1 Public Meeting with ASME to Discuss Pump Inservice Testing Issues NRC Headquarters OWFN Room 1F22 June 4, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Westinghouse Owners Group Risk-Informed Repair and Replacement – Implementation of 10 CFR Twelfth International Conference on Nuclear Engineering.
Advertisements

ISTOG RELIEF REQUEST COMMONALITY ASSESSMENT Prepared by: E. Cavey DTE-Fermi 2 Page 1 The GOAL of this effort was to identify any challenging compliance.
LATA Environmental Services of Kentucky, LLC Process for Approved Supplier Selection and Evaluation ASME NQA (and Addenda through 2007), Part I.
ASME SMR ROADMAP (STP-NU-072)
EQUIPMENT VALIDATION.
Meteorology Combined License NRC Review Process Meteorology Joseph Hoch Physical Scientist U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission June , 2008 Nuclear.
1 IST Pump Issues ASME/NRC Meeting June 4, 2007 NRC Offices.
NRC Perspective of Recent Configuration Management Issues Tom Farnholtz Chief, Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety, Region IV June 2014 CMBG.
NRC PERSPECTIVE ON RELIEF AND SAFETY VALVES Charles G. Hammer Component Performance & Testing Branch Division of Component Integrity Office of Nuclear.
World Health Organization
ISTOG MOV TESTING TRANSITION Prepared by: E. Cavey DTE-Fermi 2 Page 1 The GOAL of this effort was to develop implementation guidance for ASME Code Case.
1 What is the definition of ‘non-conforming condition?’ Non-conforming Condition © L.A. Grime, PE.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.7 Commissioning Geoff Vaughan University of Central.
Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological Instrumentation and Observations Techniques QA and QC Procedures Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological.
Electrical Cable Aging: What does IEEE Std Recommend? Module 5 Dr. John H. Bickel Evergreen Safety & Reliability Technologies, LLC.
1 NRC Plans for NESCC Concrete Specifications, Codes & Standards (SCS) Endorsement NESCC Meeting March 28, 2013 Richard Jervey USNRC Office of Regulatory.
Fermi Case Study Flow Variance ≥ 2% Obtaining NRC relief to allow for use of a 2.78% total flow reference band for Fermi RHR Service Water Pumps ISTOG.
QUALITY CONTROL OF PHYSICO-Chemical METHODS Introduction :Validation توثيق المصدوقية.
Protection Against Occupational Exposure
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT Ed Freeman Engineering Manager 1.
1 ISTOG Position on Pre-conditioning ISTOG Input on Interpretation and Clarification Of NUREG-1482 Sections 3.5 / 3.6.
Design Bases From 1957 to 2003 June 18, 2007 Chuck Casto Region II NRC.
Current Air-Operated Valve Regulatory Activities Steven Unikewicz US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation January 2006.
GSI-191 Status and Lessons Learned Presented by: Donnie Harrison Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Presented at:
NRC Endorsement of Standards
DECEMBER 2010 ISTOG MEETING NEW Q & A CARD DISCUSSION.
Regulatory Affairs Personnel Training and Qualification (RA T&Q) Overview.
Quality Assurance Program National Enrichment Facility Warren Dorman September 19, National Energy and Environmental Conference.
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin.
A SUMMARY OF CDBI FINDINGS IN SERVICE TESTING OWNERS GROUP December 2010 Clearwater, Florida.
FRANKLIN engineering group, inc. Start-up Shutdown Malfunction Plan Development and Implementation Duncan F. Kimbro
Chapter 6 : Software Metrics
NHUG - Boston - 08/04/20101 Considerations for Operability of Chillers and Chilled Water Systems NHUG Summer Meeting August 4, 2010 Tim Mitchell Component.
Maintaining the Flow ! Testing of Nuclear Feedpumps (and other important pumps)
Summary of NRC HDPE Piping Confirmatory Research Activities NESCC HDPE Piping Road Map Workshop April 18, 2013 Washington, D.C. Eric Focht, Materials Engineer.
A GENERIC PROCESS FOR REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING Chapter 2 1 These slides are prepared by Enas Naffar to be used in Software requirements course - Philadelphia.
How to Select a Test Method Marlene Moore Advanced Systems, Inc. June 15, 2010.
1 Comprehensive Pump Testing Challenges. 2 Purpose This presentation will discuss:  Hardships encountered while implementing comprehensive pump test.
What is your IST Organizational Culture like? by NextEra Energy Seabrook Station LLC Bob Parry, Tim Couture, and Debbie Masters Inservice Test Owner’s.
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords CFR policy, CFR violation, CFR enforcement Description Supporting Material
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
ISTOG Winter 2010 – Ed Cavey Fermi 2 1 ISTOG Issues - Code Inquiries / Proposed Code Cases ISTOG Issues from 2010 January meeting and subsequent telecons.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
1 Control Room Habitability Program James A. Carlson, Omaha Public Power District, Author Deep Ghosh, Southern Nuclear Operating Greg Holbrooks, PE, Duke.
1 RIC 2009 NFPA 805 Regulatory Infrastructure Development Steven A. Laur, PE Sr. Tech Adv. Risk-Informed Initiatives NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
System Monitoring at the DAEC SysMon SMART Teaming up to get the most out of System Monitoring!
Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin Management Bill Kline FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) June 2, 2008 Shell Beach, CA.
ISTOG INDUSTRY ISSUES Interactive Session Gregg Joss (Ginna Station Vice Chair ISTOG) Ron Lippy (True North Consulting ISTOG Facilitator)
ASME OM CODE CASES Presented by Jeff Neyhard for Ron Lippy Intro 101???
1 Regulatory Experience With Preconditioning ISTOG Winter Meeting Orlando Florida January 24, 2008 Tim Smith Dominion Energy Kewaunee
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency AGEING MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT Module 9 Session 9 Resource document: AMAT Guidelines, Reference document for Ageing.
1 ISTOG QUESTIONS ISTOG QUESTIONS IST Program Plan Submittals to Regulators: Prior to OM-2001, and going back to ASME Section XI, there.
Unit – I Presentation. Unit – 1 (Introduction to Software Project management) Definition:-  Software project management is the art and science of planning.
ISTOG – NRC Update Winter Meeting 2010 – Clearwater, FL Tony McMurtray Chief, Component Performance & Testing Branch Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Lecture 10 ANALYTICAL METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION IN HPLC AND GC. Lecture 10 – Chromatography, Dr. Rasha Hanafi 1© Dr. Rasha Hanafi, GUC.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Diablo Canyon NPP Maintenance Rule Program Workshop Information IAEA Workshop.
What is a software? Computer Software, or just Software, is the collection of computer programs and related data that provide the instructions telling.
SEMINAR ON PRESENTED BY BRAHMABHATT BANSARI K. M. PHARM PART DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLGY L. M. COLLEGE OF PHARMACY.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Configuration Management in NRC’s Reactor Inspection Program Tony Gody, Region II/DRS.
Use and Conduct of Safety Analysis IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decission Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Lecturer.
Best Practices in Performing DSA Legacy Reviews
Document Evaluation Process May 2005 Revision
(Additional materials)
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
NRC CM Pilot Inspections Methodology and Results
MIT Nuclear Reactor Laboratory
Temporary Alterations in Support of Maintenance and Temporary Modifications Beth Kernes Krause - Cooper Station February 24, 2019 Cleveland 2005.
TRTR Briefing September 2013
License Amendments Patrick Boyle Nuclear Engineer
Presentation transcript:

1 Public Meeting with ASME to Discuss Pump Inservice Testing Issues NRC Headquarters OWFN Room 1F22 June 4, 2007

2 Topics for Discussion Intent of the OM Code –Thomas G. Scarbrough, Office of New Reactors Pump Design Flow –Steven M. Unikewicz, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Comprehensive Pump Testing – Instrumentation Issues –Robert J. Wolfgang, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Purpose of the Group B Pump Test –Joel D. Page, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

3 Intent of the OM Code ISTA states: –Section IST establishes the requirements for preservice and inservice testing and examination of certain components to assess their operational readiness in light-water-reactor nuclear power plants. Operational readiness is defined in the Code as the ability of a component to perform its specified functions Intent established by specific language of Code Where intent not clear, Code should be revised as necessary

4 History In the past, concerns raised regarding IST requirements for pump capability and potential damage Sept letter from J. Richardson (NRC) requested that –ASME revise the requirements to ensure the ability of certain pumps and valves to perform their intended ‘hydraulic and mechanical’ safety functions Nov letter from F. Rhodes (ASME OM) stated –Major effort [was] underway … to add new requirements for pump testing that would be more related to the design basis for the pumps 1995 OM Code Subsection ISTB was result of that effort NRC staff supports 1995 ISTB requirements

5 ASME Code Relief 10 CFR 50.55a allows licensees to request relief from ASME Code requirements If relief request satisfies 10 CFR 50.55a, relief granted on an individual plant basis Code requirements not expected to be reduced to match each relief request If all licensees request relief that satisfies 10 CFR 50.55a, Code revision should be considered New plants expected to satisfy ASME Code requirements without relief

6 ISTB Requirements Preservice Test –Detailed assessment of pump performance to establish a baseline pump curve using precision instrumentation Inservice Test –Group A Pump Test Quarterly test of normally operating pumps including vibration monitoring at high flow rate as practicable –Group B Pump Test Quarterly test of standby pumps without vibration monitoring at high flow rate as practicable –Comprehensive Pump Test Test every 2 years with precision instrumentation and reference values “within + 20% pump design flow rate”

7 Pump Design Flow What is “design” flow? To Accident Analyst – Chapter 14/15 flow To Design Engineer – specified or plant operating flow To Pump Engineer – Best Efficiency Point

8 Relationship Between DB, LB, ED, and PC Plant Configuration (PC) Engineering Design (ED) Licensing Bases (LB) Design Bases (DB) Note: Design Bases is a subset of the Licensing Bases (From NUREG 1397, Section 1.4)

9 Pump Design Flow Design Bases –Information which identifies specific functions to be performed by structure, system or component (SSC) and specific value or range of values chosen for controlling parameters as reference bounds for design. These values may be either: Restraints derived from generally accepted state of art practices for achieving functional goals Requirements derived from analysis (based on calculation and/or experiments) of effect of postulated accident for which SSC must meet its functional goals

10 Pump Design Flow Engineering Design –Design requirements specified in specifications, calculations and drawings that define SSC function. This functional information includes capacities, volumes, flow rates, design capabilities (pressure or temperature limits or ratings), qualification requirements, performance accuracy limits and setpoints.

11 Pump Design Flow License Bases –Licensing Bases for plant comprised of NRC regulations, plant specific NRC requirements (e.g., Operating License, Orders, Technical Specifications, license conditions, QA Topical Report), plant-specific design bases and other plant-specific information in the Final Safety Analysis Report and Technical Requirement Manual (TRM), and regulatory commitments

12 Pump Design Flow Plant Configuration –Plant configuration is described as the currently existing characteristics of SSC

13 Pump Design Flow Generic Operating Curve

14 Pump Design Flow

15 Pump Design Flow Design Flow –A flow rate within 20% of highest practicably achievable flow rate, and enveloping the licensing bases flow rate(s), and is in a well-sloped portion of the pump performance curve such that it is effective for determining the mechanical and hydraulic operational readiness of the pump. In addition to meeting Code requirements, the pump IST flow must always meet, or be consistent with, licensing-basis assumptions in plant’s safety analysis. Above definition of design flow supports 2 goals: –Considers operational readiness –Considers monitoring for degradation

16 Comprehensive Pump Test – Instrumentation Issues CPT requires highly accurate pressure gauge of  0.5% accuracy  0.5% accuracy gauges provide better test results, allowing precise assessment of pump performance (operational readiness) Alert – Caused by pumps mechanical problem, inaccurate instrumentation or instrument drift CPT acceptance and required action range criteria are different from Group A test criteria in order to provide better testing and more precise results every 2 years

17 Group B Pump Test Purpose –Code requires a CPT each 2 years supplemented by either Group A or B test quarterly depending on whether pumps are routinely operated. For Group A and B tests, hydraulic acceptance criteria are relaxed. –Group B test is for standby pump (not routinely operated) and is to demonstrate that the pump is in the acceptable “hydraulic box” (i.e., + 10% from reference value) and no vibration testing is required –Group B test requirements for establishment of reference values same as for CPT and Group A –Group B test is intended to assess pump operational readiness, and to provide trending data of flow or differential pressure –Group B test provides repeatable measurements (every 3 months) which permit evaluation of pump condition and allows detection of degradation over time

18 Group B Pump Test Reference Point –ASME OM Code Subsection ISTA-2000 defines “reference point” as a point of operation at which reference values are established and IST parameters are measured for comparison with applicable acceptance criteria –Some licensees use a procedure that does not verify pump is in the “hydraulic box” (i.e., setting the pump speed to “reference point” and then measuring one hydraulic parameter and using that same parameter as verifying pump operationally ready; and test loop valves could be adjusted to obtain single hydraulic parameter) –Little viable operational readiness information can be derived from this procedure and, with valve adjustments, a seriously degraded pump could be acceptable –Test procedure needs to demonstrate pump in hydraulic box –Code clarification is desirable to avoid confusion