SCHEDULE 8:30 AM 10:30 AM Session I 11:00 AM Break 12:15 PM Session II 1:30 PM Lunch 2:45 PM Session III 3:15 PM 4:30 PM Session IV.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design of Steel and Composite-Structures for Seismic Loading – Safety Requirements, Concepts and Methods – Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ekkehard Fehling, University.
Advertisements

Design of Seismic-Resistant Steel Building Structures
Seismology and Earthquake Engineering :Introduction Lecture 3
Passive Vibration Control
CALCULATED vs MEASURED ENERGY DISSIPATION.
1 LESSLOSS Sub Project 7 Techniques and Methods for Vulnerability Reduction Barcelona 18 th May 07 – Lisbon 24 th May 07 LESSLOSS Dissemination Meeting.
Seismic Performance Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Bridges
1 Dynamic/Seismic analysis of RC Element including shear effect.
ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LABORATORY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COMPILED GREGORY G. PENELIS ANDREAS J. KAPPOS 3D PUSHOVER.
2.2 STRUCTURAL ELEMENT BEAM
An-Najah National University
ETABS Three Dimensional Static and Dynamic Analysis and Design of Buildings.
Performance-based Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Bridges with Foundations Designed to Uplift Marios Panagiotou Assistant Professor, University of.
Yahya C. Kurama University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana, U.S.A
Konstantinos Agrafiotis
Nirmal Jayaram Nilesh Shome Helmut Krawinkler 2010 SCEC Annual Meeting A statistical analysis of the responses of tall buildings to recorded and simulated.
Experimental & Analytical Studies of Drilled Shaft Bridge Columns Sandrine P. Lermitte, PhD Student Jonathan P. Stewart, Assistant Professor John W. Wallace,
Seismic Performance of Dissipative Devices Martin Williams University of Oxford Japan-Europe Workshop on Seismic Risk Bristol, July 2004.
2o Ciclo de Palestras em Engenharia Civil de Novembro de 2003 Universidade Nova de Lisboa-Centro de Investigaçao em Estruturas e Construção-UNIC.
NEWBuildS Tall Wood Building Design Project – Seismic & Gravity Load Analysis and Design Zhiyong Chen University of New Brunswick
Instrumented Moment Frame Steel Buildings Models Erol Kalkan, PhD California Geological Survey PEER-GMSM First Work Shop, Berkeley Oct
Level (m-1 ) Level m h (1-c)h ch Rigid Beam x1x1 x k1k1 k2k2 knkn kHkH RC AND SRC SHEAR WALL MACRO-MODELING l Multiple Vertical Line.
#1 212 Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations Lecture.
The use of risk in design: ATC 58 performance assessment procedure Craig D. Comartin.
SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF A CONCRETE BUILDING California State University at Los Angeles Belen Valencia Art Chianello Marlon Calderon Faculty Advisor: Rupa Purasinghe.
Partially Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls
Section 2.1 Overview Types of NL Models Inelastic Model Attributes
Nonlinear response- history analysis in design practice RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE November 2007 Joe Maffei.
Assessing Effectiveness of Building Code Provisions Greg Deierlein & Abbie Liel Stanford University Curt Haselton Chico State University … other contributors.
Dynamics Free vibration: Eigen frequencies
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OF EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES By Ed Wilson September 24, 2014 SEAONC Lecture #2.
FEASIBILITY STUDY OF HYBRID WOOD STEEL STRUCTURES
GW Rodgers, C Denmead, N Leach, JG Chase & John B Mander
Seismic Performance of Outriggered Tall Buildings
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ARTIFICIAL ACCELEROGRAMS
Static Pushover Analysis
NEWBuildS Tall Wood Building Design Project – Structural Design and Analysis Zhiyong Chen & Minghao Li University of New Brunswick, University of British.
Concrete 2003 Brisbane July 2003 Design Of Pre-cast Buried Structures For Internal Impact Loading.
Structural Analysis and Design of
Weian Liu 3. Research Interest Soil Structure Interaction Seismic Analysis and Design of Bridge Structures Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics.
Inelastic Seismic Response of Structures
University of Palestine
1 NEESR Project Meeting 22/02/2008 Modeling of Bridge Piers with Shear-Flexural Interaction and Bridge System Response Prof. Jian Zhang Shi-Yu Xu Prof.
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Graduation Project Prepared by : 1- Areej Melhem 2- Jawad Ateyani 3-Rasha.
Tall Building Initiative Response Evaluation Helmut Krawinkler Professor Emeritus Stanford University On behalf of the Guidelines writers: Y. Bozorgnia,
Seismic of Older Concentrically Braced Frames Charles Roeder (PI) Dawn Lehman, Jeffery Berman (co-PI) Stephen Mahin (co-PI Po-Chien Hsiao.
Presented by: Sasithorn THAMMARAK (st109957)
PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OF EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES By Ed Wilson Draft dated 8/15/14 September SEAONC Lectures #2.
Response of MDOF structures to ground motion 1. If damping is well-behaving, or can be approximated using equivalent viscous damping, we can decouple.
Adaptive Nonlinear Analysis as Applied to Performance based Earthquake Engineering Dr. Erol Kalkan, P.E. United States Geological Survey TUFTS, 2008.
Greg Deierlein, Paul Cordova, Eric Borchers, Xiang Ma, Alex Pena,
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
Vulnerable Structural Elements
Base Isolation. Conventional Construction Practice assumes Fixed Base Structures The Dynamic Characteristics of Fixed Base Structures are determined by.
INTRODUCTION Due to Industrial revolution metro cities are getting very thickly populated and availability of land goes on decreasing. Due to which multistory.
Seismic analysis of Bridges Part II
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN An Over View of the Subject
Mohammad Maher Jaradat Raghad Abdel-Salam Owaidat
Seismic Moment Dr. Syed Mohamed Ibrahim M.Tech., Ph.D.,
GUIDED BY, MS. D. DARLING HELEN LYDIA M.TECH., PRESENTED BY,
Bridge modelling with CSI software.
فصل اول 1- پیشگفتار 2- کلیات خوشا پیشگفتار: از دستاورد های امروزه مهندسی زلزله و سازه ، می توان طراحی سازه ها بر مبنای عملکرد را بر شمرد که اولا.
Earthquake Load Formulation using ASCE7-05
  An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering
1C9 Design for seismic and climate changes
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم IRENG.blogfa.com.
Earthquake resistant buildings
Introduction to Soil Dynamics
California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (CSMIP)
Presentation transcript:

SCHEDULE 8:30 AM 10:30 AM Session I 11:00 AM Break 12:15 PM Session II 1:30 PM Lunch 2:45 PM Session III 3:15 PM 4:30 PM Session IV

ENERGY DIAGRAM

ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC

IMPLIED NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR

STEEL STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIPS

INELASTIC WORK DONE

HYSTERETIC BEHAVIOR

MOMENT ROTATION RELATIONSHIP

IDEALIZED MOMENT ROTATION

DUCTILITY LATERAL LOAD Partially Ductile Ductile Brittle DRIFT

CAPACITY DESIGN STRONG COLUMNS & WEAK BEAMS IN FRAMES REDUCED BEAM SECTIONS LINK BEAMS IN ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES BUCKLING RESISTANT BRACES AS FUSES RUBBER-LEAD BASE ISOLATORS HINGED BRIDGE COLUMNS HINGES AT THE BASE LEVEL OF SHEAR WALLS ROCKING FOUNDATIONS OVERDESIGNED COUPLING BEAMS OTHER SACRIFICIAL ELEMENTS

SHEAR LINKS FOR ENERGY DISSIPATION

PERFORMANCE LEVELS Operational Immediate Occupancy Life Safety Collapse Prevention Less Damage More Damage Ref: FEMA 451 B

