Results of FEA for the PETS EBW tooling Riku Raatikainen 23.5.2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FEA Reference Guide See additional material herehere.
Advertisements

LOCATING PRINCIPLES and LOCATORS
8.6 Frictional Forces on Collar Bearings, Pivot Bearings and Disks
SPL Intercavity support Conceptual design review 04/11/ A. Vande Craen TE/MSC-CMI.
Analysis of Beams in Bending ( )
Longitudinal Expansion of RFQ Vane Ends at Section-to-Section Interface.
Time Varying Structural Behaviour of the PETS “On-Off” mechanism piston movement impact Riku Raatikainen
MAE 314 – Solid Mechanics Yun Jing
ENGR 225 Section 1.3 – 1.6.
NSTX Upgrade Testing TF Coil Flexible Connector Prototype In-Plane Deflection Test
TMM of the CLIC Two-Beam Module T0 in the LAB – Proceedings to structural FEA Riku Raatikainen
Axially loaded member Axial load and normal stress under equilibrium load, Elastic Deformation.
Intern: Erick Yanez Mentor: Shea Ferring NASA Space Grant Robotics Team.
1 RF-Structures Mock-Up FEA Assembly Tooling V. Soldatov, F. Rossi, R. Raatikainen
Influence of the Gravity, Vacuum and RF on CLIC Module T0 Behavior R. Raatikainen.
COLUMNS. COLUMNS Introduction According to ACI Code 2.1, a structural element with a ratio of height-to least lateral dimension exceeding three used.
Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Lab RFCC Module Design Review October 21, 2008 RFCC Module and Subcomponents Mechanical Design.
RF-Accelerating Structure: Cooling Circuit Modeling Riku Raatikainen
T.M.F.T: Thermal Mechanical Fatigue Testing
Multiple Coil Lift Calculation. Purposes of the Study  To investigate the stress distribution in the MCWF and the lifting device.  To make sure mounting.
#1UNIT D A force that acts to stretch and pull apart something.
Reinforced Concrete Design
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15.
7. APPROXIMATE ANALYSIS OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
Linear Buckling Analysis
FNAL QXF Curing Mold Miao Yu, FNAL 05/07/2013. FNAL Short Curing Press 2 2 meter long Capacity (pump psi) Max. force/cylinder kN (ton) Spacing cm(inch)
Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth Mechanical precision and vibration behavior of mechanical supports Johan Wickström GFA-ATK.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold] [STRC] [1]
Chapter Five Vibration Analysis.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 to 06/07/15 1.
ZDC Remote Handling Tool Structure and Force Analysis P. Debbins University of Iowa December 10, 2009.
L0 and L1 Structure Deflections During Installation of Silicon Sensors C H Daly 8/24/2003.
11/11/20151 Trusses. 11/11/20152 Element Formulation by Virtual Work u Use virtual work to derive element stiffness matrix based on assumed displacements.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. An object with forces acting on it, but with zero net force, is said to be in equilibrium. The Conditions for.
8.2 Problems Involving Dry Friction
EBW tooling for PETS FEM Riku Raatikainen
WENDELSTEIN 7-X Basismaschine Design Review Plasma Vessel Max-Planck- Institut für Plasmaphysik J. Reich, W7-X BasismaschineDesign Review Plasma Vessel.
1.5 AVERAGE SHEAR STRESS Shear stress is the stress component that act in the plane of the sectioned area. Consider a force F acting to the bar For rigid.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 1. Introduction Both cavities will be supported by the fundamental power coupler and a number of blade flexures.
Anthony Beeman.  Since the project proposal submittal on 9/21/15 I began work on the Abaqus Kinematic model utilizing join, hinge, and beam elements.
Lav meeting F. Raffaelli INFN – Sezione di Pisa C. Capoccia LNF, A. Cecchetti INFN – Sezione di Frascati CERN, Dec13 th, Feet friction studies. -Installation.
7-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. February 23, 2009 Inventory # Workbench - Mechanical Introduction 12.0 Chapter.
Updated Thermo-Mechanical Model of the CLIC Two-Beam Module Riku Raatikainen
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 13, 2007 T. Brown.
Pure Tungsten HCal: ‘staircase’ design Structural analyses and possible optimizations.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 1.
1 MFGT 104 Materials and Quality Compression, Shear, Flexural, Impact Testing Professor Joe Greene CSU, CHICO.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Coil Cool-down and EM Loads Part 1 – Results of Shell Structure and Modular Coils H.M. Fan.
Andrew Biehl.  The objective of this project is to develop a method for determining the nut factor of a bolted joint using the finite element method.
FEM Analysis of the Stage3 Support Frame H.M. Fan March 14, 2007.
MQXFB design, assembly plans & tooling at CERN J.C Perez On behalf of MQXF collaboration team MQXF Workshop on Structure, Alignment and Electrical QA.
Status of report on chapter 6: Warm cryostat mechanical calculation PH-DT Engineering Office, CERN Page 1 CERN, May 20th 2015.
Spider Web concept University of Oxford 11 Jan 2011 SLHC meeting in Edinburgh.
Gravity load on SAS – comparison between real and mock-up April 13 th, 2016.
Time Varying Structural Behaviour of the PETS “On-Off” mechanism piston movement impact Riku Raatikainen
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science under Cooperative Agreement DE-SC Michigan State.
Page 1 GSI, Hydraulic Actuators for PANDA Target Spectrometer Jost Lühning, GSI Darmstadt Functional Specifications for moving the TS: Two synchronous.
Summary of Platform and Hilman Rollers Deformation Studies John Amann ILC Mechanical Engineering 7/11/07.
Coupled thermal-structural FEA of AS tooling for brazing of manifolds to disk stack R. Raatikainen, F. Rossi
Roller/rail - System for PANDA
Linear Buckling Analysis
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING
2K Cold Box Structure Analysis
Present status of the flux return yoke design
Status of design and production of LEP connection cryostat
FEA of the On-Off Mechanism Piston Movement Impact
Contents Introduction Identification of the knowledge gap
Energy, Work & Power Energy Problems Day #1.
Bicycle Wrench Analysis
Shipping Support Post Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Results of FEA for the PETS EBW tooling Riku Raatikainen

