ACTED AME Appraisal, Monitoring and Evaluation. Summary 1/ ACTED AME department 2/ AME Responsibilities 3/ AME throughout project cycle 4/ Involvement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop MICS Technical Assistance MICS Survey Design Workshop.
1 Department of State Program Evaluation Policy Overview Spring 2013.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Pillar 4a Information management
INTEGRATING BENEFICIARY FEEDBACK INTO EVALUATION- A STRUCTURED APPROACH Presentation to UKES Conference May 2015 Theme: Theory and practice of inclusion.
Results-Oriented Monitoring (ROM)
Comprehensive M&E Systems
POLICY AND PLANNING BRANCH (PPB) Proposed M&E action plan Charles Mvula IAC WAGENINGEN UR February 9 –
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Sierra Leone Consortium for Relief and Development (CORAD) CARE Int., AFRICARE, Catholic Relief Services, World Vision Int. Action Plan for Making Monitoring.
Management Response to the Annual Report on the Evaluation Function in UN Women in 2014.
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
MAF’s M & E System Development Achievements and Ways Forward SWG-ARD, September 30, 2014 DoPC, MAF By: Somphathay Liengsone Deputy Director of Project.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
Development and Implementation of a National Multisectoral Output Monitoring System (SHAPMoS) for HIV Responses in Swaziland:  Challenges and lessons learned.
Theme III Introducing Greater Impact Orientation at the Institutional Level Group 6.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
Assessments. Assessment in the Project Cycle DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING EVALUATION ASSESSMENT.
MARKETS II M&E FRAMEWORK AND CHALLENGES Joseph Obado.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa Accra, Ghana, 9-11 July 2009 Tracking National Portfolios and Assessing Results.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Western and Central Africa Dakar, May 2007.
SUB-MODULE 5. MEANS OF VERIFICATION RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
Monitoring and Evaluation of GeSCI’s Activities GeSCI Team Meeting 5-6 Dec 2007.
M&E in the GEF Carlo Carugi Senior Evaluation Officer Expanded Constituency Workshop Dakar, Senegal - July 2011.
Project Management Learning Program 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Writing Project Report Multi-Purpose Reporting.
Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office Minsk, Belarus September 2015 Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations.
Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Policy Monitoring and Evaluation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose of a monitoring.
ACP S&T Programme - Stakeholder conference October Implemented by the ACP Secretariat Funded by the European Union EDULINK - ACP Science and.
Monitoring and Evaluation
1 Poverty Analysis and Data Initiative (PADI) Capacity Building Program To Support The Poverty Reduction Strategy Shahid Khandker World Bank Institute.
Measuring Risk, Vulnerability and Impact in Conflict: Doing Better Through Data Collaboration What is DFID doing in Afghanistan?
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Proposed Framework for Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting Negussie Gorfe.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Regional Workshop to disseminate Water Supply and Sanitation Standards of Service, adapted to LDCs Préparation to the ISO TC 224 Drafts Standards test.
Vito Cistulli - FAO -1 Damascus, 2 July 2008 FAO Assistance to Member Countries and the Changing Aid Environment.
SAVE THE CHIDLREN UK Meri Ghorkhmazyan: Emergencies M&E Adviser.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
Module 4 – Evaluation: General Characteristics. 25/02/20162 Overview of the Module Definitions Purposes Milestones Stakeholders A win-win exercise.
PROJECT DVPT / REPORTING at ACTED. Executive Summary 1.ACTED PD / Reporting structure 2.The objectives of Reporting 3.Presentation of ACTED’s Main Donors.
Tools for Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction: Guidance Notes for Development Organisations Charlotte Benson and John Twigg Presented by Margaret Arnold.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Monitoring and Evaluation for UNDP/GEF projects MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF UNDP/GEF PROJECTS Inception Workshop, Baikal Lake Watershed Project,
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
ALNAP Biannual Meeting 9-10 June 2005
GEF Familiarization Seminar
2 Seas Monitoring and Evaluation approach INTERACT seminar – Evaluation Plan workshop Vienna, 12 November 2015.
Discussion of CRVS strategies
Module 1: Introducing Development Evaluation
Induction Presentation
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Tracking development results at the EIB
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
UNDP-UNEP POVERTY & ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE (PEI): MID-TERM REVIEW
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
EVALUATIONS in the EU External Aid
Results Based Management for Monitoring & Evaluation
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
Presentation transcript:

ACTED AME Appraisal, Monitoring and Evaluation

Summary 1/ ACTED AME department 2/ AME Responsibilities 3/ AME throughout project cycle 4/ Involvement of the Region and HQ in AME

1/ ACTED AME department AME conducted by Program dpt versus AME dpt AME is a shared responsibility between program team and AME department within ACTED. The added value of having a separate AME team is that monitoring is done in a neutral and independent way, thereby ensuring unbiased results. Program team has a technical input into AME, conduct daily supervision and monitoring, while AME team does it on a more global approach, focusing on measuring indicators defined in the project proposal and assessing the impact of the intervention on the beneficiaries’ situation and livelihoods.