PERFORMANCE LEVELS

IDEALIZED FORCE DEFORMATION CURVE

ASCE 41 BEAM MODEL

STRENGTH vs. DEFORMATION ELASTIC STRENGTH DESIGN - KEY STEPS   CHOSE DESIGN CODE AND EARTHQUAKE LOADS DESIGN CHECK PARAMETERS Stress/BEAM MOMENT GET ALLOWABLE STRESSES/ULTIMATE– PHI FACTORS CALCULATE STRESSES – Load Factors (ST RS TH) CALCULATE STRESS RATIOS INELASTIC DEFORMATION BASED DESIGN -- KEY STEPS CHOSE PERFORMANCE LEVEL AND DESIGN LOADS – ASCE 41 DEMAND CAPACITY MEASURES – DRIFT/HINGE ROTATION/SHEAR GET DEFORMATION AND FORCE CAPACITIES CALCULATE DEFORMATION AND FORCE DEMANDS (RS OR TH) CALCULATE D/C RATIOS – LIMIT STATES

ASCE 41 ASSESSMENT OPTIONS Linear Static Analysis Linear Dynamic Analysis (Response Spectrum or Time History Analysis) Nonlinear Static Analysis (Pushover Analysis) Nonlinear Dynamic Time History Analysis (NDI or FNA)

STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

F-D RELATIONSHIP

BACKBONE CURVE

HYSTERESIS LOOPS

ASCE 41 BACKBONE CURVES This can be used for components of all types. It can be used if experimental results are available. ASCE 41 gives capacities for many different components. .

ASCE 41 MOMENT HINGE AUTOMATED

HYSTERESIS LOOPS AUTOMATED

IMPORTANCE OF DUCTILITY LATERAL LOAD Partially Ductile Ductile Brittle DRIFT

ASCE 41 – DUCTILITY

FORCE AND DEFORMATION CONTROL

ASCE 41 BEAM MODEL

STEEL COLUMN AXIAL-BENDING

COLUMN AXIAL-BENDING MODEL

CONCRETE COLUMN AXIAL-BENDING

STEEL STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIPS

STEEL COLUMN FIBER MODEL SECTION FIBERS

MATERIAL STRESS-STRAIN CURVES Unconfined and Confined Concrete ( Compared ) Confined Concrete Steel

CONCRETE COLUMN FIBER HINGE MODEL Reinforced Concrete Column Steel Rebar Fibers Confined Concrete Fibers Unconfined Concrete Fibers

MATERIAL STRESS-STRAIN CURVES Unconfined and Confined Concrete ( Compared ) Confined Concrete Steel

SHEAR WALL FIBER HINGE MODEL Reinforcement Layout Steel Fibers Confined Concrete Fibers Unconfined Concrete Fibers

SHEAR WALL FIBER HINGE MODEL Shear Wall Cross Section Rebar Fibers Confined and Unconfined Concrete Fibers

STRAIN AS A PERFORMANCE MEASURE Concrete   Tension Compression IO 0.0001 -0.0015 LS 0.0005 -0.003 CP 0.001 -0.0045 Rebar   Tension Compression IO 0.02 -0.02 LS 0.06 -0.06 CP 0.09 -0.09

STRAIN AND ROTATION MEASURES

CONCRETE WALL MODELING P-M Action With No Shear Coupling Nonlinear Fiber Model P-M Action With Shear Coupling (Multi-layered Nonlinear Darwin-Pecknold Concrete Shell Model )

ENERGY DISSIPATION DEVICES Buckling-Restrained Brace (BRB) Friction Isolator Rubber Isolator Viscous Damper Friction Damper

SHEAR HINGE MODEL

PANEL ZONE ELEMENT

LINEAR vs. NONLINEAR

NONLINEAR SOLUTION SCHEMES ∆ ƒ u 1 2 iteration CONSTANT STIFFNESS ITERATION 3 4 5 6 ∆ ƒ u 1 2 iteration NEWTON – RAPHSON ITERATION

NONLINEAR EVENT TO EVENT ANALYSIS

STEP BY STEP DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

EQUATIONS FOR CAA METHOD

THE POWER OF RITZ VECTORS APPROXIMATELY THREE TIMES FASTER THAN THE CALCULATION OF EXACT EIGENVECTORS IMPROVED ACCURACY WITH A SMALLER NUMBER OF VECTORS CAN BE USED FOR NONLINEAR ANALYSIS TO CAPTURE LOCAL RESPONSE

FAST NONLINEAR ANALYSIS (FNA) DISCRETE NONLINEARITY FRAME AND SHEAR WALL HINGES BASE ISOLATORS (RUBBER & FRICTION) STRUCTURAL DAMPERS STRUCTURAL UPLIFT STRUCTURAL POUNDING BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACES

RITZ VECTORS

FNA ADVANTAGES MODAL SOLUTION - NO STIFFNESS REDUCTION CLOSED FORM SOLUTION – VERY FAST TIME STEP INDEPENDENT CAPTURES HIGH FREQUENCY RESPONSE RITZ VECTORS CALCULATED ONCE MULTIPLE TIME HISTORIES ARE FAST

FNA KEY POINT The Ritz modes generated by the nonlinear deformation loads are used to modify the basic structural modes whenever the nonlinear elements go nonlinear.

DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM EQUATIONS g u - = w + x 2 M Ku C t . .. M C .. .. K .. .. ..

RESPONSE FROM GROUND MOTION A B t u g = + - . 2 x w .. ug .. 2 ug2 ug1 1 t1 t2 t

CLOSED FORM DAMPED RESPONSE { [ . ] cos ( )] sin } e u B t A d = - + xw w 1 2 Bt x [u ) 3

BASIC DYNAMICS WITH DAMPING u & - = w + x 2 M Ku C t C K g u &

RESPONSE MAXIMA u t ) cos( w = 2 - & sin( max

Displacement Response Spectrum RESPONSE SPECTRUM GENERATION -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.20 0.40 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 TIME, SECONDS GROUND ACC, g Earthquake Record -4.00 -2.00 DISPL, in. -8.00 8.00 T= 0.6 sec T= 2.0 sec 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 PERIOD, Seconds DISPLACEMENT, inches Displacement Response Spectrum 5% damping

SPECTRAL PARAMETERS S PS w = d V a v DISPLACEMENT, in. PERIOD, sec 4 8 12 16 2 6 10 PERIOD, sec DISPLACEMENT, in. 20 30 40 VELOCITY, in/sec 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 ACCELERATION, g d V S PS w = v a

Spectral Acceleration, Sa THE ADRS SPECTRUM ADRS Curve Spectral Displacement, Sd Spectral Acceleration, Sa 2.0 Seconds 1.0 Seconds 0.5 Seconds Period, T RS Curve

THE ADRS SPECTRUM

THE LINEAR PUSHOVER

EQUIVALENT LINEARIZATION How far to push? The Target Point!

ARTIFICIAL EARTHQUAKES CREATING HISTORIES TO MATCH A SPECTRUM FREQUENCY DOMAIN & TIME DOMAIN MATCHING

SPECTRAL MATCHING IN FREQUENCY DOMAIN FFT Inverse FFT Scaled Cyclic Signals for Each Frequency of Interest De-aggregated Cyclic Signals for Each Frequency of Interest Scale Amplitudes for Each Freq. (Scale factor = At/As) Seed Acceleration Time History Acceleration Time History Matched to Target Spectrum As At Target Spectrum and Spectrum for Seed Acceleration Time History Target Spectrum and Spectrum for Matched Acceleration Time History

SPECTRAL MATCHING IN TIME DOMAIN B C D E F G H I Seed Acceleration Time History Target Spectrum and Spectrum for Seed Acceleration Time History Adjust Wavelet No Yes Misfit < Tol Adjust Wavelet Wavelet for Freq. Band A No Yes Misfit < Tol ADD Wavelet for Freq. Band B ADD . . . . Misfit < Tol for all Freq. Bands Target Spectrum and Spectrum for Matched Acceleration Time History Acceleration Time History Matched to Target Spectrum

CONSEQUENCE BASED DESIGN

RATING FOR SEISMIC PERFORMANCE CoRE Rating Safety Reparability Functionality 5-Star Life Safe Loss <5% Occupiable Immediately Functional < 72 hours 4-Star Loss <10% Occupiable Immediately Functional < 1 month 3-star Loss <20% Occupiable < 1 month Functional < 6 months Certified Not estimated Not Certified Life Safety Hazard