Evaluating Configuration Management

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effective Contract Management Planning
Advertisements

INPO Update Configuration Management CMBG Meeting
INPO Update CMBG Meeting June 2013
Ensure Vendor/Engineer of Choice Product Quality
A Brief History of CM in the Nuclear Industry and the CMBG
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 3.1.
1 Continuing Evolution of U.S. Nuclear Quality Assurance Principles, Practices and Requirements PART II - A Tutorial August 2005 This document.
NRC Perspective of Recent Configuration Management Issues Tom Farnholtz Chief, Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety, Region IV June 2014 CMBG.
2007 CMBG Conference Temporary Configuration Changes Tony Hathcock Duke Energy - Oconee June 18-20, 2007 Charleston, SC.
Lindy Hughes Fleet Fire Protection Program Engineer Southern Nuclear Operating Company June 4, 2013 Fire Protection.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.7 Commissioning Geoff Vaughan University of Central.
Pre-Project Planning Lessons from the Construction Industry Institute Construction Industry Institute Michael Davis, P. Eng, PMP Ontario Power Generation.
Validation Chapter 4 1. Validation Exemplifies Process Understanding 2.
Protection Against Occupational Exposure
Presented by Dorian S. Conger Conger-Elsea, Inc Riveredge Parkway, Suite 740 Atlanta, GA phone fax
Configuration Management for Transportation Management Systems Establishing and Maintaining System Integrity.
Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.
The Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable Ralph Covington David Wang.
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG Deployment of a Margin Model at Comanche Peak Presented.
Process Safety Management
1 “Lessons Learned - Construction of the National Enrichment Facility” Stephen Cowne Director, Quality & Regulatory Affairs Louisiana Energy Services (LES)
Page 1 Evaluation Improvement Initiative A New Evaluation Approach 0616 CMBG Discussion on Revised Evaluation Approach.PPT Institute of Nuclear Power Operations.
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
Page 1 Evaluation Improvement Initiative A New Evaluation Approach 0616 CMBG Discussion on Revised Evaluation Approach.PPT Institute of Nuclear Power Operations.
1 Digital I&C Systems Configuration Management Presented By: David E Woods Senior Engineer – Electrical/I&C Design Engineering June 21, 2011.
NHUG - Boston - 08/04/20101 Considerations for Operability of Chillers and Chilled Water Systems NHUG Summer Meeting August 4, 2010 Tim Mitchell Component.
2007 CMBG Conference David Hembree Institute of Nuclear Power Operations June 20, 2007 Charleston, SC INPO Perspective on Configuration Management.
SENG521 (Fall SENG 521 Software Reliability & Testing Software Product & process Improvement using ISO (Part 3d) Department.
1 Human Performance in Reactor Safety George E. Apostolakis Massachusetts Institute of Technology Presented at the Quality Colloquium,
1 Attributes of a Successful Nuclear Construction Project – A Regulator’s Perspective Victor M. McCree Deputy Regional Administrator for Operations U.S.
Michael deLamare Requirements Management Program Functions R-9.
INPO Update Operational Excellence Outcomes and Configuration Management Glenn J. Neises, INPO Sr. Evaluator June 2004 CMBG Glenn J. Neises, INPO Sr. Evaluator.
Margin Management. PAGE 2 Margin Management Plant Shutdowns 1.Late 1990’s – numerous “surprise” long-term plant shutdowns 2.Shutdowns resulted when a.
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
2007 CMBG Conference Bill Kline FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) June 19, 2006 Charleston, SC Latent Issues and Lessons Learned Discussion.
PAGE 1 New Plant - CM Configuration Management For The Next Generation Of Nuclear Facilities Joseph Burack Consulting Engineer Configuration Management.
Configuration Management of Post-Fukushima Regulations CMBG June 2013 David Gambrell Director, Severe Accident Management Southern Nuclear.
1 CDBI Inspection Insights for 2008 Kelly Clayton Senior Reactor Inspector Engineering Branch 1 Region IV.
Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin Management Bill Kline FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) June 2, 2008 Shell Beach, CA.
HSS Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at BNL Accelerator Safety Workshop E. Lessard Collider-Accelerator Department August 12-14,
2006 CMBG Conference Keith A. Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna 2006 CMBG Conference June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA Configuration Management Awareness Training.
2010 CMBG Conference Temporary Design Changes Tony Hathcock Duke Energy - Oconee June , 2010 Charlotte, NC.
2007 CMBG Conference A Brief History of CM in the Nuclear Industry and the CMBG Presented By: Rick Harris CMBG Steering Committee June 17-20, 2007 Charleston,
2007 CMBG Conference Sam Melton Progress Energy June 19, 2007 Charleston, SC Configuration Management Principles And Practices for New Nuclear Plants.
Presented by Dorian Conger General Manager Conger-Elsea, Inc Riveredge Parkway, Suite 740 Atlanta, GA
CMBG Conference 2013 Atlanta GA June 3, 2013 ANSI/NIRMA Standard CM Year History.
Preparations for working on Station 1 November 22, 2005.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
Licensed Environmental Professionals (“LEPs”) in Connecticut CT DEP overview Gina McCarthy, Commissioner.
Delivering the Nuclear Promise Overview
Pipeline Safety Management Systems
Instructor: Lloyd Hancock
CM-101 Configuration Management Fundamentals
Testing the System.
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
NRC CM Pilot Inspections Methodology and Results
Fast Track Modifications Keith Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna
Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland
INPO Perspective of Industry CM Performance
Results of Design Reviews
Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin Management
Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives
Margin Management Configuration Management Benchmarking Group
A Brief History of CM in the Nuclear Industry and the CMBG
Analyzing CM-Related Condition Reports
Jim Powers - Director, Fleet Engineering
TRTR Briefing September 2013
Design and Operating Margins Model
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating Configuration Management Institute of Nuclear Power Operations Suite 1042 700 Galleria Parkway Atlanta, GA 30339 DAVID M. FARR Manager Configuration Management 770-644-8432 Farrdm@inpo.org 0616 CMBG Breakout Session #4 CM Evaluation Criteria.PPT

