David Pekker (U. Pitt) Gil Refael (Caltech) Vadim Oganesyan (CUNY) Ehud Altman (Weizmann) Eugene Demler (Harvard) The Hilbert-glass transition: Figuring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE ISING PHASE IN THE J1-J2 MODEL Valeria Lante and Alberto Parola.
Advertisements

Theory of the pairbreaking superconductor-metal transition in nanowires Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu.
From weak to strong correlation: A new renormalization group approach to strongly correlated Fermi liquids Alex Hewson, Khan Edwards, Daniel Crow, Imperial.
1 Spin Freezing in Geometrically Frustrated Antiferromagnets with Weak Bond Disorder Tim Saunders Supervisor: John Chalker.
D-wave superconductivity induced by short-range antiferromagnetic correlations in the Kondo lattice systems Guang-Ming Zhang Dept. of Physics, Tsinghua.
N ON - EQUILIBRIUM DYNAMIC CRITICAL SCALING OF THE QUANTUM I SING CHAIN Michael Kolodrubetz Princeton University In collaboration with: Bryan Clark, David.
Antoine Georges Olivier Parcollet Nick Read Subir Sachdev Jinwu Ye Mean field theories of quantum spin glasses Talk online: Sachdev.
Kagome Spin Liquid Assa Auerbach Ranny Budnik Erez Berg.
Subir Sachdev Science 286, 2479 (1999). Quantum phase transitions in atomic gases and condensed matter Transparencies online at
Dilute anisotropic dipolar systems as random field Ising ferromagnets In collaboration with: Philip Stamp Nicolas Laflorencie Moshe Schechter University.
Quantum phase transitions in anisotropic dipolar magnets In collaboration with: Philip Stamp, Nicolas laflorencie Moshe Schechter University of British.
Lattice modulation experiments with fermions in optical lattice Dynamics of Hubbard model Ehud Altman Weizmann Institute David Pekker Harvard University.
Breakdown of the adiabatic approximation in low-dimensional gapless systems Anatoli Polkovnikov, Boston University Vladimir Gritsev Harvard University.
Phase Diagram of One-Dimensional Bosons in Disordered Potential Anatoli Polkovnikov, Boston University Collaboration: Ehud Altman-Weizmann Yariv Kafri.
Dilute anisotropic dipolar systems as random field Ising ferromagnets In collaboration with: Philip Stamp, Nicolas Laflorencie Moshe Schechter University.
Solid state realisation of Werner quantum states via Kondo spins Ross McKenzie Sam Young Cho Reference: S.Y. Cho and R.H.M, Phys. Rev. A 73, (2006)
Entanglement in Quantum Critical Phenomena, Holography and Gravity Dmitri V. Fursaev Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, RUSSIA Banff, July 31,
Spinor condensates beyond mean-field
Jordan-Wigner Transformation and Topological characterization of quantum phase transitions in the Kitaev model Guang-Ming Zhang (Tsinghua Univ) Xiaoyong.
Dynamical Systems and Chaos Coarse-Graining in Time Low Dimensional Dynamical Systems Bifurcation Theory Saddle-Node, Intermittency, Pitchfork, Hopf Normal.
Breakdown of the adiabatic approximation in low-dimensional gapless systems Anatoli Polkovnikov, Boston University Vladimir Gritsev Harvard University.
Subir Sachdev (Harvard) Philipp Werner (ETH) Matthias Troyer (ETH) Universal conductance of nanowires near the superconductor-metal quantum transition.
Vortex pinning by a columnar defect in planar superconductors with point disorder Anatoli Polkovnikov Yariv Kafri, David Nelson Department of Physics,
Microscopic diagonal entropy, heat, and laws of thermodynamics Anatoli Polkovnikov, Boston University AFOSR R. Barankov, C. De Grandi – BU V. Gritsev –
Using dynamics for optical lattice simulations. Anatoli Polkovnikov, Boston University AFOSR Ehud Altman -Weizmann Eugene Demler – Harvard Vladimir Gritsev.
Monte Carlo Simulation of Ising Model and Phase Transition Studies
Interference of fluctuating condensates Anatoli Polkovnikov Harvard/Boston University Ehud Altman Harvard/Weizmann Vladimir Gritsev Harvard Mikhail Lukin.
U NIVERSALITY AND D YNAMIC L OCALIZATION IN K IBBLE -Z UREK Michael Kolodrubetz Boston University In collaboration with: B.K. Clark, D. Huse (Princeton)
Slow dynamics in gapless low-dimensional systems Anatoli Polkovnikov, Boston University AFOSR Vladimir Gritsev – Harvard Ehud Altman -Weizmann Eugene Demler.
Antiferomagnetism and triplet superconductivity in Bechgaard salts
Equilibrium dynamics of entangled states near quantum critical points Talk online at Physical Review Letters 78, 843.
Subir Sachdev Yale University Phases and phase transitions of quantum materials Talk online: or Search for Sachdev on.
The Ising Model of Ferromagnetism by Lukasz Koscielski Chem 444 Fall 2006.
Localization of phonons in chains of trapped ions Alejandro Bermúdez, Miguel Ángel Martín-Delgado and Diego Porras Department of Theoretical Physics Universidad.
Spin Glasses and Complexity: Lecture 3 Work done in collaboration with Charles Newman, Courant Institute, New York University Partially supported by US.
Monte Carlo Simulation of Ising Model and Phase Transition Studies By Gelman Evgenii.
Multipartite Entanglement Measures from Matrix and Tensor Product States Ching-Yu Huang Feng-Li Lin Department of Physics, National Taiwan Normal University.
Relating computational and physical complexity Computational complexity: How the number of computational steps needed to solve a problem scales with problem.
Entanglement entropy scaling of the XXZ chain
Germán Sierra, Instituto de Física Teórica UAM-CSIC, Madrid 9th Bolonia Workshop in CFT and Integrable Systems Bolonia, Sept 2014.
Max Planck Institut of Quantum Optics (Garching) New perspectives on Thermalization Aspen (NON) THERMALIZATION OF 1D SYSTEMS: numerical studies.
1 Worm Algorithms Jian-Sheng Wang National University of Singapore.
The Ising Model Mathematical Biology Lecture 5 James A. Glazier (Partially Based on Koonin and Meredith, Computational Physics, Chapter 8)
Correlated States in Optical Lattices Fei Zhou (PITP,UBC) Feb. 1, 2004 At Asian Center, UBC.
Non-equilibrium dynamics of ultracold bosons K. Sengupta Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Kolkata Refs: Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 863 (2011)
Order and disorder in dilute dipolar magnets
A simple nearest-neighbour two-body Hamiltonian system for which the ground state is a universal resource for quantum computation Stephen Bartlett Terry.
13. Extended Ensemble Methods. Slow Dynamics at First- Order Phase Transition At first-order phase transition, the longest time scale is controlled by.
Quasi-1D antiferromagnets in a magnetic field a DMRG study Institute of Theoretical Physics University of Lausanne Switzerland G. Fath.
1 Unusual magnetic ordering due to random impurities and frustration Tim Saunders Supervisor: John Chalker.
From J.R. Waldram “The Theory of Thermodynamics”.
Experimental Quantification of Entanglement in low dimensional Spin Systems Chiranjib Mitra IISER-Kolkata Quantum Information Processing and Applications.
Self-assembling tensor networks and holography in disordered spin chains A.M. Goldsborough, R.A. Roemer Department of Physics and Centre for Scientific.
Percolation Percolation is a purely geometric problem which exhibits a phase transition consider a 2 dimensional lattice where the sites are occupied with.
Giovanni Ramírez, Javier Rodríguez-Laguna, Germán Sierra Instituto de Física Teórica UAM-CSIC, Madrid Workshop “Entanglement in Strongly Correlated Systems”
Computational Physics (Lecture 10) PHY4370. Simulation Details To simulate Ising models First step is to choose a lattice. For example, we can us SC,
Panjin Kim*, Hosho Katsura, Nandini Trivedi, Jung Hoon Han
NTNU 2011 Dimer-superfluid phase in the attractive Extended Bose-Hubbard model with three-body constraint Kwai-Kong Ng Department of Physics Tunghai University,
B3 Correlations in antiferromagnets
G. Florio Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Bari, Italy
Computational Physics (Lecture 10)
Strong Disorder Renormalization Group
Electronic polarization. Low frequency dynamic properties.
Coarsening dynamics Harry Cheung 2 Nov 2017.
Solutions of black hole interior, information paradox and the shape of singularities Haolin Lu.
Applications of the Canonical Ensemble:
Superfluid-Insulator Transition of
Ehud Altman Anatoli Polkovnikov Bertrand Halperin Mikhail Lukin
Biointelligence Laboratory, Seoul National University
2D Ising model Monte-Carlo (Metropolis) method.
Presentation transcript:

