Horse Creek Wind Farm Community Review Workshop #1: Introductory Meeting April 21, 2011—6:30pm at the Paynter Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ensuring that building products meet code requirements ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. The ICC-ES Evaluation Committee conducts open public hearings on proposed.
Advertisements

Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
Step by Step Guide for Regulations S HELLY B EZANSON K ELLY O FFICE OF G ENERAL C OUNSEL S EPTEMBER 5, 2012.
Catholic School Councils A summary of 19 page document listed on school website.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering Student Chapter Standard of Excellence Training Program Webinar August 2007.
Role of the Executive Secretary Gail Dapolito Advisory Committee Coordinator Div. Scientific Advisors and Consultants Center for Biologics Evaluation and.
Environmental Impact Statement Process Development Services Department Carol Helland, Land Use Director/SEPA Official (DSD) David Pyle, Senior Land Use.
Conservation District Supervisor Accreditation Module 2: District Clerk: Roles & Responsibilities.
Procurement.
Open Meetings and Open Records. Regulatory Authority Open Meetings – KRS Open Records – KRS Applicable to ALL public agencies.
Meeting in Vermont Vermont Department of Libraries.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
BASICS OF DISTRICT BOARD MEETINGS. PURPOSES OF MEETINGS Meetings are fundamental to conducting conservation district business. Meetings are fundamental.
Change Advisory Board COIN v1.ppt Change Advisory Board ITIL COIN June 20, 2007.
CAMPUT 2015 Energy Regulation Course Donald Gordon Conference Centre Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Role of Tribunal Staff, Interveners and Independent.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Environmental Review for State Bond Funded Grant Projects Presented by Lisa Lee, Environmental Review Unit.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
Office of the Faculty Secretary www:webs.uidaho.edu/facultycouncil Faculty Senate Website 8/10/09 1.
1 Public Outreach October 2008 By Adelina Murtezaj – Public Relation Officer For Inaugural Partnership Activity between ICC and ERO.
The Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). FOIA Topics of Discussion Public Meetings Closed Meetings Meeting Notices & Agendas Electronic Communication.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
CaLP RCWG – 28 th January 2015 Start time : 3 – 5pm (Thailand) Presenters: Rebecca Vo – CaLP Asia Regional Focal Point Wadel S. Cabrera III – CaLP Asia.
Before you begin. For additional assistance, contact your club’s Information Technology Chairperson or Electronic Learning at:
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
GAC-GNSO Consultation Group On GAC Early Engagement in GNSO PDP London Progress Report 22/06/2014.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Summary of Rulemaking in California for the Forensic Alcohol Laboratories Regulation Review Committee Cathy L. Ruebusch, RN, MSN Office of Regulations.
New rights for people complaining about adult social care providers – an introduction.
Networking the World TM IEEE: Networking the World.
NOAA Science Advisory Board …advises the Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere on long- and short- range strategies for research, education,
State of implementation of the decision III/6f regarding Ukraine (MOP 2, June, , 2008, Riga, Latvia)
STAKEHOLDER CALL/MEETING TO DISCUSS AND PROVIDE INPUT ON ZEV INCENTIVE PROGRAM GUIDELINES CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD March 7,
A Division of New York Department of State New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA)
CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES. --- “The driving impetus for conducting environmental impact studies is to comparatively present the effects of proposed alternatives.
Texas Open Meetings Act Documents at Meetings What are the Rules? Becky P. Casares Assistant Attorney General Opinion Committee.
West Virginia Department of Education Introducing ……. Policy 2419: Regulations for the Education of Students with Exceptionalities.
Responsibilities of Lead Agency Pages 7-8 of Training Guide 1. Preliminary review a) Determine if activity is a project as described by CEQA b) May require.
Rulemaking by APHIS. What is a rule and when must APHIS conduct rulemaking? Under U.S. law, a rule is any requirement of general applicability and future.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
Working Together to Help Our Schools What is CPC?.
1 1 CEQA Scoping Naomi Feger Planning TMDL Section Leader Region 2.
Doc.: IEEE /0804r0 Submission May 2007 Al Petrick, WiDeFiSlide 1 TGmb – Closing Report Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE.
Pre-application process in England and Wales Sixth meeting of the Task Force on Public Participation in Decision- making under the Aarhus Convention
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Public.
Community Development Department May 2, 2016 NEW CPAC MEMBERS TRAINING WELCOME.
Results. Relationships. Reputation. Legal and Policy Elements to Community Planning and Zoning – Open Meeting Law Christopher A. Schmaltz Gust Rosenfeld,
COUNTY COUNSEL Brown Act Public Records Act Presenter: Janice D. Killion Public Records Act – Ethics – Conflicts of Interest.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens.
MEETINGS & ELECTIONS Saturday, July 22, 2017
Ian Marquand Montana Board of Medical Examiners
Community Development Department April 3, 2017
Quality Workshop The Local Council Award Scheme is a great guide for good practice in our sector and a way for councils to build confidence in their.
Overview What is the CEQA environmental review process?
Community Development Department April 3, 2017
Community Development Department May 2, 2016
SEQRA as a Tool to Review Energy Projects
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
U.S. Efforts to Engage Stakeholders through New Technologies
Region 8 Meeting Harvey Solomon, MD
1915(c) WAIVER REDESIGN 2019 Brain Injury Summit
TGmb – Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 May 2007
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Community Development Department May 2, 2016
Community Development Department April 3, 2017
Presentation transcript:

Horse Creek Wind Farm Community Review Workshop #1: Introductory Meeting April 21, 2011—6:30pm at the Paynter Center

Welcome Introduction of all Planning Board members, Secretary, Consultants, Iberdrola Representatives and others Review of Rules and Procedures to be followed during each workshop

Intent of Workshops These workshops are intended as a tool for the Planning Board to gain a better understanding of the DEIS and the issues that must or should be addressed in connection therewith. Although the public is invited to the workshops (as they must be under the open meetings law), the workshops are not intended to provide the public with a forum to address the DEIS, and there is no right to public participation at a workshop. Nevertheless, it is the Board’s intent in the interest of both openness and thoroughness to offer the public an opportunity at the workshops to make comments and pose questions. The Board may engage in dialogue with the public during the workshops. The sole purposes is to benefit the Board in its understanding of the issues as it reviews and deliberates on the DEIS. However, the workshops are not intended to be and will not be part of the official record of the Board’s review of the DEIS under SEQRA. Comments by the public during the workshop and comments made by board members or discussions between board members themselves or with the public during the workshops will not be considered part of the official record. The written comment period on the DEIS is now open and the public is free to submit such comments outside of the workshops and such written comments will be part of the official record. In addition, there will be a public hearing scheduled following the completion of the workshops at which the public will be given ample opportunity to make comments on the DEIS for the record.

Workshop Rules & Procedures The Workshops to be hosted by the Town of Clayton Planning Board will have the following rules and procedures: 1. Meetings will be held at the Paynter Senior Center, Strawberry Lane, Clayton, NY unless otherwise notified. The meetings will begin promptly at 6:30pm and will end by 8:30pm at the latest. 2. All guests will sign in (print or write so that information is legible). You must give your name and place of residence. 3. Comments will be taken during the last half-hour of the workshop. Spoken comments will be limited to two minutes. Written comments and questions may also be submitted at the end of the workshop, turned in at the Town of Clayton offices–located at 405 Riverside Drive, downtown Clayton, NY, or submitted online through the “Contact Us” link. All submitted comments must contain a name and a place of residence. 4. Comments and questions should be focused on the topics that are on the agenda for that particular meeting. 5. It is requested that any documents or comments submitted be as concise and to the point as possible. 6. It is expected that all those in attendance will act respectfully to the Board and to each other during the workshops. 7. Please remember to address all spoken comments and/or questions to the Planning Board, not to the others in attendance.

Disclosure by Board Members Planning Board members will disclose any interests in the proposed project, if they exist.

Explanation of SEQR State Environmental Quality Review Act Authority: Statute; Environmental Conservation law Article 8; DEC Administrative Regulations, 6 NYCRR Part 617 SEQR “Establishes a process to systematically consider environmental factors early in the planning stages of actions that are directly undertaken, funded or approved by local, regional and state agencies.”

