Deductive and Inductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning Deductive reasoning begins with a general premise (statement) and moves to a specific conclusion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
-- in other words, logic is
Advertisements

The Basics of Logical Argument Two Kinds of Argument The Deductive argument: true premises guarantee a true conclusion. e.g. All men are mortal. Socrates.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
Lecture 2: Deduction, Induction, Validity, Soundness.
Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
LOGO LESSON 2 REASONING By Miss.Manita Modphai. Contents Inductive Reasoning 1 Deductive Reasoning 2 Relation with Venn Diagram 4 Type of Argument 3.
Logos Formal Logic.
The Three Appeals of Argument
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
Basic Argumentation.
Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning. Objectives Use a Venn diagram to determine the validity of an argument. Complete a pattern with the most likely possible.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Persuasion Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. Sometimes this is informally called a "top-down" approach. Inductive reasoning.
Logic and Reason. Deductive Reasoning Reasoning that moves from the general to the particular Watchdogs bark at strangers. The watchdog did not bark at.
Warm Up 1. How do I know the following must be false? Points P, Q, and R are coplanar. They lie on plane m. They also lie on another plane, plane n. 2.
Chapter 2 The Logic of Quantified Statements. Section 2.4 Arguments with Quantified Statements.
Logic in Everyday Life.
Deductive vs. Inductive Logic This course is about deductive logic. But it is important to know something about inductive logic.
10/20/09 BR- Who are the three “brothers” of Argument? Today: Constructing A Logical Argument – Deductive and Inductive Reasoning -Hand in “facts” -MIKVA.
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
REASONING AS PROBLEM SOLVING DEDUCTIVE REASONING: –what, if any, conclusions necessarily follow? INDUCTIVE REASONING: –what is the probability that those.
Ways of Knowing: Reason Reason. Cogito ergo sum Reasoning Deductive Inductive.
Conjecture Indirect Reasoning – Reasoning that involves using specific examples to make a conclusion (Move from specific observations to general statements).
Theory of Knowledge Ms. Bauer
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. PROBLEM SOLVING Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
The construction of a formal argument
Do Now  What does logos appeal to in an advertisement?  Give three examples.
Deductive and induction reasoning
Logic and Reasoning.
Validity, Soundness, Strength, Cogency Jason Chang Critical Thinking.
Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning The process of logical reasoning from general principles to specific instances based on the assumed truth of.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
 Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.  You consider evidence you have seen or heard to draw a conclusion.
Deductive s. Inductive Reasoning
Logic: The Language of Philosophy. What is Logic? Logic is the study of argumentation o In Philosophy, there are no right or wrong opinions, but there.
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Arguments
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Deductive reasoning.
a valid argument with true premises.
WEEK 3 VALIDITY OF ARGUMENTS Valid argument: A deductive argument is valid if its conclusion is necessarily and logically drawn from the premises. The.
3 Types of Arguments: Ethos- Establishing a reason to listen or believe the speaker. E.g., “that guy is wearing a tie so he must know what he’s saying.”
Chapter 1: Good and Bad Reasoning
Deductive and Inductive REASONING
Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
Argumentation and Persuasion
Chapter 1 Definition Theory Causality
Win Every Argument Every Time
Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
New Rhetoric Journal PDN: read the sentence below and identify what techniques the authors used to support their claim. Come up with as many techniques.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
DEDUCTIVE REASONING Forensic Science.
2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Premise: If it’s a school day, then I have Geometry class.
Logical Fallacies.
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
Phil2303 intro to logic.
2.3 Deductive reasoning Brett Solberg AHS ’11-’12.
SUMMARY Logic and Reasoning.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Deductive and Inductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning Deductive reasoning begins with a general premise (statement) and moves to a specific conclusion.

Example Premise 1:All men are mortal Premise 2:Socrates is a man ____________________________ Conclusion:Socrates is mortal

An argument is valid if the conclusion comes logically from the premise.

Example Premise 1:All men are women Premise 2:Mr. Z. is a man. _______________ Conclusion:Mr. Z. is a woman.

This argument is valid, but not true.

An argument is sound when it is both true and valid.

Example P 1:All Meadowdale High School students who complete their senior projects by April will graduate this spring. P 2:Bruno has complete his senior project. _______________________________ C:Bruno will graduate this spring.

Inductive reasoning begins with specific premises leading to a general conclusion. _______________________

P1:Franky ate at DQ and threw up. P2:Kristina ate at DQ and threw up. P3:Justin ate at DQ and threw up. __________________________ The food at DQ made Franky, Kristina and Justin throw up.

Or… P1:A man lies on the floor of his kitchen. P2:He is surrounded by a red puddle. P3:A knife lies nearby. P4:The front door is open. _______________________