AME Values Independence Transparency Ethical Research Timeliness Relevance Professionalism Participatory methodology Accountability towards beneficiaries and donors (assessment report can be used to support a proposal / M&E more and more important for donors)

AME global structure HQ level Project Development Department Project dvpt/Reporting (AME) Regional level Regional Project Development Manager Capital level Project Dvpt / AME Manager Area level Database / GIS Manager AME Officer(s) AME Monitor(s) Database / GIS Officer(s) Database entry Assistant(s)

Conduct Appraisal, Monitoring and Evaluation and formalize results in a report Field data collection and analysis of results Follow Up of lessons learnt and best practices Capitalization resource centre in-country and intranet Maintain a database (as monitoring tool) including information on village profiles and household structure and livelihoods to be used as a basis for beneficiary selection Ex: NSP Afghanistan database enables to have a better understanding of local context and can be used as a tool to plan emergency interventionsNSP Afghanistan database KASS Afghanistan databaseKASS Afghanistan database: project monitoring tool GIS (Geographical Information System) REACHREACH as a tool for program design and follow up, Ex: web mapping Iraqweb mapping Iraq 2/ AME’s Responsibilities

3/ AME throughout project cycle Programming (Appraisal) Project design Fundraising & Contracting Project implementation MonitoringEvaluation

Regional Coordination involvement in AME Regional AME / Regional Program Development Manager: provide resource and backstopping (assessments, country exploratory mission) HQ Involvement in AME Strengthen AME as a tool to develop ACTED expertise in Relief, rehabilitation and Development, through: AME manager in charge of providing backstopping to country missions AME workplan validation by HQ for new projects Monthly AME Follow-up Transmission of AME templates and reports to HQ Resource Centre 4/ Involvement of the Region and HQ in AME

Thank you for your attention

AME process Debriefing to give early feedback to Program team Data cleaning and entry by Database team Data Analysis Consolidation of AME report Data collection on the field Development of tools (questionnaire, PRA,..) Development of ToRs Dissemination of AME report to Program, Reporting & Coordination staff, eventually external stakeholders

AME at Programming stage Appraisal / Needs assessment When? During the programming phase (before project implementation) Objectives: To identify the needs and resources of a target population To support programming strategy, project design Interaction with other ACTED departments Discussion with Program Team to identify information to collect, together with Reporting and Coordination staff.

AME at Project design stage Results of the assessment will feed the reporting for developing the project proposal AME is associated in project design to define indicators and more generally participate in drafting the logical framework Interaction with other ACTED departments Reporting, coordination and program staff

AME at Contracting stage After receipt of the contract and the creation of a project code by Reporting department at HQ, a kick-off meeting is organised with all management level staff to be involved in the project. At this occasion, AME responsibilities are discussed for the project: Definition of indicators to be measured (including those mentioned in the logframe from the proposal); Development of an AME workplan for the project. Interaction with other ACTED departments Reporting, coordination, program and support staff

Monitoring When?: During the project implementation, on the basis of the AME workplan Objectives: To measure progress and impact through systematic collection of indicators To control quality of intervention e.g. beneficiary selection To formulate recommendations for adjustments needed to achieve intended goals and follow up on those identified in the past To identify lessons learnt and best practices for future intervention. Interaction with other ACTED departments Discussion with Program Team to identify information to collect, together with Reporting staff. Results of monitoring passed on to Program, Reporting and Coordination teams, and discussion on adjustments needed.

Evaluation When? At mid-point or at the end of project implementation Objectives : To assess the impact, efficiency, effectiveness, sustainability and relevance of the project in accordance with project’s objectives, indicators and achievements. To verify accountability towards beneficiaries To identify and formalize reports on lessons learnt and best practices for future intervention, and put forward success stories. Interaction with other ACTED departments Discussion with Program Team to identify information to collect, together with Reporting staff. Results of evaluation passed on to Program, Reporting and Coordination teams, and discussion on lessons learnt and best practices.