1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

H  4l in Full Simulation preliminary results 2 A. Khodinov * and K. Assamagan ** * State University of New York at Stony Brook ** Brookhaven National.
Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.
28/2/2006S. Rosati - MC Workshop1 Muon Identification and Reconstruction Stefano Rosati INFN – Roma 1.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
25/03/2003Simulation Application for the LHCb Experiment CHEP March 2003 Presented by: W. Pokorski / CERN Authors: I. Belyaev, Ph. Charpentier,
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia & M. Vos. Introduction SCT Week – March 03 Jose E. Garcia TB & Simulation results Simulation results Inner detector.
My work PAST WORKS: 1) (Madrid) Data Analysis in L3, LEP: - Measurement of the Mass, Width and Cross Section of the W boson production at LEP, Study.
Jet Reconstruction and Calibration in Athena US ATLAS Software Workshop BNL, 27/08/03 Ambreesh Gupta, for the JetRec Group University of Chicago Outline:
1 Tracking Reconstruction Norman A. Graf SLAC July 19, 2006.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
Event Data Model in ATLAS Edward Moyse (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration CHEP 2004, Interlaken.
David N. Brown Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Representing the BaBar Collaboration The BaBar Mini  BaBar  BaBar’s Data Formats  Design of the Mini 
1 Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) Michela Biglietti (Universita’ di Napoli-Federico II) and the HLT.
1 Michela Biglietti (Universita’ di Napoli-Federico II) Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) and the HLT.
MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.
Non-prompt Track Reconstruction with Calorimeter Assisted Tracking Dmitry Onoprienko, Eckhard von Toerne Kansas State University, Bonn University Linear.
1 Muon Reconstruction in the ATLAS experiment Michela Biglietti Dottorato in Fisica Fondamentale e Applicata, XVI ciclo Università di Napoli “Federico.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
9-13/9/03 Atlas Overview WeekPeter Sherwood 1 Atlfast, Artemis and Atlantis What, Where and How.
Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.
Vertex finding and B-Tagging for the ATLAS Inner Detector A.H. Wildauer Universität Innsbruck CERN ATLAS Computing Group on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
1 Moore Packages, Repackaging and Design Status Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Gabriella Cataldi INFN/Lecce.
GDB Meeting - 10 June 2003 ATLAS Offline Software David R. Quarrie Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Atlas CHEP‘2000 Padova, ITALY February 2000 Implementation of an Object Oriented Track Reconstruction Model into Multiple LHC Experiments.
Nectarios Ch. Benekos CERN/ATLAS EESFYE - HEP 2003 Workshop, NTUA, April 17-20, 2003 Performance of the ATLAS ID Reconstruction.
Aspects of LAr Reconstruction S. Rajagopalan ATLAS Week June 4, 2001.
Muon Reconstruction with Moore and MuonIdentification The Moore/MUID group Atlas Physics Workshop Athens, May 2003.
/MuID status report on behalf of the Moore/MuID group. Status in the releases ( Units Migrations DC1/G3 MuonGeoModel Migration DC2/G4) MuID updates Trig.
A New Tool For Measuring Detector Performance in ATLAS ● Arno Straessner – TU Dresden Matthias Schott – CERN on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Computing.
Jet Reconstruction in Athena Atlas Calorimeter Energy Calibration Workshop Ringberg Castle 23/07/02 Ambreesh Gupta, University of Chicago Outline : Introduction.
Photon reconstruction and matching Prokudin Mikhail.
MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.
Software offline tutorial, CERN, Dec 7 th Electrons and photons in ATHENA Frédéric DERUE – LPNHE Paris ATLAS offline software tutorial Detectors.
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
1 Detector Performance and Physics talks at Bern (very selective!) Pete Watkins.
T. Lari – INFN Milan Status of ATLAS Pixel Test beam simulation Status of the validation studies with test-beam data of the Geant4 simulation and Pixel.
Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.
Introduction to the Athena Software Hong Ma BNL Athena Tutorial USATLAS Software Workshop.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
Moore/MUID validation with The MOORE group.
Software Week - 8/12/98G. Poulard - CERN EP/ATC1 Status of Software for Physics TDR Atlas Software Week 8 December 1998 G. Poulard.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
June 2004 ATLAS WeekAlexander Solodkov1 testbeam 2004 offline reconstruction.
CMS Cathode Strip Chambers Performance with LHC Data Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2013 Varna, September 10,
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
V. Pozdnyakov Direct photon and photon-jet measurement capability of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Valery Pozdnyakov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the HI.
BES III Software: Beta Release Plan Weidong Li 19 th October 2005.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
1 TrigMoore: Status, Plans, Possible Milestones. 2 Moore in HLT- status and ongoing work Package under the CVS directory: Trigger/TrigAlgorithms/TrigMoore.
DE/dx in ATLAS TILECAL Els Koffeman Atlas/Nikhef Sources: PDG DRDC (1995) report RD34 collaboration CERN-PPE
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Muon identification in ATLAS Peter Kluit (NIKHEF).
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
slicPandora: slic + pandoraPFANew
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
Measurement of Muon Energy Loss in ATLAS
MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) MuonIdentification
integration in HLT-status and prospects
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Moore LVL2 interface and Moore status
M.Biglietti (Univ. Naples and INFN Naples)
BES III Software: Short-term Plan ( )
Low pt muon identification
K/p fakes rejection VERY Preliminary Full offline environment
Presentation transcript:

1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined reconstruction (MuonIdentification)