 Motivation for FEA: Demonstrating the structural behaviour of the PETS under compressive force in a workbench for welding Before welding, the PETS structure is held together by a friction contact  Appropriate force is needed, which holds the parts together in the workbench Too large force values could lead into instability while smaller values are not capable of creating an appropriate friction contact

Assembly Couplers Inner Copper solid Outer Steel shell

1. Assembly and compression in a vertical position Screw Workbench scheme 2. Welding process in horizontal position

Sections Gaps (50 µm) for Welding

FE-Analysis  Assumptions and restrictions: Maximum total deformation of 50 µm were allowed (transversal < µm) Friction factor between Copper-Copper surfaces roughly 1.0 PETS under axial loading + the effect of gravity The effect of rotational velocity was neglected since its small value (0.004 rad/s)

Mesh/Loads/Boundary Conditions (total mass ≈ 45 kg) The structure is supported from both ends, where the remote displacement (B) allows longitudinal movement.

Results Total deformation (µm), Loading case 300 N Total deformation (µm), Loading case 1 kN

Results Total deformation (µm), Loading case 5 kN Total deformation (µm), Loading case 10 kN

Results-Extra Illustration of steel shell losing its stability if too large force value is applied. Overloading (def. > 50 µm), loading case 50 kN. CLASH: Frictional contact fails, loading case 200 N. Buckling

Conclusion The effect of gravity is seen significant (but still acceptable) in small force values below 1 kN and the total deformation is emphasized in vertical direction (due to gravity). Theoretical failing of the friction connection is at near 225 N In loading cases where the force reaches 5 kN the longitudinal deformation emphasizes  More stable structural behaviour in vertical direction Axial loading cases of several tons will lead into instability It should be noted that the FEM model did not include any safety factors and that the simulation model was approximately 10 kg lighter than the actual PETS structure  In a reality the clashing is expected to occur around 300 N  For reliable welding process a minimum clamping force of 1 kN should be considered as guiding value BUT As seen the difference in deformation between the loading cases of 1 kN and 5 kN is only few micrometers!  A clamping force of 5 kN is recommended to ensure a reliable friction contact and alignment during operations (transportation, manipulation etc.) Exact forces can adjusted furthermore in machining Parts to be welded could be attached into the structure by using spot welding before actual welding  Even more reliable and accurate alignment