25 January 2016 European Commission - Joint Research Centre (JRC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PM EMISSIONS FROM TYRES AND BRAKES MAIN FACTS AND OPEN ISSUES Sustainable Transport Unit Institute for Energy and Transport Joint Research Centre 04 April.
Advertisements

COPERT 4 Training 3. Activity Data – Beginner’s Guide.
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Application of the development approach described in WLTP-DHC on ACEA’s EU database By H. Steven
Real-world emissions in the EU: An overview of recent evidence and policy implications Peter Mock, Anup Bandivadekar APEC VFEL Workshop Singapore March.
REGENERATION ISSUES Institute for Energy and Transport Joint Research Centre B. Giechaskiel, J. Andersson, G. Martini 3 April 2014.
Igor Trpevski University of St. Cyril and Methodius Skopje,
3rd International Conference LUBRICANTS RUSSIA Diesel Particulate Filter Regeneration Strategy and its Influence on Engine Oil Characteristics Luca.
Assessment Criteria for the Acceptability of Cycle and Testing Procedure Informal working document DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Assessment Criteria.
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Comparison of different European databases with respect to road category and time periods (on peak, off peak, weekend)
RDE Working group Brussels, September 2015 Collection of NO x emissions data - First preliminary results RDE working group 14 September 2015 European Commission.
Comparison of PM exhaust emissions measured at a chassis dynamometer and on-road chasing Rainer Vogt, Volker Scheer, Roberto Casati Ford Forschungszentrum.
Joint Research Centre the European Commission's in-house science service JRC Science Hub: ec.europa.eu/jrc 38th UNECE IWG PMP MEETING Non- exhaust particle.
Proposed by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
Joint Research Centre the European Commission's in-house science service JRC Science Hub: ec.europa.eu/jrc 38th UNECE IWG PMP MEETING Exhaust emissions.
RDE testing: how to define NTE emission limits?
Questions on cycle representativeness (French position) EU – WLTP 17 th of September 2013.
Evaluation of candidate procedures - Status & Reporting - RDE-LDV working group 28 June 2012, Brussels, EU Martin Weiss Pierre Bonnel DG - Joint Research.
DG ENTR, 08 September 2011, Brussels, EC Pierre Bonnel Alessandro Marotta Martin Weiss Joint Research Centre (JRC) IES - Institute for Energy and Transport.
RDE PN-PEMS programme Progress Update F. Riccobono, B. Giechaskiel, P. Bonnel STU, IET, JRC, European Commission.
Joint Research Centre the European Commission's in-house science service NON-EXHAUST PARTICLE EMISSIONS.
4. Activity Data – Beginner’s Guide
India’s Comments on EPPR (Part-B2)
Proposed by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics
RDE Regulation Commission Meeting
RDE Task Force Meeting, 7th January 2014
Development of the Japan’s RDE (Real Driving Emission) procedure
Questions on cycle representativeness
RDE-LDV working group Vehicle test plan 2013
RDE Task Force Meeting, 28th November 2013, Brussels
28th of November 2013, Brussels
BRAKE PARTICLE EMISSIONS
RDE Regulation Random Cycle, Cycle Generation
LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Drafting of physical PEMS protocol –
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
JAMA position on RDE Boundary Condition
Input ACEA Boundary Conditions.
LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Released datasets -
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update and summary of previous presentations by H. Steven
Additional RDE trip indicator(s)
Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics
Analyses related to dynamic effects in vehicle speed and NOx emission measurements by H. Steven
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven
RDE Discussion of Conformity Factors - JRC views on the ACEA propsal - - August 2015 – RDE Data Evaluation group European Commission - Joint Research Centre.
Emissions testing in the laboratory and on the road: Preliminary results for one Euro 6 diesel vehicle Pierre Bonnel Martin Weiss Joint Research Centre.
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
Revision of the Work Plan
Francesco Riccobono, Barouch Giechaskiel, Pierre Bonnel
PN-PEMS Progress update
LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Released datasets -
RDE testing of hybrid vehicles Contribution to the RDE working group
16th of November 2013, Brussels
Real Driving Emissions IWG Recommendations for Data Collection & EU Dataset
Work plan and next steps – RDE-LDV working group
RDE – Assessment of positive elevation gain
LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Assessment criteria and work plan -
Emissions testing with PEMS versus random laboratory driving cycles
Comparing EMROAD and the ACEA RDE Evaluation Tool
Boundary conditions - Status
RDE-LDV working group 13 April 2012 Pierre Bonnel Martin Weiss
Review of the European test procedure for evaporative emissions
LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Assessment of RDE data evaluation methods: Set-up of "reference database“ - 16th of September 2013, Brussels Pierre Bonnel.
Informal document GRPE-77-30
RDE-LDV working group 20 November 2012, Brussels, EU Pierre Bonnel
PMP INFORMAL GROUP Exhaust particle emissions – progress report
RDE Task Force Meeting, 16th December 2013, Brussels
Informal document GRPE Rev.1
Comparison of key parameters of EU WLTP database and WLTC version 5
Presentation transcript:

Towards RDE cold-start provisions Contribution to the RDE working group 25 January 2016 European Commission - Joint Research Centre (JRC) IET - Institute for Energy and Transport Sustainable Transport Unit

Background • Current Type 1 (20-30 oC) and Type 6 tests (-7 oC) cover cold start; a dedicated cold-start test does not exist Cold start emissions are recorded in RDE but excluded from calculations Absence of vehicle conditioning Low repeatability and reproducibility of test conditions may lead to high variability of warm-up durations and cold start emissions Cold start contributes little to the overall emissions of comparatively long (up to 2h) RDE tests Implementation of dedicated cold-start provisions as part of the 3rd RDE package

Addressing cold-start - Options Option 1 – Status quo: Cold-start assessment via Type 1 and Type 6 tests; exclusion from RDE Option 2: Cold-start inclusion in RDE data evaluation but no dedicated assessment Option 3: Cold-start inclusion in RDE data evaluation with specific pre- conditioning requirements but no dedicated assessment Option 4: Dedicated cold-start provisions (including preconditioning and dedicated evaluation of emissions as part of the RDE procedure)

RDE - Preconditioning Engine, tubing, and after-treatment Parameter ranges rather than precise values Parameters to be controlled: Temperature range for vehicle storage (Status of periodically regenerating after-treatment systems) Others Minimum duration of preconditioning Standardization increases repeatability of tests but also the feasibility of defeat strategies

RDE - Driving Cold-start is typically followed by urban driving Critical parameters: Idling shares Maximum uninterrupted idling duration Maximum vehicle speed Driving dynamicity (v*a+) Test duration Proposal: RDE provisions could provide starting point for empirical assessment Focus on real-world driving data

Definition of cold start Options: Current “protective” definition: 5 min or until coolant has reached 70oC New definition for assessing cold start performance Time or distance based; first MAW Traces of coolant/oil temperature, etc. Data evaluation (e.g., at cranking, at a given coolant temperature, etc.) Applicability to hybrid vehicles Average speed Distance travelled in 5 min Distance travelled in 10 min Time to travel 2 km Time to travel 3 km 35 km/h 2.9 km 5.8 km 3:25 min 5:08 min 30 km/h 2.5 km 5.0 km 4:00 min 6:00 min 25 km/h 2.1 km 4.2 km 4:48 min 7:12 min 15 km/h 1.3 km 8:00 min 12:00 min 10 km/h 0.8 km 1.7 km 18:00 min

Empirical findings Empirical results of cold-start emission tests Laboratory tests Gasoline engines Diesel engines Vehicle ID G1 G2 G3 D1 D2 D3 Engine displacement [ccm] 2000 1200 3000 Number of cylinders 4 Engine rated power [kW] 155 90 110 100 Mileage [km] 11200 5000 13500 30000 14500

Empirical findings Normalized NOx emissions over the NEDC Gasoline vehicles emit 4 to 10 times more NOx during UDC1 than over the NEDC Diesel vehicles emit 2 to 3 times more NOx during the UDC1 than over the NEDC Three way catalyst appears to effectively reduce NOx immediately after UDC1 (195sec) Between-vehicle variability of cold-start emissions is substantial – larger vehicle sample required

Evaluation of results Weighing of cold-start vs. hot engine operation based on share of cold start operation in normal real-world vehicle operation Assessment of typical trip durations in Europe Assessment of daily frequency of trips and the occurrence of cold-start Generic weighing factors

Evaluation of results Assessing the average length of on-road trips Empirical insight to be added based on literature study WLTP data base suggests trips in Europe cover on overage 10-12 km WLTP data in line with literature findings (analysis to be expanded) Weighing time or distance based (e.g., relative to the average trip length Source Average trip length WLTP data base (430,000 km and 35, 850 short trips; Steven, pers. Communication) 10.5 km (incl. trips <1,000 m) 12.0 km (excl. trips <1,000 m) Pasaoglu et al. (2012) 15-25 km; 2-3 trips per day based on a web survey of 600 participants in 6 EU Member States De Gennaro et al. 2014 5-20 km; parking duration 2-12 h in two Italian cities based on 28,000 vehicles and 36*106 km

Outline of activities Principle choice on Options 1-4 Prescription of vehicle preconditioning (thermal conditions, duration, status of regenerating after-treatment systems) Decision on additional requirements regarding driving conditions during cold start (e.g., idling shares, driving dynamics) Decision on a time/distance-based definition of cold-start Evaluation of results: Weighing factors combining cold start emissions and the hot emissions as determined through the RDE data evaluation

Conclusions and next steps Measuring cold-start emissions does not present an analytical challenge However, vehicle conditioning and controlling for driving dynamicity is important Choice of cold-start distance to be supported by empirical data Weighing with driving under hot engine conditions requires thorough data analysis Hybrid vehicles demand attention

Contacts Pierre Bonnel pierre.bonnel@jrc.ec.europa.eu Theodoros Vlachos theodoros.vlachos@jrc.ec.europa.eu Barouch Giechaskiel barouch.giechaskiel@jrc.ec.europa.eu Francesco Riccobono francesco.riccobono@jrc.ec.europa.eu Martin Weiss martin.weiss@jrc.ec.europa.eu