2 Converter Algorithm Event Data Service Persistency Service Data Files Algorithm Transient Event Store Detec. Data Service Persistency Service Data Files Transient Detector Store Message Service JobOptions Service Particle Prop. Service Other Services Histogram Service Persistency Service Data Files Transient Histogram Store Application Manager Converter Necessity of a framework: a template application into which developers plug in their code, using mechanisms defined by the framework, collections of functionality, common vocabulary … Athena Offline software in Atlas

3 Data flow Tracking Calorimetry Muon Tracks Em cluster Muon Calo Jets … … Combined Muon Analysis Raw digits Detector Descriptio n E/  identification Event, Identified particles MC & simulation Atlas Algorithm Event TDS Algorithm Alg2 Event Alg1 Alg3 Offline Reconstruction in Atlas

4 Results : less dependencies, code is more maintainable, modular, easier to develop new reconstruction approaches Moore in Athena MooMakePhiSegments RPC/TGC digits PhiSegments MooMakeRZSegments MDT digits MooMakeRoads CrudeRZSegments MooMakeiPatTracks MooRoads MooiPatTracks MooMakeNtuples Ntuples MooAlgs MooStatistics Each step is driven by an Athena top- algorithm Transient objects are passed via TDS/StoreGate Independent algorithms, the only coupling is through the transient objects MooLVL2PhiSegmentMaker MooLVL2RZSegmentMaker Before: RPC/TGC/MDT digits Moore Ntuples Tracks Easier integration with other ATHENA packages to get services and for combined reconstruction, test-beam software, calibration, online/EF sw …

5 MooAlgs MooAlgs_2 MooEvent MooAlgs_n MooCode Events for reconstruction Athena algorithms with different features/goals Shared code used by Athena Algos MooAlgsLVL2 MooStatistics Moore Packages

6 Single muon studies A Muon track consists of hits from at least 2 stations and is successfully fitted.  (%) P T = 20 GeV P T = 100 GeV  = 3.3  = 3.4 Efficiency vs Pt Pt resolution Performance P T (GeV)

7 MOORE: Pentium III 850 MHz Mbytes MUONBOX Pt(Gev)Time(ms) Speed

8 Combined Muon Reconstruction Improve muons identification efficiency – Discrimination of muons from  rays in the muon spectrometer – Reconstruction of low energy muons that do not reach the middle and outer stations of the muon spectrometer – Rejection of decay muons (from k and  ) by requiring tracks originate close the interaction point – Discrimination of muons in hadronic jets from hadrons. An efficient muon b-tagging requires a good muon identification for non isolated muons Improve track parameters – Achieve the best possible momentum resolution – Reduce tails in the momentm resolution of the muon spectrometer, resulted from fluctuation in energy loss in the calorimeter – Improve charge determination for high energy muons Understand the detector – Check the calibration of calorimeter. – Cross check the results from the inner detector and muon spectrometer (for muons with momenta from 20 GeV to 70 GeV)

9 Muon Identification Pre-existing work: Muon Identification (MUID) package used for physic TDR  Atrecon implementation:  Input – results of ID, Calo and Muon reconstruction (Muonbox) (as C++ objects through interface packages)  Output – class structure => zebra banks => combined ntuple Purpose: associate tracks found in Muon Spectrometer with inner detector (ID) tracks and calorimeter information to identify muons at their production vertex with optimum parameter resolution 2 principle methods: 1.Stand-alone muons – Muon Spectrometer track and track-segment parameters propagated to beam-axis MS track and inner station segment parameters propagated to beam-axis Angle resolutions dominated by Coulomb scattering in calo Parametrise calorimeter effects – function of p and  (i.e. thickness) or measure energy loss from calibration of observed energy deposition MS track is express at vertex 2. Combined muons – match Muon Spectrometer to ID tracks and fit combined parameters  2 cut for matching of inner detector and muon spectrometer tracks parameters combined fit

10 Muonidentification – Athena Implementation MuidStandAlone Moore Tracks CaloClusters MuidComb MuidTracks status standalone ID Tracks MuidTracks status combined MuidInit MuidTracks status muon TruthEvent Tracks MuidNtuple MuidIDNtuple MuidCombNtuple Ntuples

11 Energy loss in the Calorimeters Total energy loss Tile Endcap hadronic LAr EM LAr reconstructed (GeV) from MC-Truth (GeV) Pt = 100 GeV Pt = 20 GeV Pt = 300 GeV

12 cot  pulls Single  Pt = 20 GeV Single  Pt = 20 GeV StandAlone Tracks :  pulls

13 entrance entrance (Moore) Pt = 20 GeV Pt = 100 GeV Pt

14 Muon Track (Moore + Calo + Muid) InDet (iPatRec) Combined (Muid)  = 2.9  = 5.2  = 2.6 Pt = 100 GeV  = 3.6  = 2.1  = 2.0 Pt = 20 GeV Muon Track (Moore + Calo + Muid) InDet (iPatRec) Combined (Muid) Pt = 300 GeV  = 3.9  = 12.5  = 3.8 Pt Resolutions & Combination

15Conclusions Moore – What is needed Description of inert material EDM implemantation Layout P – DC1 data reconstruction – Items Material, EDM, testbeam version, geometry/event description, repackaging/intergration, LVL2 … MuonIdentification – to do Energy loss parametrisation Fit-tracking optimization Calorimeter multiple scattering tuning Integration with the new version of Moore (material description and EDM) Better design, full debug …