO.
Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 3, Page 2 February 3, 2003www.atlascopco-group.com Contents  Q4 Business Highlights  Market Development.
Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 2, Contents  2003 Summary  Q4 Business Highlights  Market Development  Business Areas  Financials 
COMMITTED TO SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTIVITY Q results October 20, 2014.
Group “Handout” Quarterly presentation Atlas Copco Group.
July 16, Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 16, 2004.
Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 23, Contents  Q3 Business Highlights  Market Development  Business Areas  Financials  Outlook.
Atlas Copco Group Q results January 31, 2013
Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 4, 2008.
Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 27, 2004 April 27, 2004.
The face of interaction
Q2 Results Stockholm, July 19, 2001
Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 22, 2010.
Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 17, 2009.
Atlas Copco Group Q results October 24, 2012.
The SKF Group Year-end result 2003 Tom Johnstone President and CEO.
Atlas Copco Group Q results July 17, 2012 July 17, 2012.
Atlas Copco Group Q results April 29, 2013
Atlas Copco Group Q results April 27, 2012 April 27, 2012.
Alrik Danielson, President and CEO
Alrik Danielson, President and CEO
Presentation transcript:

Atlas Copco Group Q results July 17, 2012

Q2 - highlights  Healthy demand –Organic order intake declined slightly –Stable order intake for small and medium sized equipment –Lower order intake of large compressors and mining equipment –Strong development for the aftermarket  Sequential improvement in Asia, incl. China  Record revenues and operating profit  Continued strong value creation July 17,

Q2 - figures in summary  Orders received increased by 5% to MSEK , organic decline 2%  Revenues up 17% to a record of MSEK , organic growth 9%  Operating profit increased by 20% to MSEK (4 177) –Operating margin at 21.4% (20.9)  Profit before tax at MSEK (4 081)  Basic earnings per share SEK 2.98 (2.46)  Operating cash flow at MSEK (567) July 17,

Orders received - local currency Group total 7+% YTD, +1% last 3 months Structural change +3% YTD, +3% last 3 months 4 July 17, 2012 ABC June A =Share of orders received, year-to-date, % B =Year-to-date vs. previous year, % C =Last 3 months vs. previous year, %

Q2 - the Americas  Robust demand in North America –Order intake remained on a high level –Large mining orders in Mexico in Q –Sales of construction equipment improved  Orders received improved for all business areas in South America –Strong mining demand –Sequential improvement in Brazil July 17, ABC June 2012 A =Share of orders received, year-to-date, % B =Year-to-date vs. previous year, % C =Last 3 months vs. previous year, %

Q2 - Europe and Africa/Middle East July 17,  Orders received largely flat in Europe –Growth in Russia and Eastern Europe –Challenging market conditions in Western and Southern Europe  High level of orders in Africa / Middle East –Large orders in Q for mining equipment and compressed air equipment ABC June 2012 A =Share of orders received, year-to-date, % B =Year-to-date vs. previous year, % C =Last 3 months vs. previous year, %

Q2 - Asia and Australia  Healthy demand in Asia –Order intake increased slightly –Positive year-on-year development for mining –Decrease for industrial compressors and construction equipment –Order volumes improved sequentially in China  Order growth in Australia –Mining demand remain on high level –Large Liquefied Natural Gas compressor order July 17, ABC June 2012 A =Share of orders received, year-to-date, % B =Year-to-date vs. previous year, % C =Last 3 months vs. previous year, %

Organic * growth per quarter  Change in orders received in % vs. same quarter previous year July 17, Atlas Copco Group, continuing operations *Volume and price

Atlas Copco Group – sales bridge July 17,

Atlas Copco Group July 17, months until June 2012 Compressor Technique 38% Industrial Technique 10% Construction Technique 37% Revenues per business area Mining and Rock Excavation Technique 15%

Compressor Technique  Healthy level of order intake –Lower orders for large equipment –Organic order decline of 7% –Good aftermarket development  Operating margin at 22.0% (24.0) –Increased investments in marketing and product development  Agreement to acquire compressor manufacturer in Turkey  Launch of full range of vacuum pumps July 17,

Industrial Technique  Robust order intake –Continued strong demand from the motor vehicle industry –Slight decrease in order intake from the general industry –Good performance of the aftermarket  Operating margin at 22.8% (21.8) July 17,

Mining and Rock Excavation Technique  Continued strong mining activity –Order volumes for equipment declined –Strong aftermarket growth  Record revenues and operating profit  Operating margin at 24.8% (23.5) July 17,

Construction Technique  Overall demand largely unchanged –Orders received -2%, organically –Increased order intake in North America –Weakness in Asia and in Europe  Order intake increased sequentially in China and Brazil  Operating margin at 13.2% (13.9) July 17,

Group total July 17, April – June 2012 vs. 2011

Profit bridge July 17, April – June 2012 vs. 2011

Profit bridge – by business area July 17, April – June 2012 vs. 2011

Balance sheet July 17,

Cash flow July 17,

Near-term outlook The overall demand for Atlas Copco’s products and services is expected to remain at the current high level. July 17,

Committed to sustainable productivity. July 17,

Cautionary Statement “Some statements herein are forward-looking and the actual outcome could be materially different. In addition to the factors explicitly commented upon, the actual outcome could be materially and adversely affected by other factors such as the effect of economic conditions, exchange-rate and interest-rate movements, political risks, the impact of competing products and their pricing, product development, commercialization and technological difficulties, supply disturbances, and major customer credit losses.” July 17,