Authors: Leonidas Traipe Magdalena Rios Edison Villagra Allister Gibbons Marcelo Hidalgo Claudia Goya Authors have no financial interest.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Placido Based Corneal Topography

Advertisements

Asymmetric Keratoconus Study: Novel Tomographic Parameters to enhance sensitivity to detect abnormalities in eyes with normal axial curvature maps from.

Comparison of Visual Outcomes With Toric IOL and With Limbal Relaxing Incisions in Cataract Surgery Eriko Fukuyama, MD Fukuyama Eye Clinic Fukuoka, Japan.

TOPOGRAPHY ORBSCAN S.A.A. Mortazavi MD.

Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea in Normal- Tension Glaucoma Authors: Leonidas Traipe Ines Cayuqueo Fabiola Cerfogli Claudia Goya Allister Gibbons.

Familial corneal patterns in pellucid marginal degeneration: uncovering a possible etiology Hajirah N. Saeed, MD.

Statement of Commercial Interest: RDJ: None DRH: honoraria from Reichert for educational lectures on corneal biomechanics Multiple studies have shown ex.

Corneal topography orbscan

Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography for Evaluation of Posterior Corneal Changes after Refractive Surgery Dr. Tommy Chung Yan Chan Dr. Vishal Jhanji.

Comparison of corneal astigmatism measured with 3 devices Mariko Shirayama, M.D, Li Wang, M.D, PhD, Mitchell P. Weikert, M.D, Douglas D. Koch, M.D. Cullen.

Correlation Of Corneal Contour With Higher Order Ocular Aberrations (HOA) In Indian Eyes Manish Chaudhary MS Amit Gupta MS Advanced Eye Centre, Postgraduate.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation for Keratoconus Alejandro Navas, MD, MSc, Martha Jaimes, MD, Jesús Cabral, MD, Arturo Ramirez.

Corneal Biomechanics, Pachymetric Progression Profile and Corneal Volume: Indices for Detecting Ectasia and Screening Refractive Candidates Renato Ambrósio.

CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY Wide acceptance as a clinical examination procedure with the advent of modern laser refractive surgery Measure a greater area of the.

Long-term Follow-up for Intrastromal Cornea Ring Segments in Early to Severe Keratoconic Patients Omer Trivizki 1,Eliya Levinger 1,2, Irit Bareqet 2, Ami.

Application of Quantitative Method for Prospectively Identifying Risk for Ectasia After LASIK in Normal, Suspect, and Ectatic Eyes Mujtaba A. Qazi, MD.

David Zadok MD, Isaac Avni MD

E-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group The impact of reference body selection for calculating.

Outcome of refractive surgery in keratoconus suspect eyes

University of Verona Eye Clinic Department of Neurological and Motor Science Head: Prof. Giorgio Marchini Prevalence of Corneal Ectasia in Patients With.

Dr. Amin Hossein Rahgozar

Accelerated Transepithelial CXL for keratoconus in pediatric population Enrique O. Graue-Hernández, Andrew Olivo-Payne, Lucero J Pedro-Aguilar, Arturo.

Repeatability of Anterior and Posterior Corneal Higher- Order Aberrations in 4 mm, 6 mm and 8 mm diameters measured by Pentacam System Jadwiga Wojtowicz.

Richard Y. Hwang 1, PhD; Dan Gauthier 2, PhD; Dana Wallace 1, MD; Natalie A. Afshari 1, MD 1 Department of Ophthalmology, 2 Department of Physics Duke.

Wavefront Sensing of the Human Eye

Dr. K.S.SIDDHARTHAN Aravind Eye Hospital Coimbatore

Dept. of Ophthalmology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. Outcome after big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Medical Director - R & D Consultant, Ziemer Group AG, Port, Switzerland Speaker, Bausch & Lomb do Brasil Territory Manager.

Paragon CRT Dual Axis Introducing the next step in improving your success with corneal reshaping…. 1. Kính Paragon CRT Dual Axis – Lưỡng Trục Giới thiệu.

Correlation Between Corneal Biomechanics and Wavefront Aberrations Alejandro Rivera, MD Private Practice Mexico City The author has no financial interest.

Evaluation of Interface Reflectivity and Corneal Aberrations following DSAEK Hamid Khakshoor, MD Professor of Ophthalmology Mashhad University of Medical.

Evaluation of Zonal Equivalent Keratometry Readings After LASIK Timmy Kovoor, MD Orkun Muftuoglu, MD V.Vinod Mootha, MD Steven Verity, MD R. Wayne Bowman,

The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster Yinfei Xu, Peter S. Hersh, MD, David S. Chu, MD Institutional Affiliations.

Corneal Topography using Orbscan : Basics and interpretation

World Cornea Congress VI Michael K. Smolek & Panagiotis Kompotiatis Department of Ophthalmology LSU Eye Center of Excellence, New Orleans The authors.

ROTATING SCHEIMPFLUG TOPOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS IMPORTANT IN DISTINGUISHING NORMAL FROM KERATOCONIC CORNEAL MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES Clayton Falknor, MD, Orkun.

Evaluation of Long-Term Keratoconus Progression Using Scanning-Slit Topography First Author: David Galarreta, MD Contributing Authors: Nestor Cortes, MD,

Four Year Results Of Corneal Crosslinling (XL) in Keratoconus Fernando Aguilera-Zarate MD Fernando Aguilera-Zarate MD Instituto de Ojos de BC Instituto.

ELEVATION AND PACHYMETRY VALUES IN NORMAL CORNEAS OBTAINED BY GALILEI ASCRS Boston April Vision Sana Research Group Vision Sana Research Group.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness and Peripheral Corneal Thickness using Sheimpflug system, Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry.

Mean Keratometry Measurement Post Penetrating Keratoplasty Jacky Yeung MSc MD, Stephanie Baxter MD FRCS(C) Department of Ophthalmology, Hotel Dieu Hospital,

The Effect of Corneal Anterior Surface Eccentricity on Astigmatism after Cataract Surgery Choul Yong Park MD 1 Sung Jun Lee MD 1 Prabjot Channa MD 2 Roy.

Scheimpflug and OCT analysis of posterior keratoconus

1 P.O. dei Pellegrini; A.S.L. Napoli 1Centro 2 Dipartimento di Oftalmologia, Seconda Università degli Studi Napoli Scheimpflug topography, Scanning-Slit.

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Intracorneal Ring Segment (Intacs SK) in Keratoconus Abdulrahman Al-Muammar, MD, FRCSC I have no financial interest.

Evaluation of Corneal Tomography in Primary Pterygium Sahil Goel, MD (Presenting Author), Murugesan Vanathi MD *The authors have no financial interests.

Alex P. Lange The author has no financial interest to disclose.

Escaf M; Izquierdo Jr L; Mendoza J; Miranda M Instituto de Ojos Oftalmo Salud Lima, Peru THERE IS NO FINANCIAL INTEREST IN THIS POSTER.

M. Escaf, J. Mendoza, L. Izquierdo jr., M. Henriquez Instituto de Ojos Oftalmo Salud Lima, Peru There is no financial interest in this poster.

Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Analysis in the Ectatic Corneas: Correlation of the New Corneal Biomechanics Parameters and Severity of Keratoconus Kristin.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Central Corneal Power Measurements between Two Scheimpflug Imaging Systems Yuichi.

Risk Factor Analysis of Topographic Progression in Keratoconus Seong Joon Ahn, MD 1,2, Mee Kum Kim MD, PhD 1,2, Won Ryang Wee, MD, PhD 1,2 1 Department.

Corneal CXL in Pediatric Patients with Progressive Keratoconus Stephanie Wise, Christian Diaz, Karolien Termote, Paul J. Dubord, Martin McCarthy, Sonia.

CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL PROFILE AFTER FERRARA RING IMPLANTATION Leonardo Torquetti, MD, PhD Paulo Ferrara, MD, PhD Paulo Ferrara Eye Clinic Belo Horizonte.

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine,

Characteristics of Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma Patients with Normal Intraocular Pressure at the First Visit Won Hyuk Oh1, Bum Gi Kim1, Joo Hwa Lee2.

CORNEAL EPITHELIAL IMAGING

17100 Contact lens fitting after corneal CXL

Corneal High-Order Aberrations in Keratoconus

Toric Topographically Customized Transepithelial, Pulsed, Very High-Fluence, Higher Energy and Higher Riboflavin Concentration Collagen Cross-Linking in.

and High-Order Aberrations After Intrastromal Presbyopia Correction

MP Weikert, M Shirayama, L Wang, DD Koch

Mehdi Ghajarnia, MD Mark Mifflin, MD John A. Moran Eye Center

Comparison of corneal powers obtained from four different devices

Carlos G. Arce, MD Associate Researcher and Ophthalmologist

Sun Woong Kim, M.D.1, Hae Jung Sun, M.D.1,

Objective - To graph ordered pairs on the coordinate plane.

Dr Ciara Bergin, PhD Dr Ivo Guber, Dr Kate Hashemi, Dr Francois Majo

Aspherical ablation profiles in excimer laser treatments

Michael Goodman, Alexandra Paul and Andrew Hsu

Presentation transcript:

Authors: Leonidas Traipe Magdalena Rios Edison Villagra Allister Gibbons Marcelo Hidalgo Claudia Goya Authors have no financial interest

 They represent the true shape of the cornea – independent of the position of the corneal surface to the visual axis.  They provide more precise results than curvature maps Curvature maps assume that the visual axis and reference axis pass through the apex of the cornea

 To describe the variation in elevation topography that happens when the body of reference is changed in a Scheimpflug based system using Allegro Oculyzer (Wavelight Inc.).  To determine specific differences between: Best fit Sphere Ellipsoid Toric Ellipse

 Sample: We retrospectively analyzed 90 consecutive keratoconus patients (149 eyes), diagnosed by clinical and topographical criteria. 72.2% Male // years old  The sample was divided in 4 different stages described by Krumeich (1998) and later modified by Alio (2006). Eyes: Stage I=55 // Stage II=44 // Stage III=25 // Stage IV=25 KRUMEICH J, DANIEL J, KNÜLLE A Live-epikeratophakia for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 24: ALIO J, SHABAYEK M Corneal Higher Order Aberrations: A method to grade keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 22:

Analysis Plot – Points of elevation (in micrometers) over/under the body of reference in the central 3 mm. Valid for the anterior and posterior surface (Belin M, 2005). We used constant distances between each of the 9 points analyzed in each patient. We did not modify the axis of reference of the topographic maps. 8,00 3,57 0,00 6,00 -1,02 -10,00 11,00 2,05 -5,00 9,00 2,55 -3,00 9,00 -0,91 -8,00 10,00 0,36 -7,00 8,00 1,76 - 4,00 6,00 0,02 -6, ,00 4,40 -1, Red = Minimum value of elevation. Blue = Maximal value of elevation. White = Mean value of elevation. This procedure was applied to all eyes included in this sample. For each body of reference and for both corneal surfaces.

Elevation Point Analyzed Body of reference with statisticall diferences in comparison with the other bodies. P- value Anterior SurfacePoint 1 (Central) BFS Toric Ellipse<0.01 Ellipsoid<0.01 Posterior SurfacePoint 1 (Central) BFS Toric Ellipse<0.03 Ellipsoid<0.05 Absolutely no difference in central elevation point comparing Ellipsoid and Toric Ellipse.

 The only other study point with significant differences was point 6 (the most inferior): Only in Keratoconus Stage 2 Only between BFS and Toric Ellipse (p=0.046)  All other study points were non statistically significant comparing all bodies of reference to one another (ANOVA).

To graph the difference between using different bodies of reference in all patients studied (Stage I). Elevation in micrometers

 The central elevation (Point 1) has statistically significant variation in: Both Corneal Surfaces Between all different bodies of reference In the 4 stages of keratoconus severity  Also significantly different: All elevations comparing BFS and Toric Ellipse Most elevations comparing BFS and Ellipsoid  Except in elevation study point 6

STAGE 3STAGE 4 STAGE 1 STAGE 2 um Study Points 1-9

 As expected BFS revealed higher elevation differences.  This could probably show earlier ectatic disease increasing the tests sensitivity but decreasing test specificity.  We found no differences in using Ellipsoid or Toric Ellipse as bodies of reference.

 Posterior elevation subtraction values are more important In early stage KC they tend to be more abnormal than anterior elevation changes. This difference diminishes as the KC progresses.  Central elevation is where most differences are found between bodies of reference.