 Background at CLIC and Requirements on Time Stamping Marco Battaglia UC Berkeley, LBNL and CERN Jean Jacques Blaising LAPP, Annecy and contributions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop SLAC, January 18-21, 2011.
Advertisements

Higgs branching ratios study Oct Hiroaki Ono (NDU) Oct ILC Physics WG general meeting.
Using  0 mass constraint to improve particle flow ? Graham W. Wilson, Univ. of Kansas, July 27 th 2005 Study prompted by looking at event displays like.
Track Timing at e + e - Linear Collider with the Silicon Drift Detector Main Tracker R. Bellwied, D. Cinabro, V. L. Rykov Wayne State University Detroit,
Paris 22/4 UED Albert De Roeck (CERN) 1 Identifying Universal Extra Dimensions at CLIC  Minimal UED model  CLIC experimentation  UED signals & Measurements.
My work PAST WORKS: 1) (Madrid) Data Analysis in L3, LEP: - Measurement of the Mass, Width and Cross Section of the W boson production at LEP, Study.
Background in the CILD01fw Weekly Detector Meeting May 5, 2009 André Sailer CLIC_01_ILD.
Determination of Heavy Smuon and Selectron Mass at CLIC Outline Physics motivation Mass measurement methods (Energy scan, End Point) Energy spread, ISR.
Taikan Suehara et al., Beijing, 2010/3/29 page 1 Simulation study of W + DM signature for identification of new physics Taikan Suehara (ICEPP,
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
Silicon Sensors for Collider Physics from Physics Requirements to Vertex Tracking Detectors Marco Battaglia Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University.
Olivier RavatLes Houches/June 3rd Higgs associated production at LHC : Thecase Olivier Ravat, Morgan Lethuillier IPN Lyon Les Houches 2003 : Physics.
ILC DBD Common simulation and software tools Akiya Miyamoto KEK ILC PAC 14 December 2012 at KEK.
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
1Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 ILD and SiD detectors for 1 TeV ILC some recommendations following experience from the CLIC detector study
LCWS14, Belgrade, October M. Pandurović, H→WW at 350 GeV and 1.4 TeV CLIC Measurement of H→WW* in HZ at 350 GeV and WW fusion at 1.4 TeV CLIC.
Performance and occupancies in a CCD vertex detector with endcaps Toshinori Abe and John Jaros 04/21/04.
CLICdp achievements in 2014 and goals for 2015 Lucie Linssen, CERN on behalf of the CLICdp collaboration CLIC workshop, January 30 th
Coil and HCAL Parameters for CLIC Solenoid and Hadron-calorimetry for a high energy LC Detector 15. December LAPP Christian Grefe CERN.
Taikan Suehara, 16 th general meeting of ILC physics (Asia) wg., 2010/07/17 page 1 Model 500 GeV Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo.
Tracking and Vertexing with a Thin CMOS Pixel BeamTelescope and Thin Ladder Studies M Battaglia JM Bussat, D Contarato, P Giubilato, LE Glesener, LC Greiner,
May 31th, 2007 LCWS C. Gatto 1 Tracking Studies in the 4 th Concept On behalf of 4th Concept Software Group D. Barbareschi V. Di Benedetto E. Cavallo.
Contributions from T Baltz, A Djouadi. The Higgs Sector of the LCC4 Point LCC4 Benchmark LCC4 point in A 0 Funnel region Benchmark point defined in cMSSM.
Prospects in ALICE for  mesons Daniel Tapia Takaki (Birmingham, UK) for the ALICE Collaboration International Conference on STRANGENESS IN QUARK MATTER.
Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN.
E  e  Collisions at 1 TeV and Beyond Physics Motivations and Experimental Issues Marco Battaglia UC Berkeley – LBNL, Berkeley and Universite' Claude.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
29/08/2008ALICE Italia Analysis of the D + s  K + K - π + channel in the ALICE experiment Serhiy Senyukov Università & INFN di Torino (4050 m. asl)
Event Generation of Tim Barklow SLAC October 21, 2010.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Dominik Dannheim (CERN), André Sailer (HU Berlin / CERN) Beam-induced backgrounds in the CLIC detector models ALCPG Workshop March 2011 Eugene,
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
From the Standard Model to Discoveries - Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Dawn of the LHC Era Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida CMS Collaboration.
Higgs & EWSB session LCWS marchHiggs self couplingP. Gay 1 Higgs self coupling at e + e - Linear Collider Higgs self coupling at e + e - Linear.
07/24/07 Francisco Carrion OPTIMIZING THE TRACK DETECTOR Francisco Javier Carrión Ruiz Mentor: Hans Wenzel 07/08/09 SID CONCEPT FOR THE INTERNATIONAL LINEAR.
Mark Thomson University of Cambridge Detectors for a Multi-TeV Collider: “what can be learnt from the ILC” ALCPG Meeting, Albuquerque, 29/9/2009.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Mokka simulation studies on the Very Forward Detector components at CLIC and ILC Eliza TEODORESCU (IFIN-HH) FCAL Collaboration Meeting Tel Aviv, October.
Top Higgs Yukawa Coupling Analysis – Status Report Hajrah Tabassam Quai-i-Azam University, Islamabad ON BEHALF OF: R. Yonamine, T. Tanabe, K. Fujii, KEK.
Background studies for the ILD vertex detector Rita De Masi IPHC-Strasbourg.
Khaled Belkadhi (LLR-Ecole Polytechnique)1 DHCAL Test Beam Results using Full Train Reconstruction Khaled Belkadhi.
Taikan Suehara, 15 th general meeting of ILC physics (Asia) wg., 2010/05/15 page 1 Model 500 GeV Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo.
J. S. MarshallPandora PFA1 Pandora Particle Flow Calorimetry Tuesday 29 th January 2013 J. S. Marshall University of Cambridge.
Eunil Won/Korea U1 A study of configuration for silicon based Intermediate Trackers (IT) July Eunil Won Korea University.
Simulation Plan Discussion What are the priorities? – Higgs Factory? – 3-6 TeV energy frontier machine? What detector variants? – Basic detector would.
Tracking: An Experimental Overview Richard Partridge Brown / SLAC Fermilab ALCPG Meeting.
CMOS Pixels Sensor Simulation Preliminary Results and Plans M. Battaglia UC Berkeley and LBNL Thanks to A. Raspereza, D. Contarato, F. Gaede, A. Besson,
Photon & e+e- Hits in Muon Higgs Factory T. Markiewicz T. Maruyama SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting. Fermilab 29 May 2014.
How well do we need to know the luminosity spectrum at 3 TeV CLIC? Lucie Linssen, CERN on behalf of the CLIC physics and detector study, material principally.
Standard Monte Carlo Event Samples Norman Graf SLAC November 11, 2004.
Discrimination of new physics models with ILC
BeamCal Simulation for CLIC
Muons from single top events for DC04
ATLAS Upgrade Program Sarah Demers, US ATLAS Fellow with BNL
The Physics Case for CLIC
Requirements and Specifications for Si Pixels Sensors
Calorimeter Occupancies University of Cambridge
γ γ-> hadron Background Events at CLIC
ILD Background WG Mark Thomson
The LHC collider in Geneva
CLIC Detector CERN Status + plans
Parasitic Run Physics Simulations
Vertex optimization with full simulation
8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
ZHH Analysis preliminary results on different detector models
Physics event timing Use Pythia to generate hadronic decays at 125 GeV
Hit Density Geant 3 scoring planes
Presentation transcript:

 Background at CLIC and Requirements on Time Stamping Marco Battaglia UC Berkeley, LBNL and CERN Jean Jacques Blaising LAPP, Annecy and contributions from Daniel Schulte, Albert De Roeck CLIC Meeting CERN, May 14, 2009

 Background Characterisation   hadrons generated using GuineaPig + PYTHIA by Daniel Schulte using Schuler and Sjostrand cross section parametrisation and PS fragmentation; Database of events readable with HADES provided by Daniel; 2.7   hadrons / BX at 3 TeV for 2008 CLIC parameters; Consider only particles with |cos  | 0.2 GeV Nb of Particles Nb of Tracks Energy 11.7/BX8.1/BX27 GeV/BX

 Background Characterisation

Effects from  Background MB and A De Roeck, CERN Detector Effect +   hadrons 25 ns time stamping

Effects from  Background

Energy at ECAL from  Background

Track Occupancy from  Background Overlay   hadrons to e + e  event in PYTHIA using HADES and save BX number for each particle in event record: Full simulation using VXD+FTD+beampipe with B=5 T in Mokka and reconstruction (digitisation + pattern recognition + tracking) in Marlin.

Track Occupancy from  Background R=30 mm -50<z<50mm R=50 mm -125<z<125mm R=70 mm -125<z<125mm Hits/mm 2 /Train~0.20~0.17~0.14 z=200 mm 85<R<140mm Hits/mm 2 /Train~0.04 VXD FTD

SUSY Benchmarks at Point K'

Track Occupancy from  Background VXDFTD

Track Occupancy from  Background ~5500 hits on VXD for 50 BX Full PatRec in VXD only yielding ~450 tracks PatRec efficiency > 90 % for high p t tracks 1 ns 25 ns ~10 ns time stamping capability seems adequate for mitigating the effect of  background on event reconstruction.

Track PatRec with  Background Layer 1 R=30 mmLayer 2 R=40 mmLayer 3 R=50 mm R ROI on Layer 5.0  m6.8  m12.7  m VXD-based Full PatRec assuming 10 ns time stamping on all layers 20 BX Assume here monolithic pixels 0.12% X 0,  point = 3.5  m,  m pixel cell, Main Tracker give unambiguous Layer 5 to Layer 4 hit bundling.

Track PatRec with  Background 10 ns Time Stamp Layer 1 R=30 mm -50<z<50 mm Layer 2 R=40 mm -125<z<125 mm Layer 3 R=50 mm -125<z<125 mm VXD-based Full PatRec assuming 10 ns time stamping on all layers CLIC 3 TeV + 20 BX   hadrons Full VXD PatRec

  hadron background affects mostly channels with missing energy or precise di-jet mass reconstruction because of extra energy injected in the event; occupancy appears negligible in Barrel Cal and modest in Vertex tracking with time stamping ~ ns, preliminary results documented in CLIC Note in preparation; optimisation of time stamping strategy (very precise timing at a single layer or distributed timing in innermost tracking layers) requires to consider constraints from layer material budget, power dissipation and pixel sizes. study pattern recognition efficiency and performance for different VXD concepts (in collaboration with Alex Kluge et al.) on physics benchmarks +   hadrons and PAIR background.