Decision Support Tool for Infrastructure Improvement Elsit Mandal MGIS –Capstone Project Peer Review Advisor: Dr. Jan Wallgrun Disclaimer: KDOT data or.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oregon Freight Plan July 28, Linking Freight Improvements to Economic Growth Travel Time Freight Transportation Improvements Productivity Competitiveness.
Advertisements

Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study -- Benefit Assessment Presented by: Jack Lettiere, Commissioner New Jersey Department of Transportation Presented to:
 Permitting Routing › Definition › Permits Type › Permitting Process  Project Purpose › Proposed Solution  GIS › Definition › Functions › Benefits.
GIS and Transportation Planning
Governor’s Freight Industry Summit Draft November 12, 2012 Sandra K. Beaupre’ Wisconsin DOT Governor’s Freight Industry Summit Draft November 12, 2012.
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
Overview  Improving highway safety is a priority for all state transportation departments.  Key roadway characteristics can be used to identify sections.
I-69 Strategic Planning Corridor Study: Fulton To Eddyville, KY Fulton, Hickman, Graves, Marshall, Livingston, Lyon Counties Public Meeting November 15,
Designated by US DOT Publication of Draft PFN for Comments - Spring 2013 Initial Designation of the PFN – Fall 2013 National Freight Network Primary Freight.
TRANSIMS Research and Deployment Project TRACC TSM Staff Dr. Vadim Sokolov Dr. Joshua Auld Dr. Kuilin Zhang Mr. Michael Hope.
Washington State Truck Freight Performance Measure Research Interim Report Dale A Tabat Truck Freight Program and Policy Manager Freight Systems Division.
DETERMINATION OF FREIGHT CORRIDORS FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Texas A&M University Civil Engineering Department CVEN April 28, 2003 ADHARA CASTELBLANCO.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
Framework for Model Development General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Development of.
TRANSPORTATION ECONOMIC AND LAND USE SYSTEM (TELUS) T E L U M Interactive Software for Integrated Land Use and Transportation Modeling.
Geoinfosys Technologies New Delhi 9 th February 2012 Development of ‘Geographical Information System’ (GIS) based “Decision Support System for Transport”
Barbara Ivanov Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Freight Systems Division Director Washington State Freight Mobility Plan Truck Freight.
WVDOT GTI SECTION Status Update for Districts. AGENDA Introduction. Introduction. Status Update. Status Update. How to Spatially Enable Database. How.
Getting More Value from All Highway Data FHWA’s Current Initiatives and Future Plans Presented at Data System Requirements and Gaps to Support Restructuring.
15 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Tuesday, May 19 th, 2015 – Atlantic City, NJ Integrating Travel Demand Models & SHRP2 C11 Tools:
Freight Analysis Framework version 3 (FAF3) __________ Talking Freight Webinar October 2010.
October 21, 2013 Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief Wisconsin Department of Transportation 1 TRB – SHRP2 Symposium: Innovations in Freight.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Overview to CDOT Policies and Guidance Transit and Rail Advisory Committee Meeting April 13, 2012.
ArcGIS Network Analyst: Network Analysis with ArcGIS Online
LAND EVALUATION SITE ASSESSMENT (LESA) GIS APPLICATION REDESIGN Brad M. Shirey, GISP The Pennsylvania State University Master of GIS Program – Capstone.
AT Benefit Cost Analysis Model Highway Design, Project Management and Training Section Technical Standards Branch Presented by Bill Kenny, Director: Design,
A Geographic Analysis of Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) Data for North GA Tim Branscomb Geog 596A Capstone Proposal Penn State MGIS Program.
Network Analysis with Python
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
WVDOT/MPO/FHWA Transportation Planning Conference WVDOT Traffic Data Collection, Processing and Analysis Handbook Presented to September 16, 2015 Presented.
North Carolina’s New Statewide Road Centerline Data Sarah Wray, GISP, CGCIOTim Sheldon, GISP Spatial Data ManagerBusiness Analyst Engineering Transportation.
Cameron Smith, GIS Manager.  Introductions A Geographic Information System or GIS is a computer system that allows you to map, model, query, and analyze.
OREGON ECONOMIC & BRIDGE OPTIONS STUDY The problem is not just the bridges, or the freight system, It is about Oregon’s economy and quality of life. FHWA.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR HIGHWAY CAPACITY DECISION MAKING WEST VIRGINIA PLANNING CONFERENCE – SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 SALEEM SALAMEH, P.E., PH.D. KYOVA IPC.
Bangkok September, Economic Integration 2 Bangkok September, 2012.
Presentation Topics Oregon Transportation Investment Acts (OTIA) Goals of Statewide Traffic Mobility Program Focus of ODOT’s Mobility Approaches Results.
TRANSPORTATION ECONOMIC AND LAND USE SYSTEM (TELUS) TELUM – Interactive Software for Evaluating Land Use Implications of Transportation Projects 11th TRB.
INYO NATIONAL FOREST - TRAVEL ANALYSIS PROCESS Public Meeting – April 21, 2015.
Ohio Department of Transportation Steering Committee Meeting #3 Steering Committee Meeting #1May 30, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Steering.
An ENIF Image Is Worth A Thousand Lines of EMME/2 Output By Steve Hayto, PEng, S5 Services Carlos M Perez, PEng, Delcan Corporation 19 th Annual International.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
DRIVE Net: An E-Science Transportation Platform for Big Data, Big Discoveries, and Big Decisions PacTrans STAR Lab University of Washington July 17, 2015.
Praveen Pasumarthy, P.E., PTOE, CDM Smith Chris Edmonston, AICP, FDOT Paul Fang, FDOT INNOVATIVE METHODOLOGY TO IDENTIFY CONGESTED ROADWAYS AND BOTTLENECKS.
Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager. Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager Use Cube Base and Cube Voyager to develop data, run scenarios, and examine.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
Eric Wing, GISP July 6, 2010 Penn State Advisor: Dr. Todd Bacastow Leveraging Linear Referencing to Map Sewer Events from CCTV Logs.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Update for VTrans2025 Technical Committee April 12, 2006.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE Transport Division 1 TRANS-EUROPEAN RAILWAY (TER) PROJECT 2 nd Expert Group Meeting (Budapest, 23 September.
FHWA Office of Freight Management Freight Technology Assessment Tool.
Analyzing Changes to Truck Size and Weight Regulations Methods for States presented to AASHTO Subcommittee on Highway Transport presented by Donald Ludlow,
Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Advisory Committees September
Lakes Region Transportation Workshop November 15, 2013.
DRIVE Net: A Large-Scale Online Data Platform for Performance Analysis and Decision Support Yinhai Wang PacTrans STAR Lab University of Washington
Utah Research Benefits Value of Research Taskforce July 29, 2015 Cameron Kergaye Utah Department of Transportation.
Abstract Background Methodology Methods While the project is in the data-collection and background research phase, there are several studies that utilize.
Mike McColeman, P.E. Assistant Maintenance Administrator Ohio Department of Transportation Defining Desired Outcomes Defining Desired Outcomes.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge) Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens’ Advisory.
Freight Railway Integration Strategy For Inter-American Development Bank Transport Week 2009 by Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) Subsidiary.
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES, RANKING AND PRIORITIZATION CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLANS INCORPORATION INTO STIP & TIP STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION MONITOR.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
Road Investment Decision Framework
October 22, 2013 Ontario Ministry of Transportation Transportation Planning Branch Systems Analysis and Forecasting Office Rob Tardif Ontario Update on.
Introduction Most samples in Household Travel Surveys (HTS) complete via web Geocoding is an important element in HTS collection Online geocoding services.
ArcGIS Decision Support Tool for Infrastructure Improvement
Network Analysis with ArcGIS Online
2017 SCORT Conference Washington, DC
Presentation transcript:

Decision Support Tool for Infrastructure Improvement Elsit Mandal MGIS –Capstone Project Peer Review Advisor: Dr. Jan Wallgrun Disclaimer: KDOT data or information on these slides are displayed only for academic purposes. 1

Presentation Outline Introduction Background Motivation Goal Approach Timeline References 2

Introduction Factors affecting Transportation Cost – fuel cost, vehicle operating cost, travel time travel time impacted by speed limit, length of route, traffic congestion Funding is Scarce – Infrastructure improvement is cost intensive 3

Background The Location Advantage! Credit: KDOT/Kansas Freight Advisory Committee 4

Freight Corridors of Significance Credit: KDOT/Kansas Freight Advisory Committee (2014) 5

About 950 bridges passing over State Highway System [corrected number of bridges] Approx. 70 Bridges passing over Interstate has <15 feet vertical clearance [ corrected number of bridges ] Bridge Vertical Clearance Map-State Highway System Credit: KDOT Bureau of Structures & Geotechnical Services 6

Age of Bridges in Kansas Credit: KDOT Bureau of Structures & Geotechnical Services 7

Load Restricted Bridges Credit: KDOT Bureau of Structures & Geotechnical Services 8

Structurally Deficient Bridges Credit: KDOT Bureau of Structures & Geotechnical Services 9

Exploring KTRIPS Data-Oversize/Overweight Truck Travel Patterns (Sample One month Data from KTRIPS-Truck Route Permit System-Truck Ht < 15 Ft) 10

Motivation Prioritizing Projects-Limited Funding Traditionally, Investment decisions are made based up on physical condition More beneficial to consider multiple criteria for allocating investments (Arif, Bayraktar & Chowdhury, 2015) Decision Support System (DSS) would be helpful Growth in GIS technologies enabled Spatial Decision Support Systems (SDSS) Address the limitations of already existing DSS, by utilizing location data 11

Motivation-Contd. Available software TransCAD (by Caliper Corp.) – Special GIS software for transportation planning – Transportation travel demand modeling and forecasting – Single user licenses costing $15,000 – Customization will be needed to automate analysis TREDIS: Transportation Economic Development Impact System – (no travel demand model, can take input from TRANSCAD) Bridge Management System – AASHTOWare BrM (specific to Bridge –not much GIS functionality) ArcGIS products and extensions-general GIS software – Widely deployed with ELA, several concurrent licenses, many out of the box tools – Large User community, easy to customize with python – Broad access to GIS platform, Increased business intelligence 12

Goal Develop an ArcGIS tool to support selection of candidate bridges for improvement or rehabilitation Network Analyst extension & ESRI Streetmap required – Inputs Origin-Destination Pairs. – Truck traffic spatial geometry captured by Kansas Truck Routing Intelligent Permitting System (KTRIPS) as traffic demand Attributes include Truck height, weight and length Barriers. – Input restricted bridges as barriers. Attributes should include posted weight restrictions, vertical clearances and cost to improve or replace each one of the bridges Available funding – Anticipated Output Tool should maximize benefit/cost and output a list of candidate bridges. 13

Anticipated Output Prioritized list of bridges 14

Approach Identify Origin-Destination (O-D)Pairs by analyzing KTRIPs data – Have 2 years worth of KTRIPS data Create an O-D Cost matrix before improvement of bridges – Bridges with Height/weight restrictions act as barriers. Travel time is the cost Remove barriers or ‘barrier groups’ one by one from the route network (barrier groups will be explained later) – Investment constraint limits the number of barriers that can be removed. Recalculate travel cost matrix for various barrier removal scenarios to identify minimum cost (min. travel time) scenario 15

Approach- Cont. Calculate total saved time for each scenario of barrier removal Calculate a priority index for each bridge or bridge group obtained as travel time saving/cost of improvement. Select as many bridges with highest priority index, as possible, from this ordered list as the amount of investment allows 16

Approach Cont. Barrier Groups Bridges between interchanges 17

Potential Grouping-To Investigate Investigate how to include all potential grouping effects – Grouping effect is present when the saving in time when the group of barriers are removed > the sum of savings when the barrier removal is done one at a time Group bridges on First level of interconnected segments Group bridges on freight corridor segments Freight corridor segments can be accommodated in the route hierarchy 18

Model Builder Work Flow-Network Analyst Origin-Destination (O-D) Cost Matrix 19

Sample User Interface-Data Input 20

Sample O-D cost matrix output 21

Prototyping of the Tool Invite feedback from interested users – Statewide Planning Users of TransCAD for traffic modeling & transportation planning studies and TREDIS for economic impact – Bridge Management Users of Bridge Management software (AASHTOWare BrM) 22

Project Timelines January-April 2016 – Build Prototype, Demo/user testing, prepare survey questions, collect user feedback May-July 2016 – Data Analysis & Exploration August-December 2016 – Tool Development, Testing and Documentation Spring – 596B, Presentation at ESRI User Conference April

References 1. Arif, Farrukh., Bayaraktar,Mehmet E., Chowdhury, Arindham G., Decision Support Framework for Infrastructure Maintenance Investment Decision Making, Journal of Management In Engineering, ASCE, TRANSCAD, Transportation Planning Software, Caliper Corp., Retrieved November 12, An Analysis of the Operational Cost of Trucking, A 2014 Update, American Transportation Research Institute, September content/uploads/2014/09/ATRI-Operational-Costs-of-Trucking-2014-FINAL.pdf, retrieved December 1, Kansas DOT, KDOT vertical clearance maps, retrieved October 27, FHWA, retrieved October 27, Kansas DOT, retrieved October 27,

References-Cont. 7. FHWA, retrieved October 30, FHWA, Vertical Clearance, ance.cfm, retrieved October 24, Kansas Department of Revenue, retrieved November 15, Resources for Measuring Transportation Costs and Benefits, Transportation Costs & Benefits, Victoria Transportation Policy Institute, retrieved November 15, OD Cost Matrix, retrieved November 10, ASCE, retrieved December 8, : Sugumaran, R.,Degroote, J., Spatial Decision Support systems: Principles and Practices, CRC Press, Ringgold Inc, Portland, USA,

Acknowledgements KDOT David Cronister David Schwartz Kyle Gonterwitz Calvin Reed Tina Cramer Penn State Dr. Jan Wallgrun 26

Questions? ……… THANK YOU! 27