David England Liverpool John Moores University Whole Body Interaction: Opportunities and Challenges.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
METALEARNING: is to make sense of ones own experience of learning. (Learning about learning)
Advertisements

Welcome to DEAS 2005 Design and Evolution of Autonomic Application Software David Garlan, CMU Marin Litoiu, IBM CAS Hausi A. Müller, UVic John Mylopoulos,
ECDL’ Lisbon, September 2000 © 2000, nmg Interactivity Design and Construction Paradigms Nuno M. Guimarães
Welcome to Course: Advanced Technologies for Learning Jim Slotta … and all of you!
Team Pakistan: Ahmad Humayun Ozair Muazzam Tayyab Javed Yahya Cheema.
Staff-student collaboration to enhance digital practices in the disciplines Jim Pettiward (CELT eLearning) & Chris O’Reilly (ISS) Photo:
Revolutionary next generation human computer interaction.
Welcome Basic Concept Research Justification The Project Implementation Potential Issues Future Work What am going to talk about?
Ubiquitous Computing Computers everywhere. Agenda Old future videos
DAB:Interactive Haptic Painting with 3D Virtual Brushes Bill Baxter Vincent Scheib Ming C. Lin Dinesh Manocha SIGGRAPH 2001 Presentation by Pin Ren Feb.
Gyration GyroMouse. Digitizers 3D Digitization Data Gloves (Haptic Devices)
1 3 rd SG13 Regional Workshop for Africa on “ITU-T Standardization Challenges for Developing Countries Working for a Connected Africa” (Livingstone, Zambia,
FTCE 3.3 Identify and Apply Motivational Theories and Techniques That Enhance Student Learning Learning – Relatively permanent improvement in performance.
Electronic Visualization Laboratory University of Illinois at Chicago Interaction between Real and Virtual Humans: Playing Checkers R. Torre, S. Balcisoy.
CIS 601 Fall 2004 Introduction to Computer Vision and Intelligent Systems Longin Jan Latecki Parts are based on lectures of Rolf Lakaemper and David Young.
On Education Gerrit C. van der Veer most work done by Anne Bowser Elizabeth Churchill Jennifer Preece.
Augmented Reality New Trend in Education Adoracion C. Cunanan Presenter.
Social Immersive Media Amer Obeidah Basic Interaction Design Carnegie Mellon University.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Augmented reality applied to Resilience Management LLP Programme Knowledge Alliances“Collaborative Reformation of Curricula on Resilience Management with.
GENERAL PRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY:- Neeraj Dhiman.
Charting Past, Present, and Future Research in Ubiquitous Computing Gregory D. Abowd and Elizabeth D. Mynatt Georgia Institute of Technology LEE SEMUN.
E-Learning Overview E-learning Theory and Models Module.
10/7/2015art.live - 3 rd IST Concertation meeting 3 rd IST Concertation Meeting art.live (IST 10942) Xavier Marichal, UCL ADERSA - ADETTI - Casterman -
MOBILE GROUPWARE Jason Tsay Advanced User Interface Software - Spring 2013.
Mobile Computing: The Why’s and the How’s Patrick M. O’Shea, Ph.D.
The Future of Online Learning for Teachers and Students Chris Dede Harvard University
How Smart Homes Learn The Evolution of the Networked Home and Household Marshini Chetty, Ja-Young Sung, and Rebecca E. Grinter Ubicomp 2007 Presenter:Brian.
An Effect of interactive media in a social awareness ubiquitous learning community Associate Professor Dr.Jaitip Nasonkhla.
Obstacle Avoidance using Machine Vision Joose Rautemaa
ISECON 2003 Conference San Diego, California, USA November 6-9, 2003 K.H.VAT (Mr) Department of Computer and Information Science Faculty of Science & Technology.
Augmented Reality and 3D modelling By Stafford Joemat Supervised by Mr James Connan.
Beyond The Desktop The Future of the Interface. The co-evolution of hardware, interface and users Punched cards Character displays and keyboards Graphical.
Collide Research Group University Duisburg-Essen (UDE)
Assistive Technology in the Classroom Setting Rebecca Puckett CAE6100 – GQ1 (24494) Dec. 7, 2009.
Augmented Reality Authorized By: Miss.Trupti Pardeshi. NDMVP, Comp Dept. Augmented Reality 1/ 23.
Where Robots and Virtual Agents Meet Where Robots and Virtual Agents Meet A Survey of Social Interaction Research across Milgram’s Reality-Virtuality Continuum.
Computer Supported Collaborative Sports An Emerging Paradigm Volker Wulf, Florian ‘Floyd’ Müeller, Eckehard F. Moritz, Gunnar Stevens, Martin R. Gibbs.
Whole Body Interaction Workshop HCI2008 September 1 st, 2008.
Internet of Things. IoT Novel paradigm – Rapidly gaining ground in the wireless scenario Basic idea – Pervasive presence around us a variety of things.
CONTENT FOCUS FOCUS INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION COMPONENTS COMPONENTS TYPES OF GESTURES TYPES OF GESTURES ADVANTAGES ADVANTAGES CHALLENGES CHALLENGES REFERENCE.
Augmented Reality. The blending of digital information with the physical world User can see and is apart of the real world User is immersed in a artificial.
HLG MOS Flexibility and Adaptability HLG MOS Workshop November 24, 2015 The Hague Pádraig Dalton 1.
Virtual Pointing Device Using Stereo Camera The 6th International Conference on Applications and Principles of Information Science Jan , 2007, Kuala.
9/30/2001Craig Ganoe Methods Supporting Usability Evaluation of the Collaborative Meeting Place Craig Ganoe Project Description LiNC (Learning.
+ Innovation Powered by Technology Implementing Blended Learning Learning from Rhode Island #RIDEpowered2013.
Select-and-Point: A Novel Interface for Multi-Device Connection and Control based on Simple Hand Gestures Hyunglae Lee Ki-Won Yeom Heeseok Jeong Hyun-Jin.
Ubiquitous, Domestic and Tangible Computing A new way of thinking Saul Greenberg University of Calgary CPSC
Situated interaction in an educational setting. Irene Mavrommati Computer Technology Institute Research Unit 3: Applied Information Systems
LOOKING THROUGH A VYGOTSKIAN LENS: NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR PRACTICE BASED RESEARCH Esther Joosa – Independent Researcher and Practitioner ESTHER JOOSA ISCAR.
The Skill Theme Approach to Physical Education Chapter 9.
GraffitiLuv ™ Tangible Media Project. Overview What GraffitiLuv is about Purpose The Design Process –Evolution of the Idea –Prototyping and Player Testing.
  Computer vision is a field that includes methods for acquiring,prcessing, analyzing, and understanding images and, in general, high-dimensional data.
WP6 Emotion in Interaction Embodied Conversational Agents WP6 core task: describe an interactive ECA system with capabilities beyond those of present day.
What is Multimedia Anyway? David Millard and Paul Lewis.
Exploring the Personal and Social Capability for Primary schools.
NCP meeting Jan 27-28, 2003, Brussels Colette Maloney Interfaces, Knowledge and Content technologies, Applications & Information Market DG INFSO Multimodal.
Jeffrey Shaw Regina Banayad Photography 11. Pioneering new media artist and researcher. He has been a leading figure in new media art since its emergence.
Gido Hakvoort – Andrew Lewis
Rob Mostyn Digital Game Hub Coordinator Rochester Institute of Technology Center for Media, Arts, Games, Interaction and Creativity (MAGIC)
Lecture 15: Guest Lecture Professor Gordon Wetzstein
EURIDICE Project Exploiting the concept of Intelligent Cargo
Introducing Design and Technologies
Mixed Reality Server under Robot Operating System
Tangible Interaction & Augmented Reality
Smart Learning concepts to enhance SMART Universities in Africa
Mixed Up Multiplication Challenge
STS.035: Semester Installation Project Idea Generation
Computer Vision Readings
Building a Course with Emerging Technologies
Presentation transcript:

David England Liverpool John Moores University Whole Body Interaction: Opportunities and Challenges

Liverpool Liv. Pic

Non-Photorealism Wet and Cockshott, England, Waite - movement (and mapping) qualities of paint

Workshops First Workshop Liverpool: Whole Body Interaction: The Future of the Human Body Interdisciplinary workshop of artists and scientists Fitted in with FACT’s Future of the Human Body Exhibition Subsequent workshops at CHI2009, CHI2010 and ACE2011

Why Whole Body Interaction A reaction against: {Virtual, Mixed, Augmented} Realities Mobile, Ubiquitous Interaction Where the focus became/is increasing the technology and not the person or people interacting

WBI But more positively... A reaction to Bill Buxton’s Challenge to create interfaces that made fuller and better use of human capabilities And a reaction in favour of embodied/located action- following Suchman’s work on Plans and Situated Action

“Naturalism” Scot mentioned non-photorealism yesterday Central to discussions of mappings in WBI Current move to NUI may be misleading Is the most “natural” mapping also the most engaging interesting effective.... ? Compare Randal Smith’s continuum of Literal to Magical mappings in the ARK

Mixed Hello Open source camera vision work by Josh Nimoy - jMyron toolkit - edge detection

C0d3 Multi-device work by Caen Botto MAXMSP - Magic of the Spell “Magic Mapping”

Evolution Challenge Evolution of devices and technology WBI == movement, physiology, emotion, context, location, social connection etc etc. But emotional inference, for example, currently has 70-80% recognition rates with a small range of emotions

Autonomic models Our solution: the triangulation of inferences by combining multiple sources Works on the principle of Autonomic Computing (invented by IBM) for self- managing systems WBI interfaces and modules can be plugged in and replaced as they evolve

Future CHI2012 Community of Digital Arts - David England, Jill Fantuzacoffin Various Activities at the conference CHI2013 in Paris - the Digital Arts Community will continue We invite you to submit, participate, debate