Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0632r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Experimental Measurements for Short Range LOS SU-MIMO Date: 2015-05-11 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1252r0 Submission November 2009 Inter Cluster Parameters of Living Room Channel Model for 60 GHz WLAN Systems Date: Authors:
Advertisements

A Framework for MIMO Operation over mmWave Links
mmWave MIMO Link Budget Estimation for Indoor Environment
Doc.: IEEE /1110r1 September 2013 Submission Beam codebook design scheme for IEEE802.11aj DU GuanglongSlide 1 Date: Presenter:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0296r0 March 2015 Cagatay Capar, EricssonSlide 1 Long range indoor channel measurements for the 60 GHz band Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1202r0 September 2014 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 1 NG60 channel model Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0069r0 January 2015 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 1 MIMO option for NG60 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.
Doc.: IEEE /0685r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Channel Measurements Plan Proposal for IEEE ay Date: Authors:
Channel Sounding for ay
July 2015 doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 July 2015
Doc.: IEEE /0308r0 Submission September 2008 Gerald Chouinard, CRCSlide 1 CPE Antenna Reference Pattern IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0538r0 Submission May 2009 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Investigation into the n Doppler Model Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0 Slide 1 Non-linear Multiuser MIMO for next generation WLAN Date: Authors: Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR.
Doc.: IEEE /0489r1 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0323r1 Submission March 2009 Vinko Erceg, BroadcomSlide 1 TGad Channel Model Requirements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1153r2 Submission November 2009 Carlos Cordeiro, IntelSlide 1 Motivation and Requirements on 60 GHz Beamforming Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0493r1 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0364r1 SubmissionEldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Date: Authors: Antenna Array Gain from Measured Data for n/ac.
Doc.: IEEE /0090r0 SubmissionMartin Jacob, TU Braunschweig January 2010 Slide 1 Modeling the Dynamical Human Blockage for 60 GHz WLAN Channel.
Doc.: IEEE /0336r0 Submission March 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Conference Room Channel Model for 60 GHz WLAN Systems - Summary.
Doc.: IEEE /0935r0 Submission July 2012 Vinko Erceg, Broadcom 6-10GHz UWB Link Budget and Discussion Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [The Usage of.
Submission doc.: /1320r00 Bo, Sun (ZTE Corp), et al Slide 1 11aj 45GHz Link Budget for use cases discussion Date: Authors: Nov 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Verification of Polarization Impact Model by Experimental Data Date:
Efficient Beam Selection for Hybrid Beamforming
Doc.: IEEE /0553r1 Submission May 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Path Loss Model Development for TGad Channel Models Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0136r2 January 2014 Gal Basson, WilocitySlide 1 Beyond ad – Ultra High Capacity and Throughput WLAN 2 nd presentation.
Doc.: IEEE /0431r0 Submission April 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Polarization Model for 60 GHz Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0720r1 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Presenter: Spatial Sharing Mechanism in aj (60GHz) July 2013 Francois Chin.
Doc.: d Stochastic Channel Model for Wireless Data Center Submission Match 2015 Bile Peng (TU Braunschweig). Slide 1 Project: IEEE P
Doc.: IEEE /0493r0 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
November 2015 doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 November 2015
Doc.: IEEE /1145r0 Submission September 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 SU-MIMO Configurations for IEEE ay Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1094 Overview and discussion about the next steps for ay channel modeling Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1044r0 Submission September 2008 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 60 GHz WLAN Experimental Investigations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0133r0 Submission January 2010 Alexander Maltsev, Intel TGad Channel Model Update Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1229r1 Submission November 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Application of 60 GHz Channel Models for Comparison of TGad Proposals.
Doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2008 Vinko Erceg, BroadcomSlide 1 VHT 60 GHz Channel Model Recommendation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0720r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Presenter: Spatial Sharing Mechanism in aj (60GHz) July 2013 Francois Chin.
11ay MIMO BF Training Enhancements
Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Feasibility of SU-MIMO under Array Alignment Method Date: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /1121r0 Submission November 2009 I. Siaud, Orange LabsSlide 1 Path Loss Models for TGad Channel Models: Antenna and Dispersion Impact.
Performance Analysis of Open Loop SU-MIMO Receivers for IEEE ay
Doc.: IEEE /0015r1 Submission Large-Scale Characteristics of 45 GHz Based on Channel Measurement Authors/contributors: Date: Presenter:
InterDigital, Inc. Submission doc.: IEEE /0911r1 July 2016 Link Level Performance Comparisons of Open Loop, Closed Loop and Antenna Selection.
Doc.: IEEE /1209r0 Submission Hotel lobby SU-MIMO channel modeling: 2x2 golden set generation Date: September 2016 Alexander Maltsev,
Doc.: IEEE /0664r0 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, Intel TGad Channel Model Update Authors: Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Low Complexity Beamtraining for Hybrid MIMO Date: Slide 1 March 2016 Authors: Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix.
Closed Loop SU-MIMO Performance with Quantized Feedback
Open Loop vs Closed Loop SU-MIMO for 11ay
On the Channel Model for Short Range Communications
GI Overhead/Performance Impact on Open-Loop SU-MIMO
TGad interference modeling for MAC simulations
60 GHz Cubicle Wall Reflectivity
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
Protocols for Hybrid Beamforming in ay
A Framework for MIMO Operation over mmWave Links
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2009
Motivation and Requirements on 60 GHz Beamforming
Large-Scale Characteristics of 45 GHz Based on Channel Measurement
6-10GHz Rate-Range and Link Budget
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [The Usage of Polarized Antenna System] Date.
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
Large-Scale Characteristics of 45 GHz Based on Channel Measurement
802.11ac Channel Modeling Authors: Jan 19, 2009 Month Year
Update on “Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems” Document
Protocols for Hybrid Beamforming in ay
PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models
Channel Modeling with PAA Orientations
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Experimental Measurements for Short Range LOS SU-MIMO Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 2 Abstract This contribution presents the results of experimental measurements for the LOS short range 2x2 SU-MIMO system, [1]. As it was shown in [2] for particular example of 2x2 LOS MIMO configuration the Shannon capacity depends on the phase difference between channel coefficients and attenuation factor of the cross links. However it was shown that the dependence on phase difference is not prominent if the power of cross links is small enough comparing to the power of the direct links. In this work the results of non-coherent channel measurements are provided. In particular the power of the direct and cross links is measured and the impact of spatial antennas separation and antennas cross polarization is investigated.

doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 3 Usage Models Description The LOS SU-MIMO is proposed to be used for different usage models scenarios, [3], [4]: –Sync-and-go kiosk, digital content downloading; –Device-to-device (D2D) short range communication, tablet to laptop, handheld to laptop, laptop to laptop; –Wireless docking, connection of the laptop to external monitor and other peripherals. The distance of interest can be from ~ cm and up to ~2 m; Sync-and-go kiosk D2D communication Wireless docking

doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission LOS MIMO Configurations May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 4 Figure below shows two LOS MIMO configurations investigated in the experiment. Configuration #1: –Both devices have two Phased Antenna Array (PAAs), which can be separated by d = 10 – 30 cm and have vertical polarizations (V). It is assumed that antennas are mounted in the corners of the laptop’s lid or in the corners of the tablet device. Configuration #2: –Both devices have single PAA, but it is divided into two subarrays whose elements have different polarization types, i.e. vertical (V) or horizontal (H). This configuration may be viable for small factor handheld devices where spatial separation of antennas is not possible.

doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission Measurement Setup Description Configuration #1 – antennas spatial separation: –Measurements were done in the conference room, TX and RX devices are placed on the table. –Both TX Phased Antenna Arrays (PAAs) and RX PAAs have vertical polarization and the same geometry of 2 x 8 elements. PAAs are placed at the height of 18 cm above the table. –Distance between the geometrical centers of TX/RX PAAs: d = 10, 20, and 30 cm. –Distance between TX and RX devices: D = 20 – 200 cm, with discrete step = 20 cm. –Measurements were done after application of TXSS beamforming, assuming that TX PAA 1 makes beamforming with RX PAA 1 and TX PAA 2 makes beamforming with RX PAA 2. –Both links are trained independently. May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 5

doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission Measurement Setup Description (Cont’d) Configuration #2 – cross polarization: –The TX PAA uses for transmission subarray of 4 elements and RX PAA uses for reception only 1 omni element of the array. PAAs are placed at the height of 18 cm above the table. –The TX PAA has vertical (V) polarization and RX PAA omni element can have vertical (V) or horizontal (H) polarization, distance between TX and RX devices can be D = 20 – 200 cm, with step = 20 cm; May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 6

doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission Measured Signal Characteristics To set up directional link Transmit Sector Sweep (TXSS) beamforming protocol was applied. The following signal characteristics were measured: –Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI), which is actually a received power in the 2.16 GHz signal bandwidth, mean RSSI was estimated over 10 5 packet transmissions. –Channel impulse 2.64 GHz sample rate for channel coefficients in the direct H 11 and interfered link H 21. Channel measurements were done non-coherently, i.e. first channel impulse response was measured for link H 11 and then for H 21 (not simultaneously). May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 7

doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission Antennas Spatial Separation May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 8 Figure shows measured Radiation Pattern (RP) for broadside direction (blue line) for 2x8 array and its comparison to the theoretical one (red line) calculated for array with λ/2 elements spacing. Both curves are plotted for elevation angle equal to 0 0. Half Power Beamwidth (HPBW) is equal to ~ First null corresponds to the ~0.25 rad or ~ Theoretical RP is defined by the following equation: Comparison of measured and theoretical radiation patterns for 2x8 λ/2 array where N x = 8, d x = λ/2, φ – azimuth angle.

doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission Antennas Spatial Separation (Cont’d) The received power for the direct link H 11 can be theoretically predicted applying Friis equation: May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 9 where G(φ) is PAA gain introduced at the previous slide, d is the PAAs separation distance, D is the distance between devices. The received power of the interfered link H 21 can be theoretically calculated as follows:

doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission Antennas Spatial Separation (Cont’d) May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 10 Figure shows dependence of measured mean RSSI vs. distance D (solid lines) for direct link H 11 and interfered link H 21 for different antennas spatial separation equal to 10, 20, and 30 cm. RSSI is plotted in dB scale relatively to the point with maximum power corresponding to the direct link and D = 20 cm. This reference level is applied to be equal to 0 dB. As it can be seen from the graph, antennas separation by d = 30 cm (pink curve) creates the power difference for direct H 11 and interfered link H 21 ≥ 15.0 dB for the distances up to 2 m. Dashed lines correspond to the theoretical dependences P 11 (D) and P 21 (D,d) introduced at the previous slides. RSSI Measurements

doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission Antennas Cross Polarization May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 11 Figure shows measured dependence of mean RSSI vs. distance D for TX V – RX V and TX V – RX H polarization configurations. RSSI is plotted in dB scale relatively to the reference point (assigned to 0 dB) with maximum power corresponding to the direct link and D = 20 cm. The cross polarization factor (X-pol) does not depend on the distance and is equal to 23.0 – 24.0 dB. RSSI Measurements

doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission Conclusions This work presents the results of non-coherent channel measurements for the LOS short range SU-MIMO system. Two practical configurations for 2x2 MIMO scheme exploiting antennas spatial separation and polarization discrimination were experimentally investigated. It was shown that antennas spatial separation by 30 cm creates the difference in the direct and interfered links more than 15.0 dB for the distances up to 2 m. Cross polarization factor and therefore links separation for the perfect matching of the TX and RX antennas can achieve ~23.0 – 24.0 dB. Channel impulse responses 2.64 GHz sample rate for both direct and interfered links in the LOS conference room environment include one main tap and do not contain any significant reflection taps. May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 12

doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 13 References 1.A. Maltsev et al., “mmWave MIMO Link Budget Estimation for Indoor Environment,” IEEE doc /0113r1. 2.A. Tarighat et al., “A Framework for MIMO Operation over mmWave Links,” IEEE doc /0334r0. 3.C. Cordeiro et al., “Next Generation ad: 30+ Gbps WLAN,” IEEE doc /0606r0. 4.R. Sun et al., “NG 60 Use Cases,” IEEE doc /0328r4.