Descartes’ cosmological argument. Argument from Perfection 1. I have the idea of perfection within me. 2. I am not perfect. 3. An effect must be at least.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How do we know what exists?
Advertisements

© Michael Lacewing Innate ideas Michael Lacewing.
Meditation IV God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error.
The ontological argument. I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor.
The Role of God in the Meditations (1) Context
The Ontological Argument. Anselm’s Argument So the fool has to agree that the concept of something than which nothing greater can be thought exists in.
Descartes’ cosmological argument
Descartes’ trademark argument Michael Lacewing
Meditations on First Philosophy
Descartes’ Meditations. Suppose Descartes has proven his own existence as a thinking thing: Can he prove anything else with absolute certainty? Mathematics?
Bigquestions.co.uk1 meditation 3, the trademark argument perfection.
Malcolm’s ontological argument Michael Lacewing
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
Skepticism The Causal Argument. God A nd now I seem to discover a path that will conduct us from the contemplation of the true God, in whom are contained.
Cosmological arguments from causation Michael Lacewing
 The cosmological argument is, as it’s name sugessts (from the greek cosmos, meaning ‘universe’ or ‘world’). An a posteriori argument for the existence.
Knowledge empiricism Michael Lacewing
René Descartes The father of modern Western philosophy and the epistemological turn Methodological doubt, his dreaming argument and the evil.
Empiricism: David Hume ( ) Our knowledge of the world is based on sense impressions. Such “matters of fact” are based on experience (i.e., a posteriori.
Phil 1000 Bradley Monton Class 2 The Cosmological Argument.
Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain. Since.
Proof of God cont. Therefore, there is a mind that is causing my perceptual ideas. Therefore, there is a mind that is causing my perceptual ideas. But.
Results from Meditation 2
Descartes I am essentially rational, only accidentally an animal ‘essentially’ = logically necessarily ‘essentially’ = logically necessarily Strictly speaking,
Modern Philosophers Rationalists –Descartes –Spinoza –Leibniz Empiricists –Locke –Berkeley –Hume Epistemology - the theory of knowledge (what and how we.
The Cosmological Argument (Causation or ‘first cause’ theory)
Epistemology Revision
 According to philosophical skepticism, we can’t have knowledge of the external world.
© Michael Lacewing Reason and experience Michael Lacewing
College Algebra Fifth Edition James Stewart Lothar Redlin Saleem Watson.
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
Rene Descartes 1596—1650. Some dates 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1633: Galileo.
Is God a Deceiver? (P1)The idea I have of God is of an infinitely perfect being. (P2)The cause of such an idea must itself be infinitely perfect. (P3)Therefore,
© Michael Lacewing Doubt in Descartes’ Meditations Michael Lacewing
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
1.Everything which begins to exist has a cause. 2.The Universe exists so it must have a cause. 3.You cannot have infinite regress (i.e. An infinite number.
LECTURE 19 THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT CONTINUED. THE QUANTUM MECHANICAL OBJECTION DEPENDS UPON A PARTICULAR INTERPRETATION WE MIGHT REASONABLY SUSPEND.
After the first dialogue, Hylas admits, he is a skeptic—but so are you, he says to Philonous Phil: Not so! Skepticism only follows if you start by assuming.
Arguments for The Existence of God Ontological Cosmological Telelogical Ontological Cosmological Telelogical.
Anselm’s “1st” ontological argument Something than which nothing greater can be thought of cannot exist only as an idea in the mind because, in addition.
René Descartes (1596–1650) Cartesian Substance Dualism.
Meditation 3. Clear & Distinct Ideas Knows that he, “a thinking thing”, exists. Believes he exists because it is so “clearly and distinctly” so – this.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Sequences and Series.
Lauren Dobbs “Cogito ergo sum”. Bio  Descartes was a French born philosopher from the 1600’s.  He’s most famous for his “Meditations on First Philosophy”
Meditations: 3 & 4.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
Argument Against Empiricism (P1)Because we have no reliable method for error-correction, we can’t be certain that we are not dreaming/deluded/ brains-in-vats.
Cartesian Circle General Meaning: The veil of ideas that separates us from the external world in the Mind’s Eye Model, the general difficulty of trying.
Descartes II. First Argument for the Existence of God (P1)There must be at least as much reality and perfection in a cause as in its effect. (P2)If an.
DESCARTES: MEDITATION 3 OR: THE WORLD REGAINED — WITH CERTAINTY(?)
The essence of material things and the ontological argument.
Cosmological arguments from contingency
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Arguments for The Existence of God
Concept Innatism.
Explaining the universe
Descartes’ trademark argument
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Kant’s objection to ontological arguments
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
Aim: To explore Descartes support of the Ontological Argument.
Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain
Descartes -- Meditations Three
Philosophy Sept 28th Objective Opener 10 minutes
Arguments for The Existence of God
IN SUPPORT OF THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error
Presentation transcript:

Descartes’ cosmological argument

Argument from Perfection 1. I have the idea of perfection within me. 2. I am not perfect. 3. An effect must be at least as real as its cause. 4. The idea of perfection has more reality than I do, since I’m imperfect. 5. Thus, the idea of perfection was caused by something perfect. 6. Thus, something perfect exists.

Argument from Infinity 1. I have the idea of the infinite within me. 2. I am not infinite. (I’m finite) 3. An effect must be at least as real as its cause. 4. The idea of infinity has more reality than I do, since I’m finite. 5. Thus, the idea of the infinite was caused by something infinite. 6. Thus, something infinite exists.

Synthetic Propositions Propositions whose truth value is not determined solely by the concepts involved. “The predicate goes beyond the subject.” W.V.O. Quine

Examples I have a ring on my finger. My hair is blonde. I have the idea of perfection within me. The Astros are playing well.

The argument I am a thinking thing and I have the idea of God. There must be as much reality in the cause as in the effect. Therefore, what caused me must be a thinking thing and have the idea of God.

The argument Either what caused me is the cause of its own existence or its existence is caused by another cause. If its existence is caused by another cause, then its cause is in turn either the cause of its own existence or its existence is caused by another cause. There cannot be an infinite sequence of causes. Therefore, some cause must be the cause of its own existence. What is the cause of its own existence (and so, directly or indirectly, the cause of my existence) is God.

An additional argument Some cause is needed to keep me in existence. There cannot be an infinite chain of causes because what caused me also causes my continued existence in the present. My parents, or any other supposed cause of my existence, do not keep me in existence. The only cause that could keep me in existence is God.

Objection: the causal principle Descartes assumes that everything has a cause. Is this true? –It is not analytic, so it is not certain –Quantum mechanics suggests some events have no strict causes. –Ex. Radioactive decay, maybe some gasses (Poincare’s Conjecture), etc.

Bad Start, Good Finish Objection “My view of perfection is different from yours.” Suppose something which neither of us can think of satisfies both our views of perfection. Then, we do have the idea of perfection; it’s just not quite right. Does Descartes need our idea of perfection to be perfect?