David Pekker (U. Pitt) Gil Refael (Caltech) Vadim Oganesyan (CUNY) Ehud Altman (Weizmann) Eugene Demler (Harvard) The Hilbert-glass transition: Figuring out excited states in strongly disordered systems

Outline Quantum criticality in the quantum Ising model Disordered Quantum Ising model and real-space RG The Hilbert-glass transition Extending to excited states – the RSRG-X method + preview of punchline

Standard model of Quantum criticality Quantum Ising model: x z zz z z

Standard model of Quantum criticality Quantum Ising model: Ferro- magnet Para- magnet x z QCP Phase diagram Quantum critical regime zz z z

Disordered Quantum Ising model Quantum Ising model: QCP Para- magnet Ferro- magnet Phase diagram: Quantum critical regime zz z z z x z zz z z

Surprise: Transition in all excited states Quantum Ising model: FMPM Phase diagram: Hilbert glass transition Or: [All eigenstates doubly degenerate] QCP zz z z z x z

Surprise: Transition in all excited states Quantum Ising model: Phase diagram: Hilbert glass transition Or: [All eigenstates doubly degenerate] QCP zz z z z x x x x x FMPM x z

Surprise: Transition in all excited states FM PM Phase diagram: Hilbert glass transition Or: QCP Dynamical quantum phase transition. Temperature tuned, but with no Thermodynamic signatures. Accessible example for an MBL like transition. Hilbert glass phase x-phase

