Coherence Through Aligned Goals Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information

Advertisements

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.

Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.

Educator Evaluation: A Protocol for Developing S.M.A.R.T. Goal Statements.

Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.

Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.

Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.

“SMARTer” Goals Winter A ESE-MASS Workshop for superintendents and representatives from their leadership teams.

The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Unpacking the Rubrics and Gathering Evidence September 2012 Melrose Public Schools 1.

Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.

Educator Evaluation Workshop: Gathering Evidence, Conducting Observations & Providing Feedback MSSAA Summer Institute July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Department.

 Reading School Committee January 23,

Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Implementation MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice August 2014.

Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.

The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August

A Collaborative Approach to Planning for DDM’s Kristan Rodriguez, Ph.D Chelmsford Public Schools.

Staff & Student Feedback The Role of Feedback in Educator Evaluation January 2015.

RESA Standards 2015 Revised Standards for District and School Effectiveness.

The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.

Standards Based Report Cards: From Theory to Practice.

Title IIA: Connecting Professional Development with Educator Evaluation June 1, 2015 Craig Waterman.

Building Professional Learning Communities to Improve Instructions and Raise Achievement Overview Supporting School and District Improvement in Massachusetts.

Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.

Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,

WIDA and ACCESS: Companion Pieces to RETELL Links to Resources for Districts.

DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.

1-Hour Overview: The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation September

FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Resources for School and District Planning August 15, 2014.

New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.

 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.

Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.

TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.

ConNext Leticia Guadarrama and Multilingual Department Team.

Introduction: District-Determined Measures and Assessment Literacy Webinar Series Part 1.

Educator Evaluation Spring Convening Connecting Policy, Practice and Practitioners May 28-29, 2014 Marlborough, Massachusetts.

What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.

Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.

Using Student & Staff Feedback in Educator Evaluation November 5, 2014 MASC/MASS Joint Conference.

Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.

SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,

March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.

Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.

Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview August 4, 2015 and August 10, 2015 Presented by: Jennifer Briggs.

Professional Learning Informational Update.

Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.

Monomoy Educator Evaluation System Training

“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.

 Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence National Institute April 12 and 13, 2012.

Presented by: Barbara A. Deane–Williams, Superintendent Christopher Marino, Teacher Leader Susan Streicher, Principal Strengthening Teacher & Leader Effectiveness.

New Employee Induction Program

Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.

Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Update Board of Education September 2, 2014.

6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.

Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.

 Teachers 21 June 8,  Wiki with Resources o

Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.

Planning for Success Advancing district planning practices MASS/MASC Joint Conference November 5, 2014 Carrie Conaway, Associate Commissioner Planning.

Strategic Technology Plan May 23, 2013.

Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.

Putting it Together. Learning Intentions Participants will recognize the benefits of front-loading collaboration at the district level and plan to apply.

Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.

National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.

Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.

School Improvement Jacqueline C. Chavis, Deputy Superintendent Douglas Dohey, Interim Chief of Operations Pam Connor, Director of Elementary Leadership.

Bringing it All Together Focus on Curriculum Development & Instructional Delivery Focus on Instructional Practices Focus on Instructional Alignment Where.

Standards Implementation Steering Committee

Data for School Improvement

DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents

Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.

Presentation transcript:

Coherence Through Aligned Goals Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

WSPS District Improvement Plan: The Twitter Version Align curriculum to new MA Frameworks. Create "knowledge-driven schools." Use technology to improve instruction and collaboration.

Coherence Through Aligned Goals Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

School Improvement Plans Based upon District Improvement Plan. Incorporate data from Conditions of School Effectiveness Self-Assessment

Coherence Through Aligned Goals Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Focus the Educator Evaluation Rubrics on district and school priorities to create "power elements." All standards and indicators still in use, but district focuses on seven "power elements for teachers, SISP, building level admin and superintendent. Developed jointly by administrators and WSEA. Approved by school committee. Team Goals: Step One

Team Goals: Step Two Define and train teams. Teams developed by administrators with oversight from WSEA. Educators trained by superintendent and WSEA co-president. Examined District Improvement Plan, School Improvement Plan goals and power elements.

Coherence Through Aligned Goals Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Teacher Goals Year 1--After training, provided time for teachers to develop team goals. Year 2 o Training teachers in smaller groups o Providing time to review progress at the end of training session. o Necessary because of mixed teams

Keeping the Process Alive and Overcoming Challenges

Professional Development (Part 1) Developed resource compendium of articles, videos, and websites related to power elements. Completed text-rendering protocol of professional article during every leadership meeting.

Professional Development (Part 2) Coordinated teacher and administrator professional development to be in line with improvement plans and power elements. Three examples o PLC Expansion Project o Reading and writing in content areas o Development of curriculum guides

Ongoing Collaboration with WSEA Developed list of suggested artifacts Original developed by MTA Adapted to be as tangible as possible for WSPS educators

Educator Evaluation Steering Committee Ongoing questions and concerns about evidence led to "Bring Out Your Artifacts Day”

Are we there or are there more mountains to climb?