Non classical correlations of two interacting qubits coupled to independent reservoirs R. Migliore CNR-INFM, Research Unit CNISM of Palermo Dipartimento.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Henry Haselgrove School of Physical Sciences University of Queensland
Advertisements

Quantum Harmonic Oscillator
Optimizing pointer states for dynamical evolution of quantum correlations under decoherence Bo You,Li-xiang Cen Department of Physics, SiChuan University.
Quantum Walks, Quantum Gates, and Quantum Computers Andrew Hines P.C.E. Stamp [Palm Beach, Gold Coast, Australia]
APRIL 2010 AARHUS UNIVERSITY Simulation of probed quantum many body systems.
Kondo Physics from a Quantum Information Perspective
Adaptive Hough transform for the search of periodic sources P. Astone, S. Frasca, C. Palomba Universita` di Roma “La Sapienza” and INFN Roma Talk outline.
Frustration of Decoherence and Entanglement-sharing in the Spin-bath Andrew Hines Christopher Dawson Ross McKenzie Gerard Milburn.
Thus in the rotating frame the magnetic field becomes time-independent while the z-magnetic field component is reduced by the frequency of rotation x RoF.
Quantum One: Lecture 4. Schrödinger's Wave Mechanics for a Free Quantum Particle.
Decoherence Versus Disentanglement for two qubits in a squeezed bath. Facultad de Física Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. M.Orszag ; M.Hernandez.
Efectos de las oscilaciones de sabor sobre el desacoplamiento de neutrinos c ó smicos Teguayco Pinto Cejas AHEP - IFIC Teguayco Pinto Cejas
Suppressing decoherence and heating with quantum bang-bang controls David Vitali and Paolo Tombesi Dip. di Matematica e Fisica and Unità INFM, Università.
Adiabatic Quantum Computation with Noisy Qubits Mohammad Amin D-Wave Systems Inc., Vancouver, Canada.
Small Josephson Junctions in Resonant Cavities David G. Stroud, Ohio State Univ. Collaborators: W. A. Al-Saidi, Ivan Tornes, E. Almaas Work supported by.
Quantum Feedback Control of Entanglement in collaboration with H. M. Wiseman, Griffith University, Brisbane AU University of Camerino, Italy Stefano Mancini.
Quantum Computation and the Bloch Sphere
Lecture 6 The dielectric response functions. Superposition principle.
Subir Sachdev (Harvard) Philipp Werner (ETH) Matthias Troyer (ETH) Universal conductance of nanowires near the superconductor-metal quantum transition.
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME Xiangning Luo EE 698A Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame Superconducting Devices for Quantum Computation.
Guillermina Ramirez San Juan
Coherence and decoherence in Josephson junction qubits Yasunobu Nakamura, Fumiki Yoshihara, Khalil Harrabi Antti Niskanen, JawShen Tsai NEC Fundamental.
Quantum Mechanics from Classical Statistics. what is an atom ? quantum mechanics : isolated object quantum mechanics : isolated object quantum field theory.
Efficient Quantum State Tomography using the MERA in 1D critical system Presenter : Jong Yeon Lee (Undergraduate, Caltech)
The semiclassical Rabi problem. We have a two level atom,with We look for the solution of the Schrödinger equation as: The atom has a hamiltonian: The.
STUDY OF CORRELATIONS AND NON-MARKOVIANITY IN DEPHASING OPEN QUANTUM SYSTEMS Università degli Studi di Milano Giacomo GUARNIERI Supervisor: Bassano VACCHINI.
Ch 9 pages ; Lecture 21 – Schrodinger’s equation.
Single atom lasing of a dressed flux qubit
Dressed state amplification by a superconducting qubit E. Il‘ichev, Outline Introduction: Qubit-resonator system Parametric amplification Quantum amplifier.
Vibrational Spectroscopy
Density Matrix Density Operator State of a system at time t:
ENTANGLEMENT IN SMALL SELF-CONTAINED QUANTUM FRIDGES NICOLAS BRUNNER, RALPH SILVA, PAUL SKRZYPCZYK, MARCUS HUBER NOAH LINDEN & SANDU POPESCU SINGAPORE.
Chapter 18 Bose-Einstein Gases Blackbody Radiation 1.The energy loss of a hot body is attributable to the emission of electromagnetic waves from.
V. Brosco1, R. Fazio2 , F. W. J. Hekking3, J. P. Pekola4
Quantum Two 1. 2 Time Independent Approximation Methods 3.
Quantization via Fractional Revivals Quantum Optics II Cozumel, December, 2004 Carlos Stroud, University of Rochester Collaborators:
Quantum entanglement and Quantum state Tomography Zoltán Scherübl Nanophysics Seminar – Lecture BUTE.
Two Level Systems and Kondo-like traps as possible sources of decoherence in superconducting qubits Lara Faoro and Lev Ioffe Rutgers University (USA)
Quantum pumping and rectification effects in interacting quantum dots Francesco Romeo In collaboration with : Dr Roberta Citro Prof. Maria Marinaro University.
H ij Entangle- ment flow multipartite systems [1] Numerically computed times assuming saturated rate equations, along with the lower bound (solid line)
1 MODELING MATTER AT NANOSCALES 4. Introduction to quantum treatments The variational method.
PHYS 773: Quantum Mechanics February 6th, 2012
Adiabatic Quantum Computation with Noisy Qubits M.H.S. Amin D-Wave Systems Inc., Vancouver, Canada.
Quantum Mechanical Cross Sections In a practical scattering experiment the observables we have on hand are momenta, spins, masses, etc.. We do not directly.
DYNAMICS OF OPEN Q-SYSTES FROM A PERSPECTIVE OF QIT IMS, Imperial College, London, 18 January 2007 Vladimír Bužek Research Center for Quantum Information.
Quantum Zeno dynamics induced by Temperature B. D. Militello 44th Symposium on Mathematical Physics (Torun)June 2012 Dipartimento di Fisica Collaboration:.
For long wavelength, compared to the size of the atom The term containing A 2 in the dipole approximation does not involve atomic operators, consequently.
Experimental Quantification of Entanglement in low dimensional Spin Systems Chiranjib Mitra IISER-Kolkata Quantum Information Processing and Applications.
2 Qubits: Coupled pair of DQD. Physical system and effective Hamiltonian Electrostatic coupling between DQD1 and DQD2.
Introduction to Coherence Spectroscopy Lecture 1 Coherence: “A term that's applied to electromagnetic waves. When they "wiggle" up and down together they.
Quantum Theory of the Coherently Pumped Micromaser István Németh and János Bergou University of West Hungary Department of Physics CEWQO 2008 Belgrade,
CORRELATION-REGULATION ANALYSIS Томский политехнический университет.
International Scientific Spring 2016
STATISTICAL MECHANICS PD Dr. Christian Holm PART 5-6 Some special topics, Thermal Radiation, and Plank distribution.
The Theory of Markovian Open Quantum Systems
Chapter 6 Applications of
Quantum optics Eyal Freiberg.
G. Florio Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Bari, Italy
Density Matrix Density Operator State of a system at time t:
S. V. Remizov, A. A. Zhukov, D. S. Shapiro, W. V. Pogosov, Yu. E. Lozovik All-Russia Research Institute of Automatics, Moscow Parametrically driven hybrid.
Quantum One.
Quantum One.
Quantum Two.
Quantum mechanics II Winter 2012
Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory
§1-3 Solution of a Dynamical Equation
Quantum computation using two component Bose-Einstein condensates
Linear Vector Space and Matrix Mechanics
Dynamics and decoherence of a qubit coupled to a two-level system
Dynamics of a superconducting qubit coupled to quantum two-level systems in its environment Robert Johansson (RIKEN, The Institute of Physical and Chemical.
Presentation transcript:

Non classical correlations of two interacting qubits coupled to independent reservoirs R. Migliore CNR-INFM, Research Unit CNISM of Palermo Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche ed Astronomiche Università di Palermo, Italy M. Scala, M.A. Jivulescu, M. Guccione, L.L. Sánchez-Soto, A. Messina dsfa CNR-INFM

  The system and its Hamiltonian   Two coupled qubits interacting with two independent bosonic baths.   Counter-rotating terms are present in the interaction Hamiltonian describing the qubit-qubit coupling.   Microscopic derivation of the Markovian master equation in the weak damping limit   The system dynamics   Stationary state at general temperatures   Behavior of the entanglement at zero temperature presenting the phenomena of sudden death and sudden birth as well as the presence of stationary entanglement for long times.   Effect of nonzero temperature on the entanglement dynamics.   Conclusive remarks OUTLINE M. Scala et al., J. Phys A: Math. and Theor. 41, (2008); M. Scala et al., in preparation. R. Migliore et al., Phys. Stat. Sol. B 246, 1013 (2009).

THE SYSTEM AND ITS HAMILTONIAN We consider two spin-1/2 like interacting systems (qubits) coupled with their own (uncorrelated) bosonic environments Reservoir 2 T2T2 22 Reservoir 1 T1T1 11 Counter-rotating terms included in the interaction play a central role in the dynamics of the entanglement between the two systems. (1)

The four-level energy spectrum of the bipartite system  II II II By exploiting the fact that the Hamiltonian H S, in the uncoupled basis {|00>; |11>; |10>; |01>}, is block diagonal, it is straightforward to find its energy spectrum and the relative eigenstates & Here The allowed transitions here sketched are characterized by the Bohr frequencies

Microscopic derivation of the Markovian master equation in the weak damping limit   From this Hamiltonian model, performing both the Born-Markov and the rotating wave approximation, we find that the evolution of the two two-state systems is described by the equation: and the Kubo-Martin-Schwinger relation holds. Assuming that the two reservoirs are independent and that both are in a thermal state, with temperatures T 1 and T 2 respectively, one has: with i.e. when All the jump processes involve transitions between dressed states of the open system under study, described by the following operators relative to the coupling of the first (second) qubit with its own reservoir: for the transitions b  a and d  c for the transitions c  a and d  b (2)

Rearranging the ME, we obtain a system of differential coupled equations, describing the time evolution of the populations of the dressed states |a>, | b>, | c> and | d> namely and of the corresponding coherences:

The decay rates ( i  I,II ) and the cross terms are given by: When the temperatures of the two reservoirs T 1 and T 2 are both zero, the rates and vanish. Physically this means that there is no possibility to create excitations in the bipartite system due to the interaction with the reservoirs. The excitation rates and the cross terms are obtained by substituting, with the corresponding quantities

Analytical solution I: the stationary state We prove the existence of the following stationary solution, by imposing and the normalization condition there exists a stationary entanglement traceable back to the presence of counter-rotating terms in the interaction Hamiltonian describing the coupling between the two two-state systems. when T 1 = T 2 = 0 K   aa,ST = 1 We note, that the analysis of this Hamiltonian model allows to bring to the light the fact that, when T 1  T 2, it is wrong to apply the principle of detailed balance in order to derive the stationary solution of the master equation of the system. This is due to the fact that the excitation rates are not related to the corresponding rates from the usual Boltzmann factor. We note, that the analysis of this Hamiltonian model allows to bring to the light the fact that, when T 1  T 2, it is wrong to apply the principle of detailed balance in order to derive the stationary solution of the master equation of the system. This is due to the fact that the excitation rates are not related to the corresponding rates from the usual Boltzmann factor. Initial state: |11> Linear entropy S L (  ) =1-Tr[  2 ]

Analytical solution II: dynamics of the entanglement at zero temperature Exploiting the knowledge of the master equation solutions (when T 1 =T 2 =0 K) we determine the amount of entanglement between the two-state systems and the entanglement dynamics, by analyzing the concurrence, a function introduced by Wootters and defined as : eigenvalues of the matrix no entanglement maximal entanglement

RESULTS I: INITIAL STATE |01> concurrence  1 = 2 =10 flat spectrum ==0.1 T 1 =T 2 = 0 K Damped Rabi-oscillations + stationary entanglement due to the presence of counter-rotating terms in the  x (1)  x (2) interaction Hamiltonian which are responsible for the presence of the component |11> in the ground state |a> t

RESULTS II: INITIAL STATE |11> Birth and death of the entanglement  1 = 2 =10 ; flat spectrum: ==0.1 ; T 1 =T 2 = 0 K Sudden death and birth of entanglement, phenomena which are well known in the recent literature on dissipative two-qubits dynamics. Note that also in this case the stationary entanglement is due to the structure of the qubit-qubit interaction Hamiltonian and not to the presence of a common environment. concurrence t

EFFECT OF NONZERO TEMPERATURES I By means of Laplace transforms, it is possible to obtain the solution of the master equation at generic T 1 and T 2 initial state |01> Effect on the oscillations initial state |11> Effect on the short-time dynamics T 1 =T 2 =10 mK T 1 =T 2 =20 mK T 1 =T 2 =30 mK The oscillatory phenomena, indicating coherence, are robust enough with respect to the temperature increasing concurrence t (sec)  1 = 2 =10GHz; ohmic spectrum:  1 = 2 =0.1 T 1 =T 2 =10 mK T 1 =T 2 =20 mK T 1 =T 2 =30 mK

Initial state |11>: Effect on the long-time dynamics concurrence T 1 =T 2 =5 mK T 1 =T 2 =10 mK T 1 =T 2 =15 mK The stationary entanglement due to non-resonant interaction is less robust with respect to temperature: anyway it is experimentally detectable. t (sec) EFFECT OF NONZERO TEMPERATURES II The larger the coupling constant λ the larger the amount of stationary entanglement.

SUMMING UP  Derivation of the master equation for two coupled qubits interacting with two independent reservoirs.  Stationary solution: in general, for T 1  T 2, the detailed balance principle is not satisfied.  Dynamics at zero temperature: Damped Rabi oscillations and stationary entanglement due to the counter-rotating terms in the qubit-qubit interaction Hamiltonian.  Initial condition |11>: phenomena of sudden death and birth of entanglement.  Nonzero values for the reservoirs temperatures may destroy stationary entanglement, which is anyway visible for a reasonable temperature range. WORK IN PROGRESS…  Decoherence in superconducting systems:  Structured environments  Non-markovian dynamics WORK IN PROGRESS…  Decoherence in superconducting systems:  Structured environments  Non-markovian dynamics M. Scala et al., J. Phys A: Math. and Theor. 41, (2008); M. Scala et al., in preparation. R. Migliore et al., Phys. Stat. Sol. B 246, 1013 (2009).