Terry Boss Sr. VP Environment Safety and Operations INGAA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Safety Absolutes Green Lake
Advertisements

A Joint Code of Practice Objectives and Summary Presentation
Increasing Pipeline Safety Through Shared Planning Transmission Pipelines and Land Use: What needs to be accomplished and why? General Session --- November.
1 According to PETROSAFE safety policy, the company is keen that: Introduction All Egyptian Petroleum companies and foreign companies working in A.R.E.
The State of Natural Gas Pipelines in Fort Worth.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT AGA – BEST PRACTICE ROUNDTABLE Sara Peralta, Director – Quality & Improvement Philadelphia February, 2013.
Joe Killins & Associates, LLC Pipelines & Risk Based Management How Safe is Safe?
Government Industry R&D Forum March 2005 Pipeline Design & Construction Near Term Focus Future Gaps & Opportunities.
Demonstration Grant PARTNERS FOR PIPELINE SAFETY WEB PAGES Develop interactive and informative webpage for residents, property owners, contractors and.
GulfSafe Notification System GULF
Federal Agency Update – January 2009 Pipelines & Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA) Communications Task Team Status Danny Gibbs Spectra Energy / INGAA It’s.
HSE Performance of contractors
Responsible CarE® Process Safety Code David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
113 East College Avenue, Suite 200 Tallahassee, Florida
Damage Prevention and Public Awareness Programs. Challenges.
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America INGAA Action Plan to Build Confidence in Pipeline Safety INGAA Integrity Management Continuous Improvement.
Public Awareness Workshop Public Perspective Presented by Carl Weimer The Public’s Pipeline Awareness.
Standing On The Wall An Engineer’s Role in Risk Management and Insurance.
Congressional Reauthorization and PHMSA Rulemakings – Enough to avoid future tragedies? Carl Weimer, Executive Director Pipeline Safety Trust.
Pipelines and Risk Management How Safe is Safe? Pipeline Safety Trust Conference Denise Hamsher Enbridge Energy Company November 2006.
High Consequence Areas & Pipeline Assessment Intervals –Is there a need for change? Terry Boss Sr. VP Environment Safety and Operations Interstate Natural.
CE HYDRAULICS ENGINEERING
Controlling Risk by Managing Change Jessica Blaydes & Gary Fobare Honeywell Aerospace 2013 Region IX Workshop.
Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance A Real Estate Symposium International Right of Way Association/Appraisal Institute Las Vegas, NV January 13-15,
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance Protecting Transmission Pipelines International Right of Way Association/Appraisal Institute Las Vegas, NV January.
EHS Management System Elements
Hazard Identification
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration San Bruno – Lessons Learned Alan K. Mayberry, P.E. Deputy Associate.
SCC DA Program Stress-corrosion-cracking direct assessment (SCCDA) is a structured process that contributes to pipeline company’s efforts to improve.
Lessons Learned….. Were PG&E practices an anomaly or the tip of a bigger problem? How would we know? 2011 Pipeline Safety Trust Conference – Getting to.
Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) Supplier Awareness Training ISR Systems Danbury, CT 2011.
Shaanxi Normal University International Business School Baolai Wei A Cost Analysis for Navigation Risk.
La Center, Washington: Balancing Pipelines and Populations 1.
D AMAGE P REVENTION : A RE THE S TATES AS E NGAGED AS T HEY N EED TO B E ? C HRISTINA S AMES V ICE P RESIDENT O PERATIONS & E NGINEERING A MERICAN G AS.
Pipeline Safety Trust Fort Worth Natural Gas Production Issues John W. Pepper Project Manager Office of Pipeline Safety Southwest Region, Houston, Texas.
Pipeline Safety New Orleans Nov. 18, 2011 Getting to Zero.
Track # SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL © 2006 The Shaw Group 4171 Essen Lane Baton Rouge LA USA.
Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment
Two of the most important pieces of the health and safety legislation affecting educational establishments across the UK are the Health and Safety at.
America’s Natural Gas Utilities’ Distribution Pipelines November 2, 2006 The Connection To the Customer.
Understanding Activities, Aspects, and Impacts in the EMS.
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Manager – Pipeline Safety 1.
Responsible Care® Health & Safety Task Force – 06 H&S.
Ensuring Success in Integrity Management Marty Matheson American Petroleum Institute July 24, 2002.
Pipeline Safety Different Pathways to a Common Goal New Orleans, Louisiana November 4 th & 5 th, 2010.
What’s Wrong with Integrity Management? How Do We Improve Integrity Management? Terry Boss Senior Vice President Safety Environment and Operations PST.
Safe Working Procedure - Excavations Learning Objectives:
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
Pipeline Performance Measures Alan Mayberry New Orleans, Louisiana Pipeline Safety Trust Annual Conference
Office of Pipeline Safety Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Integrity Management July , 2002 Houston, Texas Welcome.
Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) Josef Kopec, P.Eng.
New Orleans, Louisiana November 20 & 21, 2008 Pipeline Safety What More Needs To Be Done? Presented by Carl Weimer, Executive Director.
PIPA Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline Perspective Pipeline Safety Trust Meeting Terry Boss.
Visit us at E mail: Tele:
Crisis ◦ Situation with potential to generate disaster or catastrophe, endangering the survival of the system.
Quality Assurance and Risk Management Services, Inc. 
OHSAS Occupational health and safety management system.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM RECENT PIPELINE INCIDENTS FLORIDA NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION (FNGA) OPERATING & MARKETING CONFERENCE ROD WALKER PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT.
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE CONCORD, VERMONT. GETTING STARTED EXERCISE Who lives in the Town of Concord? What buildings, infrastructure, or organizations.
Integrity Management Continuous Improvement Project Status and Implementation Process Presentation for: PHMSA Advisory Committees July 11, 2012.

Pipeline Safety Date.
Land Use David Johnson.
4 Years Milestone plan – (Company Name)
Distribution Integrity
ABC Company ABC Chemical Complex Engineering Specification
CR-GR-HSE-302 Management of change
Management of Change GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-302)
Presentation transcript:

Terry Boss Sr. VP Environment Safety and Operations INGAA

 Energy Improves the Quality of Life  Location Dilemma  Location of the Energy  Location of the Market  Linear Facilities  Footpaths  Rivers  Highways  Railroads  Shipping Channels  Flight Corridors  Pipelines  Technology and Knowledge are Changing  Expectations are Changing

Setback Temporary Construction Easement Permanent Pipeline Easement Pipelines Pipeline Pipeline Permanent Pipeline Easement Temporary Construction Easement Setback

 Facilitate Access for:  Operation  Inspection  Maintenance  Identification of Pipeline Location  Company  Landowners  Excavators  Technology and Knowledge are Changing  Expectations are Changing

 Facilitate Access for Construction of Needed Energy Pipelines  Engineering  Public Safety  Employee Safety  Environment  Historical Significance  Technology and Knowledge Are Changing  Expectations are Changing

 Spacing between a Pipeline and Some Activity  Buildings  Vegetation  Excavation  Explosive Charges  Wildlife Habitat  Vehicle Loading  Visual Impact  Today’s Definition is Public Safety

 Risk to Public = Probability * Consequence  Review Practices (Risk Management 1.0)  “Almanac”  Pipeline Safety Regulations  Consensus Standards  Pipeline Company Practices  “Emeritus Report” (Why was this done?)  Risk Management 2.0  Reduce the Probability (B31.8S; IMP)  Inform about Consequences (Communications)

 Number of Incidents  Time Dependent  Stable  Number of Leaks  Time Dependent  Stable  Number of Immediate Repairs  Time Dependent  Stable  ProbabilityTherefore Risk

 Excavation Damage Prevention Understanding  1 st Party  2 nd Party  3 rd Party  One Call Programs  Common Ground Alliance (CGA)  Excavation Damage Prevention Initiative (EDPI)  Pipeline Easement Management  Local Government Practices

 Pipelines are Key to Quality of Life  Cohabitation with Pipelines is Necessary  Common Language for Dialogue is Desirable  Reducing Probability of an Incident Achieves the Same Goals as Setbacks (Reducing Risk)  Risk to the Public Is being Addressed and Reduced  Past  Present  Future  Communication is Major Step to Understanding  Are the Present Efforts Sufficient?