Response rates and disposition coding PHC 6716 June 8, 2011 Chris McCarty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Address Frames and Mail Surveys as Complements (or Alternatives) to RDD Surveys Michael W. Link, Michael P. Battaglia, Martin R. Frankel, Larry Osborn,
Advertisements

Survey Response Rates: Trends and Standards Karen Donelan, ScD Senior Scientist in Health Policy Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School.
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Costs Per Survey Response
Using Advance Diaries in a Telephone Time Use Survey Lisa Schwartz, Lisa Lee, Cathy Haggerty and Diane Herz IATUR October 2002.
Survey Methodology Nonresponse EPID 626 Lecture 6.
How are we doing? Sort the types of error into sampling and non-sampling errors, then match the situations to the types of error.
Brian A. Harris-Kojetin, Ph.D. Statistical and Science Policy
1 Sampling Telephone Numbers and Adults, and Interview Length, and Weighting in the California Health Survey Cell Phone Pilot Study J. Michael Brick, Westat.
Microsimulation of Survey Collection Yves Bélanger Kristen Couture 26 January 2010.
Challenges to Surveys Non-response error –Falling response rates over time Sample coverage –Those without landline telephones excluded –Growing.
EKOS Research Associates Inc. Interactive Voice Response: The Past, the Present, and Into the Future Presentation to: The MRIA Ottawa Chapter January 21,
Measuring nonresponse bias in a cross-country enterprise survey
NLSCY – Non-response. Non-response There are various reasons why there is non-response to a survey  Some related to the survey process Timing Poor frame.
QMSS, Lugano, Lynn Control of Sampling Error Peter Lynn Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, UK.
Documentation and survey quality. Introduction.
Aaker, Kumar, Day Ninth Edition Instructor’s Presentation Slides
American Time Use Survey: Report on Dress Rehearsal Diane Herz American Time Use Survey IATUR meetings in Lisbon, Portugal October
Survey Methods: Communicating with Respondents
Error and Sample Sizes PHC 6716 June 1, 2011 Chris McCarty.
Copyright ©2005 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. How to Get a Good Sample Chapter 4.
Survey Sample Size MKTG 3342 Fall 2008 Professor Edward Fox.
Cell phone problem and alternative approaches Chris McCarty University of Florida PHC 6716 May,
Operational and Methodological Lessons Learned from the 2003 Joint Canada/U.S. Survey of Health Catherine Simile, Ph.D. National Center for Health Statistics.
Response Rates and Results of the Advance Letter Experiment 2004 RRFSS Workshop Toronto, June 23, 2004 David A. Northrup, Renée Elsbett-Koeppen and Andrea.
Responsive Design for Household Surveys: Illustration of Management Interventions Based on Survey Paradata Robert M. Groves, Emilia Peytcheva, Nicole Kirgis,
Adding a Mode as a Final Step in the Follow-up of a Panel Survey Seminar on New Frontiers for Statistical Data Collection Geneva, Switzerland, 31 October.
Chapter Twelve Census: Population canvass - not really a “sample” Asking the entire population Budget Available: A valid factor – how much can we.
A Latent Class Call-back Model for Survey Nonresponse Paul P. Biemer RTI International and UNC-CH Michael W. Link Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The 2006 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Paradata File: Overview And Applications Beth L. Taylor 2008 NCHS Data User’s Conference August 13 th,
2001 National Household Travel Survey Kentucky Add-on Ben Pierce Presentation By.
DRAFT - not for publication Nonresponse Bias Analysis in a Survey of Banks Carl Ramirez U.S. Government Accountability Office
DATA COLLECTION METHODS Sampling
How to Design a Sample and Improve Response Rates Alex StannardScottish Government Kevin RalstonUniversity of Stirling.
A Strategy for Prioritising Non-response Follow-up to Reduce Costs Without Reducing Output Quality Gareth James Methodology Directorate UK Office for National.
Sampling. Sampling Can’t talk to everybody Select some members of population of interest If sample is “representative” can generalize findings.
Brown, Suter, and Churchill Basic Marketing Research (8 th Edition) © 2014 CENGAGE Learning Basic Marketing Research Customer Insights and Managerial Action.
Bias in Surveys MDM4U – Mathematics of Data Management.
Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics Richard Curtin University of Michigan.
Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia The Variable Costs of Cell Phone Interviewing Understanding.
Understanding the Respondent – a Key to Improve our Data Collection Strategies? Seminar on Statistical Data Collection 26 th September 2013 Anton Johansson,
The Challenge of Non- Response in Surveys. The Overall Response Rate The number of complete interviews divided by the number of eligible units in the.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Reducing Non-Response Section A 1.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Reducing Non-Response Section B 1.
1 Non-Response Non-response is the failure to obtain survey measures on a sample unit Non-response increases the potential for non-response bias. It occurs.
Unit 7 Section : Confidence Intervals for Population Proportions  Proportion – a part of a whole. Can be represented as a percent, decimal, or.
Testing for Coverage Bias when Combining Directory-Listed And Cellphone Samples T. M. Guterbock, A. Diop, J. M. Ellis, J. L. P. Holmes and K. T. Le, Center.
Modeling and Simulation of Survey Collection Using Paradata Presented by: Kristen Couture Co-authored by: Yves Bélanger Elisabeth Neusy.
Surveying Cell Phone Numbers in the United States Synthesis and Future Research Needs Paul J. Lavrakas, Ph.D. DC-AAPOR Workshop September 4, 2008.
Sources of Errors M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Addis Ababa 4 to 8 June 2012 Arif Rashid, TOPS.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Finding low-income telephone households and people who do not have health insurance using auxiliary sample frame information for a random digit dial survey.
Survey Research.
Data Collection: Enhancing Response Rates & Limiting Errors Chapter 10.
Common sampling errors
Effects of Sampling and Screening Strategies in an RDD Survey Anthony M. Roman, Elizabeth Eggleston, Charles F. Turner, Susan M. Rogers, Rebecca Crow,
The Use of Random Digit Dialing in Household Surveys: Challenges and Changes Chris Chapman 2008 IES Research Conference Washington, DC June 11, 2008
1 Chapter 13 Collecting the Data: Field Procedures and Nonsampling Error © 2005 Thomson/South-Western.
Tracking Case Dispositions and Calculating Response Rates in the ACS Prepared for the September 26, 2006 meetings of the Federal-State Cooperative Program.
Journalism 614: Non-Response and Cell Phone Adoption Issues.
1 Survey Nonresponse Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois at Chicago March 16, 2010.
Review According to AAA survey Americans spend an average of 7.5 nights when they went on vacation people participated in the survey. A) Find a point.
RTI International is a registered trademark and a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Using Paradata for Monitoring Interviewer Performance.
Journalism 614: Non-Response and Cell Phone Adoption Issues.
Strategies for Evaluating Cessation Programs – Improving Response Rates Julie Rainey Marcy Huggins Professional Data Analysts, Inc. Minneapolis PROFESSIONAL.
Membership in Online Research Panels presentation of results from a BRI Omnibus telephone survey April 29, 2010 asdf.
What do Women Know About Breast Density?
Evaluating a Statistical Article
Cell phone problem and alternative approaches
Customer Satisfaction Research 2018 Q3 Results October 22, 2018
Presentation transcript:

Response rates and disposition coding PHC 6716 June 8, 2011 Chris McCarty

RDD Telephone Disposition Codes I = Complete interview (1.1) P = Partial interview (1.2) R = Refusal and break-off (2.10) NC = Non-contact (2.20) O = Other (2.30) UH = Unknown if household/occupied HU (3.10) UO = Unknown, other (3.20) e = Estimated proportion of cases of unknown eligibility that are eligible

Types of rates Response Rate (RR) = Proportion of cases interviewed of all eligible cases Cooperation Rate (COOP)= Proportion of cases interviewed of eligible cases contacted Refusal Rate (REF) = Proportion of eligible sample that refused Contact Rate (CON) = Proportion of eligible sample where a household was reached

What gets reported? It is rare to see anything other than the response rate reported Occasionally people will report the cooperation rate This is often reported when the response rate is low

AAPOR Response Rates

I = Complete interview (1.1) P = Partial interview (1.2) R = Refusal and break-off (2.10) NC = Non-contact (2.20) O = Other (2.30) UH = Unknown if household/occupied HU (3.10) UO = Unknown, other (3.20) e = Estimated proportion of cases of unknown eligibility that are eligible

Calculating e e is an estimate of the proportion of non-contacts that are eligible Its calculation depends on survey design and execution There are a number of ways it can be calculated Some people just make assumptions about e

Example of calculating e for May 2011 CCI

Comparison of response rates for May 2011 CCI RR111.1 RR211.1 RR312.9 RR412.9 RR516.2 RR616.2

Exceptions to AAPOR Disposition Codes In some cases AAPOR codes may not be detailed or descriptive enough to allow for exceptional circumstances with sample If possible AAPOR codes should be used If new codes must be used they should aggregate to existing AAPOR codes

Last versus Final Dispositions Last Disposition is actually the “most recent disposition” Final disposition requires a rule for evaluating call history There are no firm standards for evaluating call history Research suggests that the difference is trivial

Last versus Final Dispositions -- Research RDD 1RDD 2RDD 3Listed 1Listed 2Listed 3 Sample released Call limit Average attempts per case Completed interviews Response rate using most recent disposition Response rate using ever eligible Response rate using all five final disposition rules Response rate using only Rule Response rate using only Rule Response rate using only Rule Response rate using only Rule Response rate using only Rule Response rate using only Rule 1 and Rule For most recent call: Rule 1: Business always coded as business Rule 2: No eligible respondent always coded as no eligible respondent Rule 3: Disconnected number previously coded as no answer or temporary phone problem always coded as disconnected number Rule 4: Fax/data line previously coded as no answer or temporary phone problem always coded as Fax/data line Rule 5: Non-working number previously coded as a temporary phone problem always coded as a non-working number

Council of American Survey Research Organizations (CASRO) Disposition Codes and Response Rates

Example response rates BRFSS Response rates by state (page 32): ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Data/Brfss/2010_Summ ary_Data_Quality_Report.pdf ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Data/Brfss/2010_Summ ary_Data_Quality_Report.pdf Quinnipiac polls: –

What affects Response Rates? Maximum call attempts Maximum number of refusal callbacks Fielding time Rotation of calls across day of the week and time of day The population surveyed Survey length Sample quality Listed versus random-digit dial Salience of survey topic to respondent

Variables in model used to predict response rate across 205 surveys Overall (R 2 =0.52) Listed Sample (R 2 =0.42)RDD Sample (R 2 =0.67) VariableCoeff.Prob>tCoeff.Prob>tCoeff.Prob>t Constant Salience level 2− − Salience level − Number of calls per case Minutes per piece of sample Refusal calls Survey length− − Fielding time Fielding time squared− − − Listed versus RDD− na

What would it take to get a 70% response rate?

Ways people overstate response rates Pre-screening samples incorrectly (e.g. removing persistently unavailable numbers) Unreasonable calculations of e Purchasing RDD sample from higher density banks

Response rates with lists When sampling from a list most of these rules must be modified The fundamental question is “Who is eligible?” If being on the list makes them eligible then they are

Analyze the effects of non-response If you have information about all potential respondents, compare respondents to non- respondents Compare converted refusals to non-refusals Compare early responders to late responders