CONTINUITY OF CARE IN A RE-ENTRY CONTEXT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STANDARDS OF CARE IN CUSTODY, AFTERCARE AND SOCIAL REINTEGRATION OF CHILD OFFENDERS.
Advertisements

Guideposts --Quality Work-Based Learning Programs
Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
MISSION: To protect the public and reduce crime by and reduce crime by holding youth offenders accountable and holding youth offenders accountable and.
1 NM Behavioral Health Collaborative New Mexico Behavioral Health Plan for Children, Youth and Their Families March 2007.
Virginia Juvenile Justice Association EFFECTIVE PAROLE TRANSITION & RE-ENTRY: WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN & HOW November 2, 2006 David M. Altschuler, Ph.D.
Denise Hinds, LMSW Associate Executive Director Foster Care, Juvenile Justice and Housing December 5, 2013 NON-SECURE PLACEMENT PROGRAMS AT GOOD SHEPHERD.
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Select Committee on Homelessness Hearing, The Road Home: Step Two Mental Health Systems Laura V. Otis-Miles, Ph.D., CPRP Vice President.
Evidence-Based Intervention Services Community Corrections Partnership October 27, 2011.
Ojjdp.gov T L O A Tribal Law and Order Act Overview of the Law’s Impact on Tribal Youth and Discussion on Juvenile Detention Centers with Laura Ansera,
Community-Oriented Defense Performance Indicators A Conceptual Overview Michael Rempel Center for Court Innovation Presented at the Community-Oriented.
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
Regional Conference to End Homelessness Norfolk, VA March 2012 Prepared by: Housing Innovations.
JUVENILE REENTRY IN CONCEPT AND PRACTICE February 2, 2010 David M. Altschuler, Ph.D. Institute for Policy Studies Johns Hopkins University Models for Change.
Reintegration, Re-Entry and Community Aftercare Presented by Dr. David M. Altschuler Jeff Bidmon Eric Shafer Linda Moffitt.
Understanding Juvenile Reentry as More than a Public Safety Issue November 1, 2011 National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention Thomas Murphy Office of.
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
Raising Standards & Improving Outcomes for Independent Living Services 6/14/00.
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Shared Family Care: An Innovative Model for Supporting & Restoring Families through Community Partnerships Amy Price, Associate Director National Abandoned.
The Impact of Reentry Services on Juvenile Offenders’ Recidivism Presented by: Jeffrey A. Bouffard, Ph.D. Co-Authored with Kathleen J. Bergseth All opinions.
An Overview of the Mental Health Remedial Plan California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Division of Juvenile Justice REDEFINING MENTAL HEALTH.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Improving the Commonwealth’s Services for Children and Families A Framework.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
Transforming the lives of Juveniles through raising the standards of practice: Justice for Our Youth: The JOY Project The Uninterrupted & Tailor-Made Routing.
ASSESSMENTS OF JUVENILE OFFENDERS THROUGH EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES
National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention Dennis Mondoro Strategic Community Development Officer Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community Section 6: Reentry.
"The Changing Expectations of Juvenile Justice in Texas"
Assessing the Risk of Offending Conference 24/02/2010 Siobhan Young IYJS.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
North Carolina TASC Clinical Series Training Module One: Understanding TASC.
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
The Coalition of Community Corrections Providers of New Jersey A Partnership Responding to Prisoner Re-entry.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
Review of Judicial Branch Activities in “Raise the Age” Presented by the Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division June 28, 2012.
Classification and Supervision in Probation and Parole
Shaping the Future of Transition Office of Transition Services NC Department of Correction May 2007.
Larry J. Siegel Brandon C. Welsh David R. Montague, Lisa Hutchinson & Sharniece R. Hughes University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
Background Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide a coordinated and comprehensive array of community-based services and supports to families.
TREATMENT OF THE JUVENILE OFFENDER CONCLUSIONS FROM THEORY AND RESEARCH DR. ROBERT D. HOGE DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY CARLETON UNIVERSITY OTTAWA, ONTARIO.
Community-Based Corrections for Juveniles
1 Therapeutic Community Treatment in Correctional Settings The Call for An Integrated System George De Leon, Ph.D. Center for Therapeutic Community Research.
Missouri Reentry… It’s a Process! George A. Lombardi, Director Missouri Department of Corrections.
Children’s Mental Health & Family Services Collaboratives ~ Minnesota’s Vision ~
Educational and Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Justice Youth What’s Wrong When We Know What’s Right? Ralph B. Thomas December 17, 2007.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
National Center for Youth in Custody First Things First: Risk and Needs Assessment Data to Determine Placement and Services Alternatives.
Copyright 2009 Northumberland County Council Safeguarding and Looked After Children’s Services Early Intervention and Prevention.
ACCELERATED COMMUNITY ENTRY United States District Court Western District of Michigan Robert Holmes Bell Chief Judge.
CLASSIFICATION Risk Institutional violence/misconduct Institutional violence/misconduct Suicide Suicide Recidivism Recidivism A standardized assessment.
Evidenced Based Protocols for Adult Drug Courts Jacqueline van Wormer, PhD Washington State University NADCP/NDCI.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Key Moments in NADCP History J UVENILE D RUG C OURT G UIDELINES J UVENILE D RUG C OURT G UIDELINES “A P REVIEW ” T ERRENCE D. W ALTON, MSW, CSAC C HIEF.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
Legislative Enhancements to Behavioral Health. Recent Legislation Behavioral Health Enhancements HB 7019/SB 7068 (2015) SB 12/HB 7097 (2016) Housing Assistance.
Therapeutic Residential Care: Developing evidence based international practice LISA HOLMES, DIRECTOR, CENTRE FOR CHILD AND FAMILY RESEARCH.
A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM OF CARE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Ken Berrick, Founder and Chief Executive Officer Seneca Center for Children and Families
Promising Practices in Criminal Justice Reform
Department of Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Why Does Housing Matter with the Justice Involved Population?
Comprehensive Youth Services
Marie Crosson, Executive Director
Keys to Housing Security
Presentation transcript:

CONTINUITY OF CARE IN A RE-ENTRY CONTEXT Wisconsin Juvenile Court Intake Association 25th Anniversary Conference Madison, WI CONTINUITY OF CARE IN A RE-ENTRY CONTEXT David M. Altschuler, Ph.D. Juvenile Reintegration and Aftercare Center Institute for Policy Studies Johns Hopkins University September 15, 2005

Strategies for Effective Aftercare and Reentry Programming Key Dimensions of Promising Practice Evidence-based, research-driven intervention/ treatment modalities (“What Works” approach) Structural characteristics and features for transitional/reentry delivery of services and supervision (Reintegrative Continuum) Personnel/leadership/training Issues Case management framework (essential elements for informed decision making, continuity, and consistency across the programming continuum) Requirement for multi-agency collaboration Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

Aftercare Defined Key Dimensions of Promising Practice Aftercare refers to those activities and tasks that: Prepare out-of-home placed juveniles for re-entry into the specific communities to which they will return Establish the necessary arrangements and linkages with the full range of public and private sector departments/organizations and individuals in the community that can address known risk and protective factors Ensure the delivery of prescribed services and supervision in the community As this definition implies, the residential facility and the community have a critical role to play in aftercare. Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

Reintegrative Continuum Point of Reentry Facility Transition Community Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

Critical Structural Considerations in Aftercare The Continuum of Intervention for Youth Corrections CONFINEMENT Institution Community Commitment Successful Termination NORMALIZATION TRANSITION 1. Pre-release Planning 3. Reintegration Activities 2. Structured Re-entry Reentry Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

IAP Reintegration Continuum Transitional Phase Institutional Transition Community Transition Commitment to Correctional Confinement Completion of Community Aftercare Institutional Phase Community-Based Phase Point of Reentry Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

Targeting Factors Predictive of Reoffending Behavior Assessment Completion of Community Supervision Transition Community Facility Family Issues Substance Abuse School Conflict/Performance Peerage Other Problems/Need Areas Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

Risk & Protective Factors: Seven Domains Family and Living Arrangements Peer Groups and Friends Mental, Behavioral, and Physical Health Substance Abuse Education and Schooling Vocational Training and Employment Leisure Time, Recreation, and Avocational Interests Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

Program Design Features in the Three Segments Institutional Phase Transitional Phase Community Follow-up 1. Pre-release planning 1. Testing & probing of re-entry prior to placement in community 1. Provision of multi-modal treatment services 2. Involvement of outside agencies & individuals in institutions 2. Structured step-down process using residential placement or intensive day treatment 2. Discrete case management services 3. Targeted community activities during confinement period 3. Use of graduated sanctions & positive incentives 4. Provision of supervision & surveillance beyond ordinary working hours 5. Reduced caseload size & increased frequency of client contact 6. Multi-stage decompression process Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

The Decompression Process in Reentry Structured Transition Phase Point of Community Reentry Decreasing Emphasis on Formal Mechanisms of Social Control by Juvenile Justice Increasing Emphasis on Informal Mechanisms of Social Control by the Community Termination of Formal Aftercare Status Community Involvement Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

Continuity of Care Components Continuity of Control Continuity in Range of Services Continuity in Service Content Continuity of Social Environment Continuity of Attachment Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

Case Management: 5 Components Assessment and Classification Individual Case Planning Surveillance/Service Mix Incentives and Consequences (Graduated Responses) Brokerage and Linkages Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

Assessment and Classification Eligibility: targeting populations Static Factors Dynamic/Criminogenic Factors Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

Individual Case Planning How will risk factors be addressed? How are strengths and assets tied to social networks? How will personal goals be structured? How will the total picture be addressed in reintegration? Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

Individual Case Planning High risk – high needs High levels of accountability High levels of service provision Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

Surveillance and Service Mix Advances in diagnostic procedures Intensive Supervision Issues Carefully targeted service provision & treatment matching Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

Graduated Responses: Incentives and Consequences Key Principles: Catch them being good Have a ready continuum of reinforcements and sanctions Difficult offenders may prefer incarceration over punitive supervision models Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

Graduated Responses: Incentives and Consequences Planned responses Behavioral contracts Shift responsibilities to youth and family Continuum of responses Must have most stringent sanction available Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

Service Brokerage and Linkage to Social Systems Contractual arrangements: accessing public and private services Partnerships with community-based organizations Community linkage and embeddedness Faith-based groups Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

Obstacles to Case Management in IAP Inadequate Funding Institution Based Resources Large Case Loads/Low Staffing Established Work Hours and Habits Poor Supervision Standards Insufficient Attention to Pre-Release Issues Distance Between Institution and Community Professional and Organizational Rigidity Crisis-Driven Management Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center

Implications/Solutions Directly link institutional and community corrections: Structure Policy Programs Practices Keep deterrence in check when it creates identifiable impediments to law-abiding self-sufficiency Juvenile Reintegration & Aftercare Center