Classification of Action Type I—actions that experience has shown are more likely to have significant adverse environmental impacts Type II—actions that have been determined not to have a significant adverse environmental impacts Unlisted—actions that are not Type I or Type II.

Next Steps after Classification “If an action is determined to be a Type I or Unlisted action, the next step is to systematically consider environmental factors involved with the action to make a reasoned determination regarding the likelihood that the action may have a significant adverse impact on the environment” The EAF Form is the initial SEQR tool used for this determination

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) If a significant adverse impact is likely to occur, an EIS is prepared to explore ways to avoid/reduce adverse environmental impacts or to identify a potentially less damaging alternative. If it is determined that there will be no significant impacts on the environment, a Negative Declaration is prepared at this point and ends the SEQR process.

Positive Declaration When the lead agency determines that there may be one or more significant adverse environmental impacts from a proposed project a positive declaration is declared. This means that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared and made available for public review.

Public Participation There are opportunities for outreach and public participation throughout the EIS process. These include: Coordination with involved/interested agencies for Type 1 actions; Public input to scoping for the Draft DEIS, if chosen by the lead agency; The required 30 day public comment period on the DEIS; Public hearings.

Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) The DEIS should impartially analyze the significant adverse environmental impacts of a proposed action and examine how impacts can be avoided or minimized. Public review of a draft EIS is important and a minimum 30-day public review and comment period is required.

Public Hearing A public hearing may be held, at the discretion of the lead agency, during the draft EIS public review period. All interested parties are invited to the hearing or they may file written comments instead. All substantive comments become part of the official record and must be responded to by the lead agency in the final EIS.

Final Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS) This typically consists of the draft EIS plus supplemental information; substantive public comments and the lead agency’s responses to those comments. The lead agency files a public notice of the completion and then must wait 10 days before taking next steps. Public comments can be submitted during the 10-day period and become part of the official record and must be considered when the lead and involved agencies make written findings prior to issuing a final decision. No agency response to these comments is required.

EDR Presentation Presentation on the proposed Horse Creek Wind Farm Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)

Website Overview The Horse Creek Community Review website can be found on the Town of Clayton homepage: ( The Committee Review has an abundance of information related to the workshops and the proposed project.

Posts On the main page of the Community Review website, you will find “posts” or news updates on the workshops and the review process. Community Review homepagehomepage

Pages There are also several pages that provide specific information on the review. They include: Purpose Statement Workshop Rules & Procedures Planning Board information Proposed Project summary Topics & Agendas: lists upcoming topics and provides links to the workshop agendasTopics & Agendas Documentation: provides links to related documents, including the DEIS and received public commentsDocumentationDEIS Contact Us: form that allows public comments to be submitted electronically to the Planning BoardContact Us

Questions on the Website Please feel free to call , ext. 20 and ask for Alicia

How & Where to Access the DEIS There are several ways that you can access the DEIS. You can go to the Town Clerk’s Office at 405 Riverside Drive, Clayton, NY and sign a request to receive a CD with the DEIS; or You can access the DEIS on the Community Review website by going online to and clicking on the Horse Creek Wind Farm Community Review link on the homepage. You can also view hard copies of the DEIS at the Town of Clayton Town Clerk’s Office, and the Hawn Memorial and Depauville Libraries.

Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) The FOIL provides the public with the right to access certain government records. The DEIS (in CD format) does not need to be FOIL requested, but other related documents may need to be. FOIL request forms must be filed. These can be picked up at the Town Clerk’s office or downloaded at the Town of Clayton’s website from the Town Clerk’s page [ Once received, the Clerk has 5 days to respond to your request.

Topics for Next Workshop Workshop date: May 12, 2011 Topic ideas?

Question & Comment Period Open comments/questions from the public **Remember, the comment/question period will last for a maximum of 30 minutes and workshops will end promptly at 8:30pm at the latest**

Other Other discussion

Adjournment Next Workshop: May 12, 2011, 6:30pm at the Paynter Center