Sample Survey of Military Personnel 12 Sep 2007 Slide 1 U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Army Personnel Survey Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Findings on BOSS Fall 2000 Sample Survey of Military Personnel
Advertisements

INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH OFFICE Non-Returning Student Survey.
Dental Treatment Needs of Active Duty Military Personnel 1994 and 2003 Andrew K. York, CAPT, DC, USN Susan W. Mongeau, Lt Col, USAF, DC David L. Moss,
21st Space Wing Peterson AFB, CO FY06 Economic Impact for Colorado Springs and El Paso County Annual as of 30 Sep 2006 Prepared by: 21 st Comptroller.
Marriage, Money and Happiness By Ted Goertzel Rutgers University, Camden NJ Spring, 2004.
Subrena Simpkins (334 ) and Diane Sherman (334) Alabama Commission on.
Demographic Trends & Issues To 2020 Presentation to MnSCU Board of Trustees Tom Gillaspy, State Demographer Mn Dept of Administration October 2008.
April 2004 Dr. B.D. Maxfield Office of Army Demographics Then and Now Active-Duty Army.
Select SLIDE MASTER to Insert Briefing Title Here 5-May-15 Name/Office Symbol/(703) XXX-XXX (DSN XXX) / address Opportunities for impact by Nurses.
Change of Command Ceremony
82d Soldier Support Battalion (Airborne) Operation Enduring Freedom Military Pay Entitlements As of: 3 January 2002.
So how many people do we have running around in uniform that we are serving ?
2/16/2010 The Family Educational Records and Privacy Act.
INTRODUCTION Clinical studies have documented relationships between physical and mental health, but until now, these relationships have not been quantified.
Using Linked Data to Track Participation in the Medicaid Buy-In Program Henry T. Ireys Su Liu The Future of Disability Statistics: What We Know and Need.
Mental Health Survey 2015: Webinar 14 th January 2015.
Module 2: DEERS. 2 Module Objectives After this module, you should be able to: Explain the purpose of DEERS Identify who determines TRICARE eligibility.
Lesson Objectives DEERS After this lesson, you should be able to:
USMA ‘95 Individual Ready Reserve
OAVSNP 2014 Charlotte Alverson, NPSO Pattie Johnson, TRI Sally Simich, ODE 1.
TO CONSERVE FIGHTING STRENGTH 1 THERE IS A COST TO CARE KEVIN R. STEVENSON, LMSW-C, BCD LTC, MS CHIEF, SOCIAL WORK SERVICE UNCLASSIFIED INTRODUCTION STRESS.
Microdata Simulation for Confidentiality of Tax Returns Using Quantile Regression and Hot Deck Jennifer Huckett Iowa State University June 20, 2007.
1 Responsible Drawdown of Forces Media Kit As of July 4, 2010.
CAPPS II: A Case Study of Homeland Security Computer Applications Marcia Hofmann Staff Counsel Electronic Privacy Information Center Computer Freedom &
Virginia Department of Education - April The Career and Technical Education (CTE) Completer Follow-Up 2013 Follow-Up of the 2012 CTE Graduates.
28 Sep 2007 Slide 1 Sample Survey of Military Personnel U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Army Personnel Survey Office.
Making Veterans Visible Kate Kidder, Research Associate, Center for a New American Security.
BRIGADIER GENERAL GEORGE M. BROOKS
Analyzing Section Demographics Matthew J. Angiulo Western Region Deputy Director, Membership August 15 th, 2013.
ISFAA High School Counselor Workshop Fall Agenda …  Parental Information  After the FAFSA  Available Tools.
Overview of Military Police Customs Operations CPT Marshall Sybert MP Customs Information Brief.
