Raphia June 22, 217 BC Strategic Context Antiochus III the Great inherits the Seleucid throne in 223 BC and undertakes a quest to restore the lands lost.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alexander-Empire Builder Alexander’s empire extended across three continents that today consist of many nations and diverse cultures.
Advertisements

PELOPONNESIAN WAR 431 – 404 B.C. Athens grew in wealth, prestige, & power during the Golden Age Resulted in a CIVIL war between Athens and SPARTA Athens.
Alexander’s Empire Chapter 5 Section 4.
Carthaginian Victories!. Carthage Hannibal Mago-Hannibal’s brother Rome Scipio Sempronius CARTHAGE WON! Carthage has few causalities. Rome had an estimated.
Romans (Flaminius) Carthaginians (Hannibal) Flaminius deploys his force in column formation, heavy infantry acting as an advance guard and cavalry as the.
Marathon August [?], 490 BC Strategic Context After the failures of an expedition in 492 BC and diplomacy the following year, Darius of Persia invades.
Kosovo June 20, 1389 Strategic Context The Ottoman Empire is growing steadily at the expense of neighbouring powers in the Balkans where Murad I wishes.
Warsaw August 14-25, 1920 Strategic Context Poland takes advantage of the turmoil in Russia during its Civil War to occupy large areas of mixed Polish-Russian.
Cowpens January 17, 1781 Strategic Context The overall strategic situation of the American Revolutionary War is already decidedly in the American favour.
Leuthen December 5, 1757 Strategic Context The Seven Years’ War begins! Backed only by Britain after attacking Saxony, Prussia finds itself surrounded.
The Ice April 5, 1242 Strategic Context The Catholic and Orthodox Churches collided in the Baltic during Christianity’s spread from Palestine, hence the.
Grunwald July 15, 1410 Strategic Context Founded in 1190 in Acre, the Teutonic Knights are unable to expand against the Saracens, and eventually accept.
Pydna June 22, 168 BC Strategic Context Following the death of Philip V of Macedon in 179 BC, Perseus of Macedon hopes to renew his father’s ambition of.
Gate Pa April 29, 1864 Strategic Context The British land at Tauranga to establish a defensive base. In response, the Ngatirangi also move into the area.
Adrianople August 9, 378 Strategic Context The Visigoths and Ostrigoths conspire to assassinate Roman Emperor Valens but fail; the Romans consequently.
Maling 342 BC Strategic Context Of the Seven Warring States in China, Wei finds itself particularly vulnerable following its defeat at the Battle of Kuei-ling.
Fornovo July 6, 1495 Strategic Context In February 1495, Charles VIII of France is able to conquer Naples with the help of Milan, following a long march.
Cape Ecnomus 256 BC Strategic Context Stakes
Ayacucho December 9, 1824 Strategic Context Stakes
Blenheim August 13, 1704 Strategic Context England, as part of its commitment to the Grand Alliance with Holland, Austria and Prussia, sends then-Earl.
Torvioll June 29, 1444 Strategic Context The Ottoman Empire recovers from its decade-long civil war in 1415, and subsequently seeks to reestablish control.
Bannockburn June 24, 1314 Strategic Context Edward I of England defeats William Wallace at the Battle of Falkirk in 1298, crushing the Scottish uprising.
Thymbra [?], 546 BC Strategic Context In 559 BC, Cyrus deposes Astyages of Media and begins to consolidate his new Persian state, which he accomplishes.
Ankara July 28, 1402 Strategic Context The clash between the Timurid and Ottoman Empires is somewhat inevitable in the early 1400s. Tamerlane’s Tatars.
Zama October 19, 202 BC Strategic Context In 218 BC, Hannibal Barca leads a Carthaginian army from Spain across the Alps to invade attack the Roman Empire.
Yarmuk August 15-20, 636 Strategic Context Beginning in 622, Emperor Heraclius revitalizes the Byzantine Empire and conquers the Fertile Crescent of modern.
Lake Trasimene June 24, 217 BC Strategic Context In 218 BC, Hannibal Barca negates Roman control of the seas by leading the Carthaginians through Spain.
Varna November 10, 1444 Strategic Context Vladislav III, the King of Poland and Hungary, encourages his general, John Hunyadi, to chase the Ottomans out.
Ilipa [?], 206 BC Strategic Context In 218 BC, Hannibal Barca leads a Carthaginian army from Spain across the Alps to invade the Roman Empire. Despite.
Kulikovo September 8, 1380 Strategic Context The Golden Horde is deteriorating due to internal and external power struggles. The khan’s authority falls.
Kulikovo September 8, 1380 Strategic Context The Mongol-Tatar Golden Horde is deteriorating due to internal and external power struggles. The Khan’s authority.
THE BATTLE OF GAUGAMELA 331 B.C. By Alexandra Bowers-Mason and Christina Main From Putaruru College.
Cowpens January 17, 1781 Strategic Context Britain’s American colonies revolt in 1775, provoking a large military response from Britain. The overall strategic.
Catalaunian Plains June 20, 451 Strategic Context After four years of peace, Attila leads his Huns against the Western Roman Empire, sacking Trier and.
Catalaunian Plains June 20, 451 Strategic Context After four years of peace, Attilla leads his Huns against the Western Roman Empire, sacking Trier and.
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Ad Decimum September 13, 533 Strategic Context Stakes No Image
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Varna November 10, 1444 Strategic Context Stakes
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Ilipa [?], 206 BC Strategic Context Stakes No Image Available
Gaugamela October 1, 331 BC Strategic Context Stakes
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Alexander the Great’s Last Great Battle
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Alexander vs. the Persians – Round 1
The Trebia December [?], 218 BC
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Daras [?], 530 Strategic Context Stakes
Strasbourg August [?], 357 Strategic Context Stakes No Image Available
Zama October 19, 202 BC Strategic Context Stakes
Ruspina January 4, 46 BC Strategic Context Stakes
Ipsus [?], 301 BC Strategic Context Stakes
Alexander vs. the Persians – Round 1
Presentation transcript:

Raphia June 22, 217 BC Strategic Context Antiochus III the Great inherits the Seleucid throne in 223 BC and undertakes a quest to restore the lands lost in previous years. In 219 BC he turns against Egypt, under rule of Ptolemy IV, to ignite the Fourth Syrian War. Antiochus reduces fortress after fortress for two years while Ptolemy rebuilds the decaying army of his empire. Ptolemy is desperate enough to recruit native Egyptians, unused in combat for almost a century due to their rising nationalistic goals. With this uncertain force, Ptolemy gives battle to Antiochus at Raphia, near the famed Gaza. Stakes + A Seleucid victory would expose the Egyptian empire to further conquest and eventual collapse. + An Egyptian victory would check the Seleucid advance and reestablish a defensive line in Syria. By Jonathan Webb, 2009 ©

Raphia, 217 BC Strength  Seleucids  Well  Egyptians  Well  Antiochus III the Great  55,000 infantry  68,000 infantry  Ptolemy IV By Jonathan Webb, 2009 ©  2,000 peltasts  7,000 peltasts  5,000 cavalry  73 war elephants  6,000 cavalry  102 war elephants

Egyptians (Ptolemy) Seleucids (Antiochus) Antiochus and Ptolemy deploy their armies in a standard formation: infantry at the center, cavalry on the wings and war elephants on both wings ahead of the main line, accompanied by peltasts. Both commanders strengthen their right wings, Antiochus’ with cavalry and Ptolemy’s with infantry. Antiochus plans to use his superior cavalry and war elephants to win the battle on the wings while Ptolemy plans to use his superior infantry phalanxes to win the battle at the center. Antiochus and Ptolemy position themselves on opposing wings to begin the battle. Antiochus sends the war elephants on his right wing forward. The more numerous Seleucid war elephants defeat their Egyptian counterparts which then retreat and cause disarray in the infantry and cavalry ranks on Ptolemy’s left wing. Antiochus surges forward with the rest of his right wing to take advantage of the Egyptian left wing’s disorder; the Egyptian left wing is not surprisingly driven back. Ptolemy’s right wing also surges forward in accordance with his orders in the event of collapse on the left wing. The inferior war elephant forces do not charge until the cavalry and infantry – carefully evading the Seleucid war elephants – drive the Seleucid left wing back. The Egyptian and Seleucid left wings are both defeated by superior right wings and driven back. However, Antiochus continues to personally overpursue the retreating Egyptian left wing while Ptolemy extricates himself from the situation to take command of his infantry phalanxes. The presence of Ptolemy to his already superior infantry is invaluable; he leads his two infantry phalanxes forward to defeat the lone, outmatched Seleucid infantry phalanx outright. The Seleucid infantry flee the battle before Antiochus can return from his cavalry pursuit. Egyptians (Ptolemy IV) 68,000 infantry 2,000 peltasts 5,000 cavalry 102 war elephants Seleucids (Antiochus III the Great) 55,000 infantry 7,000 peltasts 6,000 cavalry 73 war elephants

Raphia, 217 BC Casualties & Aftermath Seleucids:Egyptians: 14,300 or 19% 2,200 or 3% By Jonathan Webb, 2009 © The battle checked Antiochus’ advance into Egyptian territory but Ptolemy was unable to fully exploit the victory. He was fully aware that his empire was weakening, not becoming stronger, and opted to use the victory to reestablish the defensive line in Syria, forcing Antiochus’s gaze elsewhere for conquest.

The Art of Battle: Animated Battle Maps By Jonathan Webb, 2009 ©