IT’S ALL ABOUT THE BIG PEOPLE Presented by: Sylvia Mijuskovic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The No Child Left Behind Act and Title 1 Schools What Parents Should Know and Do.
Advertisements

Schoolwide Programs (SWP) NCLB Regional Meetings April 2010.
Title I Compliance Federal and State Programs. Goal of Title I To help ensure that all children have the opportunity to obtain a high-quality education.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
State and Federal Accountability Directors of Special Education October 10, 2013 Region One Education Service Center Office of School Improvement, Accountability,
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Louisiana School Turnaround Specialist Program
Colorado Model Autism and SSN Programs (COMASP) Exceptional Student Leadership Unit Melinda Graham Autism Consultant Gina Quintana SSN Consultant Brooke.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program May 7, 2013.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention MN Response to Intervention Center Ann Casey, Ph.D. Director St. Croix River Ed. District
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
School Improvement Planning A Guide to the Florida Continuous Improvement Management System.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Individual Professional Development Plan
NH Department of Education NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan April 15, 2011 Referencing requirements for Schools in Need.
STAR (Support through Assistance & Reforms) Report.
Read to Achieve Newton Conover City Schools. What is the Goal? The goal of the State is to ensure that every student reads at or above grade level by.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Eighth Street Elementary School September 25 th, 2014 Mr. John McCollum Title I Annual Parent Meeting.
The Basics of Title I Florida Public School Choice Consortium's Annual Conference (FPSCC) Anke Toth November 18, 2009.
School Improvement Plan Guidance Presented by the School Improvement And Educational Data Warehouse.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
Assessment in Early Childhood Legislation. Legislation for Young Children The need for measurement strategies and tests to evaluate federal programs led.
School Improvement Plans School Improvement  The Vision  Progress  Plan Components  Problem-Solving What is our vision for school improvement.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program CCSA March 25, 2013.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting Reedy Creek Elementary September 22, 2010 Diane Crook-Nichols Principal.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Elliott Point September 15, 2015 Janet Norris.
PBIS History of Tuttle Elementary 2006-Current Tuttle Elementary School/Development of PBIS Matrix Began PBIS Awarded Model PBIS School.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 SCIP and Title I Information Session Fiscal Year
1 Division of Public Schools (PreK -12) Florida Department of Education School Improvement Plans Leading the School Improvement Process Presented.
Title I Schoolwide Mid- Year Review Melissa Moe and Kris Rangel January 24, 2013.
IT’S ALL ABOUT THE BIG PEOPLE Presented by: Sylvia Mijuskovic, Resource Teacher.
IT’S ALL ABOUT THE BIG PEOPLE Presented by: Sylvia Mijuskovic.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Differentiated Accountability Title I Conference Daytona, Florida April 29, 2009.
STAR 3 Parent Advisory Council UPDATE Questions to Parents Fact: More than 28% of children enter kindergarten more than 1 year below age level in.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents Highland Renaissance Academy.
RTI 2 Please write down three things you want to know before this session is done today.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
Accreditation (AdvancED) Process School Improvement Activities February 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator of.
MID-YEAR STAKEHOLDER’S ASSESSMENT REVIEW TWIN LAKES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY JANUARY 23, 2014.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Anderson Elementary School
School Improvement Plans
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Mountain Park Elementary School
Oakland Terrace Elementary School
Lucille Moore Elementary
Northside Elementary Title I Annual Meeting Northside Elementary
Merritt Brown Middle School
Strategic Plan: Heards Ferry Elementary
Title I Annual Meeting Waller Elementary
Presentation transcript:

IT’S ALL ABOUT THE BIG PEOPLE Presented by: Sylvia Mijuskovic

 Welcome  Review of District philosophy of SIP  What’s New?  Review of SIP Template  Parent Involvement Goal  Race to the Top  Teacher Appraisal System  SINI vs DA  DA Requirements

 TITLE I during the time that AYP was not met  Currently Title I  AYP has not been met for more than 2 years.  Other sanctions that come with SINI include Choice with transportation and SES.

DOE TEMPLATE READING ATTENDANCE MATHSUSPENSION SCIENCEPARENTAL INVOLVEMENT WRITING BIG PEOPLE OBJECTIVE

READING GOALS Problem-Solving Process to Increase Student Achievement Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of improvement for the following group: Anticipated BarrierStrategyPerson or Position Responsible for Monitoring Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Strategy Evaluation Tool 1. Students achieving proficiency (FCAT Level 3) in reading Reading Goal #1: 1.1. Enter narrative for the goal in this box Current Level of Performance:* 2012 Expected Level of Performanc e:* Enter numerical data for current level of performance in this box. Enter numerical data for expected level of performan ce in this box Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of improvement for the following group: Anticipated BarrierStrategyPerson or Position Responsible for Monitoring Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Strategy Evaluation Tool 2. Students achieving above proficiency (FCAT Levels 4 and 5) in reading Reading Goal #2: 2.1. Enter narrative for the goal in this box Current Level of Performance:* 2012 Expected Level of Performanc e:* Enter numerical data for current level of performance in this box. Enter numerical data for expected level of performan ce in this box

Once you have completed the “Big People Objective” in the yellow zone of your plan, you will complete the rest of the template following DOE guidelines.

EACH GOAL AREA TEMPLATE 1. Students achieving proficiency (FCAT Level 3) in reading 2. Students achieving above proficiency (FCAT Levels 4 and 5) in reading 3. Percentage of students making Learning Gains in reading 4. Percentage of students in Lowest 25% making learning gains in reading 5. Student subgroups not making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in reading You must complete one for each subgroup that AYP was not met A reminder that this is done for Reading, Math, Science, and Writing. Attendance and Parental Involvement do not require the above.

 Utilize data from your parent involvement survey to complete this goal.

Q & A Highly Qualified Administrators Highly Qualified Instructional Coaches Highly Qualified Teachers (strategies for retention of teachers) Non-Highly Qualified Teachers (who is out of field?) Staff Demographics Teacher Mentoring Coordination and Integration of Title I Resources RtI Literacy Teams NCLB Attachments (Choice letter, SES, SINI notification) Pre-School Transition

Part 2 - District Option: Team and School Accountability Measures 2a. 5 points – Accountability for achievement of School Improvement Plan goals. i. Part 1: Accountability for whole school implementation of strategies that support school-based SIP objective(s) as measured by a school portfolio containing evidence of in-process measures (reviewed by area offices).  2 points – Portfolio shows strong evidence of implementation of 100% of strategies  1 point – Portfolio shows some evidence of implementation of most strategies  0 points – Portfolio shows little or no evidence of implementation of strategies ii. Part 2: Accountability for whole school or team (as determined by school leadership) success in meeting targets of SIP Outcome Indicators  3 points – All Outcome Indicators met or significant growth  2 points – Most Outcome Indicators met  1 points – Some Outcome Indicators met  0 points – Few or no Outcome Indicators met

 DA Checklist  Baseline and Mid Year Data Report  Narrative Report  End of Year Checklist

FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 School Improvement Plan Hard copy to Office of Testing and Accountability (including original signatures of entire SAC) Hard copy to Area Office (including a copy of signatures of entire SAC) School Advisory Council Rosters Hard copy to Office of Testing and Accountability (including original signatures of SAC Chair and Principal) DA Checklist Hard copy to Office of Testing and Accountability

School Improvement Reporting Deadlines School Improvement Plan (SIP) Final SIP for all schoolsSeptember 30, 2011 Progress Reports School Baseline DataOctober 10, 2011 School Mid-Year DataJanuary 20, 2012 School Mid-Year Narrative ReportFebruary 3, 2012