* Includes Marine Corps Active Duty Demographic Profile Assigned Strength, Gender, Race, Marital, Education and Age Profile of Active Duty Force September.
No End In Sight Response By: Eric Jensen. U.S Casualties and Soldiers Wounded As of March 16, 2010, there have been 4,388 American casualties during the.
Richard Fafara/CFSC-SP/(703) /(DSN 1 of MWR Programs and Their Effect on Readiness and Retention.
FERPA Basics Kim Barber. FERPA defined FERPA: Federal Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 Law that protects and guards against release of student.
Evaluation of Virginia’s Preferred Drug List: 2 nd Quarter Interim Report Policy and Research Division June 22, 2004Department of Medical Assistance Services.
Project Review Team Meeting Customer User Acceptance Test Update August 10, 2011 Santa Plummer, User Acceptance Test Section Head Government Employees.
Session 3 Integrated Partner Management (IPM) Presenters Molly Wyatt Susan Stallard Margaret Ayanian Andrea DiDonna.
Analyzing Section Demographics Matthew J. Angiulo Western Region Deputy Director, Membership August 7 th, 2014.
UNCLASSIFIED OCS Structured Interview Board Briefing Facilitator: XX.
National Health Interview Survey Early Release Program: Overview and Key Health Indicators Report Jeannine S. Schiller, M.P.H. Division of Health Interview.
Presented by: Insert Name Here. AGENDA Social Security Basics Claiming Options SSI Maximization Strategies Real-Life Case Scenarios Maximizing Your SS.
Many Soldiers Died or were Wounded while fighting in Iraq. 4,184 Deaths Total 30,182 Wounded Total.
WAR IN IRAQ BY: TREVOR HERRICK. U.S. CASUALTIES IN IRAQ Since the war began on March 19 th, ,257 soldiers have been killed in Iraq. The number of.
Hourly Student Employees Getting Them Hired & Records Management Best Practices.
Lt. Gen. Mary Legere Career Summary. Lt. Gen. Mary Legere is only the fourth woman in the 240-year history of the United States Army to reach the rank.
* Includes Marine Corps Active Duty Demographic Profile Assigned Strength, Gender, Race, Marital, Education and Age Profile of Active Duty Force September.
Economics 434: The Theory of Financial Markets Professor Burton Fall 2015 August 25, 2015.
Then and Now Dr. B.D. Maxfield Office of Army Demographics Hispanics in the U.S. Army April 2004.
Then and Now Dr. B.D. Maxfield Office of Army Demographics Asians in the U.S. Army April 2004.
“Medically Ready Force…Ready Medical Force”
Inclusive Electoral Literacy Through Informal Educational Channels
Developing the Record in VA Cases
“8TH PERSCOM NEWS YOU CAN USE”
“Medically Ready Force…Ready Medical Force”
PERSONNEL ASSET INVENTORY FAQs
FY19 Professor of Military Science Centralized Selection Board Vacancy List and Preference Sheet Observations Title Slide.
FY19 Professor of Military Science Centralized Selection Board Vacancy List and Preference Sheet Observations Title Slide.
Employ the Deployed Theater Accountability System (DTAS)
Employ the Deployed Theater Accountability System (DTAS)
Determine Your Tax Filing Status
COL Matthew J. Van Wagenen Deputy Commander – Support
Warriors Walk Warriors Walk Honors Soldiers Killed in Action during Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). This walkway is.
ARMY DEMOGRAPHICS FY00 Soldier Demographics Family Demographics 1
Writing Official Histories in the Digital Age
OCS Structured Interview Board Briefing
Blue and the Gray: The Lineups
Blue and the Gray: The Lineups
THE ESSENCE OF AMERICA'S ARMY”
ARMY DEMOGRAPHICS FY01 Soldier Demographics Family Demographics 1
Presentation transcript:

Sample Survey of Military Personnel 12 Sep 2007 Slide 1 U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Army Personnel Survey Office MARITAL STATUS 1952 – 2007 (with year-by-year for ) ACTIVE ARMY From the Sample Survey of Military Personnel

Sample Survey of Military Personnel 12 Sep 2007 Slide 2 U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Army Personnel Survey Office The percent of married soldiers in the Active Army has varied greatly since the early 1950s. In the 1990s, the percent of married Soldiers reached a peak of 65.5% in 1996 (61.5% not including those who reported they were “separated, filing for divorce”) [Slides 3 and 6]. The percent of married officers has remained relatively steady since 1986 at about 74% - 77% (76.5% in 2007) [Slides 4 and 7]. The percent of married enlisted Soldiers has declined from 63.2% in 1996, and since 2000 has remained relatively steady at about 57% - 61% (60.4% in 2007) [Slides 5 and 8]. _ 1 Official marital rate data is maintained by DEERS (Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System). Key Trends 1

Sample Survey of Military Personnel 12 Sep 2007 Slide 3 U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Army Personnel Survey Office Marital Status S.E. +/-1 Note: PV1s are not targeted for inclusion in the SSMP. PV2s in USAREUR (Europe) and Eighth US Army (Korea) are not included. 1 Includes those who are “Separated or filing for divorce” NOTE: results are not Army-wide. NOTE: S00 = Spring 2000, F03 = Fall 2003 Percent Married Soldiers 1

Sample Survey of Military Personnel 12 Sep 2007 Slide 4 U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Army Personnel Survey Office Marital Status NOTE: results are not Army-wide. 1 Includes those who are “Separated or filing for divorce” Percent Married Officers 1 S.E. +/-2

Sample Survey of Military Personnel 12 Sep 2007 Slide 5 U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Army Personnel Survey Office Marital Status S.E. +/-2 Note: PV1s are not targeted for inclusion in the SSMP. PV2s in USAREUR (Europe) and Eighth US Army (Korea) are not included. NOTE: results are not Army-wide. 1 Includes those who are “Separated or filing for divorce” Percent Married Enlisted Personnel 1

Sample Survey of Military Personnel 12 Sep 2007 Slide 6 U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Army Personnel Survey Office Note: Widowed not included due to small sample size. Marital Status S.E. = +/-1 1 Note: PV1s are not targeted for inclusion in the SSMP. PV2s in USAREUR (Europe) and Eighth US Army (Korea) are not included. NOTE: results are not Army-wide. All Soldiers 1

Sample Survey of Military Personnel 12 Sep 2007 Slide 7 U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Army Personnel Survey Office Note: Widowed not included due to small sample size. Marital Status /-1S.E.=+/-2 +/-1 +/-2 +/-1+/-2 +/-1 NOTE: results are not Army-wide. +/-2 +/-1 Officers +/-1 +/-2

Sample Survey of Military Personnel 12 Sep 2007 Slide 8 U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Army Personnel Survey Office Note: Widowed not included due to small sample size. Marital Status /-1S.E.=+/-2+/-1 +/-2+/-1 NOTE: results are not Army-wide. +/-1 Enlisted Personnel 1 +/-1 1 Note: PV1s are not targeted for inclusion in the SSMP. PV2s in USAREUR (Europe) and Eighth US Army (Korea) are not included. +/-1

Sample Survey of Military Personnel 12 Sep 2007 Slide 9 U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Army Personnel Survey Office Spring 2007 Sample Survey of Military Personnel Army offices and agencies submit questions on topics to be addressed by the Sample Survey of Military Personnel (SSMP). The population for the SSMP consists of all permanent party, Active Army personnel (commissioned officers, warrant officers, and enlisted personnel [excluding all PV1 and those PV2 Soldiers in Europe and Korea]). Samples of about 10% of officers and 2-3% of enlisted personnel are drawn using the final 1 or 2 digits of Soldiers’ social security numbers. Since spring 1992, the databases have included approximately 4,000 each for officers and enlisted personnel. The Spring 2007 SSMP was conducted from about 16 April through 22 August 2007 among Soldiers who were not currently deployed in the war theaters for Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). In addition to not surveying Soldiers deployed to war theaters, the SSMP was not targeted for Soldiers who recently returned from a war theater. The survey also was not targeted for Soldiers who were preparing to be deployed soon to a war theater, such as a brigade of 82nd Airborne Division. Completed responses were received from 4,089 officers and 4,902 enlisted personnel in the Active Army. The results for the Spring 2007 SSMP were weighted up to a subset of the Active Army strength of 502,503 as of 30 April Not included are those Soldiers who were deployed for or redeployed from OIF and OEF (based on records maintained by 3rd PERSCOM) and those Soldiers preparing to deploy soon for OIF and OEF, yielding a weighted subset strength of 367,071. Inquiries for additional information should be directed to: Chief, Army Personnel Survey Office, U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2511 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA , commercial (703) , or