SELF STUDY: COUNTDOWN TO THE TEAM VISIT MSCHE ANNUAL CONFERENCE – 2009 Debra Klinman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation Team Chair Training
Advertisements

Interpreting & Applying the Standards October 4, 2006 Dr. Luis J. Pedraja, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Evaluator 102: An Introduction to Interpreting the Standards Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Evaluator 101: An Introduction to Serving as a MSCHE Evaluator Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Chairs & Evaluators Workshop: Interpreting the Standards Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs) MSCHE annual conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President.
Follow-up Reporting Expectations Part II MSCHE 2009 Annual Conference Mary Ellen Petrisko.
Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2009 Mary Ellen Petrisko.
Tips and Strategies for Chairing a Successful Team Visit
MSCHE Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko Linda Suskie.
THE PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT: RE-ACCREDITATION AT THE MID-POINT MSCHE Annual Conference – 2010 Debra G. Klinman Vice President, MSCHE.
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs)
THE PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT: RE-ACCREDITATION AT THE MID-POINT MSCHE Annual Conference – 2011 Debra G. Klinman, PhD Vice President.
Everyone take out something to write on. You will take notes. Curating a High-Impact Document Room: Ten Things Were Glad We Did Jacqueline Andrews, Linda.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Presented by Dr. Tanmay Pramanik Overview of On-Site Team Evaluation.
Planning for Academic Program Review Site Visits
So what can I expect when I serve on a NEASC/CPSS Visiting Committee? A Primer for New Visiting Committee Members.
1 Apply now to become a host for the school year!
Rejected! Rebounding From and Moving Forward Following a Monitoring Report Requirement.
How to Interpret and Apply the Characteristics of Excellence: A Framework for Determining Compliance Karen Stout, President Montgomery County Community.
Evaluation Team Chair Training Presented By Dr. Tim Eaton TRACS Regional Representative.
Preparing for NCATE October 22-26, 2005 Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
2014 External Review Team Conference Call: Preparing the Team for Off-site Review Work.
The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
DEBRA G. KLINMAN, PH.D. ELLIE A. FOGARTY, ED.D. VICE PRESIDENTS, MSCHE Tips, Strategies, and Best Practices for Team Chairs.
An Overview of the Accreditation Process and Important Policies Megan Scanlan, Director of Accreditation, Stacy Wright, Site Visit.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
The Months and The Seasons Prepared by Claudia Doria and Terra Myers.
Outcomes Assessment Forum April 5, 2011 Assessment at Queens College – Preparing for the Middle States Periodic Review Report Steven Schwarz, Associate.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Planning for Academic Program Review Site Visits
Quality Assurance Review Peoria Unified School District #11.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
Modupe Akinola, PhD Columbia University La Verne Hairston Higgins, PhD, GPHR, SPHR Eastern Michigan University.
District Accreditation as a Quality System Presented by Mary Beth Huber On behalf of the Calcasieu Parish SACS CASI Steering Committee.
External Review Team Conference Call: Preparing the Team for Off-site Review Work.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the New Members of the Board of Trustees, September.
HLC and Me What does HLC stand for? Hydrocarbolyte Liquid Crystal Holy Living in Communion Her Left Cheek Hysterical Laughing Clown Whatever it is I don’t.
So What Can I Expect When I Serve on an NEASC/CPSS Visiting Team? A Primer for New Team Members.
Presentation for Flex Day June 7, 2011 LATTC Accreditation
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence Nuts & Bolts: How to plan for a CTC Accreditation Visit October 2008.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.
NCAA Division III Compliance Concepts NCAA Division III Compliance Concepts2014.
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Overview Origin, Purpose and Benefits. Athletics Certification Process. Operating Principles. Measurable Standards.
Working Group Training Compiling Evidence for a Successful Chapter LaMont Rouse, Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
2006 BYU Reaffirmation of NWCCU Accreditation Executive Accreditation Committee February 12, 2006.
A P RACTICAL G UIDE FOR F IRST T IME C HAIRS OF D ECENNIAL R EVIEWS Charles Caramello Associate Provost and Dean of the Graduate School University of Maryland.
Middle States Self-Study Process : 2013 College Senate SUNY Oneonta October 15, 2012.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Objectives and goals of a follow-up mission Requesting an IRRS follow-up mission.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
A STUDENT’S GUIDE ACCREDITATION WHAT IS ACCREDITATION? The process by which a college is certified by a regional accrediting agency, such as the.
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
Committee on University Effectiveness Working Group on Institutional Assessment April 8, 2011.
Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
The NJIT Accreditation Process: Launching the Middle States Commission on Higher Education Self Study Presentation to Committee on Academic Affairs September.
Program Evaluation Workshop Overview of the Site Visit Process Rita Marie Cain Professor of Business Law, Bloch School.
Rec Clubs Winter Training 11/11/2015. Issues While Travelling Who to contact- Hotel/Flight/Off Campus Rental Cars-Paul Oldham On Campus Rental.
NCATE VISIT Ready, set, go… How can you help? February 3, 2012.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Timing of Preparations Standard IRRS Preparation Timeline Schedule of the Mission.
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Purpose and Benefits.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
PREPARING FOR THE SACSCOC CANDIDACY COMMITTEE VISIT
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Accreditation 2016 A student’s guide.
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
Presentation transcript:

SELF STUDY: COUNTDOWN TO THE TEAM VISIT MSCHE ANNUAL CONFERENCE – 2009 Debra Klinman

TYPICAL TIMELINE Fall Academic Year 1 – Self Study Institute Fall Academic Year 1 – Self Study Institute Spring Academic Year 1 – MSCHE Liaison Spring Academic Year 1 – MSCHE Liaison Self-Study Preparation Visit Winter Academic Year 2 – Select Team Chair Winter Academic Year 2 – Select Team Chair Fall Academic Year 2 – Complete Team Roster Fall Academic Year 2 – Complete Team Roster Fall Academic Year 2 – Chair’s Preliminary Visit Fall Academic Year 2 – Chair’s Preliminary Visit Spring Academic Year 3 – Evaluation Team Visit Spring Academic Year 3 – Evaluation Team Visit

TEAM VISIT DATES & COMMISSION ACTION VISIT VISIT April 16 – September 1 September 2 – Dec.15 December 16 – April 15 ACTION ACTIONMid-November Late Feb./early March Late June

CHAIR’S PRELIMINARY VISIT Purpose is to ensure that the team visit will be productive Purpose is to ensure that the team visit will be productive Discuss campus readiness, self-study design & report, team roster, work room & accommodations, document room, schedule of interviews, oral exit report Discuss campus readiness, self-study design & report, team roster, work room & accommodations, document room, schedule of interviews, oral exit report “Dress rehearsal” for the team visit “Dress rehearsal” for the team visit

GETTING READY FOR THE TEAM VISIT Send all self-study materials to each team member (at least 6 weeks before visit) Send all self-study materials to each team member (at least 6 weeks before visit) Send information about travel, hotel, campus map (at least 2 weeks before visit) Send information about travel, hotel, campus map (at least 2 weeks before visit) Remember that each team member is a colleague and a volunteer! Remember that each team member is a colleague and a volunteer!

TYPICAL TEAM SCHEDULE SUNDAY: Arrival, team meeting, host's reception, evening work session SUNDAY: Arrival, team meeting, host's reception, evening work session MONDAY & TUESDAY: Interviews & documents, lunch on campus, team dinner, evening work session MONDAY & TUESDAY: Interviews & documents, lunch on campus, team dinner, evening work session WEDNESDAY: Oral exit report & departure WEDNESDAY: Oral exit report & departure

THE TEAM REPORT Is the institution in compliance with all 14 Standards? Is the institution in compliance with all 14 Standards? Suggestions – collegial advice Suggestions – collegial advice Recommendations – improvement advised to remain in compliance; institution must report on these in next PRR Recommendations – improvement advised to remain in compliance; institution must report on these in next PRR Requirements – institution is out of compliance on one or more Standards Requirements – institution is out of compliance on one or more Standards Institution provides formal response Institution provides formal response

TYPICAL COMMISSION ACTIONS Reaffirm accrediation Reaffirm accrediation Commend instituion Commend instituion Request progress letter Request progress letter Request monitoring report Request monitoring report Place institution on warning Place institution on warning

COMMISSION ACTIONS self studies reviewed 41 self studies reviewed 40 affirmed; 1 postponed 40 affirmed; 1 postponed 10 commended 10 commended 12 progress letters (30%) 12 progress letters (30%) 15 monitoring reports (38%) 15 monitoring reports (38%)

STANDARDS REQUIRING THE MOST FOLLOW-UP Standard 14: Assessment of Student Learning (48% of institutions) Standard 14: Assessment of Student Learning (48% of institutions) Standard 7: Institutional Assessment (28%) Standard 7: Institutional Assessment (28%) Standard 2: Planning & Renewal (25%) Standard 2: Planning & Renewal (25%) Standard 3: Institutional Resources (22%) Standard 3: Institutional Resources (22%) Standard 4: Leadership & Governance (15%) Standard 4: Leadership & Governance (15%) Standard 12: General Education (15%) Standard 12: General Education (15%)

NEED MORE INFORMATION? Team Visits: Conducting & Hosting an Evaluation Visit (September 2009); available at Team Visits: Conducting & Hosting an Evaluation Visit (September 2009); available at Contact your Team Chairperson Contact your Team Chairperson Contact your MSCHE liaison Contact your MSCHE liaison

QUESTIONS?