Well-Managed and Understood Safety, Design, and Operational Margins Well Managed Margins OR.5 Station leadership establishes a culture that thoughtfully manages safety, design, & operational margins An “Enabler” CM.1 Plant equipment configuration is rigorously maintained and performance is consistent with design and licensing requirements CM.4 Processes that are used to control plant design bases are defined and validated Well-Managed and Understood Safety, Design, and Operational Margins The “Outcome” CM.2 Roles and responsibilities for establishing and maintaining licensing and design basis are understood and applied consistently CM.3 Day-to-day activities are conducted in a way that ensures operational and design margins are maintained

Design and Operating Margins Model Functional/Design Failure Greater than design basis range Design margin ( This is a prohibited range of operation and represents the additional conservative margin to account for uncertainties in design and construction ) Design or Tech Spec Basis Limit Analyzed transient range ( Design allows operation in the transient range. However operating restrictions consistent with the design, such as the magnitude and frequency of excursions into this range apply) Operating Point Limit Operating margin Allowed operating range ( The allowed operating range provides the normal margins operators use without violating setpoints ) Normal Operating Point

Evaluating Configuration Management Licensing Bases Plant specific requirements to ensure compliance with licensing and design assumptions. Design and Engineering Bases Fundamental requirements for SSC to ensure licensing bases are met. Design constraints to ensure owner’s requirements are met. Technical Requirements Parameters that define the function of performance of a given SSC. Parameters that ensure the design and engineering bases are met. Configuration control practices Licensing Bases Design and Engineering Bases Technical Requirements

Evaluation Building Blocks Outcome Outcome Evaluation plans Enablers Observations Attributes AFIs Strengths Noteworthy comments Area Summaries

Evaluating Configuration Management Design Requirements Documented & Retrievable Personnel Trained On Plant Changes Sound Engineering Programs Physical Plant Matches Documentation IFPT&E Controlled Written Guidance Controls CM Functions Good Craft Workmanship Design Interfaces Effective Degraded Conditions Evaluated OR.5 Leadership Establishes Culture for CM SSCs Meet Requirements CM.4 Plant Design Is Controlled & Validated Design Control Is Rigorous CM.1 Performance Consistent with Design Requirements Field Changes Evaluated Margins Verified Thru Testing Well Managed Margins PM & PdM Validates Margins Safety Evaluations Are Thorough CM.3 Day-today Activities Ensure Config. Control Maintained CM.2 Roles & Responsibilities Understood Sound Parts Evaluations Design Authority is Clear OP and MA Maintain Status Plant Design & Operating Margins Documented Degraded Conditions Resolved Aggressively Vulnerabilities Identified Proper Vendor Oversight Training Addresses Roles Contingencies Planned Extent of Condition Investigated EOP and AOP Bases Documented Emergent Issues Promptly Investigated