Experimental Study of the BEPC Ⅱ Backgrounds JIN Da-Peng IHEP, Beijing, China Representing the Backgrounds Study Group May 11, 2007, BEPC Ⅱ IMAC Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background issues in the KEKB
Advertisements

Plot Approval Yat Long Chan (CUHK) Igor Mandic (Ljubljana) Charlie Young (SLAC)
Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
ECLOUD Calculations of Field Gradients During Bunch Passage Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education Electron Cloud.
F.Brinker, DESY, July 17 st 2008 Injection to Doris and Petra Fitting the detector in the IP-region Radiation issues Beam optic, Target cell Polarisation.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
The strategy of Accelerator based High Energy Physics of China J. Gao On behalf of CEPC+SppC Group IHEP, CAS, China Roundtable discussion: “Future machines“
Radiation-protection experience at Belle / summary of beam abort system 22 September, 2003 T.Tsuboyama (KEK)
Working Group 3 Summary M. Sullivan / Y. Funakoshi.
Operational Experience with machine backgrounds at KEKB 23 September 2003 T.Tsuboyama (KEK)
Background Issues: Real Time Radiation Measurement S.M.Yang EPC.IHEP Mini-Workshop on BEPCII Background Study March 2008 Institute of High Energy.
Design of the Photon Collimators for the ILC Positron Helical Undulator Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Positron Source Meeting, July 2008.
Beijing, Feb 3 rd, 2007 LEPOL 1 Low Energy Positron Polarimetry for the ILC Sabine Riemann (DESY) On behalf of the LEPOL Collaboration.
FACET Machine Performance and Expectations M. Sullivan for the FACET Accelerator group SAREC Review July 25, 2013.
1/18 The Distribution of Synchrotron Radiation Power in the IR C. H. Yu IR Overview SR Distribution in the IR The Protection of SR Power.
Xiao-Yan Zhao Beam Instrumentation Group Accelerator Center, IHEP BEPCII Background Issues: Beam Loss Measurement.
BEPCII Prealignment Installation Survey and Alignment Accelerator Center of IHEP Xiaolong Wang
IR summary M. Sullivan Nov. 3, 2011 JLAB MEIC IR workshop.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Analysis of 2008 Beam Instability Data S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, M. Plum HB2008.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
Integrated Radiation Measurement and Radiation Protection of BES Ⅲ Zhang Qingjiang, Wu protection group, accelerator center, IHEP,
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
1 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle.
First Collision of BEPCII C.H. Yu May 10, Methods of collision tuning Procedures and data analysis Luminosity and background Summary.
Simulation on beam loss from radiative Bhabha process Y. Funakoshi KEK.
M. WeaverB-Factory Operations Review April 24, 2006 BaBar Backgrounds Matt Weaver B-Factory Operations Review April 24, 2006.
Beam Physics Issue in BEPCII Commisionning Xu Gang Accelerator physics group.
WACH4 26/11/2002Julien Cogan CERN/EP/CMA-1- THERMAL STEPS ANALYSIS Goals & Means : –apply a “step function” on the cooling water –look at : APD response.
Beam Background Simulation at Belle/KEKB Motivation SR background Particle background Feedback to the detector design SR alarm Summary O. Tajima (Tohoku.
Problems of charge compensation in a ring e+e- higgs factory Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk 5 rd TLEP3 workshop, FNAL, July 25, 2013.
Ma zhongjian Ding yadong Wang qingbin Wu qingbiao Radiation Protection Group/IHEP.
The machine status and operating mechanism of BEPCII CAO, Jianshe Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS April 16, 2013 The 4th Accelerator.
After Protons from RCS 1 st DeeMe Collaboration Meeting Dec. 10, 2012 Kazami Yamamoto J-PARC Center Accelerator Division.
Beam Instrumentation of CEPC Yue Junhui (岳军会) for the BI Group Accelerator Center, IHEP HF2014.
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
M. Sullivan Apr 27, 2017 MDI meeting
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Jim Crittenden CHESS Simulation Working Group 30 March 2015
M. Sullivan International Review Committee November 12-13, 2007
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
Introduction to the Backgrounds Study in the BEPCⅡ/BESⅢ
Energy deposition studies in IR7 for HL-LHC
Superconductivity in the BEPCII Performance
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Top-Up Injection for PEP-II and Applications to a Higgs Factory
Beam Background and the SVT Protection Collimator
Recent studies on BEPCII longitudinal impedance
Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group
Sensitivity tests of BLM_S chamber in PSB dump
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Luminometer Integration at IR2
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Design of Interaction Region
Mini-Workshop on BEPCII Background Study
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Local double ring MDI Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
BEPCII Background Issues: Collimators and Masks
Commissioning Issues of BEPCII
Low Energy Electron-Ion Collision
Polarized Positrons in JLEIC
JLEIC Reaching 140 GeV CM Energy: Concept and Luminosity Estimate
CEPC Radiation and Shielding
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
Presentation transcript:

Experimental Study of the BEPC Ⅱ Backgrounds JIN Da-Peng IHEP, Beijing, China Representing the Backgrounds Study Group May 11, 2007, BEPC Ⅱ IMAC Meeting

Outline  Motivation  Radiation detectors arrangement  Preliminary results  Next to do

Motivation 1. Take means to protect the detectors from being damaged 2. Provide good environment for data taking BEPC Ⅱ is going well

Radiation Detectors Arrangement

Magnified View Fork Pipe Both Beams e- Beam On Mar. 27, 2007, 2# was moved to 5#

Detectors in the right places

Parameters of the Radiation Detectors PIN Diodes – 0.25nA/mrad·s -1 – Damage: 1~10nA/krad – Temp Dep: 1.11times/ o C – Accuracy: ~5mrad/s RadFETs – Range: 20,000rad – Accuracy: 1.5rad – Freq: 10min

Preliminary Results 1#, 2#, 3#, 4# : 75cm from the IP; 6# : 3.31m from the IP. 160nA 80nA

Preliminary Results 5# : 2.22m from the IP. 3000nA More than 1000nA

Preliminary Results 5# detector suffers much more radiation doses than the others, which is more than one fold. Dominated doses for 5# detector are from the electron beam. 1#, 2#, 3#, 4# : 75cm from the IP; (Both beams) 6# : 3.31m from the IP; (Upper stream of e-) 5# : 2.22m from the IP. (Upper stream of e-)

Preliminary Results Electron Beam Tuning 1#, 2#, 3#, 4# : 75cm from the IP; 6# : 3.31m from the IP.

Preliminary Results Electron Beam Tuning 5# : 2.22m from the IP.

Preliminary Results Electron Beam Tuning Dose rates during injections are much higher than steady runs for each detector. InjectionsSteady Runs Dose Rate (mrad/s) Tens to Hundrends 0.5 to about Ten Int. Dose (rad/day) About 100 rad (4#) to Several Thousands (5#)

Preliminary Results Positron Beam Tuning 1#, 2#, 3#, 4# : 75cm from the IP; 6# : 3.31m from the IP.

Preliminary Results Positron Beam Tuning 5# : 2.22m from the IP.

Preliminary Results Positron Beam Tuning 5# and 6# detectors suffers less doses. Vertical detectors suffers less doses. For the horizontal detectors 1# and 3#, Outer Ring(1#).GT. Inner Ring(3#)

Preliminary Results Double Beam Tuning 2# moved to 5#.

Preliminary Results Double Beam Tuning 2# moved to 5#.

Preliminary Results Double Beam Tuning 2# moved to 5#. Really, Dose Rate at the fork pipe (about 2.2m from the IP) is much higher.

Preliminary Results Int. Dose to the CsI Crystals 30cm 40cm 50cm 60cm

Preliminary Results Int. Dose to the CsI Crystals 40cm 50cm 60cm

Preliminary Results Int. Dose to the CsI Crystals The maximum Int. dose at the position of the inner most CsI crystals is about 10rads/day, which is about 10 times that of the design value. Injections bring much more doses. The total Int. dose from the electron beam is higher than that from the positron beam.

Preliminary Results Int. Dose at the fork pipe

In the previous measurement, the Int. dose is.GT. 3000rads/day, which is mainly due to e- injections. In some cases, one turn injections can bring hundrends to one thousand rads Int. doses.

Preliminary Results Beam Loss Monitors IP No. 48No. 72 BLMs are sensitive with charged particles e+ e-

Preliminary Results Beam Loss Monitors

Why so high dose?  The accelerator needs to be well tuned, since we have just started.  In the currently used vacuum chambers, the radius near the fork pipe is smaller than the design values and makes here the bottleneck of the storage ring.  Collimators not installed.

Next to do  Further understand the results from the PIN Diodes, FETs and BLMs;  Deal with the backgrounds seriously and push ahead the manufacture and installation of the collimators;  Your suggestions??? Thanks!