Disarming disorder: Real space RG [Ma, Dasgupta, Hu (1979), Bhatt, Lee (1979), DS Fisher (1995)] Isolate the strongest bond (or field) in the chain. Domain-wall excitations neighboring fields: quantum fluctuations. Cluster ground state: 12 Choose ground-state manifold. 12

Disarming disorder: Real space RG [Ma, Dasgupta, Hu (1979), Bhatt, Lee (1979), DS Fisher (1995)] Isolate the strongest bond (or field) in the chain. 1 2 neighboring fields: quantum fluctuations. Field aligned: 3 Anti-aligned: Choose ground-state manifold. X

RG sketch Ferromagnetic phase: Paramagnetic phase: X X X X X

Universal coupling distributions and RG flow Initially, h and J have some coupling distributions:

Universal coupling distributions and RG flow These functions are attractors for all initial distributions. g h and g J flow: Ferro- magnet Para- magnet RG-flow As renormalization proceeds, universal distributions emerge: flow with RG QCP

Domain-wall excitations neighboring fields: quantum fluctuations. Cluster ground state: What about excited states? Put domain walls in strongest bonds: No effect on coupling magnitude! Pekker, GR, VO, Altman, Demler; Huse, Nandkishore, VO, Sondhi, Pal (2013)

Make spins antialigned with strong fields: 1 2 Field aligned: 3 Anti-aligned: 2 X 1 3 No effect on coupling magnitude! What about excited states? Pekker, GR, VO, Altman, Demler; Huse, Nandkishore, VO, Sondhi, Pal (2013)

RSRG-X Tree of states At each RG step, choose ground state or excitation: [six sites with large disorder]

RG sketch Hilbert-glass phase: Paramagnetic phase: X X X X X

Excited state flow Transition persists: Random-domain clusters Hilbert-glass X-phase RG-flow Universal distribution functions independent of choice: flow with RG HGT

Order in the Hilbert glass vs. T=0 Ferromagnet Symmetry-broken T=0 Ferromagnetic state: or Order parameter: Typical Hilbert-Glass excited state: Order parameter: Temporal correlations:

HGT Order in the Hilbert glass vs. T=0 Ferromagnet QCP FM PM QCP Hilbert Glass transition

T-tuned Hilbert glass transition: hJJ’ model Quantum Ising model+J’: X-states Hilbert glass T (or energy-density) tuned transition But: No thermodynamic signatures z z zz xxx x J’>0 increases h for low-energy states.

RSRG-X Tree of states Energy RG step Color code: inverse T Sampling method: Branch changing Monte Carlo steps.

RSRG-X results for the Hilbert glass transition Flows for different temperatures: Complete phase diagram:

Thermal conductivity No thermodynamic signatures – only dynamical signatures exist. Only energy is conserved: Signatures in heat conductivity? Engineering Dimension: assume scaling form:

Numerical tests

Summary + odds and ends New universality: -T-tuned dynamical quantum transition. - No thermodynamic signatures. Excited states entanglement entropy: - ‘area law’ in both phases - log(L) at the Hilbert glass transition (Follows from GR, Moore, 2004) Developed the RSRG-X - access to excitations and thermal averaging of L~5000 chains. Other Hilbert glass like transitions?

Edwards-Anderson order parameter

Lifshitz localization – a subtle example Tight-binding electrons on an irregular lattice. Density of states: Pure chain: Random J: Dyson singularity

Method of attack: Real space RG Ma, Dasgupta, Hu (1979), Bhatt, Lee (1979) J Eliminated two sites. Reduced the largest bond New Heisenberg chain resulting with new suppressed effective coupling.

D.S. Fisher (1994) J 5678 Functional flow and universal coupling distributions: Universality of emerging distribution functions

D.S. Fisher (1994) Functional flow and universal coupling distributions: Universality of emerging distribution functions 0

Random singlet phase D.S. Fisher (1995) Low lying excitations: excited long-range singlets: Susceptibility: Dyson singularity again!

Engtanglement entropy in the Heisenberg model Holzhey, Larsen, Wilczek (1994). Random singlet phase: B B A L Pure chain: Every singlet connecting A to B → entanglement entropy 1. How many qubits in A determined by B (QFT Central charge, c =1) Vidal, Latorre, Rico, Kitaev (2002). number of singlets entering region A.

Engtanglement entropy in the Heisenberg model Holzhey, Larsen, Wilczek (1994). Random singlet phase: B B A L Pure chain: How many qubits in A determined by B (CFT Central charge, c =1) Vidal, Latorre, Rico, Kitaev (2002). Effective central charge GR, Moore (2004). For the experts: Does the effective c obey a c-theorem? No… Fidkowski, GR, Bonesteel, Moore (2008). Examples of enropy increasing transitions in random non-abelian anyon chains.

Universality at the transition? Altman, Kafri, Polkovnikov, GR (2009) Insulator superfluid RSG BG MG 1 g =1 Mechanical analogy Average effective spring constant = (ave of inverse J) 0 when g=1. Stiffness ~