1 ISO TC204/WG14 FVCMS Operation Performance, and Verification Requirements 9, December 2008 WG14 Expert Member of Japan Informal document No. GRRF-S08-08.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to do Action and Change. How to… A. Engage people in Action & Change B. Prepare for an Action & Change session C. Facilitate an Action & Change session.
Advertisements

WET GRIP ADHESION FOR C2 & C3 TYRES Tyre industry position with respect to implementation of new minimum requirements for wet grip on C2 and C3 tyres 1.
Advanced Emergency Braking System / Lane Departure Warning System OICA POSITION 1 Informal document No. GRRF-S08-10 Special GRRF brainstorming session.
Vehicle Development Engineer Ellen Cameron. Introduction I have chosen to research the maths used in a Vehicle Development Engineer’s job. I decided to.
Warning Timing for AEBS AEBS/LDWS Proposal of Warning Timing 1) Warning has two functions; to induce the driver to take an avoiding maneuver.
UNFCCC Secretariat Status of negociations on CDM Perumal Arumugam Regional Workshop on CDM and NAMAs for Latin America and the Caribbean,Bogota, (31 –
Insert the title of your presentation here Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date Overview of LDW/AEBS research for the EC Presented by Iain Knight 9.
Christopher J. Bonanti United States HOD to WP.29 Associate Administrator for Rulemaking, NHTSA World Forum for the Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations.
Head Restraint GTR Status to AC th Session of WP.29 March 2007 Informal document No. WP , March 2007, agenda item II
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Information on mandatory fitting of advanced safety systems in Japan Engineering Policy Division.
Proposal to Modify Homologation Brake Test Procedure to Improve Safety on Proving Ground 18/09/2013 Mr. Klaus Vosteen ATP Executive Director Mr. Fran Martínez.
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - September 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT.
Expressway Driving. Characteristics of Expressway Driving Roadway Speed Interchanges No cross traffic Median Tollbooths Entrance/exit ramps Limited access.
PRESENTATION ON THE WORK OF WORKING GROUP 11 ON SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT EACO Seminar for Chairpersons of National Regulatory Authorities 28 May 2015 Kigali.
Proposal for Draft Amendment to Regulation No. 117
1 Consideration of Issues Japan Presentation Informal document No. GRRF-S08-13 Special GRRF brainstorming session 9 December 2008 Agenda item 5.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting Dec 9, 2008 Geneva, Switzerland John Hancock.
Damage Mitigation Braking System
2012/1/13 1 Gear shift analysis ~ Further Review on original JPN gear shift points ~ Prepared by Japan 13 January 2012.
INTRODUCTION TO STATISTICAL STUDY OF BUS ACCIDENT ARE THE BUSES SAFE OR NOT? GRSG, 109 th session Sept. – 2. Oct Presented by Dr. MATOLCSY Mátyás.
Progress report of GRSG informal group on Accident Emergency Call System (AECS) Transmitted by Chair of the AECS IWG Informal document GRSG
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - February 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT Japan.
44th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on FI Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (44th session, December 2008, agenda.
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF
Rolling Resistance Standards Work at ISO (TC31 WG6) Prepared for GRB Review 19 Sep 2011 Angela Wolynski WG6 Convenor Informal document GRB (54th.
Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division.
John Harding ITS Connected Vehicle Public Meeting
Geneva, 09 December Commission Proposal on the General Safety of Motor Vehicles Automotive Unit- F1 Geneva, 09 December Informal document No.
1 Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems Initiative Jack Ference United States Department of Transportation 2006 ITS World Congress 8-12 October 2006.
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Brief Review up to Now 1 March 11, 2011, Geneva UNECE/WP29/ITS Informal Group 19th Meeting T. Onoda & K. Hiramatsu, Japan Transmitted by expert from JAPANInformal.
1 Submitted by the experts from European Commission, Korea, Japan Studies regarding to the questions from 57 th session of GRSP Informal document GRSP
December 2015 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Transmitted by the expert from JapanGRSP Rev.1 (58th GRSP, 8-11 December 2015,
Development of Guidelines for Improvement of Vehicle Safety Regarding Infant-Carrying Vehicles Presentation material by Japan for 53rd session of GRSP.
1 Warning Timing, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-End Collisions review of some research literature referred to in the ITS guidelines.
Proposal to introduce Grouping Criteria for the approval of replacement brake lining assemblies for L-category vehicles in UN Regulation No. 90 submitted.
Concerning regarding the future development of ECE R28 1 Informal document GRB (63 rd GRB, February 2016, agenda item 2) Transmitted by the.
Supporting document for Informal document No. GRRF Presentation summary Background New applications involving the brake system are constantly approaching.
Emergency Stopping Signal 80th GRRF session Submitted by the experts from IMMA Informal document GRRF th GRRF, September 2015, Agenda item.
Cycle of Vehicle Safety Measures in Japan - Study process before & after rulemaking procedure Issue of safety regulations Enforcement (type approval &
CLEPA Position Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting 9 Dec UN Palais des.
Revision of the Automotive Vehicle Certification System of the Russian Federation Presentation at the 144 th WP.29 Session S.V.Pugatchev, Deputy Head,
WG 14 ITS: Roadway-Vehicle Warning and Control Systems
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS)
Timing to be activated the hazard lights
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking
JASIC Japan ______ 61st GRSP Session May 2017
Report and explanation document of SBR-TF
Development of the Japan’s RDE (Real Driving Emission) procedure
Statement of Principles on the Design of High-Priority Warning Signals
Industry Homework from AEB 02
Submitted by the expert from Republic of Korea
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Informal document GRSG
Average Deceleration and Peak Deceleration
VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY BRAKE SYSTEMS.
Overview of Test Procedures, etc
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
AEB 07 – Euro NCAP Summary Overview
Suggestions on development of UN Regulation No. 51
AEB IWG 02 ISO Standard: FVCMS
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
Terms of Reference (AEBS Rev.1)
Emergency Steering Function
Informal document GRRF-78-41
AEBS-08 – Industry Input.
Informal document No. GRPE-61-26
Presentation transcript:

1 ISO TC204/WG14 FVCMS Operation Performance, and Verification Requirements 9, December 2008 WG14 Expert Member of Japan Informal document No. GRRF-S08-08 Special GRRF brainstorming session 9 December 2008 Agenda item 4(c)

2 The work item leader of FVCMS is the USA. The current stage is PWI(Preliminary Work Item) Now we are considering the requirement of the operational performance. The validation method is the next step. The main part of requirement are the Mitigation Brake initiation timing and deceleration value. There are many opinion from each country, Now we are discussing and adjusting. We would like to explain the outline of the requirements. However these are not final decision. Current status

3 FVCMS(Forward Vehicle Collision Mitigation System) Introduction and Scope Forward Vehicle Collision Mitigation Systems (FVCMS) reduce the severity of collisions with forward vehicles that cannot be avoided, and may reduce the likelihood of colliding with forward vehicles While not required, this Standard permits collision avoidance to be attempted by a system that conforms to FVCMS.

4 Collision Types FVCMS shall function in rear-end collision scenarios with respect to all target vehicle. Countermeasures Type1: Collision warning + MB Type2: Collision warning + SRB+MB Type3: Collision warning + SRB

5 Requirement Light Vehicles Mitigation Brake(MB) shall generate a deceleration at least 5.0 m/s2 for a duration chosen to achieve a minimum speed reduction of at least 2.0 m/s. This requirement does not constrain the time when mitigation braking is activated. Requirement Heavy Vehicles Mitigation Brake(MB) shall generate a deceleration at least 3.3 m/s2 (0.34 g) for at least 0.30 s within the last 0.80 s before a collision. This requirement does not constrain the time when mitigation braking is triggered.

6 Speed reduction Brake(SRB) SRB shall be initiated for TTC between 1.8s and 4.0s. The activation point shall be decided by the manufacturer. The average deceleration generated by SRB when active shall not exceed 3.5 m/s2 (averaged over 2s) when the Subject Vehicle(SV) speed is 20 m/s or faster. The average deceleration generated by SRB when active shall not exceed 5.0 m/s2 (averaged over 2s) when the SV speed is 5.0 m/s or slower. The average deceleration generated by SRB when active shall not exceed the line dSV = *vSV (averaged over 2s) for any SV speed between 5.0 m/s and 20 m/s; where dSV is the deceleration of the SV, and vSV is the speed of the SV, and dSV=-aSV.

7 Emergency Event preparation FVCMS shall provide at least one means to prepare the occupants for mitigation braking. This preparation may take the form of a collision warning, SRB activation, or occupant physical protection preparations. If the collision warning or warning braking is initiated within 1.4 s of the start of MB, then a separate emergency event preparation is not required. Collision Warning The collision warnings shall follow the requirements of ISO

8 END Thank you for your attention