Human Factors. Six key areas proposed Fatigue, Automation Insertion of new technologies, Physical environment, Pilot decision making, Procedural non-compliance,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Human Factors in Flight Operations A CAA Perspective
Advertisements

Session No. 4 Implementing the State’s Safety Programme Implementing Service Providers SMS
Robert L. Helmreich, Ph.D. FRAes The University of Texas
AVIATION SAFETY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMME
Issues specific to general aviation and business jets Session 6 Presentation 3.
[Organisation’s Title] Environmental Management System
Environmental Management System (EMS)
Flight Testing Advanced Unmanned Aircraft Michael McDaniel - AIR Naval Air Systems Command NAS Patuxent River, MD, USA DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A:
The Importance of Synergy Between Flight Deck and Cabin Crews
1 JHSAT - May 2007 JHSAT SMS Briefing May 2007 AHS Forum 63 – Virginia Beach, VA Jack Drake, HAI Mark Liptak, FAA.
P-2028 Minnesota Wing Aircrew Training: Tasks P-2028 Crew Resource Management.
AERONAUTICAL DECISION MAKING
How Does Accreditation Work and How Can it Benefit You By: Marisol Valenzuela Executive Director International Accreditation Registry (IAR) Miami, Florida.
 promotion of an open and fair culture  mistakes treated in a non judgmental manner manner  it is about education not castigation - Vision -
Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.
Business Crisis and Continuity Management (BCCM) Class Session
Understanding what it means to be PIC Some ways to teach it.
The Nature of Strategic Management
Commercial Decision Making Commercial Opns Need to focus on safety Decisions may not be popular Never base inflight decisions on how it will affect your.
The Australian/New Zealand Standard on Risk Management
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION TO GENERAL RISK MANAGEMENT 2.
What SMS means for an Operator’s relationship with the CAA
Executive Briefing This briefing is designed as a stand alone briefing for Airline Senior Executives / CEOs. Minor text amendments following review at.
Change Management Chris Colomb Trish Fullmer Jordan Bloodworth Veronica Beichner.
Downloaded from AERONAUTICAL DECISION MAKING THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS’ LESSON PLAN.
Pipeline Qra Seminar Title slide Title slide.
Incident Review Meeting Example  The next slides are an example of how to complete the template and identify latent conditions, threats, errors, UAS and.
Civil Air Patrol Maj Larry Mattiello Assistant National Safety Officer Assistant National Safety Officer Southwest Region Safety Officer Southwest Region.
GWS SMS INTRODUCTION MSM Manual. 3. MISSION STATEMENT AND CORE VALUES OF THE COMPANY  MISSION  Our Mission is to provide expertise in the fields of.
Office of Aviation Safety Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Aviation Operations Jeff Guzzetti Deputy Director for Regional Operations.
Mission Aircrew School Chapter 14: Crew Resources Management (March 2011)
SMS Operation.  Internal safety (SMS) audits are used to ensure that the structure of an SMS is sound.  It is also a formal process to ensure continuous.
The Field Guide to Human Error Investigations- The Old View (Chapters 1 – 6) By Dekker AST 425.
Downloaded from 9/14/2015 Aeronautical Decision Making - The Theory Behind the Practice 1 AERONAUTICAL DECISION MAKING The Theory Behind The.
Mission Pilot Skill Set
ISO 14001:2004, Environmental Management System
Developing an Effective Ethics Program
Intro to Threat & Error Management
Slide 1Lesson 14: Fundamentals of the CAP Flying Safety Program Fundamentals of the CAP Flying Safety Program.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology 4 April 2003
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
Officer Development Program Promotional Workshop.
Root Cause Tutorial Page 1 More on Hazard Identification Techniques 1.Identify potential hazards that could threaten the safety of your employees,
1 CAA Offshore Helicopter Review Mark Swan Group Director, Safety and Airspace Regulation.
Overcoming The Challenges Together Fred Brisbois Director, Aviation & Product Safety Sikorsky Aircraft REDUCING THE ACCIDENT RATE AHS Forum 63 May 3, 2007.
SAFETY FIRST PROGRAM  SAFETY IS #1 – ACCIDENTS National focus on Safety Training Unit Managers #1 priority Can be eliminated Leadership is the key –
Integrated Safety & Risk Management for Helicopter Operations Kimberley Turner Chief Executive Officer Aerosafe Risk Management.
Developing the competency of managers in the field of safety management Aidan Nelson Director Policy & Standards International Railway Safety Conference.
Overcoming The Challenges Together Fred Brisbois Director, Aviation & Product Safety Sikorsky Aircraft REDUCING THE ACCIDENT RATE.
CAP 1145 The Norwegian Perspective. CAP 1145 My perception of The Norwegian Perspective + Positive to have safety review of Offshore helicopter operations!
Office of Aviation Safety Flight Crew Performance: Human Factors Evan Byrne, Ph.D. Human Performance Group Chairman.
Definitions What it’s about Teaching it Assessing it.
Safety Regulation Group Slide 1 CABIN CREW CRM TRAINING BEST PRACTICE Aviation House 29 January 2009.
ISO Registration Common Areas of Nonconformances.
Human Factors An Overview
Ensuring the Safety of Future Developments
American Airlines Flight 1400 St. Louis, Missouri
Chapter 3: Business Continuity Planning. Planning for Business Continuity Assess risks to business processes Minimize impact from disruptions Maintain.
SOLGM Wanaka Retreat Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 Ready? 4 February 2016 Samantha Turner Partner DDI: Mob:
Revision N° 11ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course01/01/08 Module N° 9 – SMS operation.
Flight Operations Research Centre of Excellence Dr. Hazel Courteney Head of Research & Strategic Analysis.
Protection of Transportation Infrastructure from Cyber Attacks EXECUTIVE BRIEFING.
Road Safety Education Program (RSEP) A first Summary July 2011 Putting People First.
Cross Industry E-Reps Forum Increasing Environmental Awareness and the role of the E-Rep 21 November 2012.
Presented to: North Florida Designated Pilot Examiners (DPE) By: Mark L. Laughridge, FAASTeam Program Manager Date: January 21, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration.
Commercial Decision Making
12/05/2018 Industry expectations about European Aviation Safety plan (EASp) and Certification activities G.Garrouste ASD AirWorthiness Committee chairman.
CRMSG meeting 18th March 2010.
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
Crew Resource Management
Presentation transcript:

Human Factors

Six key areas proposed Fatigue, Automation Insertion of new technologies, Physical environment, Pilot decision making, Procedural non-compliance, Maintenance issues

Key areas added Decision making ATM; airspace management Crew/management acceptance of automation Acknowledgment of environment impact on mtce Cultural issues at all levels –Management influence on culture

Three areas tackled (concensus priority) Fatigue Automation and technology insertion Human factors in maintenance –Back to fatigue!

Fatigue: challenges Variation in size of operation Wide scope of working conditions and rules Public use of aircraft (USA) –Lack of regulation Single operator organizations Knowledge of mission influence on human factors/safety –Basis for decision to go Diverse missions –Eg EMS/50% night Self-assessment has problems Methods to measure fatigue and its causes –Including non-workplace fatigue generators

Fatigue: action items Need for training and education at all levels Need tools and guidance –Fatigue assessment –For crews and management –Go/no go assessment tool –Specific needs for single helo operators Need to set a requirement floor –Tailored to industry sector/nature of operation –Must be in regulation –Based on best practices elsewhere (eg CAP 382) –Level of delegation TBD –Establish procedures or provide guidelines Fatigue-sensitive culture must be established At all levels of organization Endorsement and enforcement by management Training delivery All above applies to operations and maintenance Scan for and prioritize best practices elsewhere

Automation/New technology Insertions: Challenges Resistance to automation Automation-induced dependence or “complacency” –Supported by increased reliability/reduced frequency of occurrence Some automation takes crew out of loop –Rapid increase in workload when failure happens Transition between more/less automated cockpits, multiple cockpit configurations Lack of display/control standardization

Automation/New technology Insertions: Actions (1) Apply automation to leading accident causes –Eg brownout, loss of tail rotor effectiveness, rollover Expand training scope –Training/familiarization on automated systems –Increase realism/surprise/stress –Increased recurrent training on automated systems Not just check ride –Increased focus on abnormal/emergency procedures

Automation/New technology Insertions: Actions (2) Develop methods to accelerate introduction of new/automated technologies Improved acceptance of automation technologies Improve abnormal/emergency procedures associated with automated systems Design automated systems to prevent “person out of loop” situations Improve standardisation of information display and controls –Converge to best practices as they emerge Use automation to make helos easier to fly and reduce workload –More time for situational awareness

Human factors in maintenance Challenges Fatigue very prominent Culture is do whatever it takes to dispatch –Often internalised pressure to do whatever it takes to dispatch –Economics/revenue generation Senior management needs to better understand working level culture

Human factors in maintenance Actions High similarity with fatigue thread Transition to “flight crew culture” with standards –Currently culture is do whatever it takes to dispatch –Will require some level of regulation Consistent communication of cultural message –Analogy: MADD and drinking and driving Change the measures of performance for mtce personnel –Away from dispatch only –Eg add safety record etc. Help management understand the culture in their organization –“Whitecap” non-punitive external audit Information gathered from working level Limited disclosure/no adverse consequences