Windesheim makes knowledge work Team research on explorative dialogues.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The 21st Century Context for
Advertisements

Substantive Conversations in the Classroom.
INTEGRATING THEORY AND PRACTICE
Scenario 17: Including a pupil with special needs
Speaking, Listening and Learning: Working with children in Key
The Principal’s Role in Leading College and Career Readiness September, 2013.
Competences of student teachers: international context doc. Vitalija Gražienė, Vilnius College of Higher Education.
1 Welcome to Module 1 Principles of Mathematics Instruction.
LEARNING WALKS How we can share good practice and learn from one another. Jo Lakey School Improvement Officer.
DO NOT PLACE ANY TEXT OR GRAPHICS ABOVE THE GUIDELINE SHOWN DO NOT PLACE ANY TEXT OR GRAPHICS BELOW THE GUIDELINE SHOWN TO EDIT GRAPHICS IN THE MASTER.
Teaching Values in Economics through issues Sharing of seconded teachers.
Empowering Teachers and Student Teachers via Collaboration IPDA Belfast 2007 Dr Jim Beggs St Mary’s University College Belfast Dr Colette Murphy Queen’s.
COSEE California ?. Question: What did you observe when you used the moon balls in the phases of the moon activity? Statement: Describe what you observed.
Whole site approach to improvement Leading the Learning Workshop 3 - for leadership teams in secondary sites Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit.
Distance pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of their pedagogical courses in preparing them for their practicum By Asst. Prof. Belgin.
What is a blog? “Web log” In simple terms, a blog is a web page where what you write goes in chronological order on the front page Author can write, viewers.
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
Substantive Conversations in the Classroom.
FINDING OUR PLACE AND PURPOSES IN HUMAN RIGHTS EDUCATION.
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
Distributed Leadership Ruth Burke, Head Teacher Jumeirah English Speaking School.
Reaching and Preparing 21st Century Learners
Curriculum Planning Building a strong curriculum.
Session Seven Social Studies.
MLC Learning Model Reveal the Big Picture Immersion What do I need to Know and how will I find out? Create it Share Reflection Celebrate Brainstorm.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
+ What Should I Expect to See During Mathematics Instruction? Helping Secondary Principals Recognize and Support Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning.
10/09/2015Malta september Assessment training P.I. Vught.
Southern Regional Education Board Welcome What Does Academic Integration Really Mean in the Career-Technical Classroom? Nancy Headrick, Director State.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Student Voice: Learner Teacher, Teacher Learner Bringing the Student Voice into the classroom.
Interests, topics, problems and questions refining your research project.
Staff Development and the Change Process
Parent Education TECA 1303 Chapter 13. Do we need parent education?
Effective collaboration Session 1 – A professional community.
Aims of Workshop Introduce more effective school/University partnerships for the initial training of teachers through developing mentorship training Encourage.
EHE-310 SEPTEMBER Please turn in any RAP money. Getting to Know You Cards.
Teacher-Librarian Supported Inquiry-Based Learning
EXPLORATORY RESEARCH INITIAL RESEARCH CONDUCTED TO CLARIFY AND DEFINE THE NATURE OF A PROBLEM DOES NOT PROVIDE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE SUBSEQUENT RESEARCH.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
Chapter 18 The Curriculum.
Lesson Planning- the cornerstone of good teaching January 2012 for CTEP Chemistry 1.
Interviewing for Dissertation Research But these ideas apply to many types of interviewing.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
The Relationship between Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs and Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving Misfer AlSalouli May 31, 2005.
The literacy initiative (The reading and writing boost)
How does collaborative group work affect science learning?
Hannah Love LSIS 5645 Core Assessment IV. Why is information literacy necessary?  To fulfill the goals of education by preparing students for The workplace.
The Learning Cycle as a Model for Science Teaching Reading Assignment Chapter 5 in Teaching Science to Every Child: Using Culture as a Starting Point.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Situating Teacher Learning in the Practice of Science and Mathematics Teaching Monica Hartman University of Michigan Pre-Oral Defense Meeting May 3, 2004.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
Elaine Wilson Faculty of Education Teacher Professional Development for the 21 st Century.
Amy Drummond Daniel Paniccia Jennifer Smith.  Student in center of learning process.  Role of instructor changes. ◦ From expert to facilitator  Focus.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
Science is…. Introduction Science in the early childhood classroom should be hands-on, experimental, exciting and fun (Bredekamp & Copple, 1997) Science.
Exploring Non-Physician Roles in Competency-Based Resident Education April 1, 2016 Nicole McGuire, Education Coordinator, Union Hospital FMR (Terre Haute,
Practitioner Research in the Teacher Education’s Curriculum Mariëlle Taks, Machiel Stolk, Martijn Willemse & Fer Boei Windesheim University of Applied.
In the Age of Common Core. Close Reading of text involves an investigation of a short piece of text, with multiple readings done over multiple instructional.
DIGITAL LITERACY of students and teachers
Expeditionary Learning At Lawther Academy
TEACHING LANGUAGE SKILLS: TEACHING SPEAKING
DEVELOPING TEACHING SKILLS IN PE (GED3043)
Leading and Sustaining Restorative Practices in Schools: The Journey of Administrators and Teachers in Toronto Judith Kramer Dovercourt Public School.
Strategies and Techniques
Expeditionary Learning At Lawther Academy
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Nanotechnology & Society
Student Led Teaching Strategies
Presentation transcript:

Windesheim makes knowledge work Team research on explorative dialogues

Windesheim makes knowledge work This presentation highlights our research process and the topic of research “explorative dialogues”. When your interest lies in the research process please start at the next slide. If you (first) would like to know more about explorative dialogues go straight to slide 16. When you’d like to know more about our research results feel free to me at Content

Windesheim makes knowledge work Explorative dialogues improve the quality of education when it comes to preparing children for (21st centuries) society. (Leeman, 2004). Building on the: Relationships (among pupils and teachers and pupils) meaningful learning Multiple perspectives Listening and talking Inquisitive attitude Classroom learning connected with pupils identity development. Prior this research

Windesheim makes knowledge work A.Creating space in the teacher training curriculum. B.Professionalize on the topic and guiding of explorative classroom dialogues Ourselves: Teacher trainer/ researcher & teachers with time to teach this new topic. Research objectives

Windesheim makes knowledge work A.Where and how in our teacher trainer curriculum can our students learn about using and guiding an explorative classroom dialogue? B.What are minimum skills and organizational preconditions within design research that we need to professionalize ourselves and our colleagues in? Research question

Windesheim makes knowledge work How do we motivate our colleagues for this topic? “The curriculum is flooded!!” “Dialogues are time consuming!” “We are no experts on this topic!” “Dialogues need abstract thinking, this is only possible in save groups with smart children…” But…there’s reality

Windesheim makes knowledge work One lesson, one exercise, some literature Interviews with four participating teachers, before and after the try-out Results Yes! A tiny place in the curriculum Tacit-knowledge made explicit (thoughts and choices of teacher trainers) Support to make explorative dialogues a sustainable part of this particular lesson Students immediately go into discussion! Explorative dialogue does not take place at all! First step: pilot ( )

Windesheim makes knowledge work Design research/ research design Principal researcher develops research instruments Field notes, observations Teacher trainers make field notes All: discuss and read two times a year in research meeting Research Explorative data analysis Try-out

Windesheim makes knowledge work Data collection: field-notes (by teacher trainers), video’s (4/6), students observational notes (10), students reflection forms (10/80) This data is used for team discussion amongst participating teacher educators in order to professionalize, improve lesson materials and possible curriculum improvement Second step: focus on explorative questions

Windesheim makes knowledge work Students results: No discussions, but no questions either. There was still no real explorative dialogue Team learning results: Shared knowledge and experience with explorative classroom dialogues amongst participating teacher trainers Design results: Improved didactics Design research results: Team research in education needs, continuity of staff and regular meetings. Time is an issue! Results

Windesheim makes knowledge work Students results: Real dialogues, insight in students thoughts and learning Team learning results: Designing assignments that stimulate learning, give direct information for teachers about connection between topic and student and give research information. Design results: Improved didactics Design research results: Research instruments that both benefit research and learning process and that are easy and quick to analyze. First results

Windesheim makes knowledge work Research based, sustainable improvements PracticeResearch designProfesionlisation

Windesheim makes knowledge work Take more time for reflection Detailed theoretical explanation for students List of possible questions to ask Hand-out for preparing a explorative classroom dialogue with your class Synergy with a prior classes and prior literature (class about one-on-one talks) Giving students examples and practice in prior lessons Lesson improvements

Windesheim makes knowledge work Future Explorative dialogue during one lesson Explorative dialogue in the curriculum Structural attention for dialogues in our way of educating

Windesheim makes knowledge work Explorative dialogues Extra slides

Windesheim makes knowledge work In order prepare our children to become socially responsible and autonomic thinking participants of the 21st century society. Why education?

Windesheim makes knowledge work Citizens are capable employees on the labor market and at the same time fulfil the role of caretaker for relatives and friends Citizens who consume, but at the same time think about sustainability and dividing and reducing garbage. Citizens who are able to avow their religion and culture but at the same time give others the courtesy to do so. Etc. Socially responsible and autonomic thinking?

Windesheim makes knowledge work Knowledge of and a sense of ownership of societies dilemma’s To know “the others” whom we live with Attention for modern lifecycle. We constantly need to position ourselves to new information and changing situations. This means that educations not only about learning new knowledge. But about meaningful learning in dialogue with others (Wegerif, 2001) S0 we need

Windesheim makes knowledge work Constructive knowledge conversations Debates Explorative group dialogues Classroom conversations

Windesheim makes knowledge work A content learning conversation that contributes to identity development and empathy development by exploring one selves and others experiences, thoughts, feelings on a topic. This means: Differences aren’t polished away but are topic of exploration Slow talking (and thinking) No prefixed-results Objectives explorative classroom dialogues

Windesheim makes knowledge work Big enough to explore Contains a minimum of 1 (socially) dilemma Contains cross-connections with educational content Pupils can personally connect to the topic (experience, development, interest etc.) Topics to explore

Windesheim makes knowledge work Explorative questions Open questions Alternate in depth exploration and broadwise exploration In depth exploration: questions about circumstances, backgrounds, feelings and knowledge Broad wise exploration: asking about different (oposite) experiences/examples, different feelings and thoughts, or new/different knowledge.

Windesheim makes knowledge work Pitfalls Helm/ moderator – Drifting from main topic – Involvement Safety Sensitive subject, yes! But no therapeutically sessions.

Windesheim makes knowledge work Skills moderator? Consciousness of educational goals Knowing the meaning of classroom topics for society and being able to connect these two Knowing the development and interest of pupils and group. Set goals for this particular dialogue Possess dialogical skills Being able to reflect on own values

Windesheim makes knowledge work More information?