Ethics in Public Life Deontology: applications. Kant in action Can a dwarf let be thrown? Conseil d’Etat, 27 Octobre 1995, N° 136727,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Higher RMPS Lesson 4 Kantian ethics.
Advertisements

March 27, 2012 Kantian Deontology. Act Utilitarianism An action is morally wrong if and only if there is an alternative action that produces a greater.
Non-Consequentialism
Michael Lacewing Can war be just? Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Categorical Imperative
1 I I Is Pre-Emptive War Wrong?. 2 Phillips’ Central Claim On the principle that just war requires both justice in going to war (jus ad bellum) and justice.
Deontology: the Ethics of Duty
categorical imperative
Phil 160 Kant.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative and Euthanasia
Deontological Ethics Deontological theory—Asserts that the rightness of actions is determined partly or entirely by their intrinsic value Consequentialist.
Ethics LL.B. STUDIES 2015 LECTURE 4. Deontology: Inspirations & Applications.
Components of Moral Actions
© Michael Lacewing Can war be just? Michael Lacewing
Kantian Ethics Exam Questions
Ethical Theories: Deontology and Teleology
Lawrence M. Hinman, Ph.D. Director, The Values Institute University of San Diego 7/12/2015©Lawrence M. Hinman1 The Principle of Double Effect Phil. 321:
Kant’s deontological ethics
Kantian Ethics Leadership & Ethics (NAV 4402) 06 FEB 07 SSgt Thomas Buettner.
Michael Lacewing Deception and lies Michael Lacewing
Kant’s Ethics of Duty 3 insights form the basis for his theory  An action has moral worth if it is done for the sake of duty. (DUTY)  An action is morally.
Ethics LL.B. STUDIES 2015 LECTURE 3. Deontology Definition Deontology: "a type of moral philosophical theory that seeks to ground morality on a moral.
Deontological & Consequential Ethics
Introduction to Ethical Theory I Last session: “our focus will be on normative medical ethics, i.e., how people should behave in medical situations” –
“A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world.”
Kant’s Deontological Ethics. The Plan  What is Deontology?  Good Wills and Right Actions  The Categorical Imperative  Examples and Applications.
CHAPTER 6 MORALITY AND ACTION.
Deontological Ethics Is saving someone from drowning a morally praiseworthy act? Do motives play any role in whether an act is morally praiseworthy?
Kantian ethics (& suicide): Kantian ethics (& suicide): Immanuel Kant ( ). A German philosopher. Ought implies Can Maxims Categorical Imperative.
Consequentialism Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? What if it is a small amount of pain to prevent a.
Immanuel Kant. Two worlds Reason is part of the intelligible world Sensible (Lesser faculty) Part of the world of nature (empirical)
Immanuel Kant Duty Ethics The moral worth of an action depends on motive (do the right thing for the right reason)
Duties, Rights, and Kant Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang.
Kant’s Ethics Kant’s quotes are from FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSICS OF MORALS.
Objectives: SWBAT  Identify Immanuel Kant  Analyze Kantian Rationality  Identify and discuss the Categorical Imperative.
Lecture 6 Kantian ethics Immanuel Kant ( )
Immanuel Kant Deontological Ethics.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 12 Kant By David Kelsey.
Utilitarianism Objection –Too permissive –Utilitarian response: (1) bite the bullet (2) try to show negative side-effects, long-term consequences –Rebuttal.
EECS 690 Critiques of Deontology 31 January 2010.
Setting the state for Kant --Are there any acts that are wrong, regardless of the consequences? (Are consequences all that matter?) --Case: Bombing Hiroshima.
Theories of Morality Kant Bentham Aristotle. Morality  Morality: Action for the sake of principle  Guides our beliefs about right and wrong  Sets limits.
Ethics and Morals HRE 40 Unit 4 Mr. Carney.
A Universal Moral Theory Dennis R. Cooley Department of History North Dakota State University 19 January 2003 Supported by a USDA/CSREES/IFAFS grant, “Consortium.
Utilitarianism Act Utilitarianism: The right act is that which maximizes happiness (only version we’ve been discussing thus far) Rule Utilitarianism: The.
Principle of Double Effect Physical vs Moral Evil.
The Moral Philosophy of Immanuel Kant The Ethics of Duty and Reason
Ethics AIO 2015 LECTURE 2.
The Principle of Double Effect. The Conditions There are certain conditions which must be observed before one may perform the action in question. Should.
E THICS (V OLUNTARINESS ). V OLUNTARINESS : I TS IMPORTANCE TO ETHICS Ethics deals with the study of human acts (voluntary acts of man) It is the amount.
Lesson Objective Key Words Lesson outcomes Hypothetical Categorical Imperatives Freedom To evaluate the differences between the Hypothetical and Categorical.
KANTIAN ETHICS Immanuel Kant ( ).
Lecture 13 Kantian ethics Immanuel Kant ( )
What is the opposite of Utilitarianism? We are still addressing the question of HOW we should be moral.
EECS 690 January 27, Deontology Typically, when anyone talks about Deontology, they mean to talk about Immanuel Kant. Kant is THE deontologist.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 12 Kant
Proportionalism and the doctrine of double effect
Ethics AIO 2016 LECTURE 2.
universalizability & reversibility
Contemporary Moral Problems
Immanuel Kant’s ethics
Absolutism.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 14 Immanuel Kant
Principle of Double Effect
Just War Theory. Just War Theory JWT is not Pacifism Pacifism says that war is always unjust, and therefore always wrong. This is an absolute statement.
War and Violence Can war be just?.
Kant’s Moral Theory.
Kantian Ethics.
Public Ethics in Law and Politics
Presentation transcript:

Ethics in Public Life Deontology: applications

Kant in action Can a dwarf let be thrown? Conseil d’Etat, 27 Octobre 1995, N° ,

Categorical imperative Second formula: So act that you use humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means.

When can I lie? Kant, On a Supposed Right to Lie because of Philantropic Concerns Would it be a crime to tell a lie to a murderer who asked whether our friend who is being pursued by the murderer had taken refuge in our house? Kant’s three points: Acceptance of „a right to demand that another should lie for the sake of one’s own advantage”; from this follows „a claim that conflicts with all lawfulness”. „Whoever tells a lie, regardless of how good his intentions may be, must answer for the consequences resulting therefrom” By telling the untruth, as far as it depends on me, „I bring it about that statements (declarations) in general find no credence, and hence also that all rights based on contracts become void and lose their force, and this is a wrong done to mankind in general.”

Categorical imperative First formula: Act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law.

The Trolley case revisited

A Doctrine of Double Effect A person may licitly perform an action that he foresees will produce a good effect and a bad effect provided that four conditions are verified at one and the same time: that the action in itself from its very object be good or at least indifferent; that the good effect and not the evil effect be intended; that the good effect be not produced by means of the evil effect; that there be a proportionately grave reason for permitting the evil effect. Joseph Mangan, A Historical Analysis of the Principle of Double Effect

Double effect at work Abortion vs. rescuing mother’s life Euthanasia vs. pain relief To torture or not to torture Can war be just?

The doctrine of just war

Requirements for beginning just war (ius ad bellum) -- Just cause. There must be a specific act of injustice to be corrected. -- Competent authority. The decision to wage war should only be made by the person or governing body responsible for maintaining a nation's civil order and security. -- Right intention. The intended result of going to war must be to restore a previous state of peace and civil order. -- Last resort. All realistic nonviolent alternatives must be exhausted before going to war. --Probability of success. There must be a realistic hope of achieving victory. -- Proportionality of projected results. The good expected upon attaining victory must be greater than estimates of what it will cost to achieve victory. Source: Baptist Press,