An Assessment of the Use of AMBER in a Semi-Arid Desert Region Melissa A. Goering NOAA/NWS/Tucson, AZ Paul Jendrowski NOAA/NWS/Honolulu, HI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multiple Sensor Precipitation Estimation over Complex Terrain AGENDA I. Paperwork A. Committee member signatures B. Advisory conference requirements II.
Advertisements

Flash Flood Climatology for the Goodland County Warning Area 13 th High Plains Conference August 27, 2009.
Application of the FEWS Stream Flow (SF) Model to the Limpopo Basin, Mozambique Final Report Tanya Hoogerwerf.
Brian McInerney Hydrologist National Weather Service Hydrologic Outlook April 2006.
1.Real-time rainfall observations: Addition of USGS and NC State Climate Office precipitation stations so EMs can get real- time observations of how much.
Robert J Zamora NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Physical Sciences Division Boulder, CO Arizona HMT Soil Moisture Network.
The Areal Mean Basin Estimated Rainfall (AMBER) Program A Tool to Assist in Flash Flood Forecasting Ami Arthur Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological.
1 AMBER Areal Mean Basin Estimated Rainfall COMAP Symposium 00-3 Robert S. Davis, Pittsburgh WFO Presented by Tom Filiaggi.
The Influence of Basin Size on Effective Flash Flood Guidance
Flash Flooding Across the Southern Appalachians: An Abbreviated Climatology with Forecasting Methods and Techniques Anthony D. Phillips, David A. Call,
The U.S. Desert Southwest (and Las Vegas) Flash Floods, 7-11 July 1999 Matthew Kelsch Hydrometeorologist UCAR/COMET ® (Cooperative Program for Operational.
An Examination of the Tropical System – Induced Flooding in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania in 2004.
A Distributed Flash Flood Forecasting Rainfall- Runoff Model Applied to Watersheds in the Northeast United States Michael Schaffner NOAA National Weather.
Univ of AZ WRF Model Verification. Method NCEP Stage IV data used for precipitation verification – Stage IV is composite of rain fall observations and.
A New Technique to Forecast Arizona Summer Thunderstorms Michael Leuthold Lecturer Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Arizona.
Kristopher White & Brian Guyer The GOES-R Convective Initiation Product... Operational Examples and Thoughts on Proper Viewing Strategies.
Tropical Storm Allison & its impact on Harris County
6/3/2010 ER FFG Conference An Overview of Gridded Flash Flood Guidance; A Spatially Distributed Runoff and Threshold-Runoff Based Approach Erick Boehmler.
AMBER/FFMP Overview COMET Basin Customization August 2002 Robert S. Davis, Pittsburgh NWSWFO.
March 14, 2006Intl FFF Workshop, Costa Rica Weather Decision Technologies, Inc. Hydro-Meteorological Decision Support System Bill Conway, Vice President.
Flash Flood Monitoring and Prediction (FFMP) Flash Flood Monitoring and Prediction-Advanced (FFMPA) Reggina Cabrera NOAA/National Weather Service Eastern.
LMRFC GIS Activities Currently generate ~ 4,500 web graphics daily via ArcView 3.1 Avenue and ArcGIS standalone VB and ArcGIS VBA scripts. Used to support.
Integration of Multiple Precipitation Estimates for Flash Flood Forecasting Reggina Cabrera NOAA/National Weather Service.
Comparison of PPS and QPE Rainfall Estimates for Summer 2013 Heavy Precipitation Events Comparison of PPS and QPE Rainfall Estimates for Summer 2013 Heavy.
NATHAN FOSTER WARM SEASON WORKSHOP 5/2/12 The Flash Flood Potential Index (FFPI) Project at BTV.
Satellite precipitation estimates and the CAFFG system By Rosario Alfaro.
August 20th, CONTENT 1. Introduction 2. Data and Characteristics 3. Flood analysis 1. MOUSE 2. SOBEK 3. ARC-SWAT 4. Conclusions and suggestions.
Name, Surname, Position Logo(s) Weather monitoring and forecasting over eastern Attica (Greece) in the frame of FLIRE project Vassiliki Kotroni (1), Konstantinos.
Principles of Flash Flood Development: An Introduction to Hydrometeorology Anthony Phillips GEOG 490/590 Ball State University  Hazards associated with.
FLASH FLOOD PREDICTION James McDonald 4/29/08. Introduction - Relevance  90% of all national disasters are weather and flood related  Central Texas.
ROFFG Romania Flash Flood Guidance System. The Romania Flash Flood Guidance System is an adaptation of the HRC Flash Flood Guidance System used in various.
1 AMBER Areal Mean Basin Estimated Rainfall COMAP Flash Flood Course Robert S. Davis, Pittsburgh WFO.
1 The August 21, 2009 Chelsea, VT Flash Flood Case Study and Radar Considerations Eastern Region Flash Flood Conference June Greg Hanson WFO BTV.
Improving Short-term Predictions and the Identification of Hazardous Weather using NASA/SPoRT Transitioned Satellite Products Deirdre Kann Brian Guyer.
1 Flash Floods: Defining and Forecasting Matt Kelsch COMAP Symposium 02-1, 02-2 Heavy Precip/Flash Flood October 2001 Fort Collins,
Floods. How are floods caused? BenefitsPitfalls What are the benefits of living on a floodplain? Fertile farm land Flat land for building Historically,
The IEM-KCCI-NWS Partnership: Working Together to Save Lives and Increase Weather Data Distribution.
AMBER/FFMP Overview COMET Basin Customization August 2002 Robert S. Davis, Pittsburgh NWSWFO.
Flash Flood Monitoring and Prediction (FFMP) John Ferree Warning Decision Training Branch Norman, OK John Ferree Warning Decision Training Branch Norman,
Pittsburgh Urban Flash Flood May 18, AMBER Time Display Interval 5-minute ABR: Used to compute ABR Rate and to display 2-hour accumulated ABR.5-minute.
Distributed Hydrologic Modeling-- Jodi Eshelman Analysis of the Number of Rain Gages Required to Calibrate Radar Rainfall for the Illinois River Basin.
Flash Flood A rapid and extreme flow of high water into a normally dry area, or a rapid water level rise in a stream or creek above a predetermined flood.
A Subtle Heavy Rainfall Signature (SHARS) Event in Southeast Arizona: Ramifications of Major Flash Flooding in an Urbanized Desert Environment Michael.
During the 20 th century, thematic maps have been an ever useful tool for correlating data sets and representing relevant information. Recent technological.
Flash Flood Monitoring and Prediction Current Operational Capabilities, Issues and Perspectives Britt Westergard, Service Hydrologist WFO Jackson, KY Q2.
The July 28,1997 Fort Collins Flood: Putting the Stormwater System to the Test How Did it Serve to Minimize Societal Impact? Matt Kelsch Hydrometeorologist.
Flash Flood Monitoring and Prediction (FFMP) John Ferree Warning Decision Training Branch Norman, OK John Ferree Warning Decision Training Branch Norman,
Validation of Satellite-Derived Rainfall Estimates and Numerical Model Forecasts of Precipitation over the US John Janowiak Climate Prediction Center/NCEP/NWS.
FFMP Advanced: 4 th Regional Severe Storms / Radar and Hydrology Conference Overview, August 2009 An Overview for 4 th Regional Severe Storms / Radar and.
AMBER Areal Mean Basin Estimated Rainfall COMAP Symposium Heavy Precipitation and Flash Floods Robert S. Davis, Pittsburgh WFO.
Flash Flood Prediction Working Group Q2 Workshop June 28-30, 2005.
Agenda Introduction –What is FFMP? Foundation –Basic Components and Localization Common Problems –Often seen and easily fixed Troubleshooting Resources.
Introduction to Urban Hydrology
Latest results in the precipitation verification over Northern Italy Elena Oberto, Marco Turco, Paolo Bertolotto (*) ARPA Piemonte, Torino, Italy.
Soil type Vegetation type / Forest density Land Use Fire activity Slopes Support NWS Flash Flood Warning Program: Development of Flash Flood Potential.
11 Short-Range QPF for Flash Flood Prediction and Small Basin Forecasts Prediction Forecasts David Kitzmiller, Yu Zhang, Wanru Wu, Shaorong Wu, Feng Ding.
Radar Interpretation Chad Entremont National Weather Service Jackson, MS.
Estimating Rainfall in Arizona - A Brief Overview of the WSR-88D Precipitation Processing Subsystem Jonathan J. Gourley National Severe Storms Laboratory.
Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY ER Flash Flood Workshop, Wilkes-Barre, PA June 3, 2010.
2006 Flood in El Paso TX.
Lower Siuslaw River Watershed
Introduction to Urban Hydrology
Warm Season Flash Flood Detection Performance at WFO Binghamton
Validation of Satellite Precipitation Estimates using High-Resolution Surface Rainfall Observations in West Africa Paul A. Kucera and Andrew J. Newman.
Rangeland: Regions of North America
Brian McInerney Hydrologist National Weather Service
Finnish Meteorological Institute
Dept. of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
Altai flood’s 2014 and model precipitationg forecasts
Presentation transcript:

An Assessment of the Use of AMBER in a Semi-Arid Desert Region Melissa A. Goering NOAA/NWS/Tucson, AZ Paul Jendrowski NOAA/NWS/Honolulu, HI

AMBER Background and Display Methods Flash Flood event: Douglas, Arizona on July 24, 2001 AMBER Limitations General Conclusions –TUS WFO verification for 2001 Monsoon season Future work Introduction

Uses Digital Hybrid Reflectivity Scan from WSR-88D on 1deg x 1 km to compute radar rainfall estimates for small scale drainage basins. Average Basin Rainfall (ABR) is computed for individual range bins and averaged every volume scan. ABR is summed to produce running accumulations for 6 alert periods (30 min, 45 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 3 hr, and 6 hr) Basin Rate of Accumulation (BRA) is the volume scan ABR divided by time between scans. Comparisons area made between ABR and FFG for each time period to give an Alert Status. Three display methods used at the TUS WFO. Areal Mean Basin Estimated Rainfall

Shows ABR for the six alert time periods and BRA Gives forecasters quick display method of area and values AMBER in AWIPS D2D BRA at 1634 MST Douglas, AZ

Browser allows users to view computed BR A and ABR values for each basin Color coded Alert Status: Green (< 60% of FFG) Yellow (60-90% of FFG) Red (90-150% of FFG) Purple (>150% of FFG) Alert Window

Provides GIS capabilities and allows wide range of features: Streets Washes/Rivers Towns/Cities Flow Direction Terrain AMBER ArcView

Flash Flood: July 24, 2001 Douglas AZ Population of 19,500 Thunderstorms developed over the Perilla Mountains and moved southwest towards Douglas Heaviest precipitation fell between 1630 and 1700 MST NO warning issued

Alert Status Flash Flood: July 24, 2001 Douglas AZ 1634 MST 30 minute ABR Basin Rate of Accumulation

Alert Status Flash Flood: July 24, 2001 Douglas AZ 1654 MST 30 minute ABR Basin Rate of Accumulation

Alert Status Flash Flood: July 24, 2001 Douglas AZ 1714 MST 30 minute ABR Basin Rate of Accumulation

Flash Flood Aftermath: Douglas, AZ Estimated 100,000 to 200,000 dollars in damage. Some homes on northwest side of Douglas had 10 inches of standing water and few evacuations. Levy on east side of town broke and retention pond undersized. Four swift water rescues on northwest side of city. Basin 7276 graph at 1709 MST Seveal residents rain gages received 4.0 inches of precipitation during 30 to 45 minute event. Port Authority closed for 75 minutes and entry had 2 inches of standing water. Severe winds caused windows to break and lifted a small utility shed from a backyard and onto a neighbors fence

AMBER Limitations AMBER will be not be able to detect flash flood events in far western and northeastern portions of Tucson’s county warning area. AMBER coverage is only from a single radar, thus will have the same limitations as the radar.

Verification from 2001 Monsoon Season FAR POD CSI Lead time (minutes) Improvement in POD and lead time. Athough AMBER is not the entirely the reason for improvement on verification scores and lead time, it does have some effect. Total Warnings:44 Verified:20 Missed:2

Future Work Work on FFG values for each basin (steepness of terrain, antecedent moisture, soil, etc) Comparisons between : 1.AMBER and NSSL’s QIWI 2.AMBER and FFMP’s AMBER version Statistical significance of AMBER’s effect on the verification scores

Flash Flood: August 14, 2001 Tucson AZ AMBER was useful in the decision making process of issuing a flash flood warning. 45 minute lead time Silverbell Road between Ina and Camino del Cerro closed. Heaviest precipitation fell between 1700 and 1800 MST.

Flash Flood: August 14, 2001 Tucson AZ 1728 MST Alert Status Basin Rate of Accumulation

Flash Flood: August 14, 2001 Tucson AZ 1733 MST Alert Status Basin Rate of Accumulation

Flash Flood: August 14, 2001 Tucson AZ 1758 MST Alert Status Basin Rate of Accumulation

Flash Flood: July 5, 2001 Green Valley AZ 15 minute lead time could have been increased by 10 or 12 minutes

Flash Flood: July 5, 2001 Green Valley AZ 1827 MST Alert Status Basin Rate of Accumulation

Flash Flood: July 5, 2001 Green Valley AZ 1833 MST Alert Status Basin Rate of Accumulation

Flash Flood: July 5, 2001 Green Valley AZ 1850 MST Alert Status Basin Rate of Accumulation