Life Cycle Cost Savings by Improving Reliability Dr. Charles E. McQueary Director, Operational Test and Evaluation January 15, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CURRENT STATE OF ACQUISITION, TEST & EVALUATION ENTERPRISE NOVEMBER 2012 PRESENTATION TO INCOSE ENCHANTMENT CHAPTER Charles Pete Adolph.
Advertisements

U Development of Reliability Program Standard GEIA-STD-0009 SE Summit March 2009 Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited.
DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title 10 1 Beth Wilson Industry Co-Chair NDIA System Engineering Division, DT&E Committee Test Architect, Raytheon Company.
DLA's Aviation Supply & Demand Chain Manager Defense Supply Center Richmond Aviation Engineering Reliability and Sustainment Programs Defense Logistics.
A Navy Business Initiative Defense Daily OA Summit 12 November 2013 Nickolas H. Guertin, PE Director for Transformation DASN RDT&E
Continuous Process Improvement (CPI) Program Update Colonel Ric Sherman, United States Army Office of the Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for.
DoD Software Issues and Gap Identification Kristen Baldwin Deputy Director, Software Engineering and System Assurance OUSD(AT&L) April 18, 2007.
In-sourcing Guidelines and Procedures By Dr. John Anderson. PDASA, FMMR, OASA(M&RA)
1 PBL Panel Discussion F-22 System Program Office F-22 System Program Office F-22 System Program Director 13 January 2015.
1 The Role of the Revised IEEE Standard Dictionary of Measures of the Software Aspects of Dependability in Software Acquisition Dr. Norman F. Schneidewind.
DoD Systems and Software Engineering A Strategy for Enhanced Systems Engineering Kristen Baldwin Acting Director, Systems and Software Engineering Office.
6/17/ :30:49 PM _Teamwork Competitive Prototyping Challenges for DoD and Industry Paul Croll, AMND Fellow May 28, 2008.
14 July 2008 Blake Ireland Industry Roundtable COMPETITIVE PROTOTYPING.
Recent Trends in DoD Systems and Software Engineering Processes Bruce Amato Acting Deputy Director, Software Engineering and Systems Assurance Office of.
Procurement Transformation State of North Carolina
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
State of Kansas Statewide Financial Management System Pre-Implementation Project Steering Committee Meeting January 11, 2008.
Unclassified. Program Management Empowerment and Accountability Mr. David Ahern Director, Portfolio Systems Acquisition AT&L(A&T) 14 April 2009 The Acquisition.
Systems Engineering and Parts Management
Managing a Training Program Why train? Who will attend the training? What are the learning objectives? Strategies? Coverage? How will the training program.
Sustainability and Total Cost of Ownership Strategies for Higher Education.
First 5 Kings County Evaluation Services Request for Application Bidders Teleconference – February 22, 2012 Evaluation Services Request for Application.
Collaboration to Meet Future T&E Needs ITEA 14 September Mr. Mike Crisp Deputy Director, Air Warfare Operational Test and Evaluation.
Cost 101 for Life Cycle Logisticians R&D Cost: program costs primarily associated with the development of a new or improved capability to the point where.
What is an Inventory Program for? Dr. Emilio Moceo Ph.D Director of Studies Meet international obligations and expectations Inform international, national,
Mr. Frank J. Anderson, Jr. President, Defense Acquisition University Acquisition Education Challenges and the Human Capital Strategic Plan.
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Cleared for Public Release by OSR on 8/04/11; SR Case # 11-S-3228 applies R&M Engineering 08/16/11 Page 1 DTM R&M Engineering.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona ANDREA L. KINCAID DLA Energy Integrated Energy TrackIntegration of the Energy Industry.
1 Total Ownership Cost (TOC) and Cost as an Independent Variable (CAIV) Dr. Jeffrey Beach Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division; Survivability,
DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat Integrated Test Process Darlene Mosser-Kerner Developmental Test & Evaluation OUSD(AT&L)/Systems.
1 Always Changing / Always Challenging Accounting for Government Contracts.
PERT Overview Federal Perspective Annual PERT Workshop February 7-9, 2012 Nevada Site Office Evelyn Landini, Contracting Officer Brookhaven Site Office.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
MEMORANDUM TO: The Defense Industrial Base FROM: Brett B. Lambert, Director, Industrial Policy July 13, 2010 “The Department is committed to working with.
OSD CAIG 1 Walt Cooper OSD Cost Analysis Improvement Group (CAIG) August 13, 2008 Weapon System Sustainment: Collection of Contractor Costs.
Background Management Council (MC) was briefed on approach in early Feb 2003 and approved it Agreed that every Service Group (SG) will participate in.
Department of Navy Logistics Community Update to Logistics FIPT 28 January 2004 DoN Log. Community = 25 Job Series & 11,458 people.
Earned Value Management Update Nancy L. Spruill Director, Acquisition Resources and Analysis Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology.
Learn. Perform. Succeed. LOG 203 (R&M) - LOG 103 (RAM) Migration Prepared for the Life Cycle Logistics (LCL) Functional Integrated Product Team (FIPT)
1 Dr. Nancy L. Spruill Director, Acquisition Resources & Analysis, OUSD(AT&L) Restructure of Business Career Field.
1 And...the Rules-of-the-Road on the Promulgation of Government Contract Clauses/Regulations Are...? Charles E. Rumbaugh Rumbaugh ADR Offices
1 Improving the Risk Management Capability of the Reliability and Maintainability Program An introduction to the philosophy behind the AIAA S-102 Performance-Based.
Verification and Validation — An OSD Perspective — Fred Myers Deputy Director, Test Infrastructure Test Resource Management Center November 4, 2009.
Reliability Improvement Working Group (RIWG) Status Report Patrick Dallosta Performance Learning Director – Life Cycle Logistics (Sustainment) LCL FIPT.
Earned Value Management Update Nancy L. Spruill Director, Acquisition Resources and Analysis Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force As of: 02 Mar 051 Partnering with Industry on System Safety & MIL-STD-882D.
1 Discussion Brief on the Center for Earned Value Management (CEVM)
0 2 Nov 2010, V1.4 Steve Skotte, DAU Space Acquisition Performance Learning Director New Space Systems Acquisition Policy.
Parts Management Re-engineering and Warfighter Support International Society of Logistics May 17, 2005 Gregory E. Saunders Director, Defense Standardization.
| 1 Weapon System Acquisition Reform- Product Support Assessment DAU SYMPOSIUM 13 April 2010 Presented by: Basil Gray Where Innovation.
LOG 200 Curriculum Review 15 Apr 2011 Curriculum Review LOG 200 Intermediate Acquisition Logistics Presented to the Life Cycle Logistics (LCL) Functional.
OSD CAIG 1 OSD Cost Analysis Improvement Group and ODUSD (L&MR)/LPP and MR&MP April 26, 2007 Weapon System Sustainment: A Project to Identify Requirements.
1 Overview of SAE’s AS6500 “Manufacturing Management Program” David Karr Technical Advisor for Mfg/QA AFLCMC/EZSM
Strength through Industry & Technology How is the Government Managing for Value? Program Management Systems Committee March 11, 2007 The Voice of the Industrial.
Power to the Edge A Net-Centric DoD NII/DoD CIO IT Acquisition Management Transformation Rapid Improvement Team (RIT) Principals Meeting November 18, 2003.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force As of:1 Mrs. Marty Evans SE Forum October 15, 2004 Institutionalizing.
1 Services Contracting in the DoD: An Empirical Analysis of the Use of a Project Management Approach Breakout Session # D14 Dr. Rene G. Rendon, CFCM,
2.1 ACQUISITION STRATEGYSlide 1 Space System Segments.
ICOTE Meeting October, Chief Developmental Tester Project Status for ICOTE October 2014 Brendan Rhatigan – Lockheed Martin.
Integration of DTM “Reliability Planning, Analysis, Tracking and Reporting” into LOG 103 and other DAU Life Cycle Logistics Learning Assets.
Lesson Objectives Determine the key Requirements Manager activities leading up to the MDD, the outputs of the MDD, and the Defense Acquisition documents.
MDD to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities
Cumulative IOT&E Results Through FY 2008
MDD to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) to Milestone A (MS A)
13 November 2018.
Innovative HR Innovative HR in the UK Civil Service Deborah Crewe, Modernising People Management.
CAMELOT Coordination Analysis Motivation Execution Logistics Tracking
Industrial Base Analysis and Sustainment (IBAS) Program Overview
Perspectives on Transforming DT and OT Industry-Government Roundtable
Presentation transcript:

Life Cycle Cost Savings by Improving Reliability Dr. Charles E. McQueary Director, Operational Test and Evaluation January 15, 2009

22 Number Effective And Suitable Cumulative Number of BLRIP Reports Ideal Effective Suitable FY08 Total: 28% of Systems Not Suitable 2007: 4 of 8 (50%) Not Suitable 2008: 2 of 6 (33%) Not Suitable Why DOT&E is Interested in Reliability Cumulative IOT&E Results Through FY 2008

33 Sustainment Costs, Which are Largely Driven by Reliability, Represent the Largest Fraction of Life Cycle Costs RDT&E Procurement O&S OSD CAIG

yrs B yrs 2.5 Ton Truck 93 yrs C-130 UH-1 69 yrs M yrs 72 yrs AIM-9 56 yrs SSN yrs F yrs CH yrs HEMTT 51 yrs F yrs KC-135 SOURCE: John F. Phillips DUSD (L) Sustainment Costs Become More Important As Systems’ Service Lives Increase

55 Investment Can Improve Reliability The Cost Estimating Relationship (CER) Investment = Reliability Improvement Ratio X APUC Investment/ APUC Linear regression of In (Improvement Ratio) on In (Investment/APUC) gives: y = Log (Investment/APUC) – Percent Confidence Interval R 2 =.82 Improvement Ratio

Investment in Reliability Improvement, $M 20-Year Cost, $M Investment in Reliability, $ M 20-year Cost, $ M 120 Small Reliability Investments Can Significantly Reduce LCC Notional Example - Effect of Reliability Investment on System Cost (UAV)

7 HH-60HMH-60S $6.6M Spent on Reliability What Changed Components (APUC in $ thousand) MFBHR = Mean Flying Hours Between Removal APUC = Average Production Unit Cost Reliability Change (50 Percent Improvement) 2.4 Hrs. MFHBR3.6 Hrs. MFHBR Estimated 20-year LCC $M FY03 (LCC reduced by approximately 83 percent) Program Example: Small Investment in Reliability Produced Dramatic Reduction in Life Cycle Cost

88 Key: Start Programs Right at the Beginning of the Acquisition Cycle Defense Science Board Taskforce (May 2008) “... the single most important step necessary to correct high suitability failure rates is to ensure programs are formulated to execute a viable systems engineering strategy from the beginning, including a robust reliability, availability, and maintainability (RAM) program, as an integral part of design and development. No amount of testing will compensate for deficiencies in RAM program formulation.”

Number of Failures in the Field Ownership Cost Efforts Underway to Improve Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Cost Manual (RAM-C Manual) DOT&E on JCIDS Functional Control Boards GEIA Standard 009, RFP and Contract Language, Investment Model Reliability Growth in design phase RAM growth monitoring for incentives, Young/Bolton memos RAM program Evaluation and Standards, testing KPP RAM field data collection, feedback Right Requirements Right Contract and Incentives Right Design and Redesign Right Development Right Validation Right Next Increment

10 Development and Procurement are important cost drivers; however, Operations & Sustainment is where the majority of life cycle costs reside. There is great potential for savings if O&S costs are significantly decreased. The single greatest driver of O&S costs is reliability. The more reliable the system, the less it costs to operate and sustain in the field. Improved reliability can mean substantial cost savings, and even a small investment in reliability, can significantly decrease O&S costs. Widespread consensus on the need to improve reliability has led to the creation of effective policy – but strong leadership and continued emphasis is needed to implement policy and realize significant life cycle cost reductions. In its formal recommendations to the incoming administration for improving the DoD acquisition process, the DBB should recommend increased focus on reliability during the acquisition process. Summary

11 Back-up Slides Initiatives to Improve Reliability

12 Initiatives to Improve Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability McQueary-Finley Memo on Reliability Improvement WG (15 Feb 2008) –Ensure programs are formulated to execute a viable systems engineering strategy, including a RAM growth program. –Ensure government organizations reconstitute a cadre of experienced T&E and RAM personnel. –Implement mandated integrated DT and OT, including the sharing and access to all appropriate contractor and government data and the use of operationally representative environments in early testing.

13 Initiatives to Improve Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability Reliability Improvement Working Group Recommendations –Mandatory policy reliability policy; Service RAM “champions” –Program guidance for early reliability planning –Language for RFPs and contracts (based on ANSI/GEIA-STD “Reliability Program Standard for Systems Design, Development, and Manufacturing”) –Scorecard to evaluate bidder’s proposals –Standard evaluation criteria for credible assessments of program progress –Cadre of experts in each Service; workforce training

14 Initiatives to Improve Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability Young Memo on RAM Policy (July 2008) –The Service Secretaries are directed to establish Service policy to do the following: Effective collaboration between the requirements and acquisition communities Development contracts and acquisition plans must evaluate RAM during system design. Evaluate the maturation of RAM through each phase of the acquisition life cycle.

15 Service Progress Implementing OSD Policy for Reliability Improvement –Army Army RAM policy & guidance Designated responsible Executive; PM accountability Established center of excellence Aggressive work force training & guidance Specific programs affected –Navy “Reinvigorating existing RAM-focused procedures” “Implementing key reforms” –Air Force “Review and revise policy and guidance as needed” Initiatives to Improve Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability

16 DoDI (Dec. 2008) –"PMs for all programs shall formulate a viable Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability (RAM) strategy that includes a reliability growth program as an integral part of design and development." Initiatives